Impact of the implementation of a Sepsis Code Program in medical patient management: a cohort study in an Internal Medicine ward.

OBJECTIVE: Sepsis is the main cause of death in hospitals and the implementation of diagnosis and treatment bundles has shown to improve its evolution. However, there is a lack of evidence about patients attended in conventional units. METHODS: A 3-year retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine units with sepsis were included and assigned to two cohorts according to Sepsis Code (SC) activation (group A) or not (B). Baseline and evolution variables were collected. RESULTS: A total of 653 patients were included. In 296 cases SC was activated. Mean age was 81.43 years, median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 2 and 63.25% showed some functional disability. More bundles were completed in group A: blood cultures 95.2% vs 72.5% (p <0.001), extended spectrum antibiotics 59.1% vs 41.4% (p < 0.001), fluid resuscitation 96.62% vs 80.95% (p < 0.001). Infection control at 72 hours was quite higher in group A (81.42% vs 55.18%, odds ratio 3.55 [2.48-5.09]). Antibiotic was optimized more frequently in group A (60.77% vs 47.03%, p 0.008). Mean in-hospital stay was 10.63 days (11.44 vs 8.53 days, p < 0.001). Complications during hospitalization appeared in 51.76% of patients, especially in group B (45.95% vs 56.58%, odds ratio 1.53 [1.12-2.09]). Hospital readmissions were higher in group A (40% vs 24.76%, p < 0.001). 28-day mortality was significantly lower in group A (20.95% vs 42.86%, odds ratio 0.33 [0.23-0.47]). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of SC seems to be effective in improving short-term outcomes in IM patients, although therapy should be tailored in an individual basis.

[Potential biomarkers predictors of mortality in COVID-19 patients in the Emergency Department]. / Potenciales biomarcadores predictores de mortalidad en pacientes COVID-19 en el Servicio de Urgencias.

OBJECTIVE: Identify which biomarkers performed in the first emergency analysis help to stratify COVID-19 patients according to mortality risk. METHODS: Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study performed with data collected from patients with suspected COVID-19 in the Emergency Department from February 24 to March 16, 2020. The univariate and multivariate study was performed to find independent mortality markers and calculate risk by building a severity score. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were included, of whom 33 died and 29 of them were positive for the COVID-19 PCR test. We obtained as possible factors to conform the Mortality Risk Score age> 75 years ((adjusted OR = 12,347, 95% CI: 4,138-36,845 p = 0.001), total leukocytes> 11,000 cells / mm3 (adjusted OR = 2,649, 95% CI: 0.879-7.981 p = 0.083), glucose> 126 mg / dL (adjusted OR = 3.716, 95% CI: 1.247-11.074 p = 0.018) and creatinine> 1.1 mg / dL (adjusted OR = 2.566, 95% CI: 0.889- 7.403, p = 0.081) This score was called COVEB (COVID, Age, Basic analytical profile) with an AUC 0.874 (95% CI: 0.816-0.933, p <0.001; Cut-off point = 1 (sensitivity = 89.66 % (95% CI: 72.6% -97.8%), specificity = 75.59% (95% CI: 67.2% -82.8%). A score <1 has a negative predictive value = 100% (95% CI: 93.51% -100%) and a positive predictive value = 18.59% (95% CI: 12.82% -25.59%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical severity scales, kidney function biomarkers, white blood cell count parameters, the total neutrophils / total lymphocytes ratio and procalcitonin are early risk factors for mortality. The variables age, glucose, creatinine and total leukocytes stand out as the best predictors of mortality. A COVEB score <1 indicates with a 100% probability that the patient with suspected COVID-19 will not die in the next 30 days.

Efectividad de un paquete de medidas para reducir las bacteriemias asociadas a catéter venoso central / Effectiveness of a bundle of measures for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las infecciones asociadas a catéter son la principal causa de bacteriemia nosocomial. El objetivo principal fue demostrar una posible disminución en las tasas de bacteriemia asociada a catéter venoso central (BACVC) del entorno perioperatorio tras implementar un paquete de medidas. El objetivo secundario fue determinar qué factores se asociaban a mayor riesgo de BACVC tras la implementación del paquete de medidas. MÉTODOS: El paquete de medidas consistió en: subclavia como acceso de elección, desinfección con clorhexidina alcohólica 2%, paño estéril de cuerpo entero, funda estéril para ecógrafo y check-list de inserción. La incidencia acumulada (IA) y densidad de incidencia (DI) de BACVC se compararon antes y después de la intervención. La asociación entre las características de pacientes o CVC y BACVC se resumieron mediante odds ratio e intervalos de confianza al 95%, obtenidos mediante regresión logística múltiple, ajustado por edad, sexo, comorbilidades y días con CVC. RESULTADOS: Antes de la implementación del paquete de medidas entre enero-noviembre de 2016 la IA de BACVC fue 5,05% y de DI 5,17‰. En el mismo periodo de 2018 la IA de BACVC fue 2,28% y de DI 2,27‰, suponiendo una reducción del 54% en IA (p = 0,072) y del 56% en DI (p = 0,068). En el análisis multivariable se asociaron a mayor riesgo de BACVC: reemplazo del CVC (OR: 11,01; IC 95%: 2,03-59,60, p = 0,005), 2 o más cateterizaciones (OR: 10,05; IC 95%: 1,77-57,16; p = 0,009) y nutrición parenteral (OR: 23,37; IC 95%: 4,37-124,91; p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Las tasas de BACVC disminuyeron tras implementar el paquete de medidas de inserción. El reemplazo del CVC, 2 o más cateterizaciones y la nutrición parenteral se asociaron a BACVC tras implementar el paquete de medidas

INTRODUCTION: Catheter-associated infections are the main cause of nosocomial bacteremia. The main objective of this study was to demonstrate a possible decrease in CLABSI rates in perioperative environment after the implementation of a bundle of measures. Secondary objective was to determine which factors were associated with an increased risk of CLABSI, after the implementation of the bundle. METHODS: Insertion bundle consisted of: subclavian vein as access of choice, disinfection with alcoholic 2% chlorhexidine, central-line full body drapes, sterile ultrasound probe-cable covers and insertion check-list. Cumulative Incidence (CI) and Incidence Density Rate (IR) of CLABSIs were compared before and after the intervention. Associations between patient or CVC characteristic and CLABSI were summarized with odds ratios and 95% confidence interval, obtained from multiple logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities and days with CVC. RESULTS: Before implementing the bundle, from January to November 2016, CI of CLABSI was 5.05% and IR was 5.17 ‰. In the same period of 2018, CI of CLABSI was 2.28% and IR was 2.27 ‰, which means a reduction of 54.8% in CI (P=.072) and of 56% in IR (P=.068) In multivariable analyses, replacement of CVC was associated with a higher risk of CLABSI (OR 11.01, 95%CI 2.03-59.60, P=.005), as well as 2 or more catheterizations (OR 10.05, 95%CI 1.77-57.16, P=.009), and parenteral nutrition (OR 23.37, 95%CI 4.37-124.91, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: CLABSI rates decreased after the implementation of the insertion bundle. CVC replacement, 2 or more catheterizations and parenteral nutrition were associated with CLABSI after bundle implementation

Effectiveness of a bundle of measures for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections. / Efectividad de un paquete de medidas para reducir las bacteriemias asociadas a catéter venoso central.

INTRODUCTION: Catheter-associated infections are the main cause of nosocomial bacteremia. The main objective of this study was to demonstrate a possible decrease in CLABSI rates in perioperative environment after the implementation of a bundle of measures. Secondary objective was to determine which factors were associated with an increased risk of CLABSI, after the implementation of the bundle. METHODS: Insertion bundle consisted of: subclavian vein as access of choice, disinfection with alcoholic 2% chlorhexidine, central-line full body drapes, sterile ultrasound probe-cable covers and insertion check-list. Cumulative Incidence (CI) and Incidence Density Rate (IR) of CLABSIs were compared before and after the intervention. Associations between patient or CVC characteristic and CLABSI were summarized with odds ratios and 95% confidence interval, obtained from multiple logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities and days with CVC. RESULTS: Before implementing the bundle, from January to November 2016, CI of CLABSI was 5.05% and IR was 5.17 ‰. In the same period of 2018, CI of CLABSI was 2.28% and IR was 2.27 ‰, which means a reduction of 54.8% in CI (P=.072) and of 56% in IR (P=.068) In multivariable analyses, replacement of CVC was associated with a higher risk of CLABSI (OR 11.01, 95%CI 2.03-59.60, P=.005), as well as 2 or more catheterizations (OR 10.05, 95%CI 1.77-57.16, P=.009), and parenteral nutrition (OR 23.37, 95%CI 4.37-124.91, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: CLABSI rates decreased after the implementation of the insertion bundle. CVC replacement, 2 or more catheterizations and parenteral nutrition were associated with CLABSI after bundle implementation.

Pro-adrenomedulina preoperatoria como predictor de la necesidad de soporte orgánico postoperatorio en pacientes programados para cirugía abdominal mayor / Pre-Operative pro-adrenomedullin as a predictor of postoperative requirement of organ support in patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery. A prospective observational pilot study

INTRODUCCIÓN: La región medial de la pro-adrenomedulina (MR-Pro-ADM) es un marcador de gravedad en un amplio espectro de enfermedades como la sepsis y la disfunción cardiovascular. Su utilidad como predictor de morbimortalidad en pacientes quirúrgicos aún no se ha dilucidado. Examinamos en este estudio la capacidad del valor preoperatorio de la MR-Pro-ADM para predecir la necesidad de soporte orgánico postoperatorio (SOP). MÉTODO: Estudio observacional prospectivo piloto, en un solo centro, que incluyó a pacientes adultos programados para cirugía abdominal mayor. La capacidad de la MR-Pro-ADM para predecir la necesidad de SOP se determinó por el análisis del área bajo la curva receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Se realizó un análisis multivariante de regresión logística para determinar si el nivel de MR-pro-ADM identificado se asocia de forma independiente para la necesidad de SOP. RESULTADOS: Se reclutaron un total de 59 pacientes programados para cirugía abdominal mayor. La incidencia de SOP fue del 13,6%. Para la asociación entre los niveles de la MR-Pro-ADM y la incidencia de SOP se obtuvo un área bajo la curva ROC de 0,85 (IC 95%: 0,74-0,96; p = 0,002). El valor preoperatorio de la MR-Pro-ADM con la mejor combinación de sensibilidad y especificidad para predecir el SOP fue de 0,87nmol/l. Los pacientes con niveles séricos preoperatorios de la MR-Pro-ADM≥0,87nmol/l tuvieron una incidencia significativamente mayor de SOP (33,3 vs. 4,9%; p = 0,007). Niveles séricos preoperatorios de MR-Pro-ADM≥0,87nmol/l mostraron ser un factor independiente de riesgo en la necesidad de SOP (p = 0,001; OR: 9,758; IC 95%: 1,73-54,78) en el análisis multivariante. CONCLUSIÓN: El valor sérico preoperatorio de la MR-Pro-ADM puede ser un biomarcador útil del riesgo perioperatorio y de la necesidad de SOP en pacientes adultos programados para cirugía abdominal mayor

BACKGROUND: Mid-Regional-Pro-Adrenomedullin (MR-Pro-ADM) is a marker of severity in a wide spectrum of pathological conditions such as sepsis, and cardiovascular dysfunction. Its usefulness as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in surgical patients has yet to be elucidated. We examined the ability of preoperative MR-Pro-ADM in predicting Postoperative Requirement of Organ Support (PROS). METHODS: One centre, pilot, prospective observational cohort study, enrolling adult patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery. The accuracy of the MR-Pro-ADM to predict PROS was determined by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis. An univariate analysis was performed to identify the association of PROS and the MR-Pro-ADM value with the best combination of sensitivity and specificity. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify preoperative MR-Pro-ADM as independent risk factor for PROS. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were enrolled. The incidence of PROS was 13.6%. The association of MR-Pro-ADM levels with the incidence of PROS, was determined by an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.96, p = 0.002). The preoperative value of MR-Pro-ADM with the best combination of sensitivity and specificity to predict PROS was 0.87 nmol/l. Patients with preoperative serum levels of MR-Pro-ADM≥0.87 nmol/l had a significantly higher incidence of PROS (33.3% vs 4.9%, p = 0.007). MR-Pro-ADM≥0.87 nmol/l was shown to be an independent risk factor for PROS (p = 0.001; OR 9.758; IC 1.73-54.78) in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The preoperative serum level of MR-Pro-ADM may be a useful biomarker of perioperative risk and to predict postoperative requirement of organic support (PROS) in adult patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery

Pre-Operative pro-adrenomedullin as a predictor of postoperative requirement of organ support in patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery. A prospective observational pilot study. / Pro-adrenomedulina preoperatoria como predictor de la necesidad de soporte orgánico postoperatorio en pacientes programados para cirugía abdominal mayor.

BACKGROUND: Mid-Regional-Pro-Adrenomedullin (MR-Pro-ADM) is a marker of severity in a wide spectrum of pathological conditions such as sepsis, and cardiovascular dysfunction. Its usefulness as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in surgical patients has yet to be elucidated. We examined the ability of preoperative MR-Pro-ADM in predicting Postoperative Requirement of Organ Support (PROS). METHODS: One centre, pilot, prospective observational cohort study, enrolling adult patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery. The accuracy of the MR-Pro-ADM to predict PROS was determined by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis. An univariate analysis was performed to identify the association of PROS and the MR-Pro-ADM value with the best combination of sensitivity and specificity. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify preoperative MR-Pro-ADM as independent risk factor for PROS. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were enrolled. The incidence of PROS was 13.6%. The association of MR-Pro-ADM levels with the incidence of PROS, was determined by an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.96, p=0.002). The preoperative value of MR-Pro-ADM with the best combination of sensitivity and specificity to predict PROS was 0.87 nmol/l. Patients with preoperative serum levels of MR-Pro-ADM≥0.87 nmol/l had a significantly higher incidence of PROS (33.3% vs 4.9%, p=0.007). MR-Pro-ADM≥0.87 nmol/l was shown to be an independent risk factor for PROS (p=0.001; OR 9.758; IC 1.73-54.78) in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The preoperative serum level of MR-Pro-ADM may be a useful biomarker of perioperative risk and to predict postoperative requirement of organic support (PROS) in adult patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery.

Ability to predict the development of surgical site infection in cardiac surgery using the Australian Clinical Risk Index versus the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance-derived Risk Index.

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a major infectious complication that increases mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs. There are scores attempting to classify patients for calculating SSI risk. Our objectives were to validate the Australian Clinical Risk Index (ACRI) in a European population after cardiac surgery, comparing it against the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance-derived risk index (NNIS) and analyzing the predictive power of ACRI for SSI in valvular patients. All the patients that who underwent cardiac surgery in a tertiary university hospital between 2011 and 2015 were analyzed. The patients were divided into valvular and coronary groups, excluding mixed patients. The ACRI score was validated in both groups and its ability to predict SSI was compared to the NNIS risk index. We analyzed 1,657 procedures. In the valvular patient group (n: 1119), a correlation between the ACRI score and SSI development (p < 0.05) was found; there was no such correlation with the NNIS index. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.64 (confidence interval [CI] 95%, 0.5-0.7) for ACRI and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.5-0.7) for NNIS. In the coronary group (n: 281), there was a correlation between ACRI and SSI but no between NNIS and SSI. The ACRI AUC was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.5-0.8) and the NNIS AUC was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.4-0.7). The ACRI score has insufficient predictive power, although it predicts SSI development better than the NNIS index, fundamentally in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Further studies analyzing determining factors are needed.