Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species and Type 1 Diabetes.

SIGNIFICANCE: The complex etiology of type 1 diabetes (T1D) is the outcome of failures in regulating immunity in combination with beta cell perturbations. Mitochondrial dysfunction in beta cells and immune cells may be involved in T1D pathogenesis. Mitochondrial energy production is essential for the major task of beta cells (the secretion of insulin in response to glucose). Mitochondria are a major site of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Under immune attack, mitochondrial ROS (mtROS) participate in beta cell damage. Similarly, T cell fate during immune responses is tightly regulated by mitochondrial physiology, morphology, and metabolism. Production of mtROS is essential for signaling in antigen-specific T cell activation. Mitochondrial dysfunction in T cells has been noted as a feature of some human autoimmune diseases. Recent Advances: Preclinical and clinical studies indicate that mitochondrial dysfunction in beta cells sensitizes these cells to immune-mediated destruction via direct or indirect mechanisms. Sensitivity of beta cells to mtROS is associated with genetic T1D risk loci in human and the T1D-prone nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse. Mitochondrial dysfunction and altered metabolism have also been observed in immune cells of NOD mice and patients with T1D. This immune cell mitochondrial dysfunction has been linked to deleterious functional changes. CRITICAL ISSUES: It remains unclear how mitochondria control T cell receptor signaling and downstream events, including calcium flux and activation of transcription factors during autoimmunity. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Mechanistic studies are needed to investigate the mitochondrial pathways involved in autoimmunity, including T1D. These studies should seek to identify the role of mitochondria in regulating innate and adaptive immune cell activity and beta cell failure.

Respiration and substrate transport rates as well as reactive oxygen species production distinguish mitochondria from brain and liver.

BACKGROUND: Aberrant mitochondrial function, including excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of human diseases. The use of mitochondrial inhibitors to ascertain the sites in the electron transport chain (ETC) resulting in altered ROS production can be an important tool. However, the response of mouse mitochondria to ETC inhibitors has not been thoroughly assessed. Here we set out to characterize the differences in phenotypic response to ETC inhibitors between the more energetically demanding brain mitochondria and less energetically demanding liver mitochondria in commonly utilized C57BL/6J mice. RESULTS: We show that in contrast to brain mitochondria, inhibiting distally within complex I or within complex III does not increase liver mitochondrial ROS production supported by complex I substrates, and liver mitochondrial ROS production supported by complex II substrates occurred primarily independent of membrane potential. Complex I, II, and III enzymatic activities and membrane potential were equivalent between liver and brain and responded to ETC. inhibitors similarly. Brain mitochondria exhibited an approximately two-fold increase in complex I and II supported respiration compared with liver mitochondria while exhibiting similar responses to inhibitors. Elevated NADH transport and heightened complex II-III coupled activity accounted for increased complex I and II supported respiration, respectively in brain mitochondria. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that important mechanistic differences exist between mouse liver and brain mitochondria and that mouse mitochondria exhibit phenotypic differences compared with mitochondria from other species.

LFER Studies Evaluating Solvent Effects on an α-Chloro-and two ß,ß,ß-Trichloro-Ethyl Chloroformate Esters.

To provide insight and to identify the occurrence of mechanistic changes in relation to variance in solvent-type, the solvent effects on the rates of solvolysis of three substrates, 2,2,2-trichloro-1,1-dimethylethyl chloroformate, 2,2,2-trichloroethyl chloroformate, and 1-chloroethyl chloroformate, are analyzed using linear free energy relationships (LFERs) such as the extended Grunwald-Winstein equation, and a similarity-based LFER model approach that is based on the solvolysis of phenyl chloroformate. At 25.0 °C, in four common solvents, the α-chloroethyl chloroformate was found to react considerably faster than the two ß,ß,ß-trichloro-substituted analogs. This immense rate enhancement can be directly related to the proximity of the electron-withdrawing α-chlorine atom to the carbonyl carbon reaction center. In the thirteen solvents studied, 1-chloroethyl chloroformate was found to strictly follow a carbonyl addition process, with the addition-step being rate-determining. For the two ß,ß,ß-trichloro-substrates, in aqueous mixtures that are very rich in a fluoroalcohol component, there is compelling evidence for the occurrence of side-by-side addition-elimination and ionization mechanisms, with the ionization pathway being predominant. The presence of the two methyl groups on the α-carbon of 2,2,2-trichloro-1,1-dimethylethyl chloroformate has additive steric and stereoelectronic implications, causing its rate of reaction to be significantly slower than that of 2,2,2-trichloroethyl chloroformate.

Use of Linear Free Energy Relationships (LFERs) to elucidate the mechanisms of reaction of a γ-methyl-ß-alkynyl and an ortho-substituted aryl chloroformate ester.

The specific rates of solvolysis of 2-butyn-1-yl-chloroformate (1) and 2-methoxyphenyl chloroformate (2) are studied at 25.0 °C in a series of binary aqueousorganic mixtures. The rates of reaction obtained are then analyzed using the extended Grunwald-Winstein (G-W) equation and the results are compared to previously published G-W analyses for phenyl chloroformate (3), propargyl chloroformate (4), p-methoxyphenyl choroformate (5), and p-nitrophenyl chloroformate (6). For 1, the results indicate that dual side-by-side addition-elimination and ionization pathways are occurring in some highly ionizing solvents due to the presence of the electron-donating γ-methyl group. For 2, the analyses indicate that the dominant mechanism is a bimolecular one where the formation of a tetrahedral intermediate is rate-determining.