Serologic characteristics of oxaliplatin antibodies in 15 patients with drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin, a third-generation platinum derivative is commonly used in combination treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Since 2008, it is the second most common cause of drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) investigated in our laboratory. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples from fifteen patients including nine (60%) with intravascular hemolysis, suspected of having DIIHA were studied for the presence of anti-oxaliplatin. Direct antiglobulin tests (DATs) and tests with oxaliplatin-treated red blood cells (RBCs) or untreated and enzyme-treated RBCs in the presence of oxaliplatin were performed. A pool of normal AB sera with no unexpected antibodies was used as a control for nonimmunologic protein adsorption (NIPA). RESULTS: Eleven (73%) of the fifteen patients had antibodies to oxaliplatin that reacted with drug-treated RBCs and untreated RBCs in the presence of drug by tube and/or gel method. Lower-titer reactivity (<20) obtained with four patients' sera and the corresponding pooled normal sera was most likely due to NIPA. Eighty seven percent (13/15) of the patients had positive DAT either with anti-IgG only (33%), IgG + C3d (40%), or C3d only (13%). Two patients had a negative DAT. No directly agglutinating antibody was observed with the pools of normal donor's sera in the presence of oxaliplatin. CONCLUSION: Anti-oxaliplatin can cause severe intravascular hemolysis. Complement can usually be detected on the patient's RBCs and anti-oxaliplatin can be detected in the patient's serum. RBC-bound albumin detection with anti-human albumin needs to be performed to confirm NIPA which could have contributed to the patient's hemolytic anemia.

Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia investigation: Comparison between tube test and microcolumn agglutination (gel test) for the detection of drug-dependent antibodies in the presence of soluble drug.

OBJECTIVES: Testing for drug-dependent antibodies is traditionally performed with the tube method either with drug-treated red blood cells or with untreated red blood cells in the presence of soluble drug. Gel microcolumn agglutination method was compared to tube testing for the demonstration of drug-dependent antibodies in the presence of soluble drug. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient's samples were tested in parallel by tube and gel microcolumn agglutination method with untreated and/or enzyme-treated red blood cells in the presence of soluble drug. RESULTS: Twenty six different patient's samples were studied and thirty nine tests performed to investigate antibodies directed against fifteen different drugs. There was a good correlation between the results obtained by tube and gel method in terms of analytical sensitivity and specificity. Reactions appeared to be stronger with the gel test than seen with the conventional tube method for most of the drug antibodies investigated. Enzyme-treated cells should be used in addition to untreated cells to improve the sensitivity of the method for detecting drug-dependent antibodies especially those directed against drugs that do not bind firmly to red blood cells. CONCLUSIONS: Gel method appeared to be sensitive, reliable, reproducible, and comparable to the conventional tube method for the detection of all the drug-dependent antibodies investigated in this study. Further studies need to be performed to evaluate gel testing for the detection of drug-dependent antibodies that only react with drug-treated red blood cells.

[Investigation on HPV DNA detection and genotyping practices used in French laboratories in 2009]. / Enquête sur les pratiques de détection et de génotypage des papillomavirus humains dans les laboratoires de microbiologie en France en 2009.

The French National reference Laboratory for Human papillomavirus (HPV) performed in 2009 a national study in order to review the methods used to detect and identify HR HPV genotypes in microbiology laboratories. Results from this study show a great diversity in volumes of samples treated in laboratories. Among clinical indications, the most frequent is a result of ASC-US at a Pap smear. This indication in the only one covered by the National Public Insurance System and is mostly performed in laboratories from private sector. Other indications mainly correspond to research programs and are performed in public Hospitals. This study allowed also to review the adequacy between the liquid based cytology samples and the assays used for direct detection of HR HPV or identification of the genotypes present in the sample. The right tests were not carried in the right solution storage according to the recommendations from different HPV testing assays. National recommendations should be elaborated in order to improve the performance of the test used.

Could the new HIV combined p24 antigen and antibody assays replace p24 antigen specific assays?

The performance of twelve HIV combined p24 antigen and antibody assays available in Europe were compared. The assays were examined with a total of 1983 samples that included 1005 unselected HIV negative samples, 7 HIV-1 p24 Ag reference samples with HIV-1 Ag, 10 samples of a HIV antigen sensitivity commercial panel, 124 samples of 31 p24 antigen panels of different HIV-1 subtypes, 168 members of 24 HIV-1 seroconversion panels, 559 HIV-1 (groups M and O) antibody positive samples and 110 HIV-2 antibody positive samples. The specificity ranged from 99.4 to 100%. Ten of the 12 assays detected all anti-HIV positive samples irrespective of genotype while two assays missed one sample each (one subtype F and one subtype C). The combined assays could be classified into three groups. The first includes two assays (Enzygnost HIV Integral and Vironostika Ag/Ab) that have a clinical sensitivity similar to the two antibody only assays. The second includes the seven assays that detected infection after the p24 antigen only assay and show a delay from 3.3 to 5.17 days after HIV-1 RNA. The third group detected the infection before the p24 antigen assay and less than 3 days after nucleic acid testing (NAT). The improved ability to detect p24 Ag, at levels similar to specific HIV Ag assays, suggests that these new HIV combined Ag/Ab assays could replace p24 antigen only assays in situations for blood or organ screening when NAT is not feasible or not affordable.