RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Milan and University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Criteria have been used for selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for liver transplantation (LTx). The aims of this study were to analyse the results of LTx for HCC in Australia and New Zealand with emphasis on the effects of discordance between pre-LTx radiological and post-LTx pathological staging. METHODS: A total of 186 LTx for HCC carried out between July 1985 and August 2003 were included. Patients were categorized according to the Milan and UCSF Criteria. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 6.55 years (range 2.96-20.93 years). Pre-LTx factors associated with better survival include tumour size < or = 5 cm, number of tumours < or = 3, staging within Milan and UCSF Criteria and more recent transplantation (1996-2003). In all, 14 patients had a pre-LTx stage outside the Milan but within the UCSF Criteria. One- and 5-year patient survival rates were, respectively, 88% and 74% within the Milan Criteria, and 87% and 73% within the UCSF Criteria. Vascular invasion, capsular invasion, lymph node invasion and pathological stage outside UCSF Criteria were associated with poor outcome. Of patients within the Milan and UCSF Criteria pre-LTx, 24% and 18%, respectively, were outside the same criteria post-LTx. These patients had poorer survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the UCSF Criteria in this cohort increased the number of patients eligible for LTx without compromising 5-year survival rates. Patients whose explant tumours were outside the Milan or UCSF Criteria had poorer outcomes compared with those whose explants remained within these criteria.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of the study was to define the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients found to have undetected hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) at liver transplantation. Patients who underwent liver transplantation and were unexpectedly found to have a HCC despite prior workup showing normal alpha-fetoprotein levels and/or no visible radiological lesion were defined as having an undetected HCC. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-two of these patients had a histological diagnosis of HCC in the explanted liver. Undetected HCC was defined as a carcinoma found only on pathological evaluation of the explanted liver, with a pre-OLT workup showing a normal serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (<20 ng/mL) and/or no suspicious lesion on preoperative radiological evaluation. RESULTS: Nine patients had a tumor that met the criteria for an undetected HCC. The most common cause for transplantation was cryptogenic cirrhosis (44.4%). Tumor size was 2 cm or less in all patients, vascular invasion was detected in 11.1% of the patients, and tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) classification was stage I in 77.8%. Eight patients (88.9%) remained alive at the cessation of the analysis with a mean follow-up of 60 +/- 30.4 months. There was no tumor recurrence in any patient. Statistical analysis showed significant differences between undetected and detected HCCs when causes of pretransplantation liver disease, peak AFP level, tumor size, number of tumors, presence of vascular invasion or pathological differentiation were compared. Undetected HCCs were associated with a better survival rate after liver transplantation (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with undetected HCCs at OLT have a favorable outcome with tumor-free survival. Most patients had small, early-stage HCCs, but the possibility of finding tumors greater than 2 cm, multifocal lesions, and vascular invasion exist despite thorough investigation. An exhaustive histopathological search of the explant for malignancy will allow for greater accuracy in prognosis.