Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Melanoma Res ; 32(6): 451-459, 2022 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36164923

RESUMO

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) antibodies, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, alone or in combination with ipilimumab, have become standard treatment for melanoma and multiple other malignancies. Neurological adverse effects are rare and have not been well characterized to date. Patients who developed neurological adverse effects while being treated with PD1, alone or in combination with ipilimumab, were retrospectively identified from 10 cancer centers. Fifty-eight patients were included, and the median time from treatment initiation to development of neurological adverse effects was 7 weeks (range, 1-86.5 weeks). Thirty-seven (64%) toxicities affected the peripheral nervous system. Fifty (86%) patients were treated with corticosteroids, with 22 (37%) patients requiring further immunomodulation including intravenous immunoglobulin (16), plasmapheresis (7), mycophenolate mofetil (4), cyclophosphamide (1), and rituximab (1). Twenty-seven (46%) had a complete resolution of their neurological symptoms, and two (4%) patients died secondary to complications from their neurological adverse effects. The response rate of the cancer to immunotherapy was 78%, and the median progression free survival was not reached. Neurological adverse effects can occur with PD1 treatment, do not appear to impact treatment response, but may be irreversible or worsen in some patients. Management may require immunomodulation beyond corticosteroids.


Assuntos
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Ipilimumab/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Corticosteroides
3.
Head Neck ; 43(3): 768-777, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33169486

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data relating to the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for salivary gland carcinomas (SGC) is gradually evolving with responses varying among different histotypes. To address these disparities, this retrospective analysis examined the prevalence of recognized biomarkers of response to ICI; namely programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), combined positive score (CPS), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients with SGC with an aim to determine any prognostic or survival benefits and stratify the use of ICI in this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 52 patients with primary SGC eligible for this study, the most common histological types were adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 17, 33%), salivary duct carcinoma (n = 14, 27%), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (n = 11, 21%), and acinic cell carcinoma (n = 6, 11%). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using the Ventana Discovery Ultra auto-staining platform for EGFR, PD-1, PD-L1, and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. CPS ≥1 defined PD-L1 positive cases and log-rank testing was performed to examine the relationship between PD-L1 expression status and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: CPS positivity was seen in 9 (17.3%) patients, none of which were adenoid cystic carcinoma. All 52 (100%) cases expressed retained MMR proteins inferring microsatellite stability (MSS) and EGFR expression was identified in 45 of 52 (86.5%) patients. CPS positivity (score ≥1) was significantly associated with advanced pathological T status (P = .021), advanced pathological N status (P = .006), high histological tumor grade (P = .045), and positive histological margin (P = .023). Patients with PD-L1 positivity in tumor cells did not have an inferior 3-year OS (P = .93). CONCLUSION: The data from this retrospective study highlighting the uniform microsatellite stability alongside the low prevalence of CPS positivity suggests that only a minority of SGC patients may benefit from ICI therapy alone. The high rates of EGFR expression in SGC may be a target to augment immune checkpoint therapy response.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Carcinoma , Antígeno B7-H1/genética , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Receptores ErbB/genética , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Glândulas Salivares
4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 1: CD012988, 2020 Jan 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31994181

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Survival for stage I to III, hormone receptor-positive, breast cancer has substantially improved over time due to advances in screening, surgery and adjuvant therapy. However many adjuvant therapies have significant treatment-related toxicities, which worsen quality of life for breast cancer survivors. Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer are now prescribed aromatase inhibitors (AI) as standard, with longer durations of therapy, up to 10 years, being considered for certain women. AI treatment is associated with a high incidence of AI-induced musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS), often described as symmetrical pain and soreness in the joints, musculoskeletal pain and joint stiffness. AIMSS reduces compliance with AI therapy in up to one half of women undergoing adjuvant AI therapy, potentially compromising breast cancer outcomes. Exercise has been investigated for the prevention and treatment of AIMSS but the effect of this intervention remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of exercise therapies on the prevention or management of aromatase inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS) in women with stage I to III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Breast Cancer's Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases up to 13 December 2018. We also searched two conference proceedings portals and two clinical trials registries for ongoing studies or unpublished trials, or both, in August 2019. We also reviewed reference lists of the included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials that compared exercise versus a comparator arm. We did not impose any restriction on the comparator arm, which could include an alternative type of exercise, no exercise or a waiting list control. Both published and non-peer-reviewed studies were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. The outcomes investigated were pain, joint stiffness, grip strength, health-related quality of life, cancer-specific quality of life, adherence to AI therapy, adverse events, incidence of AIMSS, breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival. For continuous outcomes that were assessed with the same instrument, we used the mean difference (MD); for those outcomes that used different instruments, we used the standardised mean difference (SMD) for the analysis. For dichotomous outcomes, we reported outcomes as an odds ratio (OR). MAIN RESULTS: We included seven studies with 400 randomised participants; one study assessed exercise for preventing AIMSS and six studies assessed treating AIMSS. For preventing AIMSS, the single study reported no difference in pain scores, grip strength or compliance to taking AI medication between groups. Data values were not provided in the study and no other outcomes were reported. For managing AIMSS, we found that the evidence for the effect of exercise therapies on overall change in worst pain scores was very uncertain (SMD -0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.78 to 0.32; 4 studies, 284 women; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence suggested that exercise therapies result in little to no difference in overall change in stiffness scores (Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) stiffness score MD -0.76, 95% CI -1.67 to 0.15 and Visual Analogues Scale (VAS) stiffness score MD -0.42, 95% CI -2.10 to 1.26; 1 study, 53 women; low-certainty evidence). The evidence was very uncertain for the outcomes of overall change in grip strength (MD 0.30, 95% CI -0.55 to 1.15; 1 study, 83 women; very low-certainty evidence); overall change in health-related quality of life (subscales of SF-36 tool ranged from least benefit of MD 1.88, 95% CI -2.69 to 6.45 to most benefit of MD 9.70, 95% CI 1.67 to 17.73; 2 studies, 123 women, very low-certainty evidence); overall change in cancer-specific quality of life (MD 4.58, 95% CI -0.61 to 9.78; 2 studies, 136 women; very low-certainty evidence); and adherence to aromatase inhibitors (OR 2.43, 95% CI 0.41 to 14.63; 2 studies, 224 women; very low-certainty evidence). There were no adverse events identified across four studies in either arm (0 events reported; 4 studies; 331 participants; low-certainty evidence). There were no data reported on incidence of AIMSS, breast cancer-specific survival or overall survival. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Given the wide-ranging benefits of exercise for people affected by cancer, it was surprising that this review provided no clear evidence of benefit for exercise therapies in women with early breast cancer with AIMSS. This review only yielded seven eligible studies with 400 participants, which is likely to have underpowered the findings. The meta-analysis was challenging due to the considerable heterogeneity amongst the trials, with a wide range of exercise regimens and follow-up periods. Despite these inconclusive findings, exercise needs to be part of routine care for women with breast cancer due to its wide-ranging benefits. Future research in this area would be enhanced with further understanding of the mechanism of AIMSS, a single clear definition of the condition, and phase III randomised controlled trials that are adequately powered to test targeted exercise interventions on the key clinical outcomes in this condition.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Aromatase/efeitos adversos , Terapia por Exercício , Dor Musculoesquelética/induzido quimicamente , Dor Musculoesquelética/prevenção & controle , Inibidores da Aromatase/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
5.
J Thorac Oncol ; 12(11): 1626-1635, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28843363

RESUMO

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in the treatment of solid organ malignancies is becoming increasingly common. This has prompted the recognition of a new class of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) stemming from the upregulation of T-cell activity causing autoimmunity. Neurological irAEs are a rare complication of ICIs that can lead to long-term morbidity. We report a rare case of encephalopathy after treatment with pembrolizumab, to which the patient achieved durable disease response despite discontinuation of therapy. We also review the pathophysiology, incidence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of neurotoxicity secondary to ICIs. Treatment requires early administration of high-dose corticosteroids, and cessation of ICI therapy is often necessary after grade 3 or 4 irAEs. However, early data suggest that neurological irAEs correlate with a favorable disease response. Consideration should also be given to the optimal duration of ICI therapy to minimize the risk of toxicity and optimize health care expenditure.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Encefalopatias/induzido quimicamente , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...