RESUMO
Objectives: To identify predictors of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) requirement as a revascularization method in in real-world non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients. Materials and methods: . An individual pre-specified analysis of patients with NSTE-ACS was performed from two prospective Argentine registries between 2017 and 2022. We analyzed the difference in baseline characteristics between patients who required CABG and those who did not require this intervention. Then, a logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors in patients who received CABG as a method of revascularization. Results: A total of 1848 patients with a median age of 54.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 53.7-56) years and an ejection fraction of 42.1% (IQR: 41.2-43.1) were included. A total of 233 patients required CABG (12.6%). Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar, except in patients requiring CABG, who were younger (51.5 vs. 55.7 years; p=0.010), more frequently diabetic (38.2% vs. 25.7%; p=0.001) and male (90.1% vs. 73.7%; p=0.001). In addition, they had, to a lesser extent, previous cardiac surgery (2.1% vs. 11.2%; p=0.011). After multivariable analysis, the following were independently associated with CABG: age (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-0.99; p=0.008), male sex (OR: 3.08, 95% CI: 1.87-5.1; p=0.001), history of previous CABG (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.05-0.30; p=0.001) and diabetes (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.31- 2.57; p=0.001). Conclusions: In this analysis of two NSTEACS registries, younger age, male sex, a diagnosis of diabetes and the absence of previous surgery were independent predictors of the requirement for inpatient CABG.
RESUMO
RESUMEN La decisión sobre la mejor estrategia de revascularización para los pacientes con enfermedad de múltiples vasos se ha tornado una tarea compleja a medida que la angioplastia coronaria ha mejorado sus resultados. En la siguiente revisión nos propusimos evaluar las variables que en nuestra experiencia definen el beneficio de una técnica sobre la otra, entendiendo que de esta manera la decisión del médico tratante se hace más sencilla y objetiva. Por otro lado, y festejando el saludable protagonismo que se le da al paciente, creemos que esta evaluación permite ofrecer argumentos sólidos para ayudarlo en la toma de la decisión.
ABSTRACT The decision on the best revascularization strategy for patients with multivessel disease has become a complex task as coronary angioplasty has improved its results. In the following review, we set out to evaluate the variables that, in our experience, define the benefit of one technique over the other, understanding that in this way the treating physician's decision will become simpler and more objective. On the other hand, and celebrating the healthy prominence given to patients, we believe that this evaluation allows solid arguments to help them in decision making.
RESUMO
RESUMEN Introducción : Realizamos un registro multicéntrico para analizar el abordaje diagnóstico y terapéutico de todos los tipos de síndromes coronarios agudos; este registro es el primero en abordar en detalle aquellos cuadros que cursan sin enfermedad coronaria epicárdica significativa. Es importante conocer la realidad del actual accionar médico con el objeto de hallar oportunidades de mejora. Material y métodos : Se registraron en forma prospectiva pacientes hospitalizados por síndrome coronario agudo en 15 centros de Argentina, con diagnóstico con troponina ultrasensible, servicio de unidad coronaria y hemodinamia disponible las 24 horas, entre enero y agosto de 2022. Resultados : Se incluyeron 984 pacientes consecutivos, un 22,2% con angina inestable, 39,1% con infarto agudo de miocardio sin elevación del segmento ST (IAMSEST) y 24,1% con infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST (IAMCEST). Por otro lado, el 4,1% se presentó como IAM tipo 2, 1,2% como miocarditis, 0,7% como síndrome de Takotsubo y 8,6% como infarto de miocardio con enfermedad coronaria no obstructiva (MINOCA). La mediana (rango intercuartílico, RIC) de edad fue de 66 años (56,5-74), con un 75,3% de pacientes de sexo masculino. El manejo inicial de los pacientes sin elevación del segmento ST fue invasivo en el 84%, con una tasa de enfermedad coronaria significativa del 76,5%. En cuanto a la evolución intrahospitalaria, las complicaciones isquémicas más relevantes fueron el reinfarto (2,84%), angina recurrente (2,4%), angina post infarto (2%) y trombosis intra stent (0,5%). El porcentaje de eventos hemorrágicos totales fue de 4,4% y la mortalidad intrahospitalaria total fue de 3,76%. Conclusiones : El registro tiene una buena representación del espectro de pacientes con sospecha inicial de síndrome coronario agudo, manejados en centros con una estrategia inicial principalmente invasiva, con una baja tasa de complicaciones hospitalarias y una mortalidad global aceptable.
ABSTRACT Background : We conducted a multicenter registry to analyze the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to all types of acute coronary syndromes; this registry is the first to provide detailed information on conditions without significant epicardial coronary artery disease. Knowing the reality of current medical practice is important to find opportunities for improvement. Methods : Patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome between January and August 2022 in 15 centers of Argentina, with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin, coronary care unit, and catheterization laboratory available 24 hours, were prospectively recorded. Results : A total of 984 consecutive patients were included, 22.2% with unstable angina, 39.1% with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and 24.1% with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Additionally, 4.1% presented as type 2 AMI, 1.2% as myocarditis, 0.7% as Takotsubo syndrome and 8.6% as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Median age was 66 years [interquartile range (IQR) 56.5-74] and 75.3% were men. An early invasive management was used in 84% of patients without ST segment elevation, and 76.5% of them had significant coronary artery disease. During hospitalization, 2.84% of the patients presented reinfarction, 2.43% recurrent angina, 2% postinfarction angina and 0.5% stent thrombosis. Bleeding events occurred in 4.4% of the patients, and overall in-hospital mortality was 3.76%. Conclusions : The registry has a good representation of the spectrum of patients with initial suspicion of "acute coronary syndrome", managed in centers with an invasive initial strategy and with low rate of in-hospital complications and acceptable overall mortality.
