A phase II study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal and gastric cancers often present at an advanced stage. Systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment, but survival with current regimens remains poor. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the combination capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with metastatic or unresectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction tumors were enrolled and treated with capecitabine 850 mg/m(2) BID on days 1-14, and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS). Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) and -2 (NRP2) mRNA expression was evaluated in archived tumor. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were evaluable for efficacy. Median PFS was 7.2 months; median OS was 10.8 months. RR was estimated at 51.4%. The regimen was tolerable with expected drug class-related toxicities. NRP2 mRNA levels significantly correlated with PFS (p = 0.042) and showed a trend toward significance with OS (p = 0.051). Nonsignificant trends for NRP1 were noted for higher expression levels and worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab can be given safely with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinomas. The combination of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, plus bevacizumab has activity comparable to other bevacizumab-containing regimens in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer.

Phase II trial of dasatinib in patients with metastatic breast cancer using real-time pharmacodynamic tissue biomarkers of Src inhibition to escalate dosing.

PURPOSE: A phase II study of dasatinib, an inhibitor of multiple oncogenic tyrosine kinases including Src, was conducted to evaluate 16-week progression-free rate and tolerability in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Real-time assessment of potential tissue biomarkers of Src inhibition was used to optimize dosing. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligibility criteria required that patients have measurable MBC, biopsiable tumor, and unlimited prior therapies. For the analysis of change in protein biomarkers of Src inhibition, focal adhesion kinase, paxillin, and p-Src, patients underwent metastatic biopsies at baseline and 4 weeks. Patients who tolerated the starting dose of dasatinib (50 or 70 mg orally twice daily) for the first 28-day cycle, and displayed suboptimal Src inhibition, were escalated to a higher dose (70 or 100 mg). RESULTS: The trial was closed early with 31 patients because of a statistical boundary that required at least 4 (13%) patients without disease progression to continue accrual. These 31 patients had a median of 2 prior lines of chemotherapy for MBC. The most notable toxicity was pleural effusions in 16 patients (52%). Twenty patients had evaluable metastatic biopsies. None of the tumors showed the predefined optimal level of Src inhibition at week 4. CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent dasatinib did not exhibit significant antitumor activity in patients with heavily pretreated MBC. There were no clinically meaningful decreases before and after dasatinib exposure between exploratory tissue biomarkers of Src inhibition which may be attributable to challenges in defining biomarker endpoints for multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

A phase I dose-escalation study of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec/STI571) plus capecitabine (Xeloda) in advanced solid tumors.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to determine the maximally tolerated dose, recommended phase II dose and toxicity profile of capecitabine plus imatinib mesylate combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with capecitabine twice daily on days 1-14 and imatinib mesylate once daily on a 21-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity was assessed during the first cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression or undesirable toxicity. RESULTS: Six patients were treated with capecitabine at 1000 mg/m(2) and imatinib mesylate 300 mg; unacceptable toxicity due to grade 2 intolerable hand-foot syndrome and/or grade > or = 2 diarrhea was observed. Doses were subsequently reduced to capecitabine at 750 mg/m(2) and imatinib mesylate at 300 mg; toxicities were better tolerated at the lower dose. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted of grade 3 diarrhea, anorexia and fatigue lasting > or = 4 days. Treatment-related adverse events greater than or equal to grade 3 included anemia, diarrhea, dysuria, hypophosphatemia and vertigo. Minor responses were observed in two patients: stable disease > or = 6 months was observed in two out of twenty-one evaluable patients. CONCLUSION: Full doses of capecitabine and imatinib mesylate were not tolerable. The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase II dose for this drug combination is capecitabine at 750 mg/m(2) twice daily for 1-14 days and imatinib at 300 mg once daily on a 21-day cycle.

Long-term treatment with bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: case report.

Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor that has demonstrated increased overall survival when added to standard chemotherapy regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer. Herein we report the cases of 2 patients who demonstrated prolonged survival times of almost 5 and 6 years, respectively, on various chemotherapy regimens that also included bevacizumab. Throughout most of their disease course, these patients maintained a good quality of life, with some adjustments of chemotherapy doses because of side effects. Bevacizumab was generally well tolerated in long-term use.

Targeted therapy in renal cell carcinoma.

Hypoxia-regulated genes such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) are both important for tumour progression in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Drugs that block these and other pathways have been examined in Phase I and II clinical trials in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC. Results from a randomised study of an anti-VEGF antibody demonstrate a delay in the time to disease progression, suggesting a biological effect and change in the natural history of the disease. Results using small-molecule inhibitors of VEGF, FLT3, KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, such as sunitinib, show a 40% objective response rate. Results from a Phase III clinical trial with sorafenib, an inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases, show only a 2% response rate; however, a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival was observed. Objective responses have also been noted using an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin. Conversely, EGF receptor inhibitors, proteosome inhibitors, microtubule stabilising agents, cell-cycle inhibitors and imatinib were also examined with few objective responses. Ultimately, identifying the predictive factors for responsiveness to these targeted therapies may improve the clinical benefit; for example, RCC with biallelic mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau gene would have higher levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha, and may be more responsive to inhibitors of angiogenesis. Phase III studies comparing the combinations of targeted therapy could lead to a new standard of care for RCC.