[Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease with a misleading laryngeal presentation]. / Une maladie de Rosai­Dorfman­Destombes de présentation laryngée trompeuse.

Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease is a rare non-Langerhansian cell histiocytosis characterized by the accumulation of large activated histiocytes in the affected tissues with images of emperipolesis. The diagnosis is not really problematic in the classical forms, with a lymph node presentation, whose histology is very suggestive. However, it can be much more difficult in the extra-nodal forms, which are misleading in both their clinical and histological presentation. We report here a case illustrating this diagnostic difficulty. Firstly, clinically, the disease was revealed by an unusual laryngeal location, responsible for acute obstructive respiratory distress and requiring urgent surgical management. Secondly, histologically, the diagnosis was not evoked in the first instance by analysis of the laryngeal lesion. Indeed, there was a not specific appearing polymorphic infiltrate, associating small lymphocytes, plasma cells and numerous histiocytes, without evidence for a lymphoma after immunohistochemistry and lymphocyte clonality analysis. However, after re-examination of the slides, the histiocytes sometimes appeared large or xanthomised and have a PS100+, CD1a-, langerhine- phenotype, with rare images of emperipolesis. These aspects finally suggested the diagnosis of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease, then confirmed by a cervical lymph node biopsy showing characteristic histological features. Simultaneously, NGS analysis of the laryngeal lesion showed a mutation in the MAP2K1 gene, in accordance with the diagnosis. The patient was treated with revlimid and dexamethasone for 6 months, with complete remission, and is currently undergoing maintenance treatment with revlimid.

Prevalence and distribution of cervical lymph node metastases in HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: In oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OP-SCC), the prevalence and distribution of clinical and pathological lymph node metastasis in the neck have been extensively reported. It served as the basis for consensus recommendations on the selection of the lymph node levels in the neck requiring a treatment. The objective of the study is to compare the prevalence and distribution of neck node metastases in HPV+ and HPV- OP-SCC from a large series of patients with OP-SCC who underwent a cervical lymph-node dissection (LND) as part of their treatment. METHODS: The study concentrated on OP-SCC patients treated by various neck node dissection (LND) procedures from January 2014 to December 2018 in 3 French institutions. Patients with prior head and neck cancer, prior neck surgery, the use of induction chemotherapy, or patients with carcinoma of unknown primary were excluded. HPV-status was assessed by p16 immunohistochemistry. For each patient, the clinical and the pathological nodal status, as well as the distribution of the positive nodes in each neck level (from Ia to V) were reported. RESULTS: Two-hundred and sixty-three patients were included (126 p16-negative (p16-), and 137 p16-positive (p16+). The rate of clinical positive node (cN+) reached 54% and 88.3% in the p16- and p16+ groups, respectively (p < 0.001); the corresponding rate of pathological positive node (pN+) reached 61.9% and 91.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding the clinical lymph node distribution, in p16+ patients, more positive nodes were observed in the ipsilateral level IV (p = 0.003), and less positive nodes were observed in the contralateral levels III and IV (p = 0.003 and p = 0.045, respectively). Regarding the pathologic lymph node distribution in the ipsilateral neck, in the cN0 patients, no significant difference was observed between p16- and p16+ patients (p = 0.33 to 1); in the cN+ patients, the nodes were distributed in levels Ib, II, III, IV and V without differences between the p16- and the p16+ patients. In the contralateral neck of p16- patients, nodes metastases were mainly observed in levels II, III and IV, whereas for the p16+ patients, positive nodes were only observed in level II (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the higher prevalence of cN+ and pN+ in p16+ OP-SCC patients, but without meaningful difference in the distribution of the lymph node drainage between p16- and p16+ OP-SCC. It indicates that no difference should be made between p16- and p16+ patients regarding the extend of neck treatment.