The overexpression of cytochrome P450 genes confers buprofezin resistance in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål).

BACKGROUND: Buprofezin, an insect growth regulator, has been widely used to control brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens, one of the most destructive pests of rice crops in Asia. The intensive use of this compound has resulted in very high levels of resistance to buprofezin in the field, however, the underpinning mechanisms of resistance have not been fully resolved. RESULTS: Insecticide bioassays using the P450 inhibitor piperonyl butoxide significantly synergized the toxicity of buprofezin in two resistant strains of BPH (BPR and YC2017) compared to a susceptible strain (Sus), suggesting P450s play a role in resistance to this compound. Whole transcriptome profiling identified 1110 genes that were upregulated in the BPR strain compared to the Sus strain, including 13 cytochrome P450 genes, eight esterases and one glutathione S-transferase. Subsequently, qPCR validation revealed that four of the P450 genes, CYP6ER1vA, CYP6CW1, CYP4C77, and CYP439A1 were significantly overexpressed in both the BRP and YC2017 strains compared with the Sus strain. Further functional analyses showed that only suppression of CYP6ER1vA, CYP6CW1, and CYP439A1 gene expression by RNA interference significantly increased the toxicity of buprofezin against BPH. However, only transgenic Drosophila melanogaster expressing CYP6ER1vA and CYP439A1 exhibited significant resistance to buprofezin. Finally, the BPR strain was found to exhibit modest but significant levels of resistance to acetamiprid, dinotefuran and pymetrozine. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide strong evidence that the overexpression of CYP6ER1vA and CYP439A1 contribute to buprofezin resistance in BPH, and that resistance to this compound is associated with low-level resistance to acetamiprid, dinotefuran and pymetrozine. These results advance understanding of the molecular basis of BPH resistance to buprofezin and will inform the development of management strategies for the control of this highly damaging pest. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.

Inheritance and fitness cost of buprofezin resistance in a near-isogenic, field-derived strain and insecticide resistance monitoring of Laodelphax striatellus in China.

BACKGROUND: Laodelphax striatellus is one of the most destructive pests of rice and other cereal crops. Chemical control is still the most efficient way to control this pest, but insecticide resistance always threatens this approach. RESULTS: Monitoring data (2003-2020) showed that Chinese field populations of L. striatellus developed high-level buprofezin resistance within the first four years. This high-level resistance to buprofezin was stable for about ten years and persisted even when buprofezin selection pressure was absent. An established near-isogenic strain (YN-NIS) with 90.8-fold resistance to buprofezin had resistance inheritance of autosomal and incomplete dominance, and the resistance was controlled by multiple genes with no obvious fitness costs (relative fitness of 0.8707). Furthermore, the susceptibility of 29 field populations to another seven insecticides (2014-2020) showed that: (i) low-level resistance to pymetrozine, dinotefuran, sulfoxaflor and thiamethoxam was first detected in 2014 (eight years after introduction), 2016 (three years after), 2017 (four years after) and 2019 (19 years after), respectively, (ii) moderate resistance levels to chlorpyrifos were found for all populations across multiple years, and (iii) no resistance was detected for nitenpyram and triflumezopyrim. CONCLUSION: The fast buprofezin resistance development in L. striatellus would be caused by incomplete dominant resistance with almost no fitness cost in the resistant strain. Nitenpyram and triflumezopyrim showed no resistance and can be used as the main insecticide for the control of L. striatellus. These findings provide key fundamental information for controlling L. striatellus.

Baseline determination, susceptibility monitoring and risk assessment to triflumezopyrim in Nilaparvata lugens (Stål).

Triflumezopyrim, a novel mesoionic chemical insecticide, is promoted as a powerful tool for control of susceptible and resistant hopper species in rice throughout Asia. For a newly commercialized insecticide it is important to establish susceptibility baseline, conduct susceptibility monitoring, and assess the risk of resistance via artificial selection to provide foundational information on designing resistance management strategy. The susceptibility baseline of triflumezopyrim was established for three rice planthopper species, Nilarpavata lugens (Stål), Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) and Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén). The LD50 of triflumezopyrim was 0.026, 0.032 and 0.094 ng/individual for the adults of the susceptible strains of S. furcifera, L. striatellus and N. lugens, respectively, determined by a topical application method. Using a rice stem (seedling) dipping method, the LC50 was determined as 0.042, 0.024 and 0.150 mg/L for the nymphs (3rd instar) of the three hopper species, respectively. In the meanwhile, the LC50 of Pyraxalt™ (triflumezopyrim 10% SC) was 0.064 mg/L for the N. lugens susceptible strain. Furthermore, the susceptibility of triflumezopyrim and other five neonicotinoid insecticides were monitored for N. lugens field populations collected from major rice production areas in China in 2015-2019. All monitored populations were susceptible to triflumezopyrim (0.5 to 3.9-fold resistance ratio), and showed no cross-resistance to the other five neonicotinoids. These results suggested that triflumezopyrim is a good option to control resistant N. lugens. In addition, a field-collected population of N. lugens was artificially selected with triflumezopyrim for 20 generations and resulted in 3.5-fold increase in LC50 from F0 and 6.0-fold increase from that of the susceptible strain. The realized heritability (h2) of resistance was estimated as 0.0451 by using threshold trait analysis. With this h2 value, the projected triflumezopyrim resistance development (a 10-fold increase in LC50) would be expected after 30.3 or 24.0 generations if 80% or 90% of the population was killed at each generation.