Allergy to cypress and olive pollen: Clinical phenotypes and allergen recognition.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cypress and olive pollen are the most prevalent sensitizer trees in the Mediterranean area. Some patients exhibit a dual sensitization which has not been well documented yet. To identify the allergens involved in the dual cypress and olive allergy (C+O) and study the relationship between phenotype and allergen sensitization. METHODS: C+O patients were selected. Monosensitized subjects to olive or cypress were used as reference. Specific IgE to whole extracts and purified allergens from olive and cypress were performed. Immunoblotting was done to analyze IgG and IgE-binding using olive polyclonal antibodies and patients' sera, respectively. Mutual immunoblotting inhibition of olive and cypress extracts, and inhibition of cypress extract immunoblotting with olive allergens were performed. Multiple correspondence analysis and hierarchical cluster classifications were conducted to analyze the relationships between C+O clinical presentation (symptoms, seasonality) and allergen profile. RESULTS: C+O patients were clustered in 4 phenotypes. The most frequent one (58.4%) was rhinoconjunctivitis in winter (February) and spring (May), with asthma in 38% of subjects. Ole e 1 and Cup s 1 were the major allergens. Homologous proteins to Ole e 1, Ole e 9 and Ole e 11 in cypress pollen were identified and these olive allergens inhibit IgE-binding to cypress extract. CONCLUSIONS: The exclusive C+O allergy results from co-sensitization to Cup s 1 and Ole e 1, and to cross-reactivity due to Ole e 1-like, Ole e 9-like and Ole e 11-like allergens not described previously, and translates into 4 clinical phenotypes of winter and/or spring or perennial rhinoconjunctivitis with and without asthma.

A European-Japanese study on peach allergy: IgE to Pru p 7 associates with severity.

BACKGROUND: Pru p 3 and Pru p 7 have been implicated as risk factors for severe peach allergy. This study aimed to establish sensitization patterns to five peach components across Europe and in Japan, to explore their relation to pollen and foods and to predict symptom severity. METHODS: In twelve European (EuroPrevall project) and one Japanese outpatient clinic, a standardized clinical evaluation was conducted in 1231 patients who reported symptoms to peach and/or were sensitized to peach. Specific IgE against Pru p 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 and against Cup s 7 was measured in 474 of them. Univariable and multivariable Lasso regression was applied to identify combinations of parameters predicting severity. RESULTS: Sensitization to Pru p 3 dominated in Southern Europe but was also quite common in Northern and Central Europe. Sensitization to Pru p 7 was low and variable in the European centers but very dominant in Japan. Severity could be predicted by a model combining age of onset of peach allergy, probable mugwort, Parietaria pollen and latex allergy, and sensitization to Japanese cedar pollen, Pru p 4 and Pru p 7 which resulted in an AUC of 0.73 (95% CI 0.73-0.74). Pru p 3 tended to be a risk factor in South Europe only. CONCLUSIONS: Pru p 7 was confirmed as a significant risk factor for severe peach allergy in Europe and Japan. Combining outcomes from clinical and demographic background with serology resulted in a model that could better predict severity than CRD alone.

Deconstructing adverse reactions to Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid: the importance of time of onset.

BACKGROUND: Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AX-CL) is the most consumed betalactam antibiotic worldwide. We aimed to establish the different phenotypes of betalactam allergy in those referring a reaction with AX-CL and to investigate the differences between immediate and non-immediate onset. METHODS: Cross-sectional retrospective study performed at Hospital Clínico San Carlos (HCSC) and Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (HRUM) in Spain. Patients reporting reactions with AX-CL who completed the allergy workup between 2017 and 2019 were included. Data of reported reaction and allergy workup were collected. Reactions were classified as immediate and non-immediate with 1hour cut-off point. RESULTS: We included 372 patients (HCSC 208, HRUM 164). There were 90 (24.2%) immediate, 252 (67.7%) non-immediate reactions, and 30 (8.1%) with unknown latency. Allergy to betalactams was ruled-out in 266 (71.5%) and confirmed in 106 patients (28.5%). The final main diagnosis in the overall population were allergy to aminopenicillins (7.3%), to CL (7%), to penicillin (6.5%) and to betalactams (5.9%). Allergy was confirmed in 77.2% and 14.3% of immediate and non-immediate reactions respectively, with a relative risk of 5.06 (95%CI 3.64-7.02) of an allergy diagnosis in those reporting immediate reactions. Only 2/54 patients with late-positive intradermal test (IDT) to CL were diagnosed of CL allergy. CONCLUSION: Allergy diagnosis was confirmed in a minority of the whole study population, but 5 times more frequently in those reporting immediate reactions, making this classification useful in risk stratification. Late-positive IDT for CL has no diagnostic value and its late reading could be retrieved from the diagnosis work-up.

Association Between the Seed Storage Proteins 2S Albumin and 11S Globulin and Severe Allergic Reaction After Flaxseed Intake.

BACKGROUND: Given the increased popularity of flaxseed in meals, several cases of allergy to these seeds have been reported. Little is known about the allergens implicated in hypersensitivity reactions to flaxseed. The present study aimed to identify the allergens involved in IgE-mediated reactions in 5 patients with a clinical history of severe systemic symptoms after flaxseed consumption. METHODS: Proteins that were potential allergens with IgE-binding capacity were purified from flaxseed extract using chromatography and identified via MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Immunoassays were performed using the 5 allergic patients' sera tested individually and as a pool. RESULTS: Immunoblotting of the flaxseed extract revealed a low-molecular-mass protein (around 13 kDa) in 4 of the 5 patients, while a protein of approximately 55 kDa was detected in 2 patients. The proteins were identified by mass spectrometry as flaxseed 2S albumin, which is included in the WHO/IUIS allergen nomenclature as Lin u 1, and 11S globulin. Inhibition assays revealed in vitro IgE-mediated cross-reactivity between Lin u 1 and peanut and cashew nut proteins, while IgE-mediated recognition of 11S globulin by patients' sera was partially inhibited by several plant-derived sources. CONCLUSIONS: Seed storage proteins from flaxseed were involved in the development of severe symptoms in the 5 patients studied and exhibited cross-reactivity with other allergenic sources. Besides the severity of flaxseed allergy in patients sensitized to 2S albumin, this is the first time that 11S globulin has been identified as a potential allergen. Taking these data into account should ensure a more accurate diagnosis.

Association Between the Seed Storage Proteins 2S Albumin and 11S Globulin and Severe Allergic Reaction After Flaxseed Intake

Background: Given the increased popularity of flaxseed in meals, several cases of allergy to these seeds have been reported. Little is known about the allergens implicated in hypersensitivity reactions to flaxseed. The present study aimed to identify the allergens involved in IgE-mediated reactions in 5 patients with a clinical history of severe systemic symptoms after flaxseed consumption. Methods: Proteins that were potential allergens with IgE-binding capacity were purified from flaxseed extract using chromatography and identified via MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Immunoassays were performed using the 5 allergic patients’ sera tested individually and as a pool. Results: Immunoblotting of the flaxseed extract revealed a low-molecular-mass protein (around 13 kDa) in 4 of the 5 patients, while a protein of approximately 55 kDa was detected in 2 patients. The proteins were identified by mass spectrometry as flaxseed 2S albumin, which is included in the WHO/IUIS allergen nomenclature as Lin u 1, and 11S globulin. Inhibition assays revealed in vitro IgE-mediated cross-reactivity between Lin u 1 and peanut and cashew nut proteins, while IgE-mediated recognition of 11S globulin by patients’ sera was partially inhibited by several plant-derived sources. Conclusions: Seed storage proteins from flaxseed were involved in the development of severe symptoms in the 5 patients studied and exhibited cross-reactivity with other allergenic sources. Besides the severity of flaxseed allergy in patients sensitized to 2S albumin, this is the first time that 11S globulin has been identified as a potential allergen. Taking these data into account should ensure a more accurate diagnosis. (AU)

Antecedentes: Dada la creciente popularidad de la linaza en las comidas, se han notificado varios casos de alergia a estas semillas. La información acerca de los alérgenos implicados en las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a estas semillas es escasa. El presente trabajo pretende identificar los alérgenos implicados en las reacciones mediadas por IgE en cinco pacientes con una historia clínica de síntomas sistémicos graves tras el consumo de linaza. Métodos: Las proteínas susceptibles de ser alérgenos con capacidad de unir IgE se purificaron a partir del extracto de linaza mediante técnicas cromatográficas. Su identificación se realizó mediante espectrometría de masas MALDI-TOF. Se realizaron inmunoensayos con los sueros de los cinco pacientes alérgicos, utilizados de forma individual o como mezclas. Resultados: Cuatro de los cinco pacientes reconocieron una proteína de baja masa molecular (alrededor de 13 kDa) en inmunoensayos con extracto de linaza, mientras que dos pacientes reconocieron una proteína de aproximadamente 55 kDa. Se identificaron por espectrometría de masas como albúmina 2S de linaza, incluida en la nomenclatura de alérgenos de la OMS/IUIS como Lin u 1, y globulina 11S, respectivamente. Los ensayos de inhibición in vitro revelaron la existencia de reactividad cruzada de la Lin u 1 con las proteínas del cacahuete y del anacardo, mientras que el reconocimiento por parte de la IgE de la globulina 11S por parte de los sueros de los pacientes fue parcialmente inhibido por varias fuentes vegetales. Conclusiones: Las proteínas de almacenamiento de las semillas de lino estaban implicadas en el desarrollo de síntomas graves en cinco individuos y mostraron una reactividad cruzada con otras fuentes alergénicas. Además de la gravedad de la alergia a la linaza en los pacientes sensibilizados a la albúmina 2S, es la primera vez que se identifica la globulina 11S como un alérgeno potencial.

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Cancer Chemotherapy: Practical Recommendations of ARADyAL for Diagnosis and Desensitization.

Rapid drug desensitization has enabled first-line therapies in patients with drug hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs including monoclonal antibodies. Desensitization is a safe and highly effective procedure, not only for IgE-mediated reactions, but also for those mediated by non-IgE mechanisms. The likelihood of breakthrough reactions during desensitization is low, and most are mild; in fact, moderate-to-severe reactions are infrequent. In this document, 16 allergy departments belonging to the Spanish research network ARADyAL present a review of the available scientific evidence and provide general guidelines for the diagnosis and management of drug hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs and monoclonal antibodies. Emphasis is placed on the desensitization procedure.

ARADyAL: The Spanish Multidisciplinary Research Network for Allergic Diseases.

Thematic cooperative health research networks (RETICS) are organizational structures promoted by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III of the Spanish Ministry of Science with the objective of carrying out cooperative research projects addressing challenges of general interest for society as a whole in the field of health care. The RETICS of Asthma, Adverse Drug Reactions, and Allergy (ARADyAL) received funding in 2016 for a 5-year program (2017-2021). ARADyAL integrates basic and clinical research in the areas of allergy, immunology, genetics, nanomedicine, pharmacology, and chemistry, with special interest in research on new biomarkers and the design and evaluation of new interventions for allergic patients with severe phenotypes. The consortium comprises 28 groups across Spain, including 171 clinical and basic researchers, 17 clinical groups that cover more than 10 000 000 patients of all ages from urban and rural areas and 11 basic groups active mostly at universities and research institutes. ARADyAL has proposed a research program organized into 3 different areas focusing on precision medicine, as follows: Program 1, Mechanisms and prediction of adverse drug reactions and allergic diseases; Program 2, Toward a precise diagnosis of allergic diseases; and Program 3, Predicting interventions in allergic diseases. There is also 1 common program dedicated to training. The network has a Steering Committee and an External Advisory Scientific Committee, which advise the global network coordinator, who has recognized expertise in the field. ARADyAL is a unique meeting point for clinicians and basic scientists who are already working in allergy.

Shortened Up-Dosing With 7 Injections of Subcutaneous Allergy Immunotherapy (Alutard SQ) Is Safe and Well Tolerated

No disponible

ARADyAL: The Spanish Multidisciplinary Research Network for Allergic Diseases

Thematic cooperative health research networks (RETICS) are organizational structures promoted by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III of the Spanish Ministry of Science with the objective of carrying out cooperative research projects addressing challenges of general interest for society as a whole in the field of health care. The RETICS of Asthma, Adverse Drug Reactions, and Allergy (ARADyAL) received funding in 2016 for a 5-year program (2017-2021). ARADyAL integrates basic and clinical research in the areas of allergy, immunology, genetics, nanomedicine, pharmacology, and chemistry, with special interest in research on new biomarkers and the design and evaluation of new interventions for allergic patients with severe phenotypes. The consortium comprises 28 groups across Spain, including 171 clinical and basic researchers, 17 clinical groups that cover more than 10 000 000 patients of all ages from urban and rural areas and 11 basic groups active mostly at universities and research institutes. ARADyAL has proposed a research program organized into 3 different areas focusing on precision medicine, as follows: Program 1, Mechanisms and prediction of adverse drug reactions and allergic diseases; Program 2, Toward a precise diagnosis of allergic diseases; and Program 3, Predicting interventions in allergic diseases. There is also 1 common program dedicated to training. The network has a Steering Committee and an External Advisory Scientific Committee, which advise the global network coordinator, who has recognized expertise in the field. ARADyAL is a unique meeting point for clinicians and basic scientists who are already working in allergy. (AU)

Las Redes Temáticas de Investigación Cooperativa en Salud (RETICS) son unas estructuras organizativas promovidas por el Instituto de Salud Carlos III del Ministerio de e Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social con el objetivo de llevar a cabo proyectos de investigación colaborativos que aborden desafíos de interés general para la sociedad en el campo de la salud. La RETICS de Asma, Reacciones Adversas a Fármacos y Alérgicas (ARADyAL) comenzó en 2016 y fue financiada por un periodo de 5 años (2017-2021). ARADyAL integra la investigación básica y clínica en diferentes áreas de conocimiento, alergia, inmunología, genética, nanomedicina, farmacología y química, con especial interés en la investigación de nuevos biomarcadores, y el diseño y evaluación de nuevas estrategias de intervención para pacientes alérgicos con fenotipos graves. El consorcio está compuesto por 28 grupos de toda España, que incluyen 171 investigadores clínicos y básicos: 17 grupos clínicos que cubren a más de 10.000.000 de pacientes de todas las edades y de áreas tanto urbanas como rurales; 11 grupos básicos que desarrollan sus actividades principalmente en universidades e institutos de investigación. ARADyAL propone un programa de investigación organizado en tres áreas diferentes centradas en la medicina de precisión: Programa 1. Mecanismos y predicción de reacciones adversas a medicamentos y enfermedades alérgicas; Programa 2. Hacia un diagnóstico preciso de enfermedades alérgicas; y Programa 3. Predicción de intervenciones en enfermedades alérgicas. Además, hay un programa transversal dedicado a la formación. La red cuenta con un Comité de Dirección y un Comité Científico Asesor Externo, que asesoran a la coordinadora de la red la cual tiene experiencia reconocida en el campo. ARADyAL es un punto de encuentro único para médicos y científicos básicos que ya están trabajando en alergias.

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Cancer Chemotherapy: Practical Recommendations of ARADyAL for Diagnosis and Desensitization

Rapid drug desensitization has enabled first-line therapies in patients with drug hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs including monoclonal antibodies. Desensitization is a safe and highly effective procedure, not only for IgE-mediated reactions, but also for those mediated by non-IgE mechanisms. The likelihood of breakthrough reactions during desensitization is low, and most are mild; in fact, moderate-to-severe reactions are infrequent. In this document, 16 allergy departments belonging to the Spanish research network ARADyAL present a review of the available scientific evidence and provide general guidelines for the diagnosis and management of drug hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs and monoclonal antibodies. Emphasis is placed on the desensitization procedure (AU)

La desensibilización a medicamentos ha permitido la administración de fármacos de primera línea en pacientes con reacciones dehipersensibilidad (RH) a quimioterápicos (QT), incluyendo los anticuerpos monoclonales (AcM). La desensibilización es un procedimientoseguro y altamente efectivo, no únicamente para las reacciones mediadas por IgE sino también para aquellas relacionadas con un mecanismoindependiente de IgE. El riesgo de reacciones durante la desensibilización es bajo y frecuentemente las reacciones observadas son leves,considerándose infrecuentes las reacciones moderadas o graves.En este documento, dieciséis Servicios de Alergia pertenecientes a la red española de investigación ARADyAL presentan una revisiónde la evidencia científica disponible y sugieren unas pautas de actuación generales para el diagnóstico y manejo de las RH a QT y AcM,centrándose en el proceso de desensibilización (AU)

The urgent need for a harmonized severity scoring system for acute allergic reactions.

The accurate assessment and communication of the severity of acute allergic reactions are important to patients, clinicians, researchers, the food industry, and public health and regulatory authorities. Severity has different meanings to different stakeholders with patients and clinicians rating the significance of particular symptoms very differently. Many severity scoring systems have been generated, most focusing on the severity of reactions following exposure to a limited group of allergens. They are heterogeneous in format, none has used an accepted developmental approach, and none has been validated. Their wide range of outcome formats has led to difficulties with interpretation and application. Therefore, there is a persisting need for an appropriately developed and validated severity scoring system for allergic reactions that work across the range of allergenic triggers and address the needs of different stakeholder groups. We propose a novel approach to develop and then validate a harmonized scoring system for acute allergic reactions, based on a data-driven method that is informed by clinical and patient experience and other stakeholders' perspectives. We envisage two formats: (i) a numerical score giving a continuum from mild to severe reactions that are clinically meaningful and are useful for allergy healthcare professionals and researchers, and (ii) a three-grade-based ordinal format that is simple enough to be used and understood by other professionals and patients. Testing of reliability and validity of the new approach in a range of settings and populations will allow eventual implementation of a standardized scoring system in clinical studies and routine practice.

Factors increasing the risk for a severe reaction in anaphylaxis: An analysis of data from The European Anaphylaxis Registry.

BACKGROUND: Preventive measures to decrease the frequency and intensity of anaphylactic events are essential to provide optimal care for allergic patients. Aggravating factors may trigger or increase the severity of anaphylaxis and therefore need to be recognized and avoided. OBJECTIVE: To identify and prioritize factors associated with an increased risk of developing severe anaphylaxis. METHODS: Data from the Anaphylaxis Registry (122 centers in 11 European countries) were used in logistic regression models considering existing severity grading systems, elicitors, and symptoms to identify the relative risk of factors on the severity of anaphylaxis. RESULTS: We identified higher age and concomitant mastocytosis (OR: 3.1, CI: 2.6-3.7) as the most important predictors for an increased risk of severe anaphylaxis. Vigorous physical exercise (OR: 1.5, CI: 1.3-1.7), male sex (OR: 1.2, CI: 1.1-1.3), and psychological burden (OR: 1.4, CI: 1.2-1.6) were more often associated with severe reactions. Additionally, intake of beta-blockers (OR: 1.9, CI: 1.5-2.2) and ACE-I (OR: 1.28, CI: 1.05, 1.51) in temporal proximity to allergen exposition was identified as an important factor in logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest it may be possible to identify patients who require intensified preventive measures due to their relatively higher risk for severe anaphylaxis by considering endogenous and exogenous factors.

EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (AR) is an allergic disorder of the nose and eyes affecting about a fifth of the general population. Symptoms of AR can be controlled with allergen avoidance measures and pharmacotherapy. However, many patients continue to have ongoing symptoms and an impaired quality of life; pharmacotherapy may also induce some side-effects. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) represents the only currently available treatment that targets the underlying pathophysiology, and it may have a disease-modifying effect. Either the subcutaneous (SCIT) or sublingual (SLIT) routes may be used. This Guideline has been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology's (EAACI) Taskforce on AIT for AR and is part of the EAACI presidential project "EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy." It aims to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations and has been informed by a formal systematic review and meta-analysis. Its generation has followed the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) approach. The process included involvement of the full range of stakeholders. In general, broad evidence for the clinical efficacy of AIT for AR exists but a product-specific evaluation of evidence is recommended. In general, SCIT and SLIT are recommended for both seasonal and perennial AR for its short-term benefit. The strongest evidence for long-term benefit is documented for grass AIT (especially for the grass tablets) where long-term benefit is seen. To achieve long-term efficacy, it is recommended that a minimum of 3 years of therapy is used. Many gaps in the evidence base exist, particularly around long-term benefit and use in children.

Challenges in the implementation of EAACI guidelines on allergen immunotherapy: A global perspective on the regulation of allergen products.

Regulatory approaches for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) products and the availability of high-quality AIT products are inherently linked to each other. While allergen products are available in many countries across the globe, their regulation is very heterogeneous. First, we describe the regulatory systems applicable for AIT products in the European Union (EU) and in the United States (US). For Europe, a depiction of the different types of relevant procedures, as well as the committees involved, is provided and the fundamental role of national agencies of the EU member states in this complex and unique network is highlighted. Furthermore, the regulatory agencies from Australia, Canada, Japan, Russia, and Switzerland provided information on the system implemented in their countries for the regulation of allergen products. While AIT products are commonly classified as biological medicinal products, they are made available by varying types of procedures, most commonly either by obtaining a marketing authorization or by being distributed as named patient products. Exemptions from marketing authorizations in exceptional cases, as well as import of allergen products from other countries, are additional tools applied by countries to ensure availability of needed AIT products. Several challenges for AIT products are apparent from this analysis and will require further consideration.