Quality indicator survey versus traditional survey in New York State: a comparison of results from annual nursing home surveys.

Despite the passage of OBRA'87 for nursing home reform, concerns about care in facilities continue. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid developed new regulations and the Traditional Survey (TS) process for annual nursing home survey. The survey is conducted by state regional offices to determine facility compliance with federal regulations. Despite the regulations and new survey process, the TS inconsistently identified problems. A computerized process called the Quality Indicator Survey (QIS) was subsequently developed. This study was designed to compare results from TS and QIS on overall deficiencies, select quality indicators, high-severity deficiencies, and severity differences of seven quality indicators in New York State over a 6-year period from 2010 through 2015. Results of t-tests determined a significant difference in the overall mean number of deficiencies (p < .001), and on four indicators: choices (p < .001), nursing staff (p < .001), dental (p < .001), and dignity (p < .05). Facilities using the TS showed a higher mean number of harm level or higher deficiencies (p < .001). Chi-square tests for severity levels showed significantly more higher severity deficiencies on two quality indicators: nutrition (p < 0.001) and hydration (p < 0.05). Thus, the QIS produced a greater mean number of deficiencies, while TS produced more higher severity deficiencies in New York State.

Rasch Analysis of the Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale.

PURPOSE: This cross-sectional study explores the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale, a multi-item balance test for higher-functioning older adults. METHODS: Participants (n=480) were community-dwelling adults able to ambulate independently. Data gathering consisted of survey and balance performance assessment. Psychometric properties were assessed using Rasch analysis. RESULTS: Mean age of participants was 76.4 (SD=7.1) years. Mean FAB Scale scores were 24.7/40 (SD=7.5). Analyses for scale dimensionality showed that 9 of the 10 items fit a unidimensional measure of balance. Item 10 (Reactive Postural Control) did not fit the model. The reliability of the scale to separate persons was 0.81 out of 1.00; the reliability of the scale to separate items in terms of their difficulty was 0.99 out of 1.00. Cronbach's alpha for a 10-item model was 0.805. Items of differing difficulties formed a useful ordinal hierarchy for scaling patterns of expected balance ability scoring for a normative population. CONCLUSION: The FAB Scale appears to be a reliable and valid tool to assess balance function in higher-functioning older adults. The test was found to discriminate among participants of varying balance abilities. Further exploration of concurrent validity of Rasch-generated expected item scoring patterns should be undertaken to determine the test's diagnostic and prescriptive utility.

Poststroke rehabilitation: outcomes and reimbursement of inpatient rehabilitation facilities and subacute rehabilitation programs.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess whether poststroke rehabilitation outcomes and reimbursement for Medicare beneficiaries differ across inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) and skilled nursing facility (SNF) subacute rehabilitation programs. METHODS: Clinical data were linked with Medicare claims for 58,724 Medicare beneficiaries with a recent stroke who completed treatment in 1996 or 1997 in IRFs and subacute rehabilitation SNFs that subscribed to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Outcome measures were discharge destination, discharge FIM ratings and Medicare Part A reimbursement during the institutional stay. RESULTS: IRF patients that were more likely to have a community-based discharge, compared with rehabilitation SNF patients, were patients with mild motor disabilities and FIM cognitive ratings of 23 or greater (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.19; 95% CI: 1.52 to 3.14), patients with moderate motor disabilities (AOR=1.98; 95% CI: 1.49 to 2.61), patients with significant motor disabilities (AOR=1.26; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.57) and patients younger than 82 with severe motor disabilities (AOR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.25 to 1.64). IRF patients with significant and severe motor disabilities achieved greater motor function of 2 or more FIM units compared with rehabilitation SNF patients. Medicare Part A payments for IRFs were higher than rehabilitation SNF payments across all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: For most patients, poststroke rehabilitation in the more costly and intensive IRFs resulted in higher functional outcomes compared with care in a SNF-based rehabilitation program. IRF and SNF outcomes were similar for patients with minimal motor disabilities and patients with mild motor disabilities and significant cognitive disabilities. Cost-effectiveness analyses require considering the costs of the full episode of care.

Outcomes and reimbursement of inpatient rehabilitation facilities and subacute rehabilitation programs for Medicare beneficiaries with hip fracture.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess whether outcomes and reimbursement differ for Medicare beneficiaries with hip fracture when treated in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) compared with a skilled nursing facility (SNF) subacute rehabilitation program. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical data were linked with Medicare claims for 29,793 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with a recent hip fracture who completed treatment in 1996 or 1997 in rehabilitation facilities that subscribed to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured discharge destination, change in motor FIM rating, and Medicare Part A reimbursement. RESULTS: For patients with moderate-to-severe and severe disabilities, case mix groups (CMGs) 704 and 705, the percentage of patients discharged to the community from IRFs was lower than for patients treated in subacute rehabilitation SNFs, after controlling for covariates. Adjusted odds ratios were 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.92) for CMG 704 and 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.63-0.83) for CMG 705. For patients in the 3 other CMGs, no significant differences were detected. Improvement in motor functional status was roughly equivalent for patients treated in IRFs and those treated in the subacute rehabilitation programs across all 5 CMGs, after controlling for covariates. Medicare Part A payments for IRFs were significantly higher than SNF payments across all CMGs. CONCLUSION: SNF-based subacute rehabilitation was less costly and outcomes were in most, but not all, instances similar or better than IRF-based rehabilitation for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who had a recent hip fracture.

The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report: patients discharged from subacute rehabilitation programs in 1999.

This is the third annual report describing patients discharged from subacute rehabilitation programs in the United States that subscribe to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDSmr). The analysis included 39,562 complete records of first admission cases discharged alive from 180 facilities in 1999. Sixty-five percent of the patients were women, and most patients (91%) were white. Sixty-two percent of the patients were 75 yr of age or older. Before the impairment onset, 55% lived with at least one other person. The average total FIM (motor and cognitive) score change for all patients was 21.1 points, and when stratified by rehabilitation impairment group, average scores ranged from 18.3 for patients with pulmonary conditions to 25.3 for patients with a joint replacement. The percentage of patients discharged to a community-based setting ranged from 67% for patients with stroke to 94% for patients with a joint replacement. These data show that patients receiving care in subacute rehabilitation programs show measurable functional improvement and that a high percentage of patients are discharged to community-based settings.

Hospital readmission of persons with hip fracture following medical rehabilitation.

A significant percentage of older adults hospitalized and treated for hip fracture are readmitted to a hospital within six months. We analyzed information from a national database, the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Records for 8,236 patients (1994-98) who received inpatient medical rehabilitation following treatment for hip fracture were examined. Mean age was 76.51 years (S.D. = 12.48) with 71% female and 79% non-Hispanic White. The primary outcome measure was incidence of hospital readmission 0-180 days post-discharge. The hospital readmission rate was 16.7%. A Cox regression model predicting rehospitalization included the following variables (p < 0.05): basic daily living skills, age, length of stay, ethnicity, and gender. There was a statistically significant difference in the percent of male versus female patients rehospitalized for Hispanic subjects but not for non-Hispanic white or African American subjects. The greatest variability occurred among male patients. A total of 18.1% of non-Hispanic White males and 16.8% of African American males were rehospitalized. In contrast, only 10.1% of Hispanic males were rehospitalized. Basic daily living skills, length of hospital stay, age, ethnicity and gender were variables associated with hospital readmission following medical rehabilitation in persons with hip fracture. These variables should be considered in developing intervention programs to reduce the risk of hospital readmission.

Risks of acute hospital transfer and mortality during stroke rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To identify demographic, medical, and functional factors associated with transfer of stroke patients to acute hospital services and/or mortality during stroke rehabilitation. DESIGN: Two case-control studies in which logistic regression was used to control for clinical traits associated with differences in likelihood. SETTING: A total of 542 US inpatient and rehabilitation units. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 64,471 patients discharged during 1995. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Transfer to an acute hospital service and death. RESULTS: There were 5847 (9.1%) acute hospital transfers and 320 (0.5%) deaths. Greater disability at admission was associated with higher odds of both acute hospitalization and mortality. Cardiopulmonary arrest, chest pain, gastrointestinal problems, bleeding disorders, hypercoagulable states, and acute renal difficulties increased the relative odds of acute hospitalization from 3.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-4.2) to 12.7 (95% CI, 9.2-17.6). The likelihood of mortality for patients 85 years of age or older was more than 2-fold (2.5; 95% CI, 1.7-3.6) that of patients 65 years of age or younger for blacks, it was nearly 2-fold (1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.3) compared with whites, after adjusting for clinical differences. CONCLUSION: Higher likelihoods of mortality among older patients versus younger, black patients versus white, and patients with more rather than less disability at admission suggest the need for greater vigilance in monitoring medical status.

Prediction of follow-up living setting in patients with lower limb joint replacement.

OBJECTIVE: The living setting to which older adults are discharged from medical rehabilitation has important social and economic implications. This study was undertaken to develop statistical models to predict living setting after medical rehabilitation in persons with lower limb joint replacement. DESIGN: Information submitted from 1994 through 1998 to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation was examined. Hip replacement was experienced by 42% of the patients, 51% experienced a knee replacement, and 7% received some combination or other lower limb procedure. RESULTS: Persons with hip replacements were slightly older than persons with knee replacements and had a longer length of stay. Logistic regression was used to develop a predictive model based on 60% of the cases. The model included five statistically significant predictor variables. CONCLUSION: Cognitive and basic motor function associated with activities of daily living, age, length of stay, and marital status were important variables in predicting if older adults would be living at home 80-180 days after rehabilitation for lower limb joint replacement.

The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of patients discharged from comprehensive medical rehabilitation programs in 1999.

This is the 10th annual report describing patients discharged from comprehensive medical rehabilitation programs in the United States that subscribe to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. The analysis included 298,973 complete records of first admission cases discharged alive from 676 facilities in 1999. The data show that patients receiving care in comprehensive rehabilitation programs show measurable functional improvement and that a high percentage of patients are discharged to community-based settings.

A unidimensional pain/disability measure for low-back pain syndromes.

A new measure is presented, suitable for documenting severity and response to treatment in chronic low-back pain syndromes. It is self-administered and combines two pain and seven mobility items. These were selected from pre-existing validated instruments on the basis of their sensitivity to change after treatment. Their Italian validated translation was adopted. The measure was administered to 32 chronic low-back pain Italian patients, all refractory to previous conservative treatments. In most cases they presented with herniation or protrusion of 1-3 lumbar discs. Patients were treated with 3-6 sessions of autotraction over a 5- to 15-day period. Scores on the scale were recorded at admission, discharge and follow-up, 1-3 months after treatment. At discharge and at follow-up, patients were asked if, overall, they felt improved, the same or worse. At follow-up, 20 patients out of 32 reported overall improvement. Scalometric properties of the measure were tested using Rasch analysis. For admission and follow-up, items followed a consistent hierarchical relationship along a unidimensional pain/disability variable, which is being called back illness. The items were not redundant, in that they spread well along a wide range of difficulty/severity. The hierarchy matched well with the expected expression of the conditions of the patients. A study was conducted on 34 chronic back pain patients, showing satisfactory test-retest reliability. Depending on the various items, Cohen's unweighted K ranged from 0.27 to 0.78, with ten of the 11 items above the 0.45 level of acceptability, while intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.42 to 0.89. At follow-up, changes in BACKILL of plus 15% or more, with respect to admission, were consistent with patients' reports of improvement in 19 out of 20 cases. Changes in BACKILL of less than 15% were consistent with patients reports of being the same or worse in 11 out of 12 cases.