Effectiveness of a focused educational intervention on resident evaluations from faculty a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality and specificity of written evaluations by faculty attendings of internal medicine residents during inpatient rotations. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Four hospitals: tertiary care university hospital, Veterans' Administration hospital, and two community hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight faculty and 157 residents from categorical and primary-care internal medicine residency training programs rotating on inpatient general medicine teams. INTERVENTION: Focused 20-minute educational session on evaluation and feedback, accompanied by 3 by 5 reminder card and diary, given to faculty at the start of their attending month. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: 1) number of written comments from faculty specific to unique, preselected dimensions of competence; 2) number of written comments from faculty describing a specific resident behavior or providing a recommendation; and 3) resident Likert-scale ratings of the quantity and effect of feedback received from faculty. Faculty in the intervention group provided more written comments specific to defined dimensions of competence, a median of three comments per evaluation form versus two in the control group, but when adjusted for clustering by faculty, the difference was not statistically significant (P =.09). Regarding feedback, residents in the intervention group rated the quantity significantly higher (P =.04) and were significantly more likely to make changes in clinical management of patients than residents in the control group (P =.04). CONCLUSIONS: A brief, focused educational intervention delivered to faculty prior to the start of a ward rotation appears to have a modest effect on faculty behavior for written evaluations and promoted higher quality feedback given to house staff.

Clinical epidemiology of nocturnal leg cramps in male veterans.

This article describes patients with nocturnal leg cramps concerning their age, medical problems, and medications, and reviews any medical evaluation performed for the complaint of nocturnal leg cramps. Provided is a retrospective chart review of 50 patients who took quinine sulfate for nocturnal leg cramps. These patients were identified through computerized pharmacy records. A control group was chosen from age-matched patients who took medications other than quinine during the study period. In a university-affiliated Veterans Administration hospital, patients with nocturnal leg cramps had a significantly higher median number of medical problems than controls. Cardiovascular diseases and neurological diseases were significantly more common in patients with nocturnal leg cramps (cases) than in those without (controls) (82% versus 64% and 36% versus 18%, respectively). The most striking differences between patients with cramps and controls were peripheral vascular disease (34% versus 12%, P = 0.09) and peripheral neurological deficit (12% versus 0%, P = 0.012). Patients with nocturnal leg cramps were prescribed significantly more medications than were controls, but no specific medication or type of medication was prescribed more frequently to patients with cramps (other than quinine). Results suggested that men with nocturnal leg cramps have greater medical comorbidity and are prescribed more medications than age-matched control patients. Unlike in previous studies, no evidence was found that specific medications, such as diuretics, betaagonists, or calcium-channel antagonists are associated with nighttime cramps. The significantly increased frequency of peripheral vascular disease and peripheral neurologic deficits in patients with nocturnal leg cramps raised the possibility that these problems contribute to the occurrence of cramps. Although the size of the study and its methodologic limitations preclude definitive conclusions, areas for research to clarify the clinical epidemiology of nocturnal leg cramps are suggested.

Integrating general medicine and rheumatology training in the outpatient setting: a practice model.

The authors describe a primary care-based educational and practice model that integrates general medicine resident education in outpatient rheumatology with specialty fellowship training. Compared with the use of traditional specialty clinics, the model provides better access and service to patients and more appropriate training for residents. Revenues from clinical service delivered by faculty-supervised residents and fellows support 80% of the operating costs and educational activities of the model. The conceptual framework for the model reconciles the educational goals and practice philosophies of general medicine and specialty training and is applicable to training in other predominantly outpatient specialty areas.

Patient acceptance of influenza vaccination.

PURPOSE: To determine whether patients' demographic, medical, and personal characteristics, including attitudes and beliefs about vaccination, health, and medical providers, are associated with acceptance of influenza vaccine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred sixty-five patients attending a university hospital-based general medicine clinic during the fall influenza vaccination period, including 624 patients for whom influenza vaccine was indicated, were observed in a prospective cohort study. In addition, 58 patients who refused influenza vaccine and an equal number who accepted it were interviewed over the telephone to examine their beliefs and behaviors in greater detail. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of patients for whom influenza vaccine was indicated received it. Prospectively assessed patient characteristics that were significantly associated with nonvaccination included not believing vaccine prevents "flu" (relative risk [RR] 5.3), never received pneumococcal vaccine (RR 3.5), not vaccinated against influenza the previous year (RR 3.5), never vaccinated against influenza (RR 2.3), and felt sick after previous influenza vaccination (RR 2.3). Demographic characteristics and medical diagnoses were not significantly related to vaccination. Almost one half of 58 interviewed subjects who refused influenza vaccine cited fear of a reaction. Among retrospectively determined attitudes and beliefs significantly associated with refusal of influenza vaccine were not believing the vaccine works well (odds ratio [OR] 11.6), concern about a reaction (OR 9.3), and perception that the medical provider had not recommended it (OR 5.8). CONCLUSION: Demographic characteristics of patients and their medical diagnoses were not associated with acceptance of influenza vaccination. Among patients who were not vaccinated, doubts about the efficacy of influenza vaccine and fear of its side effects were common, and their perceptions of the medical provider's recommendation of vaccine appeared to be an important factor in the decision whether to accept it.

Outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction who are initially admitted to stepdown units: data from the Multicenter Chest Pain Study.

PURPOSE: To assess whether the admission of patients with chest pain to a stepdown unit would jeopardize the outcome of those patients who ultimately "ruled in" for a myocardial infarction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared the risk of an adverse outcome in initially uncomplicated, "rule-out myocardial infarction" patients who were admitted directly to a stepdown unit (n = 58) or to a coronary care unit (n = 409) at 6 hospitals and who then ultimately "ruled in" for a myocardial infarction. RESULTS: An adverse outcome (death, serious complication, or invasive intervention) occurred in 16 (28%) stepdown unit patients compared with 159 (39%) coronary care unit patients. Among patients eligible for initial care in either location, the risk of an adverse outcome after controlling for clinical characteristics was similar in the two groups using each of two different multivariate approaches. CONCLUSION: Although our study was not of sufficient size to exclude the possibility of a small benefit from initial triage to a coronary care unit, our data suggest that (1) admission of initially uncomplicated chest pain patients with a relatively low probability of acute myocardial infarction to a stepdown unit does not seriously jeopardize those who eventually "rule in" for myocardial infarction; and (2) larger observational or randomized studies, which could reduce the residual possibility of somewhat higher risk in the stepdown unit, would be ethical to perform.

Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context.

There are 14 unconfounded randomised trials of antihypertensive drugs (chiefly diuretics or beta-blockers): total 37,000 individuals, mean treatment duration 5 years, mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) difference 5-6 mm Hg. In prospective observational studies, a long-term difference of 5-6 mm Hg in usual DBP is associated with about 35-40% less stroke and 20-25% less coronary heart disease (CHD). For those dying in the trials, the DBP difference had persisted only 2-3 years, yet an overview showed that vascular mortality was significantly reduced (2p less than 0.0002); non-vascular mortality appeared unchanged. Stroke was reduced by 42% SD 6 (95% confidence interval 35-50%; 289 vs 484 events, 2p less than 0.0001), suggesting that virtually all the epidemiologically expected stroke reduction appears rapidly. CHD was reduced by 14% SD 5 (95% CI 4-22%; 671 vs 771 events, 2p less than 0.01), suggesting that just over half the epidemiologically expected CHD reduction appears rapidly. Although this significant CHD reduction could well be worthwhile, its size remains indefinite for most circumstances (though beta-blockers after myocardial infarction are of substantial benefit). At present, therefore, a sufficiently high risk of stroke (perhaps because of age, blood pressure, or, in particular, history of cerebrovascular disease) may be the clearest indication for antihypertensive treatment.

Differences between women and men in survival after myocardial infarction. Biology or methodology?

To examine the impact of gender on survival after myocardial infarction, we performed a retrospective cohort study of 332 women and 790 men. Women who had a myocardial infarction were older and more often had hypertension, diabetes, previous heart failure, and impaired left ventricular function on admission. Cumulative 3-year mortality and in-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in women than men, but mortality among hospital survivors was similar. After multivariate adjustment for baseline differences, mortality rates were not significantly different between women and men for in-hospital deaths, and mortality at 3 years among hospital survivors tended to be lower among women. We conclude that higher observed mortality rates following a myocardial infarction in women are related to differences in known risk factors for subsequent mortality and that gender should not be considered an independent risk factor for mortality after myocardial infarction.

A prospective study of high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease in women.

The relation of self-reported high blood pressure to the subsequent development of coronary heart disease and stroke was examined in a cohort of 119,963 women, aged 30-55 years, who were initially free from cardiovascular disease. Participants in the Nurses' Health Study reported high blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors on baseline questionnaires mailed in 1976. During six years of follow-up, there were 308 incident cases of coronary heart disease (66 fatal and 242 nonfatal myocardial infarctions) and 175 strokes (50 fatal and 125 nonfatal). Fatal as well as nonfatal coronary heart disease and stroke were all significantly more frequent among the women who had reported high blood pressure. After adjusting simultaneously for age and other risk factors, the relative risks were 3.5 (95% confidence interval (Cl) 2.8-4.5) for total coronary heart disease and 2.6 (95% Cl 1.8-3.5) for total stroke. This association was evident at all levels of relative weight. The results emphasize the importance of high blood pressure as an independent predictor of coronary heart disease and stroke in middle-aged women and suggest that the increased risk occurs in both lean and obese women.

The community-based randomized trials of pharmacologic treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.

The value of pharmacologic treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension remains controversial despite the availability of data from eight community-based randomized trials including over 34,000 subjects with entry diastolic blood pressures ranging from 85 to 120 mmHg. To obtain more reliable estimates of the effects of treatment, the authors conducted an overview of the data from all of these individual trials, and they found a significant 18% reduction in vascular mortality among subjects allocated to treatment, due chiefly to reductions in fatal stroke and myocardial infarction. Subjects allocated to treatment experienced highly significant reductions of approximately 40% in all stroke (typical odds ratio = 0.60, 95% confidence interval = 0.51-0.71) and fatal stroke (0.58, 0.44-0.77). For myocardial infarction, the proportional reductions were much smaller than those for stroke and were 9% for all and 8% for fatal events. While suggestive of protective effects, the typical odds ratios did not achieve statistical significance for either all (0.91, 0.82-1.01) or for fatal myocardial infarction (0.92, 0.78-1.08). This overview demonstrates a significant benefit of pharmacologic treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension on vascular mortality and on all as well as fatal stroke. It also suggests possible benefits of treatment on all and fatal myocardial infarction which should be investigated further.