Intravascular ultrasound guidance to minimize the use of iodine contrast in percutaneous coronary intervention: the MOZART (Minimizing cOntrast utiliZation With IVUS Guidance in coRonary angioplasTy) randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance on the final volume of contrast agent used in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: To date, few approaches have been described to reduce the final dose of contrast agent in PCIs. We hypothesized that IVUS might serve as an alternative imaging tool to angiography in many steps during PCI, thereby reducing the use of iodine contrast. METHODS: A total of 83 patients were randomized to angiography-guided PCI or IVUS-guided PCI; both groups were treated according to a pre-defined meticulous procedural strategy. The primary endpoint was the total volume contrast agent used during PCI. Patients were followed clinically for an average of 4 months. RESULTS: The median total volume of contrast was 64.5 ml (interquartile range [IQR]: 42.8 to 97.0 ml; minimum, 19 ml; maximum, 170 ml) in the angiography-guided group versus 20.0 ml (IQR: 12.5 to 30.0 ml; minimum, 3 ml; maximum, 54 ml) in the IVUS-guided group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the median volume of contrast/creatinine clearance ratio was significantly lower among patients treated with IVUS-guided PCI (1.0 [IQR: 0.6 to 1.9] vs. 0.4 [IQR: 0.2 to 0.6, respectively; p < 0.001). In-hospital and 4-month outcomes were not different between patients randomized to angiography-guided and IVUS-guided PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Thoughtful and extensive use of IVUS as the primary imaging tool to guide PCI is safe and markedly reduces the volume of iodine contrast compared with angiography-alone guidance. The use of IVUS should be considered for patients at high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury or volume overload undergoing coronary angioplasty. (Minimizing cOntrast utiliZation With IVUS Guidance in coRonary angioplasTy [MOZART]; NCT01947335).

Angiographic segment size in patients referred for coronary intervention is influenced by constitutional, anatomical, and clinical features.

BACKGROUND: Factors influencing the size of target vessels of patients referred for coronary intervention are poorly defined. We aimed to investigate in a large series of patients undergoing percutaneous intervention the relation of constitutional, anatomical, and clinical features with the reference diameter of coronary vessels treated with stenting. METHODS: A total of 4,850 de novo coronary lesions, non-ostial and non-bifurcational, located in native vessels were analyzed. The following pre-specified characteristics were analyzed to reflect the relation between constitutional, anatomical, and clinical features on reference vessel diameter: age, gender, height, weight, proximal location, vessel, diabetes, hypertension, multivessel disease, and clinical presentation. RESULTS: The average reference diameter was 2.66+/-0.50 mm. All pre-specified markers had a significant relation with the vessel reference diameter at univariate analysis, except by hypertension which showed a strong tendency. However, at multivariate analysis, only diabetes, proximal location, multivessel disease, clinical presentation, vessel, weight, and height were identified as independent predictors of reference vessel diameter. CONCLUSION: Reference diameter of coronary vessels at the site of lesions treated by stenting is significantly influenced by a variety of characteristics. We hypothesize that the treated segment size of patients undergoing stenting ultimately reflects the conjoint effect of several different factors, including constitutional, anatomical, and clinical features.