Efficacy and Safety of Atorvastatin for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurological condition, especially in the elderly population. Atorvastatin has shown the potential to reduce the recurrence of CSDH and improve overall outcomes. New studies have emerged since the last meta-analysis, increasing the sample size and the variety of outcomes analyzed. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies comparing the use of atorvastatin in CSDH patients with a control group or placebo. The primary outcome was the recurrence of CSDH. Secondary outcomes of interest were hematoma volume, composite adverse effects, mortality, and neurological function, measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and Barthel index for activities of daily living (ADL). RESULTS: 7 studies, of which 2 were RCTs, were included containing 1,192 patients. Overall recurrence significantly decreased compared to the control group (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25-0.83; p = 0.009). The benefits of atorvastatin were sustained in the subgroup analysis of patients who underwent initial conservative therapy (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.22-0.70; p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference when atorvastatin was combined with surgical intervention (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.21-1.32; p = 0.17). Adverse effects were not increased by atorvastatin (RR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.51-1.34; p = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin might be beneficial in reducing CSDH recurrence, especially in conservative treatment patients. Atorvastatin was not significantly associated with adverse effects. Larger, higher-quality randomized studies are needed to adequately evaluate the efficacy, safety, and optimal dose of atorvastatin in CSDH patients.

Neuroradiological features of patients with bilateral macronodular adrenocortical disease and meningiomas associated or not with genetic variants of ARMC5- a case series.

INTRODUCTION: Meningiomas are the most common primary brain and central nervous system tumors, accounting for approximately 40% of these tumors. The most important exams for the radiological study of meningiomas are computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We aimed to analyze the radiological features of patients with meningioma related to the simultaneous presence of bilateral macronodular adrenocortical disease (BMAD), with or without pathogenic variants of ARMC5. METHODS: This study included 10 patients who were diagnosed with BMAD. All of them had a radiological diagnosis of expansive brain lesions suggestive of meningioma. All patients underwent brain MRI and a neuroradiolgist analyzed the following parameters: number, site and size of lesions; presence of calcification, edema and bone involvement. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Eight patients presented with germline variants of ARMC5; the other 2, did not. The most significant result was the incidence of multiple meningiomas, which was 50% in BMAD patients, whereas the average incidence described thus far is lower than 10%. Considering location, the 22 tumors in the BMAD patients were 5 convexity tumors (22.7%), and 17 skull base tumors (77.2%), the opposite proportion of patients without BMAD. A total of 40.9% of the tumors had calcification, 9% had cerebral edema and 40.9% had bone invasion due to hyperostosis. The literature describes meningioma calcification in 25% of patients, bone invasion by tumor hyperostosis in 20%, and cerebral edema in approximately 60%. CONCLUSION: Relevant results were found considering the rate of multiple meningiomas and tumor location. This finding reinforces the need for further research into the neurological effects caused by genetic variants of ARMC5 in patients with BMAD.

Relationship Between Brain Tumors and Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review.

AIM: To investigate the possible relationship between intracranial aneurysms and brain neoplasms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review involving a search of the databases PubMed and Embase to identify relevant articles was conducted in March 2021. The initial search retrieved 451 articles. After deduplication and screening of abstracts, 56 articles were selected. After reading of the full texts, 19 articles were included in the review. RESULTS: There insufficient evidence to support that people with brain neoplasms have a higher incidence rate of IAs. However, the prevalence of IAs appears to be higher in patients with pituitary tumors than in the general population. The key factors affecting prognosis were tumor type in patients with unruptured aneurysms and progression of subarachnoid hemorrhage in individuals with ruptured aneurysms. Treatment should be individualized according to patient age, tumor pathology, location, and aneurysm rupture risk. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of evidence to affirm that the existence of brain neoplasm plays a role in the formation and rupture of intracranial aneurysms. Additionally, there is insufficient evidence to confirm a greater prevalence of intracranial aneurysms in individuals with brain tumors. The association of these two disorders does not appear to worsen patient outcome. Prognosis depends on tumor pathology for malignant cases and on subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients with ruptured aneurysms.

Short-term predictors of stereotactic radiosurgery outcome for untreated single non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a restrospective cohort study.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an option for brain metastases (BM) not eligible for surgical resection, however, predictors of SRS outcomes are poorly known. The aim of this study is to investigate predictors of SRS outcome in patients with BM secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The secondary objective is to analyze the value of volumetric criteria in identifying BM progression. This retrospective cohort study included patients >18 years of age with a single untreated BM secondary to NSCLC. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were assessed. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a BM volumetric increase 12 months after SRS. The unidimensional measurement of the BM at follow-up was also assessed. One hundred thirty-five patients were included, with a median BM volume at baseline of 1.1 cm3 (IQR 0.4-2.3). Fifty-two (38.5%) patients had SRS failure at follow-up. Only right BM laterality was associated with SRS failure (p=0.039). Using the volumetric definition of SRS failure, the unidimensional criteria demonstrated a sensibility of 60.78% (46.11%-74.16%), specificity of 89.02% (80.18%-94.86%), positive LR of 5.54 (2.88-10.66) and negative LR of 0.44 (0.31-0.63). SRS demonstrated a 61.5% local control rate 12 months after treatment. Among the potential predictors of treatment outcome analyzed, only the right BM laterality had a significant association with SRS failure. The volumetric criteria were able to identify more subtle signs of BM increase than the unidimensional criteria, which may allow earlier diagnosis of disease progression and use of appropriate therapies.

Neuropsychological outcomes in patients with ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms treated by clipping versus coiling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ruptured anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms are frequently associated with neuropsychological deficits. This review aims to compare neuropsychological outcomes between surgical and endovascular approaches to ACoA. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies comparing the endovascular and surgical approaches to ruptured ACoA aneurysms. Outcomes of interest were the cognitive function, covered by memory, attention, intelligence, executive, and language domains, as well as motor and visual functions. Nine studies, comprising 524 patients were included. Endovascularly-treated patients showed better memory than those treated surgically (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = -2; 95% CI: -3.40 to -0.61; p < 0.01). Surgically clipped patients had poorer motor ability than those with coiling embolization (p = 0.01). Executive function (SMD = -0.20; 95% CI: -0.47 to 0.88; p = 0.55), language (SMD = -0.33; 95% CI: -0.95 to 0.30; p = 0.30), visuospatial function (SMD = -1.12; 95% CI: -2.79 to 0.56; p = 0.19), attention (SMD = -0.94; 95% CI: -2.79to 0.91; p = 0.32), intelligence (SMD = -0.25; 95% CI: -0.73 to 0.22; p = 0.30), and self-reported cognitive status (SMD = -0.51; 95% CI: -1.38 to 0.35; p = 0.25) revealed parity between groups. Patients with ACoA treated endovascularly had superior memory and motor abilities. Other cognitive domains, including executive function, language, visuospatial function, attention, intelligence and self-reported cognitive status revealed no statistically significant differences between the two approaches. Trial Registration PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42023461283; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=461283.

Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery-Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Bypass versus Occipital Artery-Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Bypass for Treating Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: When traditional therapies are unsuitable, revascularization becomes essential for managing posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) or vertebral artery aneurysms. Notably, the PICA-PICA bypass has emerged as a promising option, overshadowing the occipital artery-PICA (OA-PICA) bypass. The objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of OA-PICA and PICA-PICA bypasses. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OA-PICA and PICA-PICA bypasses for treating posterior circulation aneurysms. RESULTS: We analyzed 13 studies for the PICA-PICA bypass and 16 studies on the OA-PICA bypass, involving 84 and 110 patients, respectively. The median average follow-up for PICA-PICA bypass was 8 months (2-50.3 months), while for OA-PICA, it was 27.8 months (6-84 months). The patency rate for OA-PICA was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92%-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 95%-100%) for PICA-PICA. Complication rates were 29% (95% CI: 10%-47%) for OA-PICA and 12% (95% CI: 3%-21%) for PICA-PICA. Good clinical outcomes were observed in 71% (95% CI: 52%-90%) of OA-PICA patients and 87% (95% CI: 75%-100%) of PICA-PICA patients. Procedure-related mortality was 1% (95% CI: 0%-6%) for OA-PICA and 1% (95% CI: 0%-10%) for PICA-PICA. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures have demonstrated promising results in efficacy and safety. PICA-PICA exhibits slightly better patency rates, better clinical outcomes, and fewer complications, but with a lack of substantial follow-up and a smaller sample size. The choice between these procedures should be based on the surgeon's expertise and the patient's anatomy.

Blood pressure targets after successful reperfusion in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine whether intensive blood pressure (BP) control for patients with successful reperfusion following acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is beneficial, compared to conventional BP management. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the subject. The studied outcomes included dependency or death at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 3-6); severe disability at 90 days (mRS 3-5); mortality at 90 days; and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were used to compare the treatment effects for categorical outcomes. We employed a fixed-effect model for analyses with low heterogeneity (I2 < 25%) and a random-effects model for analyses with higher heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 1519 patients were included, with 50% (n = 760) receiving intensive BP control (systolic BP < 140 mmHg). Functional disability or death at 90 days was significantly higher in the intensive group (54.9%) compared to the conventional treatment group (44.1%) (OR = 1.51; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.15-1.96; p = 0.003; I2 = 29%). Severe functional disability (mRS 3-5) was significantly higher in the intensive group (30.6% vs. 43.5%, OR = 1.75; 95%CI = 1.36-2.25; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%). There was no difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 1.13; 95%CI = 0.76-1.67) or mortality (OR = 1.22; 95%CI = 0.9-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive BP control is harmful in patients who underwent EVT for AIS and achieved successful reperfusion. It yields higher rates of functional dependence, with no differences in mortality or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Brain tissue oxygen combined with intracranial pressure monitoring versus isolated intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with traumatic brain injury: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) is pivotal in the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), but secondary brain injuries can arise despite normal ICP levels. Cerebral tissue oxygenation monitoring (PbtO2) may detect neuronal tissue infarction thresholds, enhancing neuroprotection. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of combined cerebral tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) and ICP compared to isolated ICP monitoring in patients with TBI. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Sciences databases were searched for trials published up to June 2023. A total of 16 studies comprising 37,820 patients were included. ICP monitoring was universal, with additional placement of PbtO2 in 2222 individuals (5.8%). The meta-analysis revealed a reduction in mortality (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.89, p = 0.01), a greater likelihood of favorable outcomes (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.66-3.14, p < 0.01), and a lower chance of poor outcomes (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.79, p < 0.01) at 6 months for the PbtO2 plus ICP group. However, these patients experienced a longer length of hospital stay (MD 2.35, 95% CI 0.50-4.20, p = 0.01). No significant difference was found in hospital mortality rates (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61-1.08, p = 0.16) or intensive care unit length of stay (MD 2.46, 95% CI - 0.11-5.04, p = 0.06). The integration of PbtO2 to ICP monitoring improved mortality outcomes and functional recovery at 6 months in patients with TBI. PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42022383937; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=383937.

Does amantadine improve cognitive recovery in severe disorders of consciousness after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? A double-blind placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Severe disorders of consciousness (sDoC) are a common sequela of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages (aSAH), and amantadine has been used to improve cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of amantadine treatment on consciousness in patients with sDoC secondary to aSAH. METHODS: This double-center, randomized, prospective, cohort study included patients ≥ 18 years old with sDoC after aSAH from February 2020 to September 2023. Individual patient data of patients were pooled to determine the effect of amantadine, in comparison to placebo. The primary outcomes at 3 and 6 months after the ictus were evaluated using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). In addition to all-cause mortality, secondary endpoints were assessed weekly during intervention by scores on Rappaport's Disability Rating Scale (RDRS) and Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRSR). RESULTS: Overall, 37 patients with sDoC and initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) varying between 3 and 11 were recruited and randomized to amantadine (test group, n = 20) or placebo (control group, n = 17). The average age was 59.5 years (28 to 81 year-old), 24 (65%) were women, and the mean GCS at the beginning of intervention was 7.1. Most patients evolved to vasospasm (81%), with ischemia in 73% of them. The intervention was started between 30 to 180 days after the ictus, and administered for 6 weeks, with progressively higher doses. Neither epidemiological characteristics nor considerations regarding the treatment of the aneurysm and its complications differed between both arms. Overall mortality was 10.8% (4 deaths). During the study, four patients had potential adverse drug effects: two presented seizures, one had paralytic ileus, and another evolved with tachycardia; the medication was not suspended, only the dose was not increased. At data opening, 2 were taking amantadine and 2 placebo. CONCLUSION: Despite some good results associated with amantadine in the literature, this study did not find statistically significant positive effects in cognitive recovery in patients with delayed post-aSAH sDoC. Further large randomized clinical trials in patients' subgroups are needed to better define its effectiveness and clarify any therapeutic window where it can be advantageous.

Homocysteine serum levels in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: There is very few data regarding homocysteine's influence on the formation and rupture of intracranial aneurysms. OBJECTIVE: To compare homocysteine levels between patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms, and to evaluate possible influences of this molecule on vasospasm and functional outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective, case-control study. We evaluated homocysteinemia differences between patients with ruptured and unruptured aneurysms; and the association of homocysteine levels with vasospasm and functional outcomes. Logistic regressions were performed. RESULTS: A total of 348 participants were included: 114 (32.8%) with previous aneurysm rupture and 234 (67.2%) with unruptured aneurysms. Median homocysteine was 10.75µmol/L (IQR = 4.59) in patients with ruptured aneurysms and 11.5µmol/L (IQR = 5.84) in patients with unruptured aneurysms. No significant association was detected between homocysteine levels and rupture status (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.96-1.04). Neither mild (>15µmol/L; OR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.32-4.12) nor moderate (>30µmol/L; OR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.54-1.81) hyperhomocysteinemia demonstrated significant correlations with ruptured aneurysms. Neither univariate (OR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.71-1.0) nor multivariable age-adjusted (OR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.75-1.05) models evidenced an association between homocysteine levels and vasospasm. Homocysteinemia did not influence excellent functional outcomes at 6 months (mRS≤1) (OR = 1.04; 95% CI = 0.94-1.16). CONCLUSION: There were no differences regarding homocysteinemia between patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. In patients with ruptured aneurysms, homocysteinemia was not associated with vasospasm or functional outcomes.

ANTECEDENTES: Existem poucos dados sobre a influência da homocisteína na formação e rotura de aneurismas intracranianos (AI). OBJETIVO: Comparar os níveis de homocisteína entre pacientes com AI rotos e não rotos e influências no vasoespasmo e resultados funcionais. MéTODOS: Estudo caso-controle, que avaliou as diferenças de homocisteinemia entre pacientes com aneurismas rotos e não rotos, além da associação entre níveis de homocisteína, vasoespasmo e estado funcional. Regressões logísticas foram realizadas. RESULTADOS: Um total de 348 participantes foram incluídos: 114 (32,8%) com aneurismas rotos e 234 (67,2%) não rotos. A homocisteína mediana foi de 10,75µmol/L (IQR = 4,59) nos rotos e 11,5µmol/L (IQR = 5,84) nos não rotos. Não houve associação significativa entre os níveis de homocisteína e o status de ruptura (OR = 0,99, 95% CI = 0,96-1,04). Nem a hiperhomocisteinemia leve (>15µmol/L; OR = 1,25, 95% CI = 0,32-4,12) nem a moderada (>30µmol/L; OR = 1,0, 95% CI = 0,54-1,81) mostraram correlações significativas com aneurismas rotos. Modelos univariados (OR = 0,86; 95% CI = 0,71-1,0) e multivariados ajustados por idade (OR = 0,91; 95% CI = 0,75-1,05) não evidenciaram associação entre homocisteína e vasoespasmo. A homocisteinemia não influenciou resultados funcionais excelentes em seis meses (mRS ≤ 1) (OR = 1,04; 95% CI = 0,94-1,16). CONCLUSãO: Não houve diferenças em relação à homocisteinemia entre pacientes com aneurismas intracranianos rotos e não rotos. Em pacientes com aneurismas rotos, a homocisteinemia não foi associada ao vasoespasmo ou resultados funcionais.

Efficacy and Safety of Intraoperative Radiotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are aggressive tumors of the central nervous system that cause significant morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in surgery and radiation therapy (RT), HGG still has a high incidence of recurrence and treatment failure. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach to achieve local tumor control while sparing normal brain tissue from radiation-induced damage. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the use of IORT for HGG. Eligible studies were included based on specific criteria, and data were independently extracted. Outcomes of interest included complications, IORT failure, survival rates at 12 and 24 months, and mortality. RESULTS: Sixteen studies comprising 436 patients were included. The overall complication rate after IORT was 17%, with significant heterogeneity observed. The IORT failure rate was 77%, while the survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 74% and 24%, respectively. The mortality rate was 62%. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that IORT may be a promising adjuvant treatment for selected patients with HGG. Despite the high rate of complications and treatment failures, the survival outcomes were comparable or even superior to conventional methods. However, the limitations of the study, such as the lack of a control group and small sample sizes, warrant further investigation through prospective randomized controlled trials to better understand the specific patient populations that may benefit most from IORT. However, the limitations of the study, such as the lack of a control group and small sample sizes, warrant further investigation. Notably, the ongoing RP3 trial (NCT02685605) is currently underway, with the aim of providing a more comprehensive understanding of IORT. Moreover, future research should focus on managing complications associated with IORT to improve its safety and efficacy in treating HGG.

Prospective Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy of 25 Gy in 5 Fractions Compared With 35 Gy in 5 Fractions in the Reirradiation of Recurrent Glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to investigate whether reirradiation of recurrent glioblastoma with hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT) consisting of 35 Gy in 5 fractions (35 Gy/5 fx) compared with 25 Gy in 5 fractions (25 Gy/5 fx) improves outcomes while maintaining acceptable toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a prospective randomized phase 2 trial involving patients with recurrent glioblastoma (per the 2007 and 2016 World Health Organization classification). A minimum interval from first radiation therapy of 5 months and gross tumor volume of 150 cc were required. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive HSRT alone in 25 Gy/5 fx or 35 Gy/5 fx. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). We used a randomized phase 2 screening design with a 2-sided α of 0.15 for the primary endpoint. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2019, 40 patients were randomized and received HSRT, with 20 patients in each group. The median age was 50 years (range, 27-71); a new resection before HSRT was performed in 75% of patients. The median PFS was 4.9 months in the 25 Gy/5 fx group and 5.2 months in the 35 Gy/5 fx group (P = .23). Six-month PFS was similar at 40% (85% CI, 24%-55%) for both groups. The median overall survival (OS) was 9.2 months in the 25 Gy/5 fx group and 10 months in the 35 Gy/5 fx group (P = .201). Grade ≥3 necrosis was numerically higher in the 35 Gy/5 fx group (3 [16%] vs 1 [5%]), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .267). In an exploratory analysis, median OS of patients who developed treatment-related necrosis was 14.1 months, and that of patients who did not was 8.7 months (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: HSRT alone with 35 Gy/5 fx was not superior to 25 Gy/5 fx in terms of PFS or OS. Due to a potential increase in the rate of clinically meaningful treatment-related necrosis, we suggest 25 Gy/5 fx as the standard dose in HSRT alone. During follow-up, attention should be given to differentiating tumor progression from potentially manageable complications.

Repercussions of the Emergency neurological life support on scientific literature: a bibliometric study.

BACKGROUND: In 2012, the Neurocritical Care Society launched a compilation of protocols regarding the core issues that should be addressed within the first hours of neurological emergencies - the Emergency neurological life support (ENLS). OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate this repercussion through a bibliometric analysis. METHODS: We searched Scopus on October 2022 for articles mentioning ENLS. The following variables were obtained: number of citations; number of citations per year; number of publications per year; year of publication; research type; research subtype; country of corresponding author and its income category and world region; journal of publication and its 5-year impact factor (IF); and section where ENLS appeared. RESULTS: After applying eligibility criteria, we retrieved 421 articles, published from 2012 to 2022. The mean number of citations per article was 17.46 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 8.20-26.72), while the mean number of citations per year per article was 4.05 (95% CI = 2.50-5.61). The mean destiny journal 5-year IF was 5.141 (95% CI = 4.189-6.093). The majority of articles were secondary research (57.48%; n = 242/421) of which most were narrative reviews (71.90%; n = 174/242). High-Income countries were the most prominent (80.05%; n = 337/421 articles). There were no papers from low-income countries. There were no trials or systematic reviews from middle-income countries. CONCLUSION: Although still low, the number of publications mentioning ENLS is increasing. Articles were mainly published in journals of intensive care medicine, neurology, neurosurgery, and emergency medicine. Most articles were published by authors from high-income countries. The majority of papers were secondary research, with narrative review as the most frequent subtype.

ANTECEDENTES: Em 2012, a Neurocritical Care Society lançou uma compilação de protocolos sobre as questões centrais que devem ser abordadas nas primeiras horas de emergências neurológicas ­ Emergency neurological life support (ENLS). OBJETIVO: Avaliar a repercussão do ENLS por meio de uma análise bibliométrica. MéTODOS: A base de dados Scopus foi utilizada em outubro de 2022 para a busca por artigos mencionando o ENLS. As seguintes variáveis foram obtidas: número de citações; número de citações por ano; número de publicações por ano; ano de publicação; tipo de pesquisa; país do autor correspondente e sua categoria de renda; revista de publicação e seu fator de impacto de 5 anos (IF); e seção onde o ENLS apareceu. RESULTADOS: Os 421 artigos incluídos foram publicados de 2012 a 2022. A média de citações por artigo foi de 17.46 (intervalo de confiança (IC) 95% = 8.20­26.72), enquanto a de citações por ano por artigo foi de 4.05 (IC95% = 2.50­5.61). O IF médio por revista foi de 5.14 (IC95% = 4.19­6.09). A maioria dos artigos era de pesquisa secundária (57.48%; n = 242/421), dos quais a maioria eram revisões narrativas (71.90%; n = 174/242). Os países de alta renda foram os mais prolíficos (80.05%; n = 337/421 artigos). Não houve publicações de países de baixa ou média renda. CONCLUSãO: Embora ainda baixo, o número de publicações mencionando o ENLS vem aumentando recentemente. A maioria dos artigos foram publicados em revistas de medicina intensiva, neurologia, neurocirurgia e medicina de emergência. Artigos de pesquisa secundária foram os mais comuns, com revisões narrativas sendo o subtipo mais frequente.

Maxillary artery utilization in subcranial-intracranial bypass procedures: a comprehensive systematic review and pooled analysis.

The utilization of the internal maxillary artery (IMAX) in subcranial-intracranial bypass for revascularization in complex aneurysms, tumors, or refractory ischemia shows promise. However, robust evidence concerning its outcomes is lacking. Hence, the authors embarked on a systematic review with pooled analysis to elucidate the efficacy of this approach. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases following PRISMA guidelines. Included articles used the IMAX as a donor vessel for revascularizing an intracranial area and reported at least one of the following outcomes: patency, complications, or clinical data. Favorable outcomes were defined as the absence of neurologic deficits or improvement in the baseline condition. Complications were considered any adverse event directly related to the procedure. Out of 418 retrieved articles, 26 were included, involving 183 patients. Among them, 119 had aneurysms, 41 experienced ischemic strokes (transient or not), 2 had arterial occlusions, and 3 had neoplasia. Furthermore, 91.8% of bypasses used radial artery grafts, and 87.9% revascularized the middle cerebral artery territory. The median average follow-up period was 12 months (0.3-53.1). The post-operation patency rate was 99% (95% CI: 97-100%; I2=0%), while the patency rate at follow-up was 82% (95% CI: 68-96%; I2=77%). Complications occurred in 21% of cases (95% CI: 9-32%; I2=58%), with no significant procedure-related mortality in 0% (95% CI: 0-2%; I2=0%). Favorable outcomes were observed in 88% of patients (95% CI: 81-96%; I2=0%), and only 3% experienced ischemia (95% CI: 0-6%; I2=0%). The subcranial-intracranial bypass with the IMAX shows excellent postoperative patency and considerable favorable clinical outcomes. While complications exist, the procedure carries a minimal risk of mortality. However, long-term patency presents heterogeneous findings, warranting additional research.

Complications associated with combined direct and indirect bypass in Moyamoya Disease: A meta-analysis.

Bypass revascularization helps prevent complications in Moyamoya Disease (MMD). To systematically review complications associated with combined direct and indirect (CB) bypass in MMD and analyze differences between the adult and pediatric populations. A systematic literature review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL, were queried from January 1980 to March 2022. Complications were defined as any event in the immediate post-surgical period of a minimum 3 months follow-up. Exclusion criteria included lack of surgical complication reports, non-English articles, and CB unspecified or reported separately. 18 final studies were included of 1580 procured. 1151 patients (per study range = 10-150, mean = 63.9) were analyzed. 9 (50.0%) studies included pediatric patients. There were 32 total hemorrhagic, 74 total ischemic and 16 total seizure complications, resulting in a rate of 0.04 (95% CI 0.03, 0.06), 0.7 (95% CI 0.04, 0.10) and 0.03 (95% CI 0.02, 0.05), respectively. The rate of hemorrhagic complications in the pediatric showed no significant difference from the adult subgroup (0.03 (95% CI 0.01-0.08) vs. 0.06 (95% CI 0.04-0.10, p = 0.19), such as the rate of ischemic complications (0.12 (95% CI 0.07-0.23) vs. 0.09 (95% CI 0.05-0.14, p = 0.40). Ischemia is the most common complication in CB for MMD. Pediatric patients had similar hemorrhagic and ischemic complication rates compared to adults.

Efficacy and Safety of Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Surgery for Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Treating complex posterior circulation aneurysms poses challenges, and extracranial to intracranial (EC-IC) bypass techniques are potential therapeutic options. However, the safety and efficacy of this approach for posterior circulation aneurysms remain unclear. The study's objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of EC-IC bypass in these aneurysms. METHODS: Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a systematic review on EC-IC revascularization for posterior circulation aneurysms. Included studies had at least 4 patients and reported data on mortality, patency, complications, or clinical outcomes. Favorable clinical outcomes were defined as modified Rankin Scale below 3 or Glasgow Outcome Scale above 3, and complications were any issues related to the bypass procedure. RESULTS: From 3036 articles reviewed, 22 studies involving 196 patients who underwent 210 EC-IC bypass procedures for posterior circulation aneurysms were selected. The median follow-up period of 14 studies was 31.66 months (6-61 months). Final follow-up indicated a high bypass patency rate of 96% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 91%-100%; I2 = 12%], with a mortality rate of 5% [95% CI: 1%-9%; I2 = 0%]. Additionally, 83% [95% CI: 70%-96%; I2 = 77%] of patients showed good outcomes at the last follow-up. Complications were observed in 40% [95% CI: 26%-55%; I2 = 80%]. Heterogeneity was associated with specific studies. CONCLUSIONS: EC-IC bypass procedures are a viable treatment option for posterior circulation aneurysms, with high bypass patency rates and favorable clinical outcomes. However, complications, especially neurological deficits, exist. Open revascularization remains essential for neurovascular surgeons dealing with complex aneurysms.

Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with dysphagia after stroke: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Swallowing is a complex function that can be disrupted after stroke. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation therapy that recently has been tested to treat stroke-related dysphagia. METHODS: The authors performed a search in the literature to review the described evidence of the use of tDCS in dysphagia after stroke. Three electronic databases were searched. The risk of bias evaluation was carried out through the RoB-2 tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework was also implemented. RESULTS: Of 265 articles, only nine studies were included in this review. The most common location of the tDCS stimulation was the unaffected hemisphere (44%). Regarding the outcome measure, the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) was the most commonly used (55%). However, due to the high heterogeneity of the protocols, and considering the differences between the types of stroke, the authors opted not to perform a metanalysis. Instead, a systematic review with a thorough analysis of each individual study and the impact of the differences to the outcomes was preferred. CONCLUSIONS: The final considerations are that even though the majority of studies described benefits from tDCS in post-stroke dysphagia, as they present too many methodological differences, it is not possible to compare them. In addition, many articles included patients with less than 6 months after stroke, which is an important bias as the swallowing function can be recovered spontaneously within this period, turning the certainty of the evidence really low.