Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 45(9): 516-531, Diciembre 2021. graf, tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-224313

RESUMO

Objective: The “Open Lung Approach” (OLA), that includes high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure coupled with limited tidal volumes, is considered optimal for adult patients with ARDS. However, many previous meta-analyses have shown only marginal benefits of OLA on mortality but with statistical heterogeneity. It is crucial to identify the most likely moderators of this effect. To determine the effect of OLA strategy on mortality of ventilated ARDS patients. We hypothesized that the degree of recruitment achieved in the control group (PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 3 of ventilation), and the difference in Mechanical Power (MP) or Driving Pressure (DP) between experimental and control groups will be the most likely sources of heterogeneity. Design: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO database. We searched only for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). GRADE guidelines were used for rating the quality of evidence. Publication bias was assessed. For the Meta-analysis, we used a Random Effects Model. Sources of heterogeneity were explored with Meta-Regression, using a priori proposed set of possible moderators. For model comparison, Akaike's Information Criterion with the finite sample correction (AICc) was used. Patients: Fourteen RCTs were included in the study. Results: Evidence of publication bias was detected, and quality of evidence was downgraded. Pooled analysis did not show a significant difference in the 28-day mortality between OLA strategy and control groups. Overall risk of bias was low. The analysis detected statistical heterogeneity. The two “best” explicative meta-regression models were those that used control PaO2/FiO2 on day 3 and difference in MP between experimental and control groups. The DP and MP models were highly correlated. Conclusions: There is no clear benefit of OLA strategy on mortality of ARDS patients, with significant heterogeneity among RCTs. ... (AU)


Objetivo: La Estrategia Open Lung (EOL), que incluye niveles elevados de presión positiva teleespiratoria junto con volumen corriente bajo, es considerada como el «patrón oro» para los pacientes adultos con SDRA. Sin embargo, varios metaanálisis previos han mostrado únicamente beneficios marginales de la EOL en la disminución de la mortalidad, aunque con gran heterogeneidad estadística. Es crucial identificar los moderadores más probables, así como determinar el efecto de la estrategia EOL en la mortalidad de los pacientes ventilados con SDRA. La hipótesis fue que el grado de reclutamiento alcanzado en el grupo control (cociente PaO2/FiO2 en el día3 de ventilación) y la diferencia en potencia mecánica (MP) o driving pressure (DP) entre el grupo experimental y el grupo control son la fuente más probable de heterogeneidad. Diseño Se realizó una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de acuerdo con la declaración PRISMA, y se registró en la base de datos PROSPERO (N.° CRD42020179778). Se seleccionaron únicamente ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA). Se estratificó la calidad de la evidencia de acuerdo con la metodología GRADE. Se evaluó el sesgo de publicación. Para el metaanálisis se utilizó el modelo de efectos aleatorios. Se exploraron las fuentes de heterogeneidad mediante metarregresión utilizando a priori un conjunto establecido de posibles moderadores. Para el modelo de comparación se utilizó el criterio de información de Akaike con la corrección para muestras pequeñas (AICc). Pacientes Se incluyeron 14 ECA en el estudio. Resultados Se detectó un sesgo de publicación, y la calidad fue degradada. El análisis combinado no mostró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la mortalidad en el día28 entre la estrategia EOL y los grupos control. El riesgo total de sesgo fue bajo. El análisis detectó heterogeneidad estadística. ... (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Adulto , Medidas de Volume Pulmonar , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Oxigênio , Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Viés de Publicação , Artéria Pulmonar
2.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 45(9): 516-531, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34839883

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The "Open Lung Approach" (OLA), that includes high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure coupled with limited tidal volumes, is considered optimal for adult patients with ARDS. However, many previous meta-analyses have shown only marginal benefits of OLA on mortality but with statistical heterogeneity. It is crucial to identify the most likely moderators of this effect. To determine the effect of OLA strategy on mortality of ventilated ARDS patients. We hypothesized that the degree of recruitment achieved in the control group (PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 3 of ventilation), and the difference in Mechanical Power (MP) or Driving Pressure (DP) between experimental and control groups will be the most likely sources of heterogeneity. DESIGN: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO database. We searched only for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). GRADE guidelines were used for rating the quality of evidence. Publication bias was assessed. For the Meta-analysis, we used a Random Effects Model. Sources of heterogeneity were explored with Meta-Regression, using a priori proposed set of possible moderators. For model comparison, Akaike's Information Criterion with the finite sample correction (AICc) was used. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: Fourteen RCTs were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Not applicable. RESULTS: Evidence of publication bias was detected, and quality of evidence was downgraded. Pooled analysis did not show a significant difference in the 28-day mortality between OLA strategy and control groups. Overall risk of bias was low. The analysis detected statistical heterogeneity. The two "best" explicative meta-regression models were those that used control PaO2/FiO2 on day 3 and difference in MP between experimental and control groups. The DP and MP models were highly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear benefit of OLA strategy on mortality of ARDS patients, with significant heterogeneity among RCTs. Mortality effect of OLA is mediated by lung recruitment and mechanical power.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Adulto , Humanos , Pulmão , Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Tórax , Volume de Ventilação Pulmonar
3.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34103170

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The "Open Lung Approach" (OLA), that includes high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure coupled with limited tidal volumes, is considered optimal for adult patients with ARDS. However, many previous meta-analyses have shown only marginal benefits of OLA on mortality but with statistical heterogeneity. It is crucial to identify the most likely moderators of this effect. To determine the effect of OLA strategy on mortality of ventilated ARDS patients. We hypothesized that the degree of recruitment achieved in the control group (PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 3 of ventilation), and the difference in Mechanical Power (MP) or Driving Pressure (DP) between experimental and control groups will be the most likely sources of heterogeneity. DESIGN: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO database. We searched only for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). GRADE guidelines were used for rating the quality of evidence. Publication bias was assessed. For the Meta-analysis, we used a Random Effects Model. Sources of heterogeneity were explored with Meta-Regression, using a priori proposed set of possible moderators. For model comparison, Akaike's Information Criterion with the finite sample correction (AICc) was used. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: Fourteen RCTs were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Not applicable. RESULTS: Evidence of publication bias was detected, and quality of evidence was downgraded. Pooled analysis did not show a significant difference in the 28-day mortality between OLA strategy and control groups. Overall risk of bias was low. The analysis detected statistical heterogeneity. The two "best" explicative meta-regression models were those that used control PaO2/FiO2 on day 3 and difference in MP between experimental and control groups. The DP and MP models were highly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear benefit of OLA strategy on mortality of ARDS patients, with significant heterogeneity among RCTs. Mortality effect of OLA is mediated by lung recruitment and mechanical power.

4.
Rev. esp. pediatr. (Ed. impr.) ; 67(5): 247-250, sept.-oct. 2011.
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-101713

RESUMO

Introducción. Las bronquiectasias siguen siendo un problema en nuestro medio por su morbilidad y falta de consenso en su manejo. Objetivo: valorar la evolución a largo plazo de nuestros casos. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo y descriptivo de los pacientes afectos de bronquiectasias, excluidos los de fibrosis quística. Resultados. Se estudiaron 40 pacientes. Veintidós eran de sexo masculino. La edad media al comienzo de la sintomatología fue de 5 años y 6 meses (rango 6 meses – 14 años y 6 meses). Las bronquiectasias se diagnosticaron con una media de 19 meses después del inicio de su sintomatología (rango 6 m- 4 a). La mayoría (95%) debutó como neumonía, 10 de ellos con atelectasia. Tres por cuerpo extraño intrabronquial. El tratamiento se basaba en prevenir y tratar las exacerbaciones con ciclos de antibioticoterapia y fisioterapia respiratoria. En la evolución a largo plazo, 10 (25%) pacientes fueron lobectomizados. Nuevo de 28 bronquiectasias cilíndricas curaron clínica y radiológicamente, dieciséis se mantenían estables y 3 empeoraron. Conclusión. El diagnóstico precoz de las bronquiectasias, en su forma cilíndrica, y su tratamiento adecuado, es capaz de frenar la progresión de la enfermedad y, en algunos casos, revertir el proceso y curarse (AU)


Introduction. Bronchiectasis remains a problem in our environment due to its morbidity and lack of consensus in their management. Objective: understand the long-term outcome of our cases. Patients and methods. Retrospective analysis of patients suffering from bronchiectasis, excluding those of cystic fibrosis. Results. 40 patients were studied. Twenty-two were male. The mean age at the onset of symptoms was 5 years and 6 months (range 6m – 14y6m). Bronchiectasis was diagnosed with an average of 19 months later (range 6m-4y). Most (95%) debuted as pneumonia, 10 of them with atelectasis. Three due to intrabronchial foreign body. The treatment was based on preventing and treating exacerbations with cycles of chemotherapy and chest physiotherapy. In the long-term outcome 10 (25%) patients were lobectomized. Nine of 28 cylindrical bronchiectasis, clinically and radiologicaly cured, sixteen remained stable and 3 worsened. Conclusion. Early diagnosis of bronchiectasis, with cylindrical form and proper treatment can slow the progression of the disease and, in some cases, reverse the process and heal (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Bronquiectasia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Atelectasia Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Progressão da Doença , Migração de Corpo Estranho/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Pneumonectomia , Recidiva , Diagnóstico Precoce
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA