Influence of MHC class I and II haplotypes on the experimental infection of Mauritian cynomolgus macaques with SHIVSF162P4cy.

Mauritian cynomolgus macaques (MCM) are widely used in human immunodeficiency virus research because of their restricted major histocompatibility complex (MHC) diversity which provides the opportunity to address the influence of host factors on vaccine studies. We herein report the impact of MHC haplotype on the outcome of 21 MCM infections with the CCR5-tropic simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)(SF162P4cy). MCM were susceptible to SHIV(SF162P4cy) infection as shown by viremia and loss of CD4+ T cells. A significant association between haplotype M7 (class IA, IB, II) and persistent viremia was observed in chronic phase, whereas recombinant class IA haplotype was associated with a reduction of viral RNA during acute infection. Class IB M4 haplotype displayed significantly lower acute phase provirus copy numbers. In addition, statistical analysis indicated a detrimental effect of haplotype M4 (class IA, IB) on the course of infection as indicated by lower CD4+ T-cell levels during chronic infection. A decrease in post-acute phase CD4+ T-cell numbers was also observed in haplotype M2 animals. This is the first report that documents the effects of host MHC class I and II molecules on the SHIV(SF162P4cy) infection in MCM, particularly with regard to the association between recombinant class IA, M4, and M7 haplotypes and the dynamic of viral replication and level of CD4+ T cells.

Postnatal passive immunization of neonatal macaques with a triple combination of human monoclonal antibodies against oral simian-human immunodeficiency virus challenge.

To develop prophylaxis against mother-to-child human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission, we established a simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) infection model in neonatal macaques that mimics intrapartum mucosal virus exposure (T. W. Baba et al., AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 10:351-357, 1994). Using this model, neonates were protected from mucosal SHIV-vpu(+) challenge by pre- and postnatal treatment with a combination of three human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), F105, 2G12, and 2F5 (Baba et al., Nat. Med. 6:200-206, 2000). In the present study, we used this MAb combination only postnatally, thereby significantly reducing the quantity of antibodies necessary and rendering their potential use in humans more practical. We protected two neonates with this regimen against oral SHIV-vpu(+) challenge, while four untreated control animals became persistently infected. Thus, synergistic MAbs protect when used as immunoprophylaxis without the prenatal dose. We then determined in vitro the optimal MAb combination against the more pathogenic SHIV89.6P, a chimeric virus encoding env of the primary HIV89.6. Remarkably, the most potent combination included IgG1b12, which alone does not neutralize SHIV89.6P. We administered the combination of MAbs IgG1b12, 2F5, and 2G12 postnatally to four neonates. One of the four infants remained uninfected after oral challenge with SHIV89.6P, and two infants had no or a delayed CD4(+) T-cell decline. In contrast, all control animals had dramatic drops in their CD4(+) T cells by 2 weeks postexposure. We conclude that our triple MAb combination partially protected against mucosal challenge with the highly pathogenic SHIV89.6P. Thus, combination immunoprophylaxis with passively administered synergistic human MAbs may play a role in the clinical prevention of mother-to-infant transmission of HIV type 1.

cis expression of the F12 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Nef allele transforms the highly productive NL4-3 HIV type 1 to a replication-defective strain: involvement of both Env gp41 and CD4 intracytoplasmic tails.

F12 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) nef is a naturally occurring nef mutant cloned from the provirus of a nonproductive, nondefective, and interfering HIV-1 variant (F12-HIV). We have already shown that cells stably transfected with a vector expressing the F12-HIV nef allele do not downregulate CD4 receptors and, more peculiarly, become resistant to the replication of wild type (wt) HIV. In order to investigate the mechanism of action of such an HIV inhibition, the F12-HIV nef gene was expressed in the context of the NL4-3 HIV-1 infectious molecular clone by replacing the wt nef gene (NL4-3/chi). Through this experimental approach we established the following. First, NL4-3/chi and nef-defective (Deltanef) NL4-3 viral particles behave very similarly in terms of viral entry and HIV protein production during the first replicative cycle. Second, no viral particles were produced from cells infected with NL4-3/chi virions, whatever the multiplicity of infection used. The viral inhibition apparently occurs at level of viral assembling and/or release. Third, this block could not be relieved by in-trans expression of wt nef. Finally, NL4-3/chi reverts to a producer HIV strain when F12-HIV Nef is deprived of its myristoyl residue. Through a CD4 downregulation competition assay, we demonstrated that F12-HIV Nef protein potently inhibits the CD4 downregulation induced by wt Nef. Moreover, we observed a redistribution of CD4 receptors at the cell margin induced by F12-HIV Nef. These observations strongly suggest that F12-HIV Nef maintains the ability to interact with the intracytoplasmic tail of the CD4 receptor molecule. Remarkably, we distinguished the intracytoplasmic tails of Env gp41 and CD4 as, respectively, viral and cellular targets of the F12-HIV Nef-induced viral retention. For the first time, the inhibition of the viral life cycle by means of in-cis expression of a Nef mutant is here reported. Delineation of the F12-HIV Nef mechanism of action may offer additional approaches to interference with the propagation of HIV infection.

E2F activates late-G1 events but cannot replace E1A in inducing S phase in terminally differentiated skeletal muscle cells.

We have previously shown that the adenovirus E1A oncogene can reactivate the cell cycle in terminally differentiated cells. Current models imply that much or all of this E1A activity is mediated by the release of the E2F transcription factors from pocket-protein control. In contrast, we show here that overexpression of E2F-1, E2F-2 and E2F-4, or a chimeric E2F-4 tethered to a nuclear localization signal cannot reactivate postmitotic skeletal muscle cells (myotubes). This is not due to lack of transcriptional activity, as demonstrated on both a reporter construct and a number of endogenous target genes. Although cyclin E was strongly overexpressed in E2F-transduced myotubes, it lacked associated kinase activity, possibly explaining the inability of the myotubes to enter S phase and accumulate cyclin A. Although E2F is not sufficient to trigger DNA synthesis in myotubes, its activity is necessary even in the presence of E1A, as dominant-negative DP-1 mutants inhibit E1A-mediated cell cycle reentry. Our data show that, to reactivate myotubes, E1A must exert other functions, in addition to releasing E2F. They also establish mouse myotubes as an experimental system uniquely suited to study the most direct E2F functions in the absence of downstream cell cycle effects.

Terminally differentiated skeletal myotubes are not confined to G0 but can enter G1 upon growth factor stimulation.

Terminally differentiated cells are specialized cells unable to proliferate that constitute most of the mammalian body. Despite their abundance, little information exists on the characteristics of cell cycle control in these cells and the molecular mechanisms that prevent their proliferation. They are generally believed to be irreversibly restricted to the G0 state. In this report, we define some features of a paradigmatic terminally differentiated system, the skeletal muscle, by studying its responses to various mitogenic stimuli. We show that forced expression of a number of cell cycle-regulatory genes, including erbB-2, v-ras, v-myc, B-myb, ld-1, and E2F-1, alone or in combinations, cannot induce terminally differentiated skeletal muscle cells (myotubes) to synthesize DNA. However, serum-stimulated myotubes display a typical immediate-early response, including the up-regulation of c-fos, c-jun, c-myc, and ld-1. They also elevate the expression of cyclin D1 after 4 hours of serum treatment. All these events take place in myotubes in a way that is indistinguishable from that of quiescent, undifferentiated myoblasts reactivated by serum. Moreover, pretreatment with serum shortens the time required by E1A to induce DNA synthesis, confirming that myotubes can partially traverse G1. Serum growth factors do not activate late-G1 genes in myotubes, suggesting that the block that prevents terminally differentiated cells from proliferating acts in mid-G1. Our results show that terminally differentiated cells are not confined to G0 but can partially reenter G1 in response to growth factors; they contribute to a much-needed definition of terminal differentiation. The important differences in the control of the cell cycle between terminally differentiated and senescent cells are discussed.