Scoping the Demand for Night Operation of Essex & Herts Air Ambulance: A Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: Helicopter emergency medical services play an important role in the prehospital care of critically ill and injured patients, providing enhanced interventions and direct transfer to specialist centers. Essex & Herts Air Ambulance (EHAAT) delivers prehospital critical care to patients in Essex, Hertfordshire, and the surrounding areas. Historically, EHAAT's resources have not operated during the night. This study aimed to ascertain demand for prehospital critical care in Essex and Hertfordshire during night hours. METHODS: A prospective observational design was used. Data were collected by 11 critical care paramedics during night shifts on a critical care desk using an online survey. Details were recorded for incidents in Essex and Hertfordshire between 21:00 and 07:00 deemed appropriate for a prehospital critical care response. RESULTS: A total of 108 incidents were recorded across 52 nights, equating to an average of 2.08 incidents per night. For 52 incidents, there was no critical care resource available to attend. The majority of incidents fell in closer proximity to EHAAT's North Weald base than its Earls Colne base. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest a potential need for prehospital critical care during night hours in Essex and Hertfordshire and support the operation of a resource from EHAAT's North Weald base.

The effect of the introduction of a regional major trauma network on triage decisions made by a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service.

BACKGROUND: A major trauma network (MTN) has been in place in the East of England, with a single hospital operating as the major trauma centre (MTC). The primary aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine whether triage destination decisions with regard to trauma patients made by a helicopter-based doctor-paramedic team are affected by the introduction of a regional trauma network. In addition, we will describe and discuss the logistics of transfer of injured patients attended by the service. METHODS: This is a retrospective database review that was carried out over two 12-month periods. The first period was before the introduction of an MTN, and the second was after its introduction. All patients who were conveyed to an MTC were identified. Nontrauma patients were excluded. The MTN trauma triage tool was retrospectively applied. A comparative analysis of the two cohorts was carried out. For the group of patients conveyed to the regional MTC, additional follow-up information was obtained. This included patient survival at 30 days and the final injury severity score for each patient. RESULTS: A total of 220 cases were identified in which a major trauma patient was conveyed to an MTC. There were 94 cases in the year before the introduction of the MTN (cohort 1) and 124 in the year during which the MTN was active (cohort 2). There was no significant difference in the number of patients conveyed to each MTC between cohort 1 and cohort 2. The trauma triage tool status was 'positive' in 52.1% of cases in cohort 1 and 55.6% of cases in cohort 2 (P=0.60). Advice of the consultant on call was more commonly used for patients in cohort 2 than for those in cohort 1 (66.9 vs. 40.6%; P<0. 01). CONCLUSION: The introduction of a regional MTN has not significantly affected the triage decisions made by our physician-paramedic teams.