RESUMO
In patients with end-stage heart failure, advanced therapies such as heart transplantation and long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) have to be considered. LVADs can be implanted as a bridge to transplantation or as an alternative to heart transplantation: destination therapy. In the Netherlands, long-term LVAD therapy is gaining importance as a result of increased prevalence of heart failure together with a low number of heart transplantations due to shortage of donor hearts. As a result, the difference between bridge to transplantation and destination therapy is becoming more artificial since, at present, most patients initially implanted as bridge to transplantation end up receiving extended LVAD therapy. Following LVAD implantation, survival after 1, 2 and 3 years is 83%, 76% and 70%, respectively. Quality of life improves substantially despite important adverse events such as device-related infection, stroke, major bleeding and right heart failure. Early referral of potential candidates for long-term MCS is of utmost importance and positively influences outcome. In this review, an overview of the indications, contraindications, patient selection, clinical outcome and optimal time of referral for long-term MCS is given.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is increasing substantially and, despite improvements in medical therapy, HF still carries a poor prognosis. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) by a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) improves survival and quality of life in selected patients. This holds especially for the short-term outcome, but experience regarding long-term outcome is growing as the waiting time for heart transplantation is increasing due to the shortage of donor hearts. Here we present our results from the University Medical Centre Utrecht. METHODS: Data of all patients with a cf-LVAD implant between March 2006 and January 2018 were collected. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes included adverse events defined according to the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) definitions, described per patient year. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients (69% male, mean age 50⯱ 13 years) received a cf-LVAD. After a median follow-up of 542 (interquartile range 205-1044) days, heart transplantation had been performed in 82 (31%) patients, the cf-LVAD had been explanted in 8 (3%) and 71 (26%) had died. Survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 83%, 72% and 57%, respectively, with heart transplantation, cf-LVAD explantation or death as the end-point. Death was most often caused by neurological complications (31%) or infection (20%). Major bleeding occurred 0.51 times and stroke 0.15 times per patient year. CONCLUSION: Not only short-term results but also 5year survival after cf-LVAD support demonstrate that MCS is a promising therapy as an extended bridge to heart transplantation. However, the incidence of several major complications still has to be addressed.
RESUMO
Today, continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (cf-LVADs) are implanted more often in patients with end-stage heart failure. Because of greater durability they can be implanted for an extended period of time. As a result of increased numbers of patients on cf-LVAD support, healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential complications inherent to this therapy. Both bleeding and thrombosis may occur, and also complications related either to the device itself or to the ensuing altered haemodynamics, valvular pathology, and rhythm disturbances such as ventricular tachycardias and fibrillation. Accurate clinical evaluation, together with an electrocardiogram and, if necessary, combined with an echocardiogram, is obligatory in these situations. This review summarizes common complications complemented by a few clinical cases.
