Comparison of omeprazole and lansoprazole in short-term triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: Effective anti-Helicobacter pylori therapies with few side-effects are needed. AIM: To study the effectiveness of short-term triple therapy with amoxycillin, clarithromycin and either omeprazole or lansoprazole for eradication and healing of peptic ulcers. METHODS: Patients with gastric or duodenal ulcers received amoxycillin (1 g b.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.d.) and lansoprazole (30 mg b.d.) (LAC) or omeprazole (20 mg b.d.) (OAC) for 7 days. Endoscopic examinations were performed before treatment and at least 4 weeks after completion of therapy. H. pylori status was confirmed by rapid urease test and histological examination (Giemsa stain) from gastric biopsies taken from both the antrum and the body. RESULTS: A total of 356 patients were randomized in this single-blind study. On a per protocol basis, H. pylori was eradicated in 134 of 170 patients (79%) in the lansoprazole group and in 105 of 146 (72%) in the omeprazole group (P = 0.189); and in intention-to-treat analysis 72% and 62%, respectively (P = 0.043). Healing of the ulcers was obtained in 166 of 186 (98%), and in 139 of 146 patients (95%), respectively (P = 0.357). Side-effects occurred in two patients in the LAC group and in six in the OAC group B (four stopped therapy). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the two regimens are highly effective in healing duodenal ulcers and are well tolerated. Neither treatment achieves the ideal cure rate for H. pylori. Lansoprazole does not appear to have a significant advantage over omeprazole either in ulcer healing or in H. pylori eradication.

Clinical significance of gastric dysplasia: a multicenter follow-up study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Pathology Study Group.

The evolution of gastric moderate and severe dysplasia was examined in a prospective multicenter study. One-hundred-and-nine of 141 patients with the endoscopic-bioptic diagnosis of moderate or severe dysplasia had an adequate follow-up and were included into the study. After revision of the initial slides by a gastrointestinal pathologist, 57 patients whose lesions did not meet the histological criteria for dysplasia were excluded, being reclassified as hyperplastic or metaplastic lesions (group 2). The 52 patients with confirmed moderate or severe dysplasia (group 1) were followed up for at least six months or underwent surgery for confirmed dysplasia or cancer. Thirty-two cancers were found in group 1 (33% in patients with moderate and 81% in patients with severe dysplasia). Among them, about half (n = 17) were early gastric cancers. Neither severe dysplasia nor cancer were found during the follow-up in group 2. Mean follow-up time was 13 months in group 1 and 16 months in group 2. Our results indicate that: 1) Confirmed moderate dysplasia shows a high risk of cancer development and requires strict bioptic follow-up; 2) Surgery is indicated in confirmed severe gastric dysplasia seen in the early detection of gastric cancer.