Postcardiac Surgery Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Patients on Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) use and complications (euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis [eDKA] rate, mortality, infection, hospital, and cardiovascular intensive care unit [CVICU] length of stay [LOS]) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: At an academic university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: SGLT2i use versus no SGLT2i use. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors evaluated patients undergoing cardiac surgery within 24 hours of hospital admission (between February 2, 2019 to May 26, 2022) for SGLT2i prevalence and eDKA frequency. The outcomes were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum and chi-square testing as appropriate. The cohort included 1,654 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, of whom 53 (3.2%) were prescribed an SGLT2i before surgery; 8 (15.1%) of 53 had eDKA. The authors found no differences between patients with and without SGLT2i use in hospital LOS (median [IQR]: 4.5 [3.5-6.3] v 4.4 [3.4-5.6] days, p = 0.46) or CVICU LOS (median [IQR]: 1.2 [1.0-2.2] v 1.1 [1.0-1.9] days, p = 0.22), 30-day mortality (1.9% v 0.7%, p = 0.31), or sternal infections (0.0% v 0.3%, p = 0.69). Among patients prescribed an SGLT2i, those with and without eDKA had similar hospital LOS (5.1 [4.0-5.8] v 4.4 [3.4-6.3], p = 0.76); however, CVICU LOS was longer in patients with eDKA (2.2 [1.5-2.9] v 1.2 [0.9-2.0], p = 0.042). Mortality (0.0% v 2.2%, p = 0.67) and wound infections (0.0% v 0.0%, p > 0.99) were similarly rare. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative eDKA occurred in 15% of patients on an SGLT2i prior to cardiac surgery, and was associated with longer CVICU LOS. Future studies into SGLT2i management perioperatively are important.

Failure to Clear Intermediate Lactate Levels in Ward Patients With Admission Blood Cultures Did Not Increase the Risk of Intensive Care Unit Transfer or In-Hospital Mortality: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction A sepsis bundle instituted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, known as SEP-1, mandates remeasuring lactate concentrations in patients with suspected sepsis who have an initial lactate level ≥ 2.0 mmol/L to identify those at risk of mortality or clinical deterioration. However, in the group with an intermediate lactate level (2.0 - 3.9 mmol/L), evidence for the predictive utility for such practice is lacking. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the potential utility of repeating the blood lactate measurement for the premonitory detection of clinical deterioration in patients admitted to a ward with a diagnosis of suspected sepsis and an initial intermediate lactate level. Methods Using electronic health records, we retrospectively evaluated all non-hospice adult patients admitted from the emergency department to a ward of an academic medical center between October 1, 2017, and November 30, 2019, in whom a blood culture was obtained on admission as part of their workup for suspected sepsis. Patient demographics, the times and values of lactate concentrations, the occurrence of subsequent intensive care unit (ICU) transfer during the admission, and hospital mortality were determined. We computed the relative risk of ICU transfer (i.e., clinical deterioration) and hospital mortality in patients whose initial lactate was in the intermediate range who failed to reduce their lactate concentration by at least 10% within six hours. We hypothesized that failure to clear the lactate would be associated with an increased risk of ICU transfer and hospital mortality. Results We studied 12,157 patients, of whom 25 hospice patients were excluded. Of the remaining 12,132 patients, 1,416 (11.7%) were initially admitted to an intensive care unit, and 10,716 (88.3%) were admitted to a ward. Repeat lactate determinations were performed in 10.7%, 77.1%, and 90.2% of the ward patients with initial normal (< 2.0 mmol/L), intermediate (2.0 - 3.99 mmol/L), and high (≥ 4.0 mmol/L) admission lactate concentrations, respectively. There was no increase in the relative risk of ICU transfer (relative risk [RR] = 0.90, 95% CI, 0.53 - 1.28, P = 0.55) or hospital mortality (RR = 1.23, 95% CI, 0.85 - 1.79, P = 0.27) within the intermediate lactate level group among those whose lactate remained within 10% of the initial value (i.e., no change) or increased by more than 10%, compared to those in whom the level decreased by more than 10%. Conclusions Failure to reduce lactate concentrations in ward patients admitted with possible sepsis and an intermediate lactate level was not associated with an increased risk of ICU transfer or mortality. These results call into question the mandate in SEP-1 to routinely repeat the lactate determination in patients presenting with an intermediate concentration.

Accuracy of the minimal leak test for endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of the minimum leak test as a surrogate for target endotracheal cuff pressure of 20-30 cm H2 O in intubated patients. METHODS: Cuff pressures were measured at the University of Miami Hospital using the minimum leak test on every intubated patient once per shift, then cuff pressure was reevaluated using handheld numerical manometers and recorded pressures above or below the target range, readjusting the pressure as needed. This assessment was repeated throughout each patient's intubation for up to 6 days. The readjustment rate of the test and the probability of a patient needing at least one adjustment were determined. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two patients were evaluated. Median age was 67 years (range 29-95), 52% were male, 48% were female. Patients were followed for an average of 4.7 days. Seven hundred twenty-two minimum leak tests were performed. Of these, 170 required readjustment into the target range (24% readjustment rate). Of the tests outside target range, 66% of cuffs were overinflated and 34% were underinflated. Fifty-five percent of patients required at least one adjustment. CONCLUSION: Despite ubiquitous use of the minimum leak test for endotracheal cuff pressure adjustment, the test has an unacceptably high error rate resulting in cuff pressures above or below the target range. Most patients will require at least one adjustment throughout an intubation, putting them at risk for tracheal injury, stenosis, or leak and aspiration. The minimum leak test is not sufficiently accurate for endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring. Formal manometry is superior and should be used to optimize patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1646-1650, 2020.