Structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis assessed by musculoskeletal ultrasound: A systematic literature review by the Structural Joint Damage Task Force of the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group.

OBJECTIVES: To identify and synthesize the evidence for the use and measurement properties of musculoskeletal ultrasound in assessing structural joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A systematic literature search (SLR) of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was performed. Original articles were included published in English reporting on ultrasound of bone erosion, cartilage damage and the measurement properties of ultrasound according to the OMERACT filter 2.1. RESULTS: Of the 1.495 identified articles 149 were included in the final review, most of which reported on cross-sectional studies and used the OMERACT definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. Among these, bone erosions were assessed in 139 (93.3%), cartilage damage in 24 (16.1%), enthesophytes in 8 (5.4%), osteophytes in 15 (10.1%) and malalignment and ankylosis in a single (0.9%) study, respectively. Most studies (126/149, 84.6%) assessed the joints of the hands. The overwhelming majority of studies (127/149, 85.2%) assessed structural joint damage bilaterally. Validity, reliability and responsiveness were assessed in 21 (14.1%), 34 (22.8%) and 17 (11.4%) studies, respectively. CONCLUSION: While the results of this SLR suggest that ultrasound is a sensitive, reliable and feasible tool to detect damage in RA, they also highlight the need for further research and validation. Findings of this SLR will inform the next steps of the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group in developing an ultrasound score for assessing structural joint damage in patients with RA.

The diagnostic value of conventional radiography and musculoskeletal ultrasonography in calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine and compare the accuracy of conventional radiography (CR) and musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) in the diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals deposition disease (CPPD). DESIGN: A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane), conference abstracts and reference lists was undertaken. Studies which evaluated the accuracy of CR and/or US in the diagnosis of CPPD, using synovial fluid analysis (SFA), histology or classification criteria as reference tests were included. Subgroup analyses by anatomic site and by reference test were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included. Using SFA/histology as reference test, CR and US showed an excellent (CR AUC = 0.889, 95%CI = 0.811-0.967) and an outstanding (US AUC = 0.954, 95%CI = 0.907-1.0) diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.01), respectively. Furthermore, US showed a higher sensitivity (0.85, 95%CI = 0.79-0.90 vs 0.47, 95%CI = 0.40-0.55) and only a little lower specificity (0.87, 95%CI = 0.83-0.91 vs 0.95, 95%CI = 0.92-0.97) than CR. A considerable heterogeneity between the studies was found, with adopted reference test being the main source of heterogeneity. In fact, subgroup analysis showed a significant change in the diagnostic accuracy of CR, but not of US, using Ryan and McCarty criteria or SFA/histology as reference test (CR: AUC = 0.956, 95%CI = 0.925-1.0 vs AUC = 0.889, 95%CI = 0.828-0.950, respectively, p < 0.01) (US: AUC = 0.922, 95%CI = 0.842-1.0 vs AUC = 0.957, 95%CI = 0.865-1.0, respectively, p = 0.08) CONCLUSIONS: Although US is more sensitive and a little less specific than CR for identifying CPP crystals, both these two techniques showed a great diagnostic accuracy and should be regarded as complementary to each other in the diagnostic work-up of patients with CPPD.

Ankle pain in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of clinical and sonographic findings.

To describe the prevalence and distribution of clinical and ultrasound (US) pathological findings at ankle level and to compare them, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study assessing patients diagnosed with RA according to the 2010 ACR criteria, who were recruited consecutively and independently of disease status or treatment and of the presence of pain at ankle level. Clinical and US findings were acquired by two independent rheumatologists. US assessments were performed according to the EULAR and OMERACT indications. A total of 224 ankles of 112 RA patients were examined. One hundred (89.3%) patients were women and 12 (10.7%) were men, with a mean age of 51 years. RA mean disease duration was 72 months. Ankle spontaneous pain was found in 56.2% of the patients. In 65.2% of the patients, US found at least one pathologic sign indicative of joint and/or tendon pathology. Using grayscale US, joint involvement was more frequently found than tendon pathology (37.5% vs 22.3%). Conversely, no substantial difference was found between the prevalence of power Doppler signal at joint and tendon level. There was a significant correlation between clinical findings and US findings indicative of tibiotalar joint synovitis and peroneal tenosynovitis. In the present study, pain and US pathologic findings at ankle level were described and compared in a cohort of RA patients. Spontaneous pain was found in more than half of the patients and US found joint involvement more prevalent than tendon pathology.

Ultrasound in the assessment of musculoskeletal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: state of the art and perspectives.

Musculoskeletal manifestations are extremely common in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Transient and migratory arthralgia is frequently reported even without clinical signs of joint or tendon inflammation. In less than 15% of patients, joints may be more severely affected by deforming (Jaccoud's arthropathy) and/or erosive arthropathy (Rhupus syndrome). In recent years, ultrasound has emerged as a promising imaging technique for the assessment of musculoskeletal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus, having demonstrated the ability to detect inflammation and structural damage both at articular and periarticular level. Recent ultrasound studies have also revealed new insights into musculoskeletal involvement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, some of them questioning the traditional concepts of systemic lupus erythematosus arthropathy, with potential clinical, prognostic and therapeutic implications. In daily clinical practice, the use of ultrasound in the assessment of joint and tendon involvement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus is still limited. Several methodological issues encountered in ultrasound studies evaluating musculoskeletal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus patients need to be addressed in order to improve both the reliability and clinical usefulness of ultrasound findings. This paper reviews ultrasound studies assessing musculoskeletal involvement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, highlighting certainty, limits, potential applications and future perspectives of ultrasound use in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

Systemic lupus erythematosus arthropathy: the sonographic perspective.

Background Despite being promising, the use of ultrasound (US) in the assessment of musculoskeletal manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is still limited. Literature on this topic is scarce and the spectrum and clinical relevance of US abnormalities has not yet been outlined. With this paper, we aim to explore the panel of joint and tendon US findings in a group of SLE patients. Methods Twenty-five consecutive SLE patients, with current or medical history of musculoskeletal symptoms, were studied. All patients underwent routine clinical examination and US evaluation. The US examination targeted sites clinically involved in the physical examination and/or indicated as painful in the patient's medical history. Results One or more US changes were found in all the patients. US abnormalities were detected in 85 out of the 243 scanned joints (35%), in 70 out of the 215 scanned tendons (32.6%) and in 10 out of the 41 scanned entheses (24.4%). Synovial effusion, synovial hypertrophy, "mixed" synovitis (coexistence of synovial effusion and synovial hypertrophy), joint dislocation, bone erosion, and cartilage damage were found in 9.5%, 11.5%, 14%, 3.7%, 2.1%, and 4.5% of the scanned joints, respectively. Tenosynovitis, tendon dislocation, tendon tear, tendon thinning, and tendinitis/peritendinitis were detected in 17.7%, 8.4%, 0.9%, 4.2%, and 4.7% of the scanned tendons, respectively. Power Doppler signal, hypoechogenicity, thickening, enthesophytes, calcifications, and bone erosions were detected at the entheseal level in 12.2%, 9.8%, 12.2%, 7.3%, 7.3%, and in 0% of the scanned entheses, respectively. Conclusions This study revealed an unexpectedly wide heterogeneity of US pathologic findings in the joints and tendons of patients with SLE. A broad spectrum of US changes also involving anatomic structures not considered in previous investigations, including entheses and tendons with no synovial sheath, was detected. These preliminary results suggest that US is able to identify several US "patterns" whose clinical, prognostic, and pathogenetic significance is still to be defined.

Entheseal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: are we missing something?

Background Musculoskeletal involvement is extremely common in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Continuing the research initiated in patients with inflammatory arthritis, recent studies have shown the potential role of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) in the evaluation of clinical and subclinical lupus synovitis. The inflammatory process in SLE is traditionally considered to be localized at synovial tissue areas while enthesis is not included among the possible targets of the disease. Patients and methods Entheses included in the Glasgow Ultrasound Enthesitis Scoring System were scanned in a cohort of 20 SLE patients serving as disease controls in an MSUS study aimed at assessing enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis. We describe in detail four cases with unexpected and unequivocal expressions of MSUS enthesitis according to the OMERACT definition. Three out of four patients had no predisposing factors for enthesopathy. Case no. 2 was treated with a variable-dose prednisone regimen. Results In the four cases MSUS examination revealed relevant grey-scale and power Doppler abnormalities at the entheseal level, most commonly at the distal insertion of the patellar tendon. Signs of clinical enthesitis were detected in only one patient. Conclusions This case series shows for the first time the presence of clearly evident MSUS findings indicative of enthesitis in four out of 20 SLE patients (20%), raising the hypothesis that enthesis could be a missing target in the clinical evaluation of SLE patients. Our case series justifies further investigations for a better evaluation of the prevalence, characteristics and clinical relevance of entheseal involvement in SLE.

PO-40 - Real-life use of non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with cancer associated venous thromboembolism: data from a prospective cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) has an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). Type, stage of cancer and chemotherapy (CHT) influence thromboembolic risk. The use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is controversial in patients with CAT. AIM: The aim of this study is to assess mortality, recurrent VTE and bleeding complications in patients with CAT and in patients without cancer receiving NOACs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute objectively confirmed VTE receiving NOACs within 1 month from diagnosis are included from September 2013 in an ongoing prospective cohort study. Characteristics of patients and outcome are reported according to the presence of CAT. Chi-squared test and Student' t-test are used. RESULTS: As for November 10(th) 2015, 472 patients were included in the study: 78 with CAT (16.5%). Lung, breast, gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancer was observed in 16%, 24%, 20% and 24% of patients with CAT, respectively. 31 patients with CAT (40%) were on CHT or radiotherapy (RT). 10 patients with CAT (13%) had at least an additional risk factor for VTE (4 had a CVC related thrombosis) and 34 (43.5%) were inpatients. Baseline characteristics of patients with and without CAT are reported in the Table. Pulmonary embolism was index VTE in 152 patients: 24.4% of patients with CAT and in 33.8% of those without cancer (p=0.10). DVT only was present in 320 patients and 78 had both DVT and PE. Among NOACs patients, 312 (66%) received initial loading dose: 61% of those with CAT and 67% without. 53 (11%) received reduced maintenance doses (10% with CAT, 11% without). As for nowadays, 272 patients had at least 3 months of follow-up, the mean follow-up being 8.6 months. 20 patients died (7.3%): 17 were cancer related deaths. Non cancer related death occurred in 1 patient with CAT (2%) and in 2 patients without (0.9%). No fatal bleedings or fatal VTE recurrences occurred. Patients recruitment and follow-up is currently ongoing aimed at assessing mortality, recurrent VTE and bleeding complications. Updated results on clinical outcomes will be presented at the congress. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CAT receiving NOACs are treated as patients without CAT in terms of use of loading doses and maintenance treatment. Upper arm thrombosis is more frequently involved in CAT patients and proximal lower vein in patients without CAT. Non cancer related mortality was higher in CAT patients but no fatal recurrences or fatal bleedings were observed so far.

Ultrasound in the diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition disease. A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasonography (US) demonstrated to be a promising tool for the diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition disease (CPPD). The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to collect the definitions for the US elementary lesions and to summarize the available data about US diagnostic accuracy in CPPD. METHODS: We systematically reviewed all the studies that considered US as the index test for CPPD diagnosis without restrictions about the reference test or that provided definitions about US identification of CPPD. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each study and definitions were extrapolated. Subgroup analyses were planned by anatomical site included in the index text and different reference standards. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were included in this review. All the studies were eligible for the collection of US findings and all definitions were summarized. US description of elementary lesions appeared heterogeneous among the studies. Regarding US accuracy, 13 articles entered in the meta-analysis. Considering each joint structure, the sensitivity ranged between 0.77 (0.63-0.87) and 0.34 (0.16-0.58) while the specificity varies between 1.00 (0.89-1.00) and 0.92 (0.16-1.00). Considering the reference standards used, the sensibility ranged between 0.34 (0.02-0.65) and 0.87 (0.76-0.99) while specificity ranged between 0.84 (0.52-1.00) and 1.00 (0.99-1.00). CONCLUSION: US is potentially a useful tool for the diagnosis of CPPD but universally accepted definitions and further testing are necessary in order to assess the role of the technique in the diagnostic process.

Atlas-based knee osteophyte assessment with ultrasonography and radiography: relationship to arthroscopic degeneration of articular cartilage.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate intra- and inter-reader agreement of ultrasonography (US) and conventional radiography (CR) for the evaluation of osteophyte presence and size within the tibiofemoral joint. In addition, to correlate these findings with arthroscopic degeneration of the articular cartilage. METHOD: Forty adult patients with knee pain were enrolled in this study. Knee CR and US scanning of the medial and lateral bone margins were performed on all patients. A novel atlas for the US grading of knee osteophytes was used in the evaluation. The number and size of the osteophytes were evaluated semi-quantitatively in two rounds from both the CR images (four readers) and the US images (14 readers). The Noyes grading system was used for the evaluation of arthroscopic degeneration of the articular cartilage in 26 patients. RESULTS: On average, intra- and inter-reader US and CR agreement was substantial and comparable to each other (κ = 0.60-0.72). US detected more osteophytes than CR at both the medial (65% vs. 48%) and lateral (70% vs. 60%) compartments. A statistically significant correlation between CR- or US-based osteophyte and arthroscopy grades was observed only for US at the medial compartment (rs = 0.747, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The detection of knee osteophytes using the novel US atlas is as reproducible as reading conventional radiographs. US is more sensitive to detect knee osteophytes than CR. Furthermore, osteophytes detected with US correlate significantly with arthroscopic cartilage changes at the medial knee compartment whereas those detected by CR do not.

Global ultrasound assessment of structural lesions in osteoarthritis: a reliability study by the OMERACT ultrasonography group on scoring cartilage and osteophytes in finger joints.

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasonography is sensitive for the evaluation of cartilage pathology and degree of osteophytes in patients with hand osteoarthritis (OA). High consistency of assessments is essential, and the OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) ultrasonography group took the initiative to explore the reliability of a global ultrasonography score in patients with hand OA using semiquantitative ultrasonography score of cartilage and osteophytes in finger joints. METHODS: Ten patients with hand OA were examined by 10 experienced sonographers over the course of two days. Semiquantitative scoring (0-3) was performed on osteophytes (carpo-metacarpal 1, metacarpo-phalangeal (MCP) 1-5, proximal interphalangeal 1-5 and distal interphalangeal 2-5 joints bilaterally with an ultrasonography atlas as reference) and cartilage pathology (MCP 2-5 bilaterally). A web-based exercise on static cartilage images was performed a month later. Reliability was assessed by use of weighted κ analyses. RESULTS: Osteophyte scores were evenly distributed, and the intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were substantial to excellent (κ range 0.68-0.89 and mean κ 0.65 (day 1) and 0.67 (day 2), respectively). Cartilage scores were unevenly distributed, and the intraobserver and interobserver reliability was fair to moderate (κ range 0.46-0.66 and mean κ 0.39 (day 1) and 0.33 (day 2), respectively). The web-based exercise showed acceptable agreement for cartilage being normal (κ 0.47) or with complete loss (κ 0.68), but poor for the intermediate scores (κ 0.22-0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the present semiquantitative ultrasonography scoring system for cartilage pathology in hand OA is not recommended (while normal or total loss of cartilage may be assessed). However, the OMERACT ultrasonography group will endorse the use of semiquantitative scoring of osteophytes with the ultrasonography atlas as reference.

Educational recommendations for the conduct, content and format of EULAR musculoskeletal ultrasound Teaching the Teachers Courses.

OBJECTIVE: To produce educational guidelines for the conduct, content and format of theoretical and practical teaching at EULAR musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) Teaching the Teachers (TTT) Courses. METHODS: A Delphi-based procedure with 24 recommendations covering five main areas (Duration and place of the course; Faculty members; Content of the course; Evaluation of the teaching skills; TTT competency assessment) was distributed among a group of experts involved in MSUS teaching, in addition to an advisory educational expert being present. Consensus for each recommendation was considered achieved when the percentage of agreement was >75%. RESULTS: 21 of 24 invited participants responded to the first Delphi questionnaire (88% response rate). All 21 participants also responded to the second round. Agreement on 19 statements was obtained after two rounds. CONCLUSIONS: This project has led to the development of guidelines for the conduct, content and format of teaching at the EULAR MSUS TTT Courses that are organised annually, with the aim of training future teachers of EULAR MSUS Courses, EULAR Endorsed MSUS Courses, as well as national and local MSUS Courses. The presented work gives indications on how to homogenise the teaching at the MSUS TTT Courses, thus resolving current discrepancies in the field.

EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of spondyloarthritis in clinical practice.

A taskforce comprised of an expert group of 21 rheumatologists, radiologists and methodologists from 11 countries developed evidence-based recommendations on the use of imaging in the clinical management of both axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA). Twelve key questions on the role of imaging in SpA were generated using a process of discussion and consensus. Imaging modalities included conventional radiography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography, single photon emission CT, dual-emission x-ray absorptiometry and scintigraphy. Experts applied research evidence obtained from systematic literature reviews using MEDLINE and EMBASE to develop a set of 10 recommendations. The strength of recommendations (SOR) was assessed by taskforce members using a visual analogue scale. A total of 7550 references were identified in the search process, from which 158 studies were included in the systematic review. Ten recommendations were produced using research-based evidence and expert opinion encompassing the role of imaging in making a diagnosis of axial SpA or peripheral SpA, monitoring inflammation and damage, predicting outcome, response to treatment, and detecting spinal fractures and osteoporosis. The SOR for each recommendation was generally very high (range 8.9-9.5). These are the first recommendations which encompass the entire spectrum of SpA and evaluate the full role of all commonly used imaging modalities. We aimed to produce recommendations that are practical and valuable in daily practice for rheumatologists, radiologists and general practitioners.

Radiologists and rheumatologists on performing and reporting shoulder ultrasound: from disagreement to consensus.

Shoulder pain is a common condition in the rheumatologist's practice, yet there are no guidelines on how to report shoulder ultrasound (US) examinations. The aim of this study was to compare scanning and reporting techniques performed by radiologists and rheumatologists and identify any discrepancies between the two. The participants in this study were five rheumatologists and two radiologists specialized in musculoskeletal US. The study was divided in 2 phases. In the first phase, each participant performed an US of 3 patients and reported the findings without knowing the patient diagnosis and the findings reported by the other operators. Other three investigators reported the US technique of each operator. Reports and images were subsequently compared to identify any discrepancies and reach consensus on a common approach. In the second phase, a US scan was performed on a fourth patient in a plenary session to assess feasibility and efficacy of the common approach The US scanning technique was similar for all operators. The differences in reporting emerged in the description of the rotator cuff disease. Radiologists provided a detailed description of lesions (measurements along 2 axis and scoring of lesions), whereas rheumatologists described carefully the inflammatory changes. The experts concluded that lesions should be measured along 2 axes and the grade of degeneration and the age of the lesion should be reported. Another difference emerged in the description of the irregularities of the bone surface. The experts concluded that the term erosion should be used only when an inflammatory joint disease is suspected. This study led to the clarification of some inconsistencies in US reporting, and represented an interesting collaborative experience between radiologists and rheumatologists.

Defining enthesitis in spondyloarthritis by ultrasound: results of a Delphi process and of a reliability reading exercise.

OBJECTIVE: To standardize ultrasound (US) in enthesitis. METHODS: An initial Delphi exercise was undertaken to define US-detected enthesitis and its core components. These definitions were subsequently tested on static images taken from spondyloarthritis patients in order to evaluate their reliability. RESULTS: Excellent agreement (>80%) was obtained for including hypoechogenicity, increased thickness of the tendon insertion, calcifications, enthesophytes, erosions, and Doppler activity as core elementary lesions of US-detected enthesitis. US definitions were subsequently obtained for each elementary component. On static images, the intraobserver reliability showed a high degree of variability for the detection of elementary lesions, with kappa coefficients ranging from 0.13-1. The interobserver kappa values were variable, with the lowest kappa coefficient for enthesophytes (0.24) and the highest coefficient for Doppler activity at the enthesis (0.63). CONCLUSION: This is the first consensus-based US definition of enthesitis and its elementary components and the first step performed to ensure a higher degree of homogeneity and comparability of results between studies and in daily clinical work.

EFSUMB minimum training requirements for rheumatologists performing musculoskeletal ultrasound.

In order to optimize and standardize musculoskeletal ultrasonography education for rheumatologists, there is a need for competency assessments addressing the required training and practical and theoretical skills. This paper describes how these competency assessments for rheumatologists were developed and what they contain.

Diffusion and applications of musculoskeletal ultrasound in Italian Rheumatology Units.

The Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Study Group of the Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR) was founded during the 68th SIR Congress, on November 2011. The request of activation of this group was based on the increasing interest and the widespread diffusion of ultrasound in the scientific rheumatology community and on the solid experience of some Italian rheumatologists in the field. The aims of the Study Group are to stimulate the applications and use of ultrasound in the clinical practice at the level of the Italian rheumatology units and, in addition, to develop research projects at a national level...

The reliability of musculoskeletal ultrasound in the detection of cartilage abnormalities at the metacarpo-phalangeal joints.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of ultrasound (US) in detecting cartilage abnormalities at the metacarpo-phalangeal (MCP) joints in people with cartilage pathology. METHODS: Nine expert ultrasonographers initially achieved consensus on definitions and scanning protocols. They then examined the second to fifth MCP joints of the dominant hand of eight people with hand osteoarthritis (OA). US examinations were conducted in two rounds, with independent blinded evaluations of cartilage lesions. Global cartilage abnormalities were assessed by applying a dichotomous (presence/absence) score; in addition, the following lesions were evaluated using the same scoring system: loss of anechoic structure and/or thinning of the cartilage layer, and irregularities and/or loss of sharpness of at least one cartilage margin. Reliability was assessed using kappa (k) coefficients. RESULTS: Thirty-two joints were examined. Intra-observer k values ranged from 0.52 to 1 for global cartilage abnormalities; k values ranged from 0.54 to 0.94 for loss of anechoic structure and/or thinning of cartilage layer and from 0.59 to 1 for irregularities and/or loss of sharpness of at least one cartilage margin. Values of k for inter-observer reliability were 0.80 for global cartilage abnormalities, 0.62 for loss of anechoic structure and/or thinning of cartilage layer, and 0.39 for irregularities and/or loss of sharpness of at least one cartilage margin. CONCLUSION: US is a reliable imaging modality for the detection of cartilage abnormalities in patients with cartilage pathology in the MCP joints. The analysis of specific cartilage measures showed more variable results that may be improved by modifying definitions and further standardization of US techniques.

Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist XXXIX. Sonographic assessment of the hip in fibromyalgia patients.

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a common form of non-inflammatory rheumatism within the general population with symptoms often mimicking those of arthritis or muscle disorders. Arthralgic symptoms in the region of the hip are commonly mentioned by patients with FMS and one of the diagnostic trigger points for the condition is found around the greater trochanter. To date, no formal imaging studies using ultrasound (US) have been performed in FMS. This study describes the correlation between clinical and US findings in patients presenting with primary FMS to rheumatology clinics. In the majority of the patients, no significant pathological US abnormalities were detected.

Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist XXXVII. Sonographic assessment of the hip in ankylosing spondylitis patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of ultrasound (US) detectable inflammation in hips of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and the relationship between US and measures of disease activity and severity. METHODS: Consecutive patients with AS attending the rheumatology units involved in this study were enrolled. Clinical and demographical data were recorded. US examination of bilateral hips was performed at the same time, evaluating anterior longitudinal scan to search for synovial hypertrophy (SH), joint effusion (JE) or power Doppler (PD) positive synovitis. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were included, median age (interquartile range, IQR) 49 (39, 59.5), median disease duration 98 (72, 204) months, 80.3% were treated with TNF-α inhibitors, median BASDAI 2.65 (1.96, 3.95), 30.3% had hip tenderness. US JE was found in 26.7% of patients, US SH in 16%, no patient had detectable PD. The concordance between clinical findings and US abnormalities was moderate, with a kappa of 0.44. Patients with detectable US abnormalities had higher median visual analogue scale (VAS) pain and C-reactive protein (CRP), while there was no significant association with other measures of disease activity and disability. In the subgroup of patients with no hip tenderness, US alterations were still significantly related to higher CRP levels, while in patients with hip tenderness and no US abnormalities CRP was not higher than in the asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: US assessment of hip joint in AS patients can be considered of value, as suggested by the correlation with relevant clinical and laboratory measures. In asymptomatic patients, US examination might provide further information on subclinical involvement.