High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus Low PEEP During General Anesthesia for Surgery - a Bayesian individual patient data meta-analysis of three randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The influence of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications after surgery is still not definitively established. Bayesian analysis can help to gain further insights from the available data and provide a probabilistic framework that is easier to interpret. Our objective was to estimate the posterior probability that the use of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers is associated with reduced postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with intermediate-to-high risk under neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations regarding the treatment effect. METHODS: Multilevel Bayesian logistic regression analysis on individual patient data from three randomized clinical trials carried out on surgical patients at Intermediate-to-High Risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The main outcome was the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the early postoperative period. We studied the effect of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus Low PEEP Ventilation. Priors were chosen to reflect neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations of the treatment effect. RESULTS: Using a neutral, pessimistic, or optimistic prior, the posterior mean odds ratio (OR) for High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers compared to Low PEEP was 0.85 (95% Credible Interval [CrI] 0.71 to 1.02), 0.87 (0.72 to 1.04), and 0.86 (0.71 to 1.02), respectively. Regardless of prior beliefs, the posterior probability of experiencing a beneficial effect exceeded 90%. Subgroup analysis indicated a more pronounced effect in patients who underwent laparoscopy (OR: 0.67 [0.50 to 0.87]) and those at high risk for PPCs (OR: 0.80 [0.53 to 1.13]). Sensitivity analysis, considering severe postoperative pulmonary complications only or applying a different heterogeneity prior, yielded consistent results. CONCLUSION: High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers demonstrated a moderate reduction in the probability of PPC occurrence, with a high posterior probability of benefit observed consistently across various prior beliefs, particularly among patients who underwent laparoscopy.

Clinical validation of the Air-Test for the non-invasive detection of perioperative atelectasis in children.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of anesthesia-induced atelectasis in children is high and closely related to episodes of hypoxemia. The Air-Test is a simple maneuver to detect lung collapse. By a step-reduction in FiO2 to 0.21, a fall in pulse-oximetry hemoglobin saturation <97% unmasks the presence of collapse-related shunt in healthy lungs. The aim of this study was to validate the Air-Test as a diagnostic tool to detect perioperative atelectasis in children using lung ultrasound as a reference. METHODS: We first assessed the Air-Test in a retrospective cohort of 88 anesthetized children (Retrospective study) followed by a prospective study performed in 72 children (45 postconceptional weeks to 16 years old) using a similar protocol (Validation study). We analyzed the performance of the Air-Test to detect atelectasis by an operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, using lung ultrasound consolidation score as reference. RESULTS: Preoperative SpO2 was normal in both studies (retrospective 98.7±0.6%, validation 99.0±0.9%). The Air-Test, with a SpO2 cut point <97%, resulted positive in 67 patients in the retrospective study (SpO2 93.3±2.1%) and in 59 in the validation study (SpO2 94.9±1.8%); both P<0.0001. In the validation study, the Air-Test showed a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.92), specificity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.84-1) and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-1.00). AUC between both studies was similar (P=0.16). CONCLUSIONS: The Air-Test is a noninvasive and accurate method to detect atelectasis in healthy anesthetized children. It can be used as a screening tool to individualize patients that can benefit from lung recruitment maneuvers.

Effect of immediate initiation of invasive ventilation on mortality in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a target trial emulation.

PURPOSE: Invasive ventilation is a fundamental treatment in intensive care but its precise timing is difficult to determine. This study aims at assessing the effect of initiating invasive ventilation versus waiting, in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure without immediate reason for intubation on one-year mortality. METHODS: Emulation of a target trial to estimate the benefit of immediately initiating invasive ventilation in hypoxemic respiratory failure, versus waiting, among patients within the first 48-h of hypoxemia. The eligible population included non-intubated patients with SpO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 and SpO2 ≤ 97%. The target trial was emulated using a single-center database (MIMIC-IV) which contains granular information about clinical status. The hourly probability to receive mechanical ventilation was continuously estimated. The hazard ratios for the primary outcome, one-year mortality, and the secondary outcome, 30-day mortality, were estimated using weighted Cox models with stabilized inverse probability weights used to adjust for measured confounding. RESULTS: 2996 Patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria of whom 792 were intubated within 48 h. Among the non-invasive support devices, the use of oxygen through facemask was the most common (75%). Compared to patients with the same probability of intubation but who were not intubated, intubation decreased the hazard of dying for the first year after ICU admission HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.68-0.96, p = 0.018). Intubation was associated with a 30-day mortality HR of 0.80 (95% CI 0.64-0.99, p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: The initiation of mechanical ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure reduced the hazard of dying in this emulation of a target trial.

Predicting the Length of Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Disease Syndrome Using Machine Learning: The PIONEER Study.

Background: The ability to predict a long duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) by clinicians is very limited. We assessed the value of machine learning (ML) for early prediction of the duration of MV > 14 days in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: This is a development, testing, and external validation study using data from 1173 patients on MV ≥ 3 days with moderate-to-severe ARDS. We first developed and tested prediction models in 920 ARDS patients using relevant features captured at the time of moderate/severe ARDS diagnosis, at 24 h and 72 h after diagnosis with logistic regression, and Multilayer Perceptron, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest ML techniques. For external validation, we used an independent cohort of 253 patients on MV ≥ 3 days with moderate/severe ARDS. Results: A total of 441 patients (48%) from the derivation cohort (n = 920) and 100 patients (40%) from the validation cohort (n = 253) were mechanically ventilated for >14 days [median 14 days (IQR 8-25) vs. 13 days (IQR 7-21), respectively]. The best early prediction model was obtained with data collected at 72 h after moderate/severe ARDS diagnosis. Multilayer Perceptron risk modeling identified major prognostic factors for the duration of MV > 14 days, including PaO2/FiO2, PaCO2, pH, and positive end-expiratory pressure. Predictions of the duration of MV > 14 days showed modest discrimination [AUC 0.71 (95%CI 0.65-0.76)]. Conclusions: Prolonged MV duration in moderate/severe ARDS patients remains difficult to predict early even with ML techniques such as Multilayer Perceptron and using data at 72 h of diagnosis. More research is needed to identify markers for predicting the length of MV. This study was registered on 14 August 2023 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT NCT05993377).

Multidisciplinary Consensus on the Management of Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in the COVID-19 Patient.

Acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia often requires a comprehensive approach that includes non-pharmacological strategies such as non-invasive support (including positive pressure modes, high flow therapy or awake proning) in addition to oxygen therapy, with the primary goal of avoiding endotracheal intubation. Clinical issues such as determining the optimal time to initiate non-invasive support, choosing the most appropriate modality (based not only on the acute clinical picture but also on comorbidities), establishing criteria for recognition of treatment failure and strategies to follow in this setting (including palliative care), or implementing de-escalation procedures when improvement occurs are of paramount importance in the ongoing management of severe COVID-19 cases. Organizational issues, such as the most appropriate setting for management and monitoring of the severe COVID-19 patient or protective measures to prevent virus spread to healthcare workers in the presence of aerosol-generating procedures, should also be considered. While many early clinical guidelines during the pandemic were based on previous experience with acute respiratory distress syndrome, the landscape has evolved since then. Today, we have a wealth of high-quality studies that support evidence-based recommendations to address these complex issues. This document, the result of a collaborative effort between four leading scientific societies (SEDAR, SEMES, SEMICYUC, SEPAR), draws on the experience of 25 experts in the field to synthesize knowledge to address pertinent clinical questions and refine the approach to patient care in the face of the challenges posed by severe COVID-19 infection.

Comprehensive study of mechanical power in controlled mechanical ventilation: Prevalence of elevated mechanical power and component analysis / Estudio Integral de la Potencia Mecánica en la Ventilación Mecánica Controlada: Prevalencia de Potencia Mecánica Elevada y Análisis de Componentes

Objective To determine the prevalence of elevated mechanical power (MP) values (>17J/min) used in routine clinical practice. Design Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, analytical, multicenter, international study conducted on November 21, 2019, from 8:00 AM to 3:00 PM. NCT03936231. Setting One hundred thirty-three Critical Care Units. Patients Patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for any cause. Interventions None. Main variables of interest Mechanical power. Results A population of 372 patients was analyzed. PM was significantly higher in patients under pressure-controlled ventilation (PC) compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VC) (19.20±8.44J/min vs. 16.01±6.88J/min; p<0.001), but the percentage of patients with PM>17J/min was not different (41% vs. 35%, respectively; p=0.382). The best models according to AICcw expressing PM for patients in VC are described as follows: Surrogate Strain (Driving Pressure) + PEEP+Surrogate Strain Rate (PEEP/Flow Ratio) + Respiratory Rate. For patients in PC, it is defined as: Surrogate Strain (Expiratory Tidal Volume/PEEP) + PEEP+Surrogate Strain Rate (Surrogate Strain/Ti) + Respiratory Rate+Expiratory Tidal Volume+Ti. Conclusions A substantial proportion of mechanically ventilated patients may be at risk of experiencing elevated levels of mechanical power. Despite observed differences in mechanical power values between VC and PC ventilation, they did not result in a significant disparity in the prevalence of high mechanical power values. (AU)

Objetivo Determinar la prevalencia de valores elevados de potencia mecánica (PM) (>17J/min) utilizados en la práctica clínica habitual. Diseño estudio observacional, descriptivo de corte transversal, analítico, multicéntrico e internacional, realizado el 21 de noviembre de 2019 en horario de 8 a 15 horas. NCT03936231. Ámbito Ciento treinta y tres Unidad de Cuidados Críticos. Pacientes pacientes que recibirán ventilación mecánica por cualquier causa. Intervenciones ninguna Variables de interés principales Potencia mecánica. Resultados se analizaron 372 enfermos. La PM fue significativamente mayor en pacientes en ventilación controlada por presión (PC) que en ventilación controlada por volumen (VC) (19,20+8,44J/min frente a 16,01+6,88J/min; p<0,001), pero el porcentaje de pacientes con PM>17J/min no fue diferente (41% frente a 35% respectivamente; p=0,382). Los mejores modelos según AICcw que expresan la PM para los enfermos en VC se decribe como: Strain subrogante (Presión de conducción) + PEEP+Strain Rate subrogante (PEEP/cociente de flujo) + Frecuencia respiratoria. Para los enfermos en PC se define como: Strain subrogante (Volumen tidal expiratorio/PEEP) + PEEP+Strain Rate subrogante (Strain subrogante/Ti) + Frecuencia respiratoria+Expiratory Tidal Volumen+Ti. Conclusiones Gran parte de los pacientes en ventilación mecánica en condiciones de práctica clínica habitual reciben niveles de potencia mecánica peligrosos. A pesar de las diferencias observadas en los valores de potencia mecánica entre la ventilación VC y PC, este porcentaje de riesgo fue similar en PC y VC. (AU)

Tratamiento con equinocandinas en un paciente crítico sometido a técnica continua de reemplazo renal / Echinocandins in a critically ill patient during continuous venovenous renal replacement

Los pacientes críticos con candidiasis invasiva (CI) suelen presentar con frecuencia insuficiencia renal, por lo que en ocasiones requieren técnicas continuas de reemplazo renal (TCRR). Las equinocandinas son la primera opción en el tratamiento de la CI en el paciente crítico con enfermedad moderada o grave. Debido a su perfil farmacocinético y farmacodinámico (FC/FD), su eliminación durante las TCRR debe ser despreciable, sin que sea necesario ajustar sus dosis, como así lo indican los escasos estudios clínicos que hay al respecto. Caso clínico. Varón de 66 años intervenido por peritonitis secundaria a dehiscencia de sutura intestinal, que ingresa en la unidad de cuidados intensivos con cuadro clínico compatible con shock séptico y síndrome de disfunción multiorgánica (SDMO), por lo que se inicia TCRR. Al presentar factores de riesgo de CI, y al haberse observado levaduras en el líquido peritoneal, se pauta anidulafungina a dosis habituales. Se opta por anidulafungina debido a la insuficiencia hepática del paciente. En los cultivos del líquido peritoneal y exudado anal, se aísla Candida albicans sensible a fluconazol. No obstante, se decide mantener la anidulafungina debido al SDMO y al aclaramiento que presenta el fluconazol durante las TCRR. La evolución del paciente es favorable, y es trasladado a sala de hospitalización a los 20 días de la cirugía. Conclusiones. Dado su perfil FC/FD, las equinocandinas podrían administrarse con seguridad a dosis habituales en el paciente crítico con CI sometido a TCRR. No obstante, se requieren nuevos estudios que aporten más información para reforzar esta recomendación. El metabolismo extrahepático de la anidulafungina la hace especialmente interesante frente al resto de equinocandinas y otros antifúngicos en pacientes con diferentes grados de insuficiencia hepática(AU)

Background. Critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis (IC) often suffer renal failure, which sometimes requires continuous renal replacement techniques (CRRT). Echinocandins are the first line treatment for IC in critically ill patients with mild or severe illness. Their elimination during CRRT should be negligible due to their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile, and dose adjustment are not needed, as suggested by the few reported clinical studies. Clinical case. This is the case of a 66 year old male who underwent surgery due to peritonitis secondary to intestinal suture dehiscence. The patient was admitted to ICU with septic shock symptoms and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and CRRT was started. Anidulafungin was prescribed at the usual dosage due to the IC risk factors present, and the observation of yeasts in the peritoneal fluid. Anidulafungin was selected due to the hepatic failure suffered by the patient. An isolate of Candida albicans susceptible to fluconazole was cultured from peritoneal fluid and rectal exudates. However, anidulafungin was maintained due to the MODS and observing the clearance of fluconazole during CRRT. The patient's condition improved favourably, being moved to the surgical ward 20 days after the surgery. Conclusions. Echinocandins, due to their PK/PD profile, could be safely given at usual doses to critically ill patients undergoing CRRT. However, new studies are required to strengthen this recommendation. Its extrahepatic metabolism makes anidulafungin a more attractive option among echinocandins and other antifungals when used in patients with different degrees of hepatic failure(AU)

Colangitis esclerosante primaria / Primary sclerosing cholangitis

La Colangitis Esclerosante Humana constituye un sindrome colestático crónico, de etiología desconocida, de base autoinmune, que lleva a la cirrosis biliar en años. De curso variable, con una media de sobrevida de 18 años, se asocia en un alto porcentaje a la colitis ulcerosa crónica, y en un 20 por ciento a colangiocarcinoma. La colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica es el patrón de oro para el diagnóstico. El transplante hepático es el único tratamiento efectivo. Se presenta un caso en un joven de 19 años, portador de patología autoinmune con una colangitis primaria en etapa de cirrosis portal y se hace la revisión del tema.