Gender-based Disparity Exists in the Surgical Experience of Female and Male Urology Residents.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a discrepancy exists in the number and type of cases logged between female and male urology residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ACGME case log data from 13 urology residency programs was collected from 2007 to 2020. The number and type of cases for each resident were recorded and correlated with resident gender and year of graduation. The median, 25th and 75th percentiles number of cases were calculated by gender, and then compared between female and male residents using Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: A total of 473 residents were included in the study, 100 (21%) were female. Female residents completed significantly fewer cases, 2174, compared to male residents, 2273 (P = .038). Analysis by case type revealed male residents completed significantly more general urology (526 vs 571, P = .011) and oncology cases (261 vs 280, P = .026). Additionally, female residents had a 1.3-fold increased odds of logging a case in the assistant role than male residents (95% confidence interval: 1.27-1.34, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Gender-based disparity exists within the urology training of female and male residents. Male residents logged nearly 100 more cases than female residents over 4years, with significant differences in certain case subtypes and resident roles. The ACGME works to provide an equal training environment for all residents. Addressing this finding within individual training programs is critical.

How Effective Was the 2014 AUA Cryptorchidism Guideline? A Multi-institutional Evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: In 2014, the AUA published guidelines regarding the evaluation of cryptorchidism. This multi-institutional study aims to determine if these guidelines reduced the age of referral and the utilization of ultrasound in boys with cryptorchidism. We hypothesize that delayed referral continues, and utilization of ultrasound remains unchanged. METHODS: A retrospective review of boys referred for the evaluation of cryptorchidism was performed at 4 academic institutions, collecting data for 1 year prior (2013) and 2 nonconsecutive years following guideline creation (2015 and 2019). Across these time frames, we compared median ages at evaluation and surgery, and rates of patient comorbidities, orchiopexy, and preevaluation ultrasound. RESULTS: A total of 3,293 patients were included. The median age at initial pediatric urology evaluation in all cohorts was 39 months (IQR: 14-92 months). Following publication of the AUA Guidelines, there was no difference (P = .08) in the median age at first evaluation by a pediatric urologist between 2013 and 2015, and an increase (P = .03) between 2013 and 2019. Overall, 21.2% of patients received an ultrasound evaluation prior to referral, with no significant difference between 2013 and 2015 (P = .9) or 2019 (P = .5) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that, despite publication of the AUA Guidelines on evaluation and treatment of cryptorchidism, there has been no reduction in the age of urological evaluation or the utilization of imaging in boys with undescended testis. Finding alternative avenues to disseminate these evidence-based recommendations to referring providers and exploring barriers to guideline adherence is necessary to improve care for patients with cryptorchidism.

Virtual "Matchmaking": Stakeholder Perspectives on the Future of the Urology Residency Match.

OBJECTIVE: To examine stakeholder perspectives regarding the lack of in-person externships and transition to a virtual urology residency interview format. The unprecedented disruption from the COVID-19 pandemic forced an abrupt pivot to a "virtual" Urology Match for the 2021 cycle. We aim for our study to inform ongoing deliberations on the future of the Urology Match. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following Urology Match day in February 2021, two surveys were distributed by the Society of Academic Urologists to all applicants and program directors (PDs) who participated in the 2021 Urology Match. RESULTS: Overall, 192 of 481 applicants (40%) and 63 of 160 PDs (39%) responded. Most applicants (67%) were satisfied with their match outcomes, although unmatched applicants were significantly more likely to be unsatisfied than matched applicants (98% vs 9%, P <.0001). Most PDs were equally (79%) or more satisfied (13%) with their match outcomes compared with prior years. Nearly all applicants (93%) and PDs (94%) recommended retaining an in-person externship option. Most applicants (61%) and PDs (71%) felt their outcomes would not have changed with in-person interviews. Applicants and PDs were evenly split as to whether interviews should be conducted in-person or virtually in the future. CONCLUSION: The vast majority of applicants and PDs recommended retaining in-person externships for future match cycles despite high costs. In contrast, there was ambivalence amongst both groups of stakeholders regarding the format of interviews for future match cycles. We recommend virtual interviews moving forward to help alleviate the financial burden placed on applicants and increase equity.

Investigating the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthesia in Brachial Plexus Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 18 Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dexmedetomidine has been thought to be an effective adjuvant to local anesthetics in brachial plexus blockade. We sought to clarify the uncertainty that still exists as to its true efficacy. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to assess the ability of dexmedetomidine to prolong the duration and hasten the onset of motor and sensory blockade when used as an adjuvant to local anesthesia for brachial plexus blockade versus using local anesthesia alone (control). A search strategy was created to identify eligible articles in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. The methodological quality for each included study was evaluated using the Cochrane Tool for Risk of Bias. RESULTS: Eighteen randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis (n = 1092 patients). The addition of dexmedetomidine significantly reduced sensory block time onset time by 3.19 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], -4.60 to -1.78 minutes; I = 95%; P < 0.00001), prolonged sensory block duration by 261.41 minutes (95% CI, 145.20-377.61 minutes; I = 100%; P < 0.0001), reduced the onset of motor blockade by 2.92 minutes (95% CI, -4.37 to -1.46 minutes; I = 96%, P < 0.0001), and prolonged motor block duration by 200.90 minutes (CI, 99.24-302.56 minutes; I = 99%; P = 0.0001) as compared with control. Dexmedetomidine also significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia by 289.31 minutes (95% CI, 185.97-392.64 minutes; I = 99%; P < 0.00001). Significantly more patients experienced intraoperative bradycardia with dexmedetomidine (risk difference [RD], 0.06; 95% CI, 0.00-0.11; I = 72%; P = 0.03); however, there was no difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypotension (RD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.04; I = 3%; P = 0.45). It is important to note that all studies reported that intraoperative bradycardia was either transient in nature or reversible, when needed, with the administration of intravenous atropine. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine has the ability to hasten the onset and prolong the duration of blockade when used as an adjuvant to local anesthesia for brachial plexus blockade. Considering an analgesic effect to be either decreased pain, a longer duration of analgesic block, or decreased opioid consumption, the addition of dexmedetomidine to local anesthetics for brachial plexus blockade was found to significantly improve analgesia in all 18 included studies. However, patients receiving dexmedetomidine should be continuously monitored for the potentially harmful but reversible adverse effect of intraoperative bradycardia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level I.