A Narrative Review of Aconite Poisoning and Management.

Aconite poisoning refers to toxicity resulting from plants belonging to the Aconitum genus, which comprises over 350 different species of perennial flowering plants that grow in temperate mountainous areas of the northern hemisphere (North America, Europe, Asia). These plants contain a group of toxins known as aconite alkaloids, which encompass numerous closely related toxic compounds. Conventional teaching from toxicology textbooks has broadly classified these alkaloids based on their mechanism of action, often simplifying them as substances that prevent sodium channel inactivation. However, this is an oversimplified and sometimes inaccurate description, as some aconite alkaloids can act as sodium channel blockers. Aconite alkaloids have a long history of use as poisonous substances and have been historically employed for hunting, assassinations, traditional medicine, and self-inflicted harm. Toxicity can occur due to the consumption of traditional medicines derived from aconitum plants or the ingestion of aconite plants and their derivatives. The clinical manifestations of aconite poisoning may encompass gastrointestinal symptoms, sensory alterations, seizures, and life-threatening dysrhythmias that may not respond to standard treatments. Treatment is primarily supportive however evaluation and management of these patients should be personalized and carried out in collaboration with a toxicologist.

2022 Annual Report of the National Poison Data System® (NPDS) from America's Poison Centers®: 40th Annual Report.

INTRODUCTION: This is the 40th Annual Report of America's Poison Centers National Poison Data System (NPDS). As of 1 January, 2022, all 55 of the nation's poison centers (PCs) uploaded case data automatically to NPDS. The upload interval was 4.72 [4.40, 9.27] (median [25%, 75%]) minutes, effectuating a near real-time national exposure and information database and surveillance system. METHODS: We analyzed the case data tabulating specific indices from NPDS. The methodology was similar to that of previous years. Where changes were introduced, the differences are identified. Cases with medical outcomes of death were evaluated by a team of medical and clinical toxicologist reviewers using an ordinal scale of 1-6 to assess the Relative Contribution to Fatality (RCF) of the exposure. RESULTS: In 2022, 2,483,183 closed encounters were logged by NPDS: 2,064,875 human exposures, 50,381 animal exposures, 363,099 information requests, 4,790 human confirmed nonexposures, and 38 animal confirmed nonexposures. Total encounters showed a 12.9% decrease from 2021, and human exposure cases decreased by 0.771%, while health care facility (HCF) human exposure cases increased by 0.214%. All information requests decreased by 48.4%, medication identification (Drug ID) requests decreased by 21.2%, and medical information requests showed a 76.92% decrease, although these remain twice the median number before the COVID-19 pandemic. Drug Information requests showed a 52.4% decrease, due to declining COVID-19 vaccine calls to PCs but still comprised 5.55% of all information contacts. Human exposures with less serious outcomes have decreased 1.70% per year since 2008, while those with more serious outcomes (moderate, major or death) have increased 4.41% per year since 2000.Consistent with the previous year, the top 4 substance classes most frequently involved in all human exposures were analgesics (11.5%), household cleaning substances (7.23%), antidepressants (5.61%), and cosmetics/personal care products (5.23%). Antihistamines (4.81%) replaced sedatives/hypnotics/antipsychotics as the 5th substance class. As a class, analgesic exposures increased most rapidly, by 1,514 cases/year (3.26%/year) over the past 10 years for cases with more serious outcomes.The top 5 most common exposures in children age 5 years or less were household cleaning substances (10.3%), analgesics (9.54%), cosmetics/personal care products (9.49%), dietary supplements/herbals/homeopathic (6.65%), and foreign bodies/toys/miscellaneous (6.61%). NPDS documented 3,255 human exposures resulting in death; 2,622 (80.6%) of these were judged as related (RCF of 1-Undoubtedly responsible, 2-Probably responsible, or 3-Contributory). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the continued value of PC expertise and the need for specialized medical toxicology information to manage the increasing number of more serious exposures. Unintentional and intentional exposures continue to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the US. The near real-time status of NPDS represents a national public health resource to collect and monitor US exposure cases and information requests. The continuing mission of NPDS is to provide a nationwide infrastructure for surveillance for all types of exposures (e.g., foreign body, infectious, venomous, chemical agent, or commercial product), and the identification and tracking of significant public health events. NPDS is a model system for the near real-time surveillance of national and global public health.

A systematic review of phenibut withdrawal focusing on complications, therapeutic approaches, and single substance versus polysubstance withdrawal.

INTRODUCTION: Phenibut is an unregulated supplement that acts primarily as a gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor agonist. Use of phenibut can lead to dependence and subsequent withdrawal when use is stopped. Phenibut withdrawal can cause severe symptoms such as delirium, hallucinations, and seizures. The purpose of this systematic review is to characterize the natural history of phenibut withdrawal and summarize treatment strategies published in the literature. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses checklist. English language peer-reviewed articles or conference abstracts in humans describing phenibut withdrawal after cessation of use were included. Databases (Ovid/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Science Direct) and references of included articles were searched. Case reports were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports. Patient demographics and key outcomes, including withdrawal characteristics and treatment characteristics, were collected into a predefined data collection sheet by six independent reviewers. RESULTS: Search results yielded 515 articles of which 25 were included. All articles were case reports or published conference abstracts. All of the cases (100 percent) involved male patients and the median age was 30 years, (interquartile range 23.5-34 years, range 4 days-68 years). The median daily phenibut dose prior to experiencing withdrawal was 10 g (interquartile range 4.75-21.5 g, range 1-200 g). The shortest duration of phenibut use (2-3 g daily) prior to withdrawal was one week. Withdrawal symptoms occurred as quickly as two hours after the last phenibut dose. Sixteen patients (64 percent) reported progression of withdrawal severity within the first 24 hours of healthcare contact. Seizures were reported in two patients (8 percent), intubation in six patients (24 percent), and intensive care unit admission in 11 patients (44 percent). Withdrawal patterns and outcomes were similar in those using phenibut alone and those with comorbid polysubstance use. Withdrawal treatment strategies varied widely. Only three cases (12 percent) were managed outpatient and all three utilized a phenibut tapering strategy. All patients undergoing medication-assisted abstinence were admitted inpatient for symptom management and received a drug that acts on gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors. The most commonly used medication was a benzodiazepine, reported in 17 cases (68 percent). Nineteen patients (76 percent) required at least two drug therapies to manage symptoms. Baclofen was used in 15 cases (60 percent), primarily in conjunction with gamma-aminobutyric acid type A agonists (12 of 15 cases) or as monotherapy during a phenibut taper (two of 15 cases). Two patients using baclofen monotherapy outpatient, after initial stabilization with multiple drug classes, reported adverse effects. One patient had a seizure and the other experienced recurrent withdrawal symptoms, returned to using phenibut, and was admitted to a hospital for withdrawal symptom management with benzodiazepines. LIMITATIONS: This review is subject to several limitations. Due to the manual nature of article selection, it is possible relevant articles may not have been included. As the entire data set is comprised of case reports it may suffer from publications bias. Outcomes and meaningful conclusions from specific treatment strategies were rarely available because of the heterogeneous nature of case reports. It is possible those reporting only phenibut use were actually using multiple substances. The doses of phenibut a user believed they were taking may be different from what was present in the unregulated product. CONCLUSIONS: Phenibut withdrawal appears to have a range of severity. It is important to recognize that patients undergoing phenibut abstinence may have progressive symptom worsening during early withdrawal. All published cases of abrupt phenibut abstinence were admitted inpatients for symptom management. Benzodiazepines or barbiturates with adjunctive baclofen appear to be the most commonly used drugs for moderate to severe withdrawal. Outpatient management via slow phenibut tapers with or without adjunctive gamma-aminobutyric acid agonist therapy may be successful. However, there is no standard treatment, and consultation with experts (e.g., toxicologists, addiction specialists) experienced in managing withdrawal syndromes is recommended. Significant study is warranted to develop methods of triaging phenibut withdrawal (e.g., severity scoring, inpatient versus outpatient management) and creating optimal treatment regimens.

Outcomes of pediatric ingestions of alcohol-based hand sanitizers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: In July 2020, an outbreak of methanol-contaminated hand sanitizers in the United States prompted our regional poison center to implement a more conservative triage guideline for hand sanitizer exposures. All pediatric hand sanitizer ingestions of more than a "taste" were referred to a healthcare facility for assessment. We then evaluated the effect of this change on identifying patients with methanol poisoning. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective review of pediatric (<19 years) hand sanitizer ingestions reported to our poison center from May 1, 2020 through January 28, 2022. Methanol and ethanol concentrations were collected if available. RESULTS: During the study period, we received 801 calls regarding hand sanitizer exposure, of which 140 children were referred to a healthcare facility for hand sanitizer ingestions. Of those, 88 (63%) had methanol and/or ethanol concentrations measured. No child had a detectable methanol concentration, 78 had ethanol testing, and 12 had a detectable ethanol concentration. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, no patient tested had a detectable methanol concentration. Children who consumed enough to have a detectable ethanol concentration were symptomatic or had an intentional ingestion. Asymptomatic children with unintentional ingestion of hand sanitizer were at low risk for methanol toxicity.

Lack of Association of Initial Vasopressor Dosing with Survival and Cardiac Re-Arrest Likelihood After Return of Spontaneous Circulation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest occurs in approximately 350,000 patients outside the hospital and approximately 30,000 patients in the emergency department (ED) annually in the United States. When return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is achieved, hypotension is a common complication. However, optimal dosing of vasopressors is not clear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if initial vasopressor dosing was associated with cardiac re-arrest in patients after ROSC. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of adult patients experiencing cardiac arrest prior to arrival or within the ED. Patients were assigned to one of four groups based on starting dose of vasopressor: low dose (LD; < 0.25 µg/kg/min), medium dose (MD; 0.25-0.49 µg/kg/min), high dose (HD; 0.5-0.99 µg/kg/min), and very high dose (VHD; ≥ 1 µg/kg/min). Data collection was performed primarily via manual chart review of medical records. The primary outcome was incidence of cardiac re-arrest within 1 h of vasopressor initiation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify any covariates strongly associated with the primary outcome. RESULTS: No difference in cardiac re-arrest incidence was noted between groups. The VHD group was significantly more likely to require a second vasopressor (p = 0.003). The HD group had lower survival rates to hospital discharge compared with the LD and MD groups (p = 0.0033 and p = 0.0147). In the multivariate regression, longer duration of pre-vasopressor re-arrests and hyperkalemic cardiac arrest etiology were significant predictors of cardiac re-arrest after vasopressor initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Initial vasopressor dosing was not found to be associated with risk of cardiac re-arrest or, conversely, risk of adverse events.

Can Metronidazole Cause a Disulfiram-Like Reaction? A Case-Control Study Propensity Matched by Age, Sex, and Ethanol Concentration.

INTRODUCTION: There is controversy over the existence of a metronidazole-induced disulfiram-like reaction. Uncontrolled case reports suggest metronidazole can cause a severe disulfiram-like reaction in combination with ethanol. Criticism of these cases suggest the observed effects appear to be as likely caused by ethanol as by a drug interaction. Controlled experimental data refute these reports, demonstrating metronidazole does not increase acetaldehyde and cannot reliably produce disulfiram-like reactions. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively assess the incidence of clinical effects consistent with a disulfiram-like reaction in a population of patients with confirmed ethanol use who received metronidazole. As alcohol may also be responsible for the effects seen, the incidence of effects is assessed against a control group matched for age, sex, and ethanol concentration. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed from December 1, 2010, through December 31, 2020 on emergency department patients with ethanol use confirmed via detectable ethanol concentration who received metronidazole while ethanol was predicted to still be present in the serum. A matched comparator group with the same ethanol concentrations, as well as sex and age, was generated for comparison. The incidence of disulfiram-like reaction symptoms documented in the medical record was compared between groups. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included in the study: 18 in the metronidazole group and 18 in the ethanol concentration matched control group. The mean age in both groups was 46 years. The metronidazole group was 50% male, and the mean ethanol concentration was 0.21 g/dL. The control group was 44.4% male. There was significantly less hypertension in the metronidazole group compared to the control group (16.7% vs 61.1%, P $lt; 0.0001). There were no other significant difference in disulfiram-like effects between the two groups. No patients who received metronidazole and had a detectable ethanol concentration had a suspected disulfiram-like reaction documented in the medical record. CONCLUSIONS: This data set further supports the lack of a disulfiram-like reaction when metronidazole is used in patients with recent ethanol use in the acute care setting. Additionally, it highlights that the clinical effects of a disulfiram-like reactions may be present at baseline from ethanol ingestion or underlying disease regardless of metronidazole use. These findings are consistent with well-controlled human and animal data demonstrating no increase in acetaldehyde concentrations or disulfiram-like symptoms when metronidazole is co-administered with ethanol. In patients where metronidazole is indicated as the superior agent, its use should not be avoided due to concern about an interaction with ethanol.

Incidence of rebound salicylate toxicity following cessation of urine alkalinization.

INTRODUCTION: Management of patients with salicylate toxicity frequently requires urine alkalinization to enhance excretion of salicylate. One strategy for determining when to stop urine alkalinization is to wait for two consecutive serum salicylate concentrations to be less than 300 mg/L (2.17 mmol/L) and declining. When alkalinization of the urine ceases, a rebound in serum salicylate concentration can occur from tissue redistribution or delayed gastrointestinal absorption. Whether this can lead to rebound toxicity is not well understood. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective review of cases with a primary ingestion of acetylsalicylic acid reported to the local poison center over a five-year period. Cases were excluded if the product was not listed as the primary ingestion or if there was no serum salicylate concentration documented after discontinuation of intravenous sodium bicarbonate infusion. The primary outcome was the incidence of serum salicylate rebound to a concentration greater than 300 mg/L (2.17 mmol/L) after discontinuation of intravenous sodium bicarbonate infusion. RESULTS: A total of 377 cases were included. Of these, eight (2.1%) had a serum salicylate concentration increase (rebound) after stopping the sodium bicarbonate infusion. All these cases were acute ingestions. Five of the eight cases had rebound serum salicylate concentrations that were greater than 300 mg/L (2.17 mmol/L). Of these five patients, only one reported recurrent symptoms (tinnitus). Prior to stopping urinary alkalinization, the last or the last two serum salicylate concentrations were less than 300 mg/L (2.17 mmol/L) in three and two cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with salicylate toxicity, the incidence of rebound in serum salicylate concentration after cessation of urine alkalinization, is low. Even if serum salicylate rebounds to supratherapeutic concentrations, symptoms are often absent or mild. Routine repeat serum salicylate concentrations after urine alkalinization is stopped may be unnecessary unless symptoms recrudesce.

Seizure Occurring During Baclofen Monotherapy for Phenibut Withdrawal.

OBJECTIVE: Phenibut is a widely available gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor agonist. When taken chronically, phenibut causes dependence and subsequent withdrawal if stopped. Baclofen, a gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor agonist structurally related to phenibut, has been used to manage phenibut withdrawal (PW), although baclofen doses for PW are not well defined and may exceed Food and Drug Administration-approved doses. Little data described outcomes from baclofen use. METHODS: This case details a patient who experienced a seizure while on baclofen 10 mg thrice daily as monotherapy for PW and highlights a potential risk of underdosing baclofen as monotherapy in the management of PW. RESULTS: A man in his early 30s with anxiety, depression, and substance use disorder presented to the emergency department by family for lethargy and confusion starting earlier that day. He had been using 25-30 g of phenibut daily for the past 6 months. On arrival, he was hypertensive, tachycardic, tachypneic, and lethargic. The patient received 1 mg of intravenous lorazepam and was admitted to the hospital for presumed PW. His symptoms improved overnight, and he was discharged on 10 mg of baclofen thrice daily. He returned 28 hours later after having a seizure and required intensive care admission in addition to multimodal drug therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Phenibut use is rising, and treatment options for PW, such as baclofen, warrant additional study. Potential risks of underdosing baclofen if used as monotherapy in PW may include seizures as withdrawal progresses. Baclofen's role in therapy may be more appropriate as an adjunct than a cornerstone of therapy. Treatment done in consultation with providers experienced in managing withdrawal such as a toxicologist may help reduce this risk.

Ventricular fibrillation in a 21-year-old after inhalation of an isobutyl nitrite "popper" product.

BACKGROUND: Alkyl nitrite analogs known as "poppers" have been inhaled recreationally for decades. They are available to be purchased from gas stations marketed as "nail polish remover not for human consumption". These rapid-onset, short-acting, vasodilators cause the user to experience euphoria, dizziness, tachycardia and flushing. While chronic use may lead to problems such as methemoglobinemia or neuropathy, nitrites rarely lead to acute life-threatening side effects such as ventricular dysrhythmias. CASE REPORT: We report a case of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest in a 21-year-old male after inhaling from a solution labeled to contain isobutyl nitrite, a rarely reported adverse effect of "popper" use. The product was analytically confirmed to contain mainly isobutyl alcohol, volatile hydrocarbons, and isobutyl nitrite, as well as smaller quantities of other substances. The patient was also prescribed escitalopram and hydroxyzine may have contributed. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in the field after initiation of CPR and defibrillation. He was found to have no clear predisposition to arrythmias during his care or on follow up. CONCLUSION: Alkyl nitrite "popper" users and clinicians should be aware that products labeled to contain nitrites may contain volatile hydrocarbons along with nitrites and have the potential to cause arrhythmia.

Intracranial hemorrhage after a single dose of Yohimbine in a chronic user of clonidine.

INTRODUCTION: Yohimbine, an alpha-2 adrenoreceptor antagonist found in a variety of supplements, has been historically used to treat libido, erectile dysfunction, xerostomia, and as a weight loss enhancement. Yohimbine toxicity causes a sympathomimetic syndrome as demonstrated by the case below of a female who developed an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) following an ingestion of yohimbine. CASE: This case follows a 39-year-old female who presented to the emergency department (ED) with complaints of nausea, emesis, and flushing following the ingestion of a female sexual enhancement supplement labeled to contain yohimbine (BioXgenic Nature's Desire) one hour prior. The patient took her prescribed 0.1 mg clonidine when the symptoms commenced. Upon arrival, the patient's blood pressure was 198/93. She developed neurological sequelae including a left-sided facial droop and weakness of her right extremities. A computed tomography scan demonstrated an acute basal ganglia hemorrhage with mild mass effect and mild subarachnoid hemorrhage. She was transferred to a regional referral hospital and discharged 16 days later to a rehabilitation center with persistent neurological sequelae. DISCUSSION: This patient exhibited sympathetic toxicity temporally associated with yohimbine ingestion. Our patient also had a variety of risk factors that increased the likelihood of a poor outcome with yohimbine. Chronic use of clonidine is known to down-regulate alpha-2 receptors. This leads to dependence of clonidine to maintain adrenergic homeostasis and could potentiate the effects of yohimbine. To compound effects, our patient was also taking bupropion and desvenlafaxine, which inhibit norepinephrine reuptake, likely worsening our patient's sympathomimetic response. Despite the temporal relationship of our patient's ICH and ingestion of yohimbine, a definitive relationship cannot be inferred due to our lack of confirmatory testing of yohimbine content and possibility of adulterants. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not regulate the supplement market strictly, with multiple studies illustrating variation among ingredients of supplements despite stated quantities on the labels. CONCLUSION: Dietary supplements are not required by the FDA to undergo efficacy or safety testing, necessitating clear post-marketing communication regarding potential adverse events from various supplements. Users should be aware of yohimbine-containing products and the possible side effects of toxicity. It is crucial that physicians and patients be aware of possible drug-supplement interactions of yohimbine and the presentation of sympathomimetic syndromes.

Accidental Occupational Exposure to a Large Volume of Liquid Fentanyl on a Compromised Skin Barrier with No Resultant Effect.

The high prevalence of fentanyl in the illicit drug supply has generated concern among first responders regarding occupational exposure. Social media sharing of unconfirmed first responder overdoses after brief exposure to fentanyl may be contributing to an inappropriate risk perception of brief dermal fentanyl exposure. This case details a dermal exposure to a large dose of analytically confirmed pharmaceutical fentanyl (fentanyl citrate, 10 microgram fentanyl base per ml), over a large skin surface area. Additionally, the exposure occurred at a site with some skin barrier compromise, a factor that can increase fentanyl absorption. The patient underwent appropriate decontamination and underwent a brief medical assessment with no clinical effects of opioid exposure observed. This information is of value to first responders and other health care workers who are at risk of occupational fentanyl exposure. Findings are consistent with in vitro and ex vivo data supporting low risk of rapid absorption after brief dermal fentanyl exposure.

Impact of timing and dosing of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate administration on outcomes in warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with time to administration and dose of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in patients with ICH on warfarin. DESIGN: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with ICH on warfarin who received 4F-PCC. SETTING: The site of the study was a large, Level I trauma, academic medical center with a dedicated neurologic intensive care unit and an emergency department (ED) that has approximately 72,000 visits annually. PATIENTS: Patients were included if they were ≥18 years of age, diagnosed with ICH, had an INR >1 due to warfarin use, and received both 4F-PCC and IV vitamin K for anticoagulation reversal. Exclusion criteria included patients who were less than 18 years of age, were not currently taking warfarin, had a bleeding site other than ICH, were pregnant or incarcerated, had an inadequate medical record, had a left ventricular assist device, had known liver disease with Child-Pugh Class C, received anticoagulation with heparin therapy within 24 h of anticoagulation reversal, or did not receive vitamin K within 24 h of hospital admission. INTERVENTION: Our primary outcome was a composite of hematoma expansion or death due to neurologic injury. Treatment groups were defined as receipt of 4F-PCC within 0-30, 31-60, 61-90, 91-120 min, or greater than 120 min. Hematoma expansion was defined as any increase in hematoma size as assessed by a radiologist via standard 6-h CT. Death due to neurologic injury was defined as death prior to a repeat CT being performed or documentation of a neurologic cause of death. Adequate INR reversal (INR ≤1.3 on repeat INR) vs. inadequate INR reversal and weight-based vs. fixed-dose 4F-PCC were also assessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 94 patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty-one patients (43.6%) met the composite endpoint, including 60% of the 31-60 min group, 47.6% of the 61-90 min group, 71.4% of the 91-120 min group, and 30.6% of the >120-min group. A significant difference in primary outcome occurred between the 91-120 min and >120-min groups (71.4% vs. 30.6%; p= 0.005), but this difference was not observed when accounting for disparities in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Patients with adequate INR reversal were less likely to meet the primary endpoint than those with inadequate INR reversal (28.1% vs. 58.6%; p= 0.0059). There was less failure of anticoagulation reversal with weight-based dosing compared with fixed dosing (24.2% vs. 65.0%; p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: No difference in clinical outcomes among 4F-PCC dosing strategies or time windows to administration was observed in patients with GCS <15. Rates of repeat INR ≤1.3 were higher with weight-based dosing, suggesting investigation of populations in which fixed dosing may be inappropriate is warranted.

2021 Annual Report of the National Poison Data System© (NPDS) from America's Poison Centers: 39th Annual Report.

ABSTRACTINTRODUCTION: This is the 39th Annual Report of America's Poison Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS). As of 1 January, 2021, all 55 of the nation's poison centers (PCs) uploaded case data automatically to NPDS. The upload interval was 4.87 [4.38, 8.62] (median [25%, 75%]) minutes, effectuating a near real-time national exposure and information database and surveillance system. METHODS: We analyzed the case data tabulating specific indices from NPDS. The methodology was similar to that of previous years. Where changes were introduced, the differences are identified. Cases with medical outcomes of death were evaluated by a team of medical and clinical toxicologist reviewers using an ordinal scale of 1-6 to assess the Relative Contribution to Fatality (RCF) of the exposure. RESULTS: In 2021, 2,851,166 closed encounters were logged by NPDS: 2,080,917 human exposures, 62,189 animal exposures, 703,086 information requests, 4,920 human confirmed nonexposures, and 54 animal confirmed nonexposures. Total encounters showed a 14.0% decrease from 2020, and human exposure cases decreased by 2.22%, while health care facility (HCF) human exposure cases increased by 7.20%. All information requests decreased by 37.0%, medication identification (Drug ID) requests decreased by 20.8%, and medical information requests showed a 61.1% decrease, although these remain about 13-fold higher than before the COVID-19 pandemic. Drug Information requests showed a 146% increase, reflecting COVID-19 vaccine calls to PCs. Human exposures with less serious outcomes have decreased 1.80% per year since 2008, while those with more serious outcomes (moderate, major or death) have increased 4.56% per year since 2000.Consistent with the previous year, the top 5 substance classes most frequently involved in all human exposures were analgesics (11.2%), household cleaning substances (7.49%), cosmetics/personal care products (5.88%), antidepressants (5.61%), and sedatives/hypnotics/antipsychotics (4.73%). As a class, antidepressant exposures increased most rapidly, by 1,663 cases/year (5.30%/year) over the past 10 years for cases with more serious outcomes.The top 5 most common exposures in children age 5 years or less were cosmetics/personal care products (10.8%), household cleaning substances (10.7%), analgesics (8.16%), dietary supplements/herbals/homeopathic (7.00%), and foreign bodies/toys/miscellaneous (6.51%). Drug identification requests comprised 3.64% of all information contacts. NPDS documented 4,497 human exposures resulting in death; 3,809 (84.7%) of these were judged as related (RCF of 1-Undoubtedly responsible, 2-Probably responsible, or 3-Contributory). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the continued value of PC expertise and the need for specialized medical toxicology information to manage more serious exposures. Unintentional and intentional exposures continue to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the US. The near real-time status of NPDS represents a national public health resource to collect and monitor US exposure cases and information contacts. The continuing mission of NPDS is to provide a nationwide infrastructure for surveillance for all types of exposures (e.g., foreign body, infectious, venomous, chemical agent, or commercial product), and the identification and tracking of significant public health events. NPDS is a model system for the near real-time surveillance of national and global public health.

Hemolysis after subcutaneous deoxycholic acid overdose.

This report describes a case of hemolysis in a patient injecting deoxycholic acid and benzyl alcohol for aesthetic benefit without medical supervision. The concentration and dose injected by the patient resulted in a 10-fold overdose of deoxycholic acid in comparison to the FDA-recommended dosing for the approved indication. Providers should be aware of medically unsupervised use of DCA and other injectables and the potential risks associated with this practice.