Sepsis urinaria tras tratamiento endourológico de la litiasis por ureterorrenoscopia / Urinary sepsis after endourological ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lithiasis

Objetivo: Evaluar la incidencia, presentación clínica y factores asociados al desarrollo de sepsis urinaria tras la realización de una ureterorrenoscopia. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de los pacientes intervenidos mediante ureterorrenoscopia para el tratamiento de la litiasis entre julio de 2015 y octubre de 2017. Se identificaron aquellos pacientes que desarrollaron sepsis urinaria en los primeros 30 días tras la intervención. Se recogieron antecedentes personales, clínicos, quirúrgicos y microbiológicos. Se realizó análisis estadístico mediante chi2 (o test exacto de Fisher), t de Student (o U de Mann-Whitney) o regresión logística según procediese. Resultados: Se realizaron 246 ureterorrenoscopias, 184 (74,8%) sobre litiasis ureterales y 62 (25,2%) sobre litiasis renales, con una edad media de 52 (44,5-59,5) años. Tras el procedimiento, 18 (7,3%) pacientes desarrollaron sepsis urinaria, 10 de ellos (55,5%) en las primeras 24h. El urocultivo mostró enterobacterias (61,1%) y enterococos (38,9%). El antibiograma mostró mayor sensibilidad a nitrofurantoínas (100%) y a quinolonas (72%). El análisis estadístico mostró que el sexo femenino, el inicio clínico de la litiasis en forma de sepsis urinaria, haber recibido antibiótico o haber precisado derivación urinaria mediante doble J en el inicio, el urocultivo prequirúrgico positivo y la persistencia de restos litiásicos tras la cirugía se asociaron de forma significativa (p<0,05) al desarrollo de sepsis urinaria tras la ureterorrenoscopia. Conclusión: La sepsis urinaria es una complicación que aparece tras la realización de una ureterorrenoscopia, especialmente en pacientes de sexo femenino, con antecedente de sepsis urinaria, antibioterapia, doble J, urocultivo previo positivo o presencia de restos litiásicos tras el procedimiento

Objective: To evaluate the incidence, clinical presentation and factors associated with the development of urinary sepsis after performing ureterorenoscopy. Material and methods: Retrospective study of patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lithiasis between July 2015 and October 2017. Patients who developed urinary sepsis during the 30 days following the intervention were identified. Personal, clinical, surgical and microbiological backgrounds were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with the Chi squared test (or Fisher's exact test), Student's t (or U Mann-Whitney) or logistic regression as appropriate. Results: 246 ureterorenoscopies were performed, 184 (74.8%) on ureteral stones and 62 (25.2%) on kidney stones, with a mean age of 52 (44.5-59.5) years. After procedure, 18 (7.3%) patients developed urinary sepsis, 10 of them (55.5%) occurred in the first 24h. The urine culture showed enterobacteria (61.1%) and enterococci (38.9%). The antibiogram showed greater sensitivity to nitrofurantoins (100%) and quinolones (72%). The statistical analysis showed that female sex, the clinical debut of urolithiasis as urinary sepsis, having received antibiotic or having required urinary diversion by a double J during debut, positive presurgical uroculture and the persistence of residual lithiasis after surgery were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with the development of urinary sepsis after ureterorenoscopy. Conclusion: Urinary sepsis is a complication that appears after performing ureterorenoscopy, especially in female patients with a history of urinary sepsis, antibiotic therapy, double J, previous positive urine culture or residual lithiasis after the procedure

Urinary sepsis after endourological ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lithiasis. / Sepsis urinaria tras tratamiento endourológico de la litiasis por ureterorrenoscopia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence, clinical presentation and factors associated with the development of urinary sepsis after performing ureterorenoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lithiasis between July 2015 and October 2017. Patients who developed urinary sepsis during the 30 days following the intervention were identified. Personal, clinical, surgical and microbiological backgrounds were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with the Chi squared test (or Fisher's exact test), Student's t (or U Mann-Whitney) or logistic regression as appropriate. RESULTS: 246 ureterorenoscopies were performed, 184 (74.8%) on ureteral stones and 62 (25.2%) on kidney stones, with a mean age of 52 (44.5-59.5) years. After procedure, 18 (7.3%) patients developed urinary sepsis, 10 of them (55.5%) occurred in the first 24h. The urine culture showed enterobacteria (61.1%) and enterococci (38.9%). The antibiogram showed greater sensitivity to nitrofurantoins (100%) and quinolones (72%). The statistical analysis showed that female sex, the clinical debut of urolithiasis as urinary sepsis, having received antibiotic or having required urinary diversion by a double J during debut, positive presurgical uroculture and the persistence of residual lithiasis after surgery were significantly associated (P<.05) with the development of urinary sepsis after ureterorenoscopy. CONCLUSION: Urinary sepsis is a complication that appears after performing ureterorenoscopy, especially in female patients with a history of urinary sepsis, antibiotic therapy, double J, previous positive urine culture or residual lithiasis after the procedure.

Experience With Hypothermic Machine Perfusion in Expanded Criteria Donors: Functional Outcomes.

Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) decreases delayed graft function (DGF) and improves 1-year graft survival in expanded criteria donors (ECDs). Time of HMP could be associated with incidence of DGF. OBJECTIVE: To analyze functional outcomes of ECD grafts preserved totally (local grafts) or partially (imported grafts) with HMP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected data from a cohort of first ECD graft receptors, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. A total of 119 imported and 74 local grafts were included. Local ECD kidneys were preserved with HMP after retrieval. Imported ECD kidneys were preserved with simple cold storage and HMP. Vascular thrombosis, acute rejection, DGF, 1-year glomerular filtration rate, and 1-year graft survival were assessed. Univariate and estimative multivariate logistic regression was applied for analysis of DGF. A Cox proportional hazards model was applied to estimate graft survival. RESULTS: DGF occurred in 14 recipients of local grafts and in 33 recipients of imported grafts (28.0 vs 18.1%, P = .13); 1-year graft survival was better in the group of local grafts (80.3 vs 91.9%, P = .03). No differences in vascular thrombosis (5.9 vs 5.4%, P = .88), acute rejection (12.3 vs 9.8%, P = .91), or 1-year glomerular filtration rate (41.2 vs 40.5 mL/m/1.73m2, P = .87) were observed. In multivariate analysis, adjusted odds ratio for DGF was 1.20 (P = .79) and adjusted hazard ratio for graft survival was 1.93 (P = .31). CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend that complete HMP reduces the risk of DGF and improves 1-year graft survival in ECD kidneys.

Comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of 2 and 3cm renal lithiasis. / Comparación entre nefrolitotomía percutánea y ureteroscopia flexible para el tratamiento de litiasis renales de entre 2 y 3cm.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES: The first-line treatment for >2cm lithiasis is percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), leaving flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) as a second option. In the present review, the stone-free rate and the complications of both techniques were evaluated in the treatment of 2-3cm stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systematic review of studies that compared both techniques. Studies that were not comparative, as well as those carried out in the pediatric population or with <2cm or>3cm stones, were excluded. Two researchers independently performed the investigation, obtaining 5 studies that made up a total of 815 patients: 252 belonged to the fURS group and 563 to the PNL group. Four studies were retrospective, and one was non-randomized prospective. RESULTS: Stone-free rate ranged between 47.0% and 95.0% for the fURS and between 87.0% and 100% for the PNL. The complication rate was 8.8-29.0% in the fURS and 11.9-27.0% in the PNL. fURS required a greater number of procedures, and had a lower decrease in haemoglobin and creatinine rise compared to PNL. CONCLUSIONS: The stone-free rate was higher for PNL, although the fURS could reach comparable results at the expense of performing several procedures. Both techniques have a similar frequency of complications, but the PNL has more postsurgical analytical alterations.