Optimal injection interval for testosterone undecanoate treatment of hypogonadal and transgender men.

OBJECTIVE: To define the optimized inter-injection interval of injectable testosterone undecanoate (TU) treatment for hypogonadal and transmen based on individual dose titration in routine clinical practice. DESIGN AND METHODS: A prolective observational study of consecutive TU injections in men undergoing testosterone replacement therapy for pathological hypogonadism or masculinization of female-to-male transgender (transmen) subject to individual dosing titration to achieve a stable replacement regimen. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2019, 6899 injections were given to 325 consecutive patients. After excluding the 6-week loading dose, 6300 injections were given to 297 patients who had at least three and a median of 14 injections. The optimal injection interval (mean of last three injection intervals) had a median of 12.0 weeks (interquartile range 10.4-12.7 weeks). The interval was significantly influenced by age and body size (body surface area, BSA) but not by diagnosis or trough serum LH, FSH, and SHBG. Longer (≥14 weeks; 68/297, 23%), but not shorter (≤10 weeks; 22/297, 7.4%), intervals were weakly correlated with age but not diagnosis or other covariables. Low blood hemoglobin increased with trough serum testosterone to reach plateau once testosterone was about 10 nmol/L or higher. CONCLUSION: Optimal intervals between TU injection after individual titration resulted in the approved 12-week interval in 70% of patients with only minor influence for clinical application of BSA and not of trough serum LH, FSH, and SHBG. Individually optimized inter-injection interval did not differ between men with primary or secondary hypogonadism or transmen.

Rate and Extent of Recovery from Reproductive and Cardiac Dysfunction Due to Androgen Abuse in Men.

CONTEXT: Androgen abuse impairs male reproductive and cardiac function, but the rate, extent, and determinants of recovery are not understood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate recovery of male reproductive and cardiac function after ceasing androgen intake in current and past androgen abusers compared with healthy non-users. METHODS: Cross-sectional, observational study recruited via social media 41 current and 31 past users (≥3 months since last use, median 300 days since last use) with 21 healthy, eugonadal non-users. Each provided a history, examination, and serum and semen sample and underwent testicular ultrasound, body composition analysis, and cardiac function evaluation. RESULTS: Current abusers had suppressed reproductive function and impaired cardiac systolic function and lipoprotein parameters compared with non- or past users. Past users did not differ from non-users, suggesting full recovery of suppressed reproductive and cardiac functions after ceasing androgen abuse, other than residual reduced testicular volume. Mean time to recovery was faster for reproductive hormones (anti-Mullerian hormone [AMH], 7.3 months; luteinizing hormone [LH], 10.7 months) than for sperm variables (output, 14.1 months) whereas spermatogenesis (serum follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], inhibin B, inhibin) took longer. The duration of androgen abuse was the only other variable associated with slower recovery of sperm output (but not hormones). CONCLUSION: Suppressed testicular and cardiac function due to androgen abuse is effectively fully reversible (apart from testis volume and serum sex hormone binding globulin) with recovery taking between 6 to 18 months after ceasing androgen intake with possible cumulative effects on spermatogenesis. Suppressed serum AMH, LH, and FSH represent convenient, useful, and underutilized markers of recovery from androgen abuse.

Testosterone for Androgen Deficiency-Like Symptoms in Men Without Pathologic Hypogonadism: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Cross-over With Masked Choice Extension Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Off-label testosterone prescribing for androgen deficiency (AD)-like sexual and energy symptoms of older men without pathologic hypogonadism has increased dramatically without convincing evidence of efficacy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with three phases, we entered 45 men aged at least 40 years without pathologic hypogonadism but with AD-like energy and/or sexual symptoms to either daily testosterone or placebo gel treatment for 6 weeks in a cross-over study design with a third, mandatory extension phase in which participants chose which previous treatment they preferred to repeat while remaining masked to their original treatment. Primary endpoints were energy and sexual symptoms as assessed by a visual analog scale (Lead Symptom Score [LSS]). RESULTS: Increasing serum testosterone to the healthy young male range produced no significant benefit more than placebo for energy or sexual LSS. Covariate effects of age, body mass index, and pretreatment baseline serum testosterone on quality-of-life scales were detected. Only 1 out of 22 indices from seven quality-of-life scales was significantly improved by testosterone treatment over placebo. Participants did not choose testosterone significantly more than placebo as their preferred treatment in the third phase. CONCLUSIONS: Six-week testosterone treatment does not improve energy or sexual symptoms more than placebo in symptomatic men without pathologic hypogonadism.

Pharmacokinetics and Acceptability of Subcutaneous Injection of Testosterone Undecanoate.

CONTEXT: Can injectable testosterone undecanoate (TU) be administered effectively and acceptably by the subcutaneous (SC) route? OBJECTIVE: To investigate the acceptability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SC injection of TU. DESIGN: Randomized sequence, crossover clinical study of SC vs IM TU injections. SETTING: Ambulatory clinic of an academic andrology center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty men (11 hypogonadal, 9 transgender men) who were long-term users of TU. injections. Intervention: Injection of 1000 mg TU (in 4 mL castor oil vehicle) by SC or IM route. Main Outcome Measures: Patient-reported pain, acceptability, and preference scales. PK by measurement of serum testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and estradiol (E2) concentrations with application of population PK methods and dried blood spot (DBS) sampling. RESULTS: Pain was greater after SC compared with IM injection 24 hours (but not immediately) after injection but both routes were equally acceptable. Ultimately 11 preferred IM, 6 preferred SC, and 3 had no preference. The DBS-based PK analysis of serum testosterone revealed a later time of peak testosterone concentration after SC vs IM injection (8.0 vs 3.3 days) but no significant route differences in model-predicted peak testosterone concentration (8.4 vs 9.6 ng/mL) or mean resident time (183 vs 110 days). The PK of venous serum testosterone, DHT, and E2 did not differ according to route of injection. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that SC TU injection is acceptable but produces greater pain 24 hours after injection that may contribute to the overall majority preference for the IM injection. The PK of testosterone, DHT, or E2 did not differ substantially between SC and IM routes. Hence whereas further studies are required, the SC route represents an alternative to IM injections without a need to change dose for men for whom IM injection is not desired or recommended.

Sperm cryopreservation prior to gonadotoxic treatment: experience of a single academic centre over 4 decades.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the natural history of outcomes of sperm cryostorage at an Australian tertiary academic centre? SUMMARY ANSWER: Cryostorage is feasible in virtually all men facing gonadotoxic therapy but the timing of sperm disposal varies according to the reason for it. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Gonadotoxic treatment for cancer or non-cancer diseases damages spermatogenesis and impairs male fertility. Sperm cryopreservation is an established technique to preserve male fertility prior to gonadotoxic treatment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective review of clinical, anthropometric, semen analysis and hormonal data from 1978 to 2017 involving 2717 men comprising 2085 men with cancer, 234 non-cancer disease and 398 healthy controls, in a single tertiary academic centre with the same clinic and laboratory staff. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING AND METHODS: Sperm output was analysed according to diseases, the feasibility of sperm cryostorage notably for adolescents, regional access to an urban cryostorage facility, the determinants of sperm output and time-dependent disposal of cryostored sperm. Semen samples were assessed by contemporaneous WHO methods. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of 2085 men with cancer, 904 (43%) had haematological malignancies, 680 (33%) testicular cancers and 136 (6.5%) were adolescents. Most men (89%) and adolescents (80%) could collect sperm. Sperm output for all cancers and non-cancer diseases was lower than controls. Sperm output correlated positively with total testicular volume (r = 0.44, P < 0.0001) and negatively with serum FSH and LH (r = -0.24, -0.12, respectively, both P < 0.0001) but not testosterone. For all stored samples, the median time in cryostorage was 8.5 years, 7% were transferred for use to induce pregnancy (median time 2.5 years) and 62.2% were discarded as no longer needed (return of fertility, 35.9% median 3.5 years; death, 26.3%, median 6.5 years), the high disposal rate reflecting regular annual follow-up to establish ongoing need for continued cryostorage. Cryostorage facilities are not available in remote and rural areas of the State and the proportion of outer regional and remote area residents cryostoring sperm was only about half that compared with urban residents. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study does not report the pregnancy outcomes of the patients who used the cryostored sperm, due to recent limitations on health data privacy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Sperm cryostorage is feasible for virtually all men, including sufficiently mature adolescents, who can collect semen to insure future paternity as well as making positive psychological preparation for the patient's survival. Disposal of cryostored material when no longer required is efficient with regular follow-up. Sperm cryopreservation should be an integral part of comprehensive treatment plan in men receiving gonadotoxic treatment but remains underutilized. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): There was no external funding for this study and there were no relevant conflicts of interest.

Factors influencing time course of pain after depot oil intramuscular injection of testosterone undecanoate.

Pain following depot intramuscular (IM) injection of oil vehicle-based drugs has been little studied. This study aimed to determine prospectively the prevalence, determinants, severity and functional consequences of pain during the week after IM injection of 1 000 mg testosterone undecanoate (TU) in a 4-mL castor oil vehicle. Androgen-deficient men receiving regular T replacement therapy at an academic andrology clinic were recruited to report pain scores using a coloured visual linear analogue scale at seven times over the first day and daily for a week after a deep IM gluteal injection. The time course and covariables influencing pain scores were analysed by mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA). Following 168 injections in 125 men, pain was reported by 80% of men, peaking immediately after injection, reaching only moderate severity, lasting 1-2 days and returning to baseline by day 4. The pain required little analgesic use and produced minimal interference in daily activities. The time course of pain scores was reproducible in the 43 men who underwent two consecutive injections. Pain was more severe in men who had an earlier painful injection, but less severe in older and more obese men. There were negligible differences in post-injection pain experience between experienced nurses administering injections. Deep IM gluteal injection of depot TU in 4-mL castor oil is well tolerated and post-injection pain is influenced by earlier painful injection experience, as well as age and obesity.

Randomized cross-over clinical trial of injectable vs. implantable depot testosterone for maintenance of testosterone replacement therapy in androgen deficient men.

BACKGROUND: Life-long testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) for younger men with organic androgen deficiency is best provided by depot testosterone (T) products. This study compared directly the two long-acting depot T products, subdermal T implants (TI) and injectable T undecanoate (TU) for maintenance of TRT. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Men with organic androgen deficiency (n = 38) undergoing regular TRT at an academic Andrology centre were recruited for a two period, randomized sequence, cross-over clinical trial without intervening wash-out period of TRT maintenance. OUTCOMES: For both depot T products, their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were evaluated using a range of androgen sensitive clinical, laboratory and quality of life measures as well as preference for ongoing treatment after experience of both products. RESULTS: The two depot T products had distinct pharmacokinetics and were not bioequivalent. However, there were no consistent clinical differences in a comprehensive range of pharmacodynamic measures reflecting androgen effects on biochemistry and haematology, muscle mass and strength, and quality of life, mood and sexual function. The majority (91%) of participants chose TU over TI at study completion. CONCLUSION: Despite significant pharmacokinetic differences, the two depot T products are clinically interchangeable allowing for choice dependent on patient and physician delivery preference in practice but most patients preferred the injectable over the implantable form.