Isolated 'idiopathic' micropenis: hidden genetic defects?

Micropenis is defined as a stretched penile length of less than 2-2.5SD for age. Aetiologies include hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, testicular dysgenesis, defects in testosterone synthesis, androgen resistance [5α-reductase (5αR) deficiency or partial androgen insensitivity] and other rare causes like growth hormone GH deficiency. Often, the cause remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether isolated micropenis with normal plasma testosterone could hide a molecular defect in the androgen pathway. Twenty-six boys with isolated micropenis were included in this study. All of them had 46,XY karyotype, normal luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone and a normal plasma testosterone response to human chorionic gonadotropin testing. Androgen receptor (AR), 5αR and steroidogenic factor 1 (SF1) genes were sequenced. A mutation in the AR gene was found in two patients, and a new mutation in the SF1 gene was found in one patient who was the only one to have a low level of inhibin B (InhB). This is the first report of isolated micropenis as a revealing symptom of AR and SF1 mutations. Anti-Mullerian hormone and InhB should thus be evaluated in patients with isolated micropenis, even when plasma testosterone is in the normal range. Detection of gene mutations is helpful for diagnosis, treatment and genetic counselling for probands.

Reduced charges and costs associated with outpatient autologous stem cell transplantation.

High-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue is increasingly being delivered in the outpatient setting. Such intensive outpatient management programs have reduced the total hospital length of stay without compromising clinical outcomes. However, a detailed financial analysis of outpatient programs has not been performed. These data are the results of a prospective study of 94 patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant in one of three settings: traditional inpatient, partial outpatient, total outpatient. Patients were allowed to choose their own treatment setting based upon the availability of a caregiver and personal preference. Total hospital length of stay and the actual cost and charges for each patient were monitored prospectively. The patients in the three groups were well balanced with regard to age and functional status prior to high-dose chemotherapy. The average length of stay was reduced from 17.3 to 8.2 to 2.7 days in the three different treatment settings (P < 0.01). Mean procedure costs were reduced from $39.7 thousand (US dollars) to $36.2 thousand to $29.4 thousand in the three treatment settings (P < 0.029). No differences in toxicity or overall response to therapy was noted. High-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue can be safely administered in the outpatient setting and results in significant cost savings.

Use of a modified nominal group process for improving laboratory performance in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody testing. Reaching consensus on three questions concerning HIV-1 testing.

Using expert panels of medical technologists and public health microbiologists, a modified nominal group process was used to reach a consensus on three questions concerning current human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) testing methods. The questions related to important sources of error, improving the testing process, and improving proficiency testing. The modified nominal group process proved to be effective in developing lists of errors in laboratory testing; it provided a fast, economic means of identifying possible areas for improving laboratory quality assurance and training programs. For the HIV testing model, the focus group panelists indicated laboratory pipetting errors, labeling, and specimen identification as the most important sources of error. To improve the quality of this testing, the panel recommended standardizing test interpretation and restricting testing to laboratories licensed to perform HIV-1 testing. To improve proficiency testing, the use of blind specimens and establishing minimum standards of performance were suggested.

Content and design of laboratory report forms for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody testing.

In a pilot study involving proficiency testing for human immunodeficiency virus, markedly diverse and potentially confusing test report forms were encountered among participating laboratories. Therefore, a comprehensive study of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 report forms was conducted from state-licensed testing laboratories in California. Participants analyzed three serum samples of known human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody reactivity and reported their results on forms that they would normally submit to clinicians. Report forms from 84 laboratories were evaluated for content, design, and clarity. Differences were found among commercial, hospital, and public health laboratories. The significance of these findings is discussed. This technique also may be applied to evaluate laboratory report form design and content for other diagnostic test results.

Analytic results of HIV-1 testing using blind proficiency testing.

The use of blind proficiency testing (PT) to examine analytic performance of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antibody testing. A total of 32 hospital, blood bank, public health, and commercial laboratories were included in this study. Test sera were introduced as clinical specimens for HIV-1 testing from private practitioners, group practices, clinics, and hospitals in Southern California. A total of 26 laboratories were located throughout California, with six laboratories located in six other states. Results from 306 enzyme immunoassay screening tests and 192 supplemental tests for HIV-1 were reported. Although one positive specimen was reported as indeterminate in almost 30% of results, screening and supplemental testing performances were excellent, with accuracy levels comparable to performance reported on open PT and performance evaluation surveys in the United States. The indeterminate results were attributed to the interpretive criteria used rather than to laboratory errors. Blind PT can be an important tool in improving the quality of total laboratory testing, the usefulness of laboratory results in patient care, and ultimately the health of the public.

Methods for a model blind proficiency testing system.

The method developed for establishing a blind proficiency testing (PT) system is presented. The Laboratory Assurance Program of the Graduate School of Public Health at San Diego State University is developing and pilot testing innovative strategies that will evaluate and improve the performance of clinical laboratories. To date, a total of 32 laboratories have been incorporated into this program along with 12 counseling and testing sites. From June 1988 to December 1989, five blind PT surveys for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody testing were conducted, representing 306 proficiency specimens entered into the testing system as simulated patient specimens. Despite the difficulties and expense involved, we found the system to be acceptable and to have certain advantages over conventional methods of external testing.

Identification of nonanalytic issues in HIV-1 antibody testing using blind proficiency testing.

Blind proficiency testing was used to examine nonanalytic performance indicators for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antibody testing. Physician offices, clinics, and hospitals located throughout Southern California submitted simulated patient specimens to laboratories as routine test requests. A total of 32 laboratories were involved during five blind proficiency testing surveys. Turnaround time for a reactive specimen ranged from three to 17 days. Laboratory charges for evaluating a reactive specimen varied depending on the volume of testing, prevalence of reactive specimens, and whether screening and confirmatory tests were billed separately or as a package price. Charges for an enzyme immunoassay screening test plus supplemental tests ranged from $11.75 to $114.50, with a median of $31.00 for 24 laboratories that participated in one of the five surveys. Evaluation of laboratory report content revealed that 37% of the 16 screening reports and 71% of the 14 supplemental reports contained information that was unrelated to the patient results. Evaluation of the testing system documents the need to monitor multiple outcomes of the total laboratory testing process, not just the analytic testing phase.