RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether social determinants of health (SDH) risk adjustment changes hospital-level performance on the 30-day Pediatric All-Condition Readmission (PACR) measure and improves fit and accuracy of discharge-level models. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all hospital discharges meeting criteria for the PACR from 47 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information database from January to December 2014. We built four nested regression models by sequentially adding risk adjustment factors as follows: chronic condition indicators (CCIs); PACR patient factors (age and sex); electronic health record-derived SDH (race, ethnicity, payer), and zip code-linked SDH (families below poverty level, vacant housing units, adults without a high school diploma, single-parent households, median household income, unemployment rate). For each model, we measured the change in hospitals' readmission decile-rank and assessed model fit and accuracy. RESULTS: For the 458 686 discharges meeting PACR inclusion criteria, in multivariable models, factors associated with higher discharge-level PACR measure included age <1 year, female sex, 1 of 17 CCIs, higher CCI count, Medicaid insurance, higher median household income, and higher percentage of single-parent households. Adjustment for SDH made small but significant improvements in fit and accuracy of discharge-level PACR models, with larger effect at the hospital level, changing decile-rank for 17 of 47 hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: We found that risk adjustment for SDH changed hospitals' readmissions rate rank order. Hospital-level changes in relative readmissions performance can have considerable financial implications; thus, for pay for performance measures calculated at the hospital level, and for research associated therewith, our findings support the inclusion of SDH variables in risk adjustment.
Assuntos
Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Reembolso de Incentivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco Ajustado , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Study Objectives: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is effective in treating obstructive sleep apnea in children, but adherence to therapy is low. Our center created an intensive program that aimed to improve adherence. Our objective was to estimate the program's efficacy, cost, revenue and break-even point in a generalizable manner relative to a standard approach. Methods: The intensive program included device consignment, behavioral psychology counseling, and follow-up telephone calls. Economic modeling considered the costs, revenue and break-even point. Costs were derived from national salary reports and the Pediatric Health Information System. The 2015 Medicare reimbursement schedule provided revenue estimates. Results: Prior to the intensive CPAP program, only 67.6% of 244 patients initially prescribed CPAP appeared for follow-up visits and only 38.1% had titration polysomnograms. In contrast, 81.4% of 275 patients in the intensive program appeared for follow-up visits (p < .001) and 83.6% had titration polysomnograms (p < .001). Medicare reimbursement levels would be insufficient to cover the estimated costs of the intensive program; break-even points would need to be 1.29-2.08 times higher to cover the costs. Conclusions: An intensive CPAP program leads to substantially higher follow-up and CPAP titration rates, but costs are higher. While affordable at our institution due to the local payer mix and revenue, Medicare reimbursement levels would not cover estimated costs. This study highlights the need for enhanced funding for pediatric CPAP programs, due to the special needs of this population and the long-term health risks of suboptimally treated obstructive sleep apnea.
Assuntos
Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Cooperação do Paciente , Pediatria/economia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/economia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pediatria/métodos , Polissonografia/economia , Polissonografia/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine if household income is associated with hospitalization costs for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of inpatient, nonrehabilitation hospitalizations at 43 freestanding children's hospitals for patients <19 years old with unintentional severe TBI and SCI from 2009-2012. Standardized cost of care for hospitalizations was modeled using mixed-effects methods, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, primary payer, presence of chronic medical condition, mechanism of injury, injury severity, distance from residence to hospital, and trauma center level. Main exposure was zip code level median annual household income. RESULTS: There were 1061 patients that met inclusion criteria, 833 with TBI only, 227 with SCI only, and 1 with TBI and SCI. Compared with those with the lowest-income zip codes, patients from the highest-income zip codes were more likely to be older, white (76.7% vs 50.4%), have private insurance (68.9% vs 27.9%), and live closer to the hospital (median distance 26.7 miles vs 81.2 miles). In adjusted models, there was no significant association between zip code level household income and hospitalization costs. CONCLUSIONS: Children hospitalized with unintentional, severe TBI and SCI showed no difference in standardized hospital costs relative to a patient's home zip code level median annual household income. The association between household income and hospitalization costs may vary by primary diagnosis.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Classe Social , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Renda , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In preparation for the development of a curriculum on health care costs and value for pediatricians, the goal of this study was to assess pediatricians' baseline perceptions about the concepts of "cost" and "value" in health care, and topics that should be included in a curriculum that teaches about costs and value in pediatrics. METHODS: Physicians in the Department of Pediatrics at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia received an online freelisting survey asking them to generate lists of words that come to mind when thinking about "costs" in health care, "value" in health care, and topics to include in a curriculum on costs and value in pediatrics. AnthroPac software generated salience scores, indicating the relative importance of each term. RESULTS: A total of 207 surveys were completed for a 40% response rate. For the "cost" prompt, the most salient responses were "excessive," "waste," and "insurance." For the "value" prompt, the most salient responses were "outcomes" and "quality." For elements to include in a curriculum, the most salient responses were "insurance" and "costs." Analyzing responses based on years in practice, percentage clinical time, and division resulted in slightly different lists and salience scores. CONCLUSIONS: In this freelisting exercise, there was general agreement that health care costs are "excessive," that "outcomes" and "quality" are integral to value, and that there is a need for education in these areas, especially around "insurance." Differences based on years in practice, percentage clinical time, or division can inform the development of targeted curricula that consider the needs, knowledge, and interests of these groups.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Pediatria/educação , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Currículo , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess readmission rates identified by 3M-Potentially Preventable Readmissions software (3M-PPRs) in a national cohort of children's hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1â719â617 hospitalizations for 1â531â828 unique patients in 58 children's hospitals from 2009 to 2011 from the Children's Hospital Association Case-Mix Comparative database were examined. Main outcome measures included rates, diagnoses, and costs of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) and all-cause readmissions. RESULTS: The 7-, 15-, and 30-day rates by 3M-PPRs were 2.5%, 4.1%, and 6.2%, respectively. Corresponding all-cause readmission rates were 5.0%, 8.7%, and 13.3%. At 30 days, 60.6% of all-cause readmissions were considered nonpreventable by 3M-PPRs, more than one-half of which were related to malignancies. The percentage of readmissions rated as potentially preventable was similar at all 3 time intervals. Readmissions after chemotherapy, acute leukemia, and cystic fibrosis were all considered nonpreventable, and at least 80% of readmissions after index admissions for sickle cell crisis, bronchiolitis, ventricular shunt procedures, asthma, and appendectomy were designated potentially preventable. Total costs for all readmissions were $1.7 billion; PPRs accounted for 27.3% of these costs. The most costly readmissions were associated with ventricular shunt procedures ($26.5 million/year), seizures ($15.5 million/year), and sickle cell crisis ($15.0 million/year). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of PPRs were significantly lower than all-cause readmission rates more than one-half of which were caused by exclusion of malignancies. Annual costs of PPRs, although significant in the aggregate, appear to represent a much smaller cost-savings opportunity for children than for adults. Our study may help guide children's hospitals to focus readmission reduction strategies on areas where the financial vulnerability is greatest based on 3M-PPRs.
Assuntos
Emergências , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Tonsilectomia , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that children's hospitals with shorter length of stay (LOS) for hospitalized patients have higher all-cause readmission rates. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal, retrospective cohort study of the Pediatric Health Information System of 183616 admissions within 43 US children's hospitals for appendectomy, asthma, gastroenteritis, and seizure between July 2009 and June 2011. Admissions were stratified by medical complexity, based on whether patients had a complex chronic health condition, were neurologically impaired, or were assisted with medical technology. Outcome measures include LOS; all-cause readmission rates within 3, 7, 15, and 30 days; and the association between hospital-specific mean LOS and all-cause readmission rates as determined by linear regression. RESULTS: Mean LOS was <3 days for all patients across all conditions, except for appendectomy in complex patients (mean LOS 3.7 days, 95% CI 3.47-4.01). Condition-specific 3-, 7-, 15-, and 30-day all-cause readmission rates for noncomplex patients were all <5%. Condition-specific readmission rates for complex patients ranged from <1% at 3 days for seizures to 16% at 30 days for gastroenteritis. There was no linear association between hospital-specific, condition-specific mean LOS, stratified by medical complexity, and all-cause readmission rates at any time interval within 30 days (all P values ≥.10). CONCLUSION: In children's hospitals, LOS is short and readmission rates are low for asthma, appendectomy, gastroenteritis, and seizure admissions. In the conditions studied, there is no association between shorter hospital-specific LOS and higher readmission rates within the LOS observed.