Resultados oncológicos de un programa de prostatectomía radical asistida por robot «da Vinci» en una cohorte de 408 pacientes consecutivos / Oncologic outcomes in 408 consecutive patient cohort treated with da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar las características generales y los resultados oncológicos en una cohorte de 408 casos de prostatectomía radical asistida por robot da Vinci Standard de 4 brazos, realizadas entre octubre del 2006 y febrero del 2015. El análisis estadístico se realizó con el programa SPSS 20.0. Las variables cualitativas se presentan con su distribución de frecuencias y las cuantitativas con su media y desviación estándar o mediana y rango intercuartil. La asociación entre variables cualitativas se analizó con el test de la χ2. La variable de resultado de la supervivencia libre de enfermedad se evaluó con un análisis de curvas de Kaplan-Meier y se contrastaron las diferencias con el test de Breslow. Se ajustó un modelo de regresión de Cox. Entre los resultados destacamos un seguimiento 47 meses (32-68,75 meses), supervivencia libre de recurrencia 90 meses (IC del 95%, 86-94), mediana de tiempo a recurrencia de 23 meses (10,5-37 meses), recurrencia del 16,6% (68/408), recidiva bioquímica (62/498, 15,2%) y un 22% de complicaciones, la mayoría Clavien I-II. Los resultados se resumen en las tablas 1 a 7 y en la figura 1. CONCLUSIONES: 1) la prostatectomía radical robótica es una técnica segura con un porcentaje asumible de complicaciones, en su mayoría menores (grados I y II de Clavien); 2) encontramos mayor probabilidad de permanecer libre de recidiva en los grados más bajos de la clasificación de ISUP y mayor probabilidad de recidiva en casos de alto riesgo, y 3) en el modelo multivariante comprobamos que el grado ISUP se relacionó de forma significativa con la supervivencia y fueron variables pronosticas independientes los grados de la clasificación ISUP y los márgenes quirúrgicos positivos

The objective of this study is to evaluate the general characteristics and oncological results in a cohort of 408 cases submitted to da Vinci Standard 4-armed robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), performed between October 2006 and February 2015 at Clínico San Carlos hospital. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 20.0 program. Qualitative variables are presented with their frequency distribution and quantitative variables with their mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range. The χ2 test was used to analyze the association of qualitative variables. The disease-free survival outcome variable was evaluated with a Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, and the differences were contrasted with the Breslow test. A Cox regression model was adjusted. Among the results, we highlight the follow-up of 47 months (32-68.75 m), recurrence-free survival of 90 months (95% CI, 86-94), median time to recurrence of 23 months (10.5-37 m), recurrence 16'6% (68/408), biochemical recurrence (62/498, 15'2 %) and 22% of complications, mostly Clavien I-II. The results are summarized in Tables 1 to 7 and Figure 1

Oncologic outcomes in 408 consecutive patient cohort treated with da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. / Resultados oncológicos de un programa de prostatectomía radical asistida por robot «da Vinci¼ en una cohorte de 408 pacientes consecutivos.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the general characteristics and oncological results in a cohort of 408 cases submitted to da Vinci Standard 4-armed robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), performed between October 2006 and February 2015 at Clínico San Carlos hospital. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 20.0 program. Qualitative variables are presented with their frequency distribution and quantitative variables with their mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range. The χ2 test was used to analyze the association of qualitative variables. The disease-free survival outcome variable was evaluated with a Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, and the differences were contrasted with the Breslow test. A Cox regression model was adjusted. Among the results, we highlight the follow-up of 47 months (32-68.75m), recurrence-free survival of 90 months (95% CI, 86-94), median time to recurrence of 23 months (10.5-37 m), recurrence 16'6% (68/408), biochemical recurrence (62/498, 15'2%) and 22% of complications, mostly Clavien I-II. The results are summarized in Tables 1 to 7 and Figure 1. CONCLUSIONS: 1) RARP is a safe technique with an acceptable percentage of complications, mostly minor (Clavien grades iandii), 2) We found a higher probability of remaining recurrence-free in the lower grades of the ISUP classification and a higher probability of recurrence in high-risk cases, and 3) The multivariate model showed that the ISUP grade was significantly related to survival and the ISUP and PSM classification grades were independent prognostic variables.

[Prognostic factors of spontaneous expulsion in ureteral lithiasis]. / Factores predictivos para la expulsión de la litiasis ureteral.

UNLABELLED: Medical treatment, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopy are therapeutic options for ureteral stones. EWSL and endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones have a high success rate. However it has surgical as well as anaesthetic risks. For many patients, a medicinal treatment without invasive procedures is an option. Watchful waiting does not always result in stone clearance and may be associated with recurrent renal colic. The study of the prognostic factors for expulsion and the medical therapy will help us to select candidates for medical expulsive treatment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the characteristics of the stones and the medication administered (alpha blockers, NSAIDs or a combination of both) as predictors of spontaneous passage of the stone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study of 260 patients with 278 ureteral stones was conducted. Primary endpoint was stone expulsion. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted testing the effect of stone location, size and composition, and medication (alpha-blockers, NSAIDs, or combination) on stone clearance. RESULTS: 34,2% of the stones studied were spontaneously eliminated. Stone location (pelvic ureter, OR=1.823, p=0.013), size (>5 mm, OR=3.37, p>0.02), and medication (combination of alpha blockers and NSAIDs, OR=8.70, >0.001) were predictors of spontaneous clearance. Multivariate analysis confirmed size (p=0.006) and medication (p>0.001) as independent predictive factors.The use of the combination of NSAIDs and alpha-blockers versus observation multiplied times 8.21 (95%CI 3.37-20.01) the possibilities of spontaneous expulsion. CONCLUSIONS: Size of stone and medication were confirmed as independent factors for spontaneous expulsion of ureteral stones.

Factores predictivos para la expulsión de la litiasis ureteral / Prognostic factors of spontaneous expulsion in ureteral lithiasis

El tratamiento médico, la litotricia y la ureteroscopia son opciones terapéuticas para el tratamiento de la litiasis ureteral. La ureteroscopia y la litotricia son altamente resolutivas, si bien no están exentas de riesgos quirúrgicos y anestésicos. El tratamiento médico expulsivo es menos efectivo pero carece de esos riesgos. La selección de enfermos para el tratamiento médico debe ser cuidadosa, atendiendo a factores como el tamaño, la composición y la localización de la litiasis. Objetivos: Analizar retrospectivamente el papel de las características litiásicas y de la medicación (alfabloqueantes, antiinflamatorios no esteroideos [AINE] o la combinación de ambos) como factores predictivos de la expulsión de cálculos ureterales. Material y métodos: Para el estudio se encontraron disponibles 278 litiasis ureterales correspondientes a 260 enfermos. La variable principal del estudio fue el «resultado clínico» (expulsión o persistencia de la litiasis). Se analizaron la influencia de la localización, el tamaño, la composición y la medicación administrada (alfabloqueantes, AINE o la combinación de ambos) con el test de la chi cuadrado. A continuación, se llevó a cabo un análisis multivariante con un modelo de regresión logística para estudiar la influencia de cada una de las variables en presencia del resto de las covariables. Resultados: Se produjo la expulsión del 34,2% de las litiasis. La localización (uréter pelviano, odds ratio [OR]= 1,823; p=0,02), el tamaño (<5mm, OR=3,37; p<0,001) y la medicación administrada (combinación de alfabloqueantes y AINE, OR=8,70; p<0,001) resultaron factores predictivos para la expulsión. El análisis multivariante confirmó al tamaño (p=0,006) y a la medicación (p<0,001) como factores predictivos independientes. El tratamiento con una combinación de AINE y alfabloqueantes multiplica por 8,21 (intervalo de confianza del 95%: 3,37–20,01) las posibilidades de expulsión en comparación con la mera actitud expectante. Conclusiones: El tamaño del cálculo y la medicación son factores predictivos independientes para la expulsión de la litiasis ureteral (AU)

Medical treatment, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopy are therapeutic options for ureteral stones. EWSL and endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones have a high success rate. However it has surgical as well as anaesthetic risks. For many patients, a medicinal treatment without invasive procedures is an option. Watchful waiting does not always result in stone clearance and may be associated with recurrent renal colic. The study of the prognostic factors for expulsion and the medical therapy will help us to select candidates for medical expulsive treatment. Objectives: To evaluate the characteristics of the stones and the medication administered (alpha blockers, NSAIDs or a combination of both) as predictors of spontaneous passage of the stone. Material and methods: A retrospective observational study of 260 patients with 278 ureteral stones was conducted. Primary endpoint was stone expulsion. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted testing the effect of stone location, size and composition, and medication (alpha-blockers, NSAIDs, or combination) on stone clearance. Results: 34,2% of the stones studied were spontaneously eliminated. Stone location (pelvic ureter, OR= 1,823, p=0,013), size (<5mm, OR=3,37, p<0,02), and medication (combination of alpha blockers and NSAIDs, OR= 8,70, p<0.001) were predictors of spontaneous clearance. Multivariate analysis confirmed size (p=0,006) and medication (p<0,001) as independent predictive factors. The use of the combination of NSAIDs and alpha-blockers versus observation multiplied times 8,21 (95% CI 3.37–20,01) the possibilities of spontaneous expulsion. Conclusions: Size of stone and medication were confirmed as independent factors for spontaneous expulsion of ureteral stones (AU)

[Periurethral injections of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: description of the technique and bibliographic review]. / Inyecciones periuretrales de copolímero de dextranómero/ácido hialurónico como tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo en la mujer: descripción de la técnica y revision de la literatura.

OBJECTIVES: The system enables a non endoscopic, outpatient treatment of the female stress urinary incontinence. The article intends to familiarize the readers with the procedure. METHODS: We describe the technique, graphically, with all steps, and perform a bibliographic review. RESULTS: In accordance to the main clinical studies reviewed, the periurethral injection of dextranomer/ hyaluronic acid copolymer has an efficacy of near 75%, with a simple, reproducible technique with rare adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment with this type of periurethral injections may be valid as a minimally invasive treatment of the female stress urinary incontinence, because of its efficacy, tolerability and reproducibility.

Inyecciones periureterales de copolímero de dextranómero/ácido hialurónico como tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo en la mujer: descripción de la técnica y revisión de la literatura / Periuretheral injections of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: description of the technique and bibliographic review

OBJETIVO: El sistema permite un tratamiento no endoscopio y ambulatorio de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo en la mujer. En este artículo se pretende conseguir la familiarización con el procedimiento. METODOS: Descripción de la técnica de forma gráfica con los pasos correspondientes y revisión de la literatura. RESULTADO: La inyección periuretral de copolimero de dextranomero/acido hialuronico como se deduce de la revisión de los principales estudios clínicos tiene una eficacia cercana al 75% con una técnica sencilla, reproducible y con escasos efectos adversos. CONCLUSIONES: El tratamiento con este tipo de inyecciones periuretrales puede ser válido como manejo minimamente invasivo de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo, por su eficacia, tolerabilidad y reproducibilidad

OBJECTIVES: The system enables a non endoscopic, outpatient treatment of the female stress urinary incontinence. The article intends to familiarize the readers with the procedure. METHODS: We describe the technique, graphically, with all steps, and perform a bibliographic review. RESULTS: In accordance to the main clinical studies reviewed, the periurethral injection of dextranomer/ hyaluronic acid copolymer has an efficacy of near 75%, with a simple, reproducible technique with rare adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment with this type of periurethral injections may be valid as a minimally invasive treatment of the female stress urinary incontinence, because of its efficacy, tolerability and reproducibility