Management of statin-intolerant patient.

Large scale clinical trials have undoubtedly demonstrated that statins are effective in reducing cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in almost all patient populations. Also the short and long-term safety of statin therapy has been well established in the majority of treated patients. Nevertheless, intolerance to statins must be frequently faced in the clinical practice. The most commonly observed adverse effects of statins are muscle symptoms and elevation of hepatic aminotransferase and creatinine kinase (CK) levels. Overall, myalgia (muscle pain with or without plasma CK elevations) and a single abnormally elevated liver function test constitute approximately two-thirds of reported adverse events during statin therapy. These side effects raise concerns in the patients and are likely to reduce patient's adherence and, consequently, the cardiovascular benefit. Therefore, it is mandatory that clinicians improve knowledge on the clinical aspects of side effects of statins and the ability to manage patients with intolerance to statins. Numerous different approaches to statin-intolerant patients have been suggested, but an evidence-based consensus is difficult to be reached due to the lack of controlled trials. Therefore, it might be useful to review protocols and procedures to control statin intolerance. The first step in managing intolerant patients is to determine whether the adverse events are indeed related to statin therapy. Then, the switching to another statin or lower dosage, the alternate dosing options and the use of non-statin compounds may be practical strategies. However, the cardiovascular benefit of these approaches has not been established, so that their use has to be employed after a careful clinical assessment of each patient.

Post-conditioning by a short administration of desflurane reduced renal reperfusion injury after differing of ischaemia times in rats.

BACKGROUND: 'Anaesthetic post-conditioning', that is administration of anaesthetics during early reperfusion, is known to have positive effects on several organs. For the kidney, however, the effects of post-conditioning by volatile anaesthetics are not well researched. We examined renal function and morphology after post-conditioning by desflurane. METHODS: Anaesthetized rats were subjected to 30 or 45 min of renal ischaemia 14 days after contralateral nephrectomy. Post-conditioning was achieved by administration of 1 MAC desflurane (6.7 vol%) for 15 min during early reperfusion (all groups n=8). Cystatin C (CyC), creatinine clearance (Cl(Cr)) and fractional sodium excretion (FE(Na)) were measured in the awake rats over 3 days. Cell damage was graded from 1 to 4 in histological sections. Functional variables [mean (SD)] were compared statistically by a one-way anova followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison test and histological scores (median and range) by Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Pre-ischaemia function did not differ between the groups, but was markedly reduced after ischaemia. After 30 min ischaemia, the area under the curve (AUC) for Cl(Cr) was smaller in the desflurane than in the control group [21.5 (5.0) vs 31.6 (5.1) ml min(-1) h, P<0.05]. After 45 min desflurane reduced the AUC compared with the control group for both CyC [15 (4) vs 21 (3) mg litre(-1) h] and FE(Na) [1054 (221) vs 1570 (572)% h, both P<0.05). Morphological differences were greater between the 30 min groups [control: 2.75 (2.0-3.5) vs desflurane: 1.5 (1.0-2.5); P<0.05] than between the 45 min groups [control: 3.5 (3.0-4.0) vs desflurane: 3.0 (1.5-4.0)]. CONCLUSION: Desflurane post-conditioning protects renal function and tissue. This protection was greater after the short episode than after the long episode of ischaemia.

Effect of sevoflurane preconditioning on ischaemia/reperfusion injury in the rat kidney in vivo.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Whereas the protective effect of anaesthetic and ischaemic preconditioning has been described for several organs, it is uncertain whether this mechanism is also effective in the kidney. We compared the effect of preconditioning with sevoflurane and preconditioning with short episodes of ischaemia on renal ischaemia/reperfusion injury in the rat in vivo. METHODS: Fourteen days after right-sided nephrectomy, anaesthetized male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to a sham-operated group (no arterial occlusion, n = 5) or underwent 45 min of left renal artery occlusion (control group, n = 9) followed by 3 days of reperfusion. Two further experimental groups of animals were preconditioned prior to ischaemia either by administering 1 MAC sevoflurane for 15 min followed by 10 min of washout (sevoflurane group, n = 10) or by subjecting the animals to three short episodes of renal ischaemia (ischaemia-preconditioned group, n = 8). Blood creatinine was measured during reperfusion and morphological damage was assessed by histological examination. RESULTS: Baseline creatinine values were similar in all four groups (0.7 +/- 0.2 mg dL-1; mean +/- SD) and remained unchanged in the sham-operated animals after 3 days (0.8 +/- 0.2 mg dL-1). Creatinine levels increased in the ischaemic preconditioning group (3.3 +/- 1.2 mg dL-1) and sevoflurane preconditioning group (4.0 +/- 1.1 mg dL-1) compared to the control group (1.6 +/- 0.6 mg dL-1). Morphological damage was less severe in the control group, i.e. in animals without preconditioning, than in both preconditioning groups. CONCLUSION: Neither sevoflurane nor ischaemic preconditioning preserves renal function or attenuates cell damage in the rat in vivo.