Polymyxin monotherapy versus polymyxin-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis was performed to compare polymyxin monotherapy and polymyxin-based combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP) infections. METHODS: We conducted searches on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Collaborative database for both observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing polymyxin monotherapy with polymyxin-based combination therapy in patients with CR-KP infection. The primary outcome was mortality. We divided all included studies into several groups according to different combination-combination and different infection types. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for outcome analysis. RESULTS: Ten studies with 481 patients were included. Polymyxin monotherapy was associated with higher mortality than polymyxin-based combination therapy in treatment of CR-KP bloodstream infections (BSI) (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.14-3.27, P = 0.01) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)/hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.15-12.71, P = 0.03). In subgroup analysis of different combinations, mortality was significantly higher with polymyxin monotherapy compared with combination therapy with tigecycline (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.05-3.37, P = 0.03), or with cabapenem (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.25-7.74, P = 0.01), but no differences were found in combinations with aminoglycosides (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.29, P = 0.38). Three-drug combination therapy including polymyxin was also associated with significant survival benefit (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.60-9.32, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Polymyxin-based combination therapy provides significant survival benefit in treatment of CR-KP, which appears to be more pronounced when a carbapenem or tigecycline is included in the regimen.

Efficacy of Xuebijing for coagulopathy in patients with sepsis.

OBJECTIVES: To provide evidence of the clinical efficacy of Xuebijing (XBJ) on blood coagulation in patients with sepsis. METHODS: We conducted this meta-analysis in The People's Hospital of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China between December 2013 and May 2014. We searched a number of databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before December 2013 using the keywords 'Xuebijing', 'coagulation' and 'sepsis'. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.2 from the Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs involving 867 patients were included. Compared with placebo, XBJ injection significantly improved platelets (mean differences [MD] = 42.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.42 - 61.86, p<0.00001), shortened the activated partial thromboplastin time (MD = -4.81, 95% CI: -7.86 - [-1.76], p=0.002), shortened the prothrombin time (MD = -2.33, 95% CI: -4.15 - [-0.51], p=0.01), and shortened the thrombin time (MD = -2.05, 95% CI: -3.52 - [-0.58], p=0.006). However, no significant difference was found between the XBJ injection and the placebo group for fibrinogen (MD = 0.21, 95% CI: -0.38 - 0.81, p=0.48). CONCLUSION: Xuebijing injection may improve coagulopathy in patients with sepsis. High-quality and large sample clinical trials are needed for confirmation.