A Head-to-head Comparison of De Novo Sirolimus or Everolimus Plus Reduced-dose Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective and Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi), sirolimus (SRL) and everolimus (EVR), have distinct pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics properties. There are no studies comparing the efficacy and safety of de novo use of SRL versus EVR in combination with reduced-dose calcineurin inhibitor. METHODS: This single-center prospective, randomized study included first kidney transplant recipients receiving a single 3 mg/kg antithymocyte globulin dose, tacrolimus, and prednisone, without cytomegalovirus (CMV) pharmacological prophylaxis. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: SRL, EVR, or mycophenolate sodium (MPS). Doses of SRL and EVR were adjusted to maintain whole blood concentrations between 4 and 8 ng/mL. The primary endpoint was the 12-mo incidence of the first CMV infection/disease. RESULTS: There were 266 patients (SRL, n = 86; EVR, n = 90; MPS, n = 90). The incidence of the first CMV event was lower in the mTORi versus MPS groups (10.5% versus 7.8% versus 43.3%, P < 0.0001). There were no differences in the incidence of BK polyomavirus viremia (8.2% versus 10.1% versus 15.1%, P = 0.360). There were no differences in survival-free from treatment failure (87.8% versus 88.8% versus 93.3%, P = 0.421) and incidence of donor-specific antibodies. At 12 mo, there were no differences in kidney function (75 ± 23 versus 78 ± 24 versus 77 ± 24 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P = 0.736), proteinuria, and histology in protocol biopsies. Treatment discontinuation was higher among patients receiving SRL or EVR (18.6% versus 15.6% versus 6.7%, P = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: De novo use of SRL or EVR, targeting similar therapeutic blood concentrations, shows comparable efficacy and safety. The reduced incidence of CMV infection/disease and distinct safety profile of mTORi versus mycophenolate were confirmed in this study.

Bioequivalence of 2 formulations of montelukast (5 mg chewable tablet) in the fasting state: an open-label randomized, single-dose, 2-period, crossover study / Estudo de bioequivalência entre duas formulações de comprimidos mastigáveis de Montelucaste de 5 mg em condições de jejum: um estudo randomizado, de dose única, aberto, dois períodos, cruzado

Introduction: Montelukast, a selective and active leukotriene receptor antagonist, is one of the most common agents in asthma treatment for both adults and children. Objective: To assess whether the pharmacokinetic profiles of two formulations of montelukast were similar after a single 5 mg dose (chewable tablets), administered orally under fasting conditions, sampling blood before and 36 hours after administration. Methods: This was a randomized, 2-sequence, 2-period, crossover study of 2 chewable tablet formulations of the drug: Singulair®, provided by Merck Sharp and Dohme Farmacêutica Ltda. (reference), and generic montelukast, manufactured by Eurofarma Laboratórios S.A. (test). Plasma samples obtained from 35 participants were analyzed for montelukast through high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry, with montelukast-d6 as the internal standard. Peak montelukast concentrations were 299.313 (SD, 11.039) ng/mL for the reference formulation and 279.803 (SD, 10.085) ng/mL for test formulation. Results: Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between AUC0-36h, AUC0-inf, or Cmax between formulations, with the following test/reference ratios: 102.458 for AUC0-36h, 102.522 for AUC0-inf, and 93.490 for Cmax. No serious adverse events were reported during the trial. Our results demonstrated the bioequivalence of Singulair® and Eurofarma's generic montelukast. Conclusions: Our results revealed that the new generic tablets are clinically safe and can be used interchangeably with the brand name product. Eurofarma's montelukast offers a safe, effective, and cheaper treatment option for people with asthma or allergic rhinitis.

Introdução: O montelucaste, um antagonista seletivo e ativo dos receptores de leucotrienos, é um dos agentes mais comumente usados na prática clínica no tratamento da asma, tanto em adultos quanto em crianças. Objetivo: Avaliar se os perfis farmacocinéticos de duas formulações de montelucaste eram semelhantes após uma dose única de comprimidos mastigáveis de 5 mg, administrados por via oral em jejum, coletando amostras de sangue desde antes da administração até 36 horas depois disso. Métodos: Estudo comparativo randomizado, 2 sequências e 2 períodos, cruzado, de dois medicamentos em comprimidos mastigáveis: Singulair®, fornecido pela Merck Sharp e Dohme Farmacêutica Ltda. (referência) e Montelucaste 5 mg, fabricado pela Eurofarma Laboratórios S.A. (teste). Amostras de plasma obtidas de 35 indivíduos elegíveis foram analisadas para montelucaste por cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência acoplada a espectrometria de massa em tandem, tendo Montelucaste-d6 como padrão interno. As concentrações máximas de montelucaste foram 299,313±11,039 ng/mL para referência e 279,803±10,085 ng/mL para formulação de teste. Resultados: A análise estatística não mostrou diferenças significativas para AUC0-36h, AUC0-inf e nem para Cmax entre as formulações, apresentando as razões Teste/Referência: 102,458 para AUC0-36h, 102,522 para AUC0-inf e 93,490 para Cmax. Nenhum evento adverso grave foi relatado durante o estudo. De acordo com a regulamentação brasileira, o atual estudo farmacocinético demonstrou bioequivalência entre os agentes individuais e forneceu evidências de bioequivalência entre Singulair® e Montelukast fabricado pela Eurofarma. Resultado: Os resultados mostraram que os novos comprimidos genéricos são clinicamente seguros e podem ser trocados pela marca original. O montelucaste da Eurofarma oferece uma opção de tratamento mais barata, segura e eficaz para indivíduos com asma ou rinite alérgica.

Presumed cytomegalovirus retinitis late after kidney transplant / Retinite presumida por citomegalovírus tardiamente após um transplante renal

Abstract Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is a rare manifestation of CMV invasive disease and potentially threatening to vision in immunocompromised individuals. Clinical suspicion is fundamental since it is an unusual entity with a progressive and often asymptomatic installation over a long period. The authors report a 70-year-old man with diabetic nephropathy who underwent a kidney transplant (KT) in August 2014 with good clinical evolution. No previous CMV infection or episodes of acute rejection were reported. Five years after transplant, he was admitted due to a reduced visual acuity of the left eye with seven days of evolution with associated hyperemia, without exudate. The ophthalmologic evaluation was compatible with acute necrosis of the retina and presumed associated with CMV infection. He had a progressive improvement after ganciclovir initiation. CMV retinitis is one of the most serious ocular complications in immune-suppressed individuals and can lead to irreversible blindness, and because of that, early diagnosis and treatment remains crucial in obtaining the best visual prognosis in affected patients. Secondary prophylaxis with ganciclovir is not consensual, neither is the safety of reintroducing the antimetabolite in these cases.

Resumo A retinite por citomegalovírus (CMV) é uma manifestação rara de doença invasiva por CMV e potencialmente ameaçadora para a visão em indivíduos imunocomprometidos. A suspeita clínica é fundamental, uma vez que se trata de uma entidade incomum, com uma instalação progressiva e frequentemente assintomática durante um longo período. Os autores relatam um homem de 70 anos de idade com doença renal do diabetes que foi submetido a um transplante renal (KT) em Agosto de 2014 com boa evolução clínica. Nenhuma infecção anterior por CMV ou episódios de rejeição aguda foram relatados. Cinco anos após o transplante, ele foi internado devido a uma acuidade visual reduzida do olho esquerdo com sete dias de evolução com hiperemia associada, sem exsudato. A avaliação oftalmológica foi compatível com a necrose aguda da retina e presumivelmente associada à infecção por CMV. Ele teve uma melhora progressiva após o início do ganciclovir. A retinite por CMV é uma das complicações oculares mais graves em indivíduos imunossuprimidos e pode levar à cegueira irreversível e, por isso, o diagnóstico e o tratamento precoces continuam sendo cruciais para obter o melhor prognóstico visual em pacientes afetados. A profilaxia secundária com ganciclovir não é consensual, tampouco a segurança de reintroduzir o antimetabólito nestes casos.

Presumed cytomegalovirus retinitis late after kidney transplant.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is a rare manifestation of CMV invasive disease and potentially threatening to vision in immunocompromised individuals. Clinical suspicion is fundamental since it is an unusual entity with a progressive and often asymptomatic installation over a long period. The authors report a 70-year-old man with diabetic nephropathy who underwent a kidney transplant (KT) in August 2014 with good clinical evolution. No previous CMV infection or episodes of acute rejection were reported. Five years after transplant, he was admitted due to a reduced visual acuity of the left eye with seven days of evolution with associated hyperemia, without exudate. The ophthalmologic evaluation was compatible with acute necrosis of the retina and presumed associated with CMV infection. He had a progressive improvement after ganciclovir initiation. CMV retinitis is one of the most serious ocular complications in immune-suppressed individuals and can lead to irreversible blindness, and because of that, early diagnosis and treatment remains crucial in obtaining the best visual prognosis in affected patients. Secondary prophylaxis with ganciclovir is not consensual, neither is the safety of reintroducing the antimetabolite in these cases.

The influence of the antithymocyte globulin dose on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing kidney retransplantation.

Optimizing antithymocyte globulin (rATG) dosage is critical for high immunological risk patients undergoing a repeat kidney transplant. This natural retrospective cohort study compared clinical outcomes of two successive cohorts of consecutive recipients of retransplants receiving 5 x 1 mg/kg (rATG-5, n = 100) or a single 3 mg/kg (rATG-3, n = 110) dose of rATG induction therapy. All patients had negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch and no anti-HLA A, B, DR donor-specific antibodies (DSA). The primary endpoint was efficacy failure (first biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death) at 12 months. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of efficacy failure (18.0% vs. 21.8%, HR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.66-2.25), respectively. There were no differences in 3-years freedom from biopsy proven acute rejection, and patient, graft, and death-censored graft survivals. There were no differences in the incidence of surgical complications (25.0% vs. 18.2%; p 0.151), early hospital readmission (27.8% vs. 29.5%; p = 0.877) and CMV infections (49% vs. 40%; p = 0.190). There were also no differences in the incidence (59.6% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.897) and duration of delayed graft function but a stable difference in estimate glomerular filtration rate was observed from month 1 (54.7±28.8 vs. 44.1±25.3 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.005) to month 36 (51.1±27.7 vs. 42.5±24.5, p = 0.019). Mean urinary protein concentration (month 36: 0.38±0.81 vs. 0.70±2.40 g/ml, p = 0.008) and mean chronic glomerular Banff score in for cause biopsies (months 4-36: 0.0±0.0 vs. 0.04±0.26, p = 0.044) were higher in the rATG-3 group. This cohort analysis did not detect differences in the incidence of efficacy failure and in safety outcomes at 12 months among recipients of kidney retransplants without A, B, and DR DSA, receiving induction therapy with a single 3 mg/kg rATG dose or the traditional 5 mg/kg rATG.

Purple urine bag syndrome: case report for Streptoccocus agalactiae and literature review.

We report a case of purple urine bag syndrome, associated to Streptococcus agalactiae urinary tract infection, progressing to septic shock and death. We present a review of the literature on the subject and take the opportunity to attend readers about increasing incidence with population aging and its potential bad outcome.

Purple urine bag syndrome: case report for Streptoccocus agalactiae and literature review / Síndrome da urina roxa na bolsa coletora: relato de caso por Streptoccocus agalactiae e revisão da literatura

Abstract We report a case of purple urine bag syndrome, associated to Streptococcus agalactiae urinary tract infection, progressing to septic shock and death. We present a review of the literature on the subject and take the opportunity to attend readers about increasing incidence with population aging and its potential bad outcome.

Resumo Relatamos um caso de síndrome de urina roxa na bolsa coletora, associada à infecção do trato urinário por Streptococcus agalactiae, evoluindo para choque séptico e óbito. Apresentamos ainda uma revisão da literatura sobre o assunto e aproveitamos para atentar os leitores sobre o aumento de sua incidência com o envelhecimento populacional e seu potencial mau prognóstico.