Needle electromyography does not meaningfully impact findings in MR-neurography/-myography.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) and myography (MRM) are emerging imaging methods for detecting diseases of the peripheral nerve system (PNS). Most patients with PNS diseases also undergo needle electromyography (EMG). This study examined whether EMG led to lesions that were detectable using MRN/MRM and whether these lesions could impair image interpretation. METHODS: Ten patients who underwent clinically indicated EMG were recruited. MRN/MRM was performed before and 2-6 h after EMG, and if achievable, 2-3 days later. T2 signal intensity (SI) of the tibialis anterior muscle (TA) was quantified, and sizes and SI of the new lesions were measured. Visual rating was performed independently by three neuroradiologists. RESULTS: T2 lesions at the site of needle insertion, defined as focal edema, were detectable in 9/10 patients. The mean edema size was 31.72 mm2 (SD = 14.42 mm2 ) at the first follow-up. Susceptibility-weighted imaging lesions, defined as (micro) hematomas were detected in 5/10 patients (mean size, 23.85 mm2 [SD = 12.59 mm2 ]). General muscle SI of the TA did not differ between pre- and post-EMG examinations. Lesions size was relatively small, and the readers described image interpretation as not impaired by these lesions. DISCUSSION: This study showed that focal edema and hematomas frequently occurred after needle EMG and could be observed using MRN/MRM. As general muscle SI was not affected and image interpretation was not impaired, we concluded that needle EMG did not interfere with MRN/MRM.

Detection of Traumatic and Postoperative Nerve Lesions following Upper Extremity Fractures in a Pediatric Cohort Using MR Neurography.

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the upper extremity are common traumatic injuries in children. Nerve lesions are a rare but typical complication of these fractures. Additional to physical, electrophysiological, and sonographic examinations, magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) can be used to assess the degree and exact localization of nerve damage. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the potential role of this examination technique for children and to test a proposed MRN classification of traumatic nerve injury according to Chhabra in a pediatric cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pediatric patients undergoing MRN for traumatic nerve injury from January 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively identified. A total of 12 consecutive patients with sufficient clinical data, an MRN, and if available follow-up examination were enrolled and analyzed. RESULTS: In 10 of 12 cases one or more nerve lesions could be identified by MRN using the classification proposed by Chhabra et al. MRN was used to assess nerve injuries, imaging results were compared with clinical course. Clinical follow-up examinations of 10 patients showed an overall good clinical recovery, even in one case with severe trauma and nerve surgery. CONCLUSION: MRN as a noninvasive procedure can help in the evaluation of nerve injury, especially for the identification of lower grade nerve damage and to objectify suspected nerve damage in case of uncertain clinical examination results; thus, can help in decision making whether surgical revision or conservative treatment is preferable.