Patients' attitudes and knowledge about drug use: a survey in Turkish family healthcare centres and state hospitals

Background/aim: Irrational drug use is a common problem. This study aimed to evaluate patients' knowledge and habits concerning drug use, and compare them in terms of some sociodemographic characteristics. Materials and methods: A face-to-face questionnaire was given to outpatients from family healthcare centres (FHCs) and state hospitals (SHs) in 12 provinces in Turkey during May 2010. A total of 4470 patients (FHCs: 2209; SHs: 2261) responded to the questionnaire (response rate: 93.1%). Results: Getting prescriptions without a physical examination was common (second place in FHCs; third place in SHs); 51.0% stated that they wanted physicians to prescribe drugs that they had used before. More than half stated that antibiotics cured every illness. In addition, 55.9% reported that their relatives recommended drugs to them when they got ill; 37.1% reported that they recommended them to relatives as well. Of the survey respondents, 70.5% stated that they had stopped their medications before the recommended time. Patients' knowledge and attitudes about drug use showed significant differences in comparisons of sex, age, educational level, and social security. Conclusion: Patients' knowledge and attitudes about drugs were far from rational. To eliminate irrational use of drugs, public education about drug use is needed.

PRescriptiOn PattERns of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation (PROPER study).

INTRODUCTION: Inappropriate use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) have not been well investigatedand, however, may be frequent in real-world practice in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This study was designed to evaluate the prescription patterns and appropriateness of OACs in patients with NVAF in real-world clinical settings. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational study (NCT02366338). A total of 148 patients with NVAF were screened for OAC prescription. Appropriateness of prescribing was evaluated using 9 criteria of the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI): indication, choice, dosage, modalities and practicability of administration, drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, duplication, and duration. For each criterion, the evaluator has to rate whether the medication is (A) appropriate, (B) inappropriate but with limited clinical importance, and (C) inappropriate. RESULTS: Of 148 patients, 73 (50%) were on warfarin (group 1), 39 (26%) were on rivaroxaban (group 2), and 36 (24%) were on dabigatran therapy (group 3). The MAI showed that 83% of group 1, 28% of group 2, and 47% of group 3 patients had at least 1 inappropriate criterion. Moreover, according to the choice criterion, 37% of group 1, 8% of group 2 and 5% of group 3 were rated as inappropriate, and dosage was not appropriate in 77% of group 1, 23% of group 2, and 42% of group 3. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate drug use is frequent among patients with NVAF not only for warfarin but also for NOACs. Although there is an apparent improvement in thromboprophylaxis of NVAF, much more effort is needed for appropriate use of OACs.

Cutaneous microvascular reactivity and aortic elasticity in coronary artery disease: Comparison of the laser Doppler flowmetry and echocardiography.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Decreased vascular reactivity in atherosclerosis was previously shown. In our study, it was aimed to demonstrate the decreased vascular functions in both microvascular and macrovascular tissues and to estimate any correlation between them. METHODS: Twenty-five control outpatients with no coronary artery disease (CAD) history and 26 outpatients with CAD history were enrolled in the study. Local cutaneous post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) responses after three minutes of brachial occlusion with a pneumatic cuff were recorded noninvasively by a Perimed Periflux 5010 laser Doppler flow system. Aortic distensibility and stiffness indexes were recorded noninvasively by a two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography machine (Vivid S6 GE Medical System, Horten, Norway). RESULTS: Except for the medication history of subjects, there were no significant demographic differences between the CAD and control groups. Peak flow (PF), resting flow (RF) and biological zero(BZ) laser Doppler measurements were not decreased, but PF-RF/RF (%), PF-BZ/BF (%), hyperemia repayment and PORH indexes were significantly decreased in the CAD group (P=0.005, P=0.024, P=0.017, P=0.006, respectively) with laser Doppler measurements. Aortic strain (%) and aortic distensibility (cm3/dyn-1) measurements were significantly decreased in the CAD group (P=0.005, P=0.013). However, there was no correlation between microvascular indexes (hyperemia repayment index, PORH index) and macrovascular indexes (aortic strain and aortic distensibility). DISCUSSION: Different corrupted vascular tonus regulator systems in arteries of varying diameter, different major reactive responses to the stimuli or, finally, the lack of a number of subjects to obtain a significant level may be responsible for the irrelevant correlation analysis. CONCLUSION: The differences in arterial beds (both aorta and microcirculation) may be examined to assess the cardiovascular risk in patients with history of CAD.

Aspects of physicians' attitudes towards the rational use of drugs at a training and research hospital: a survey study.

PURPOSE: The rational use of drugs (RUD) is primarily the responsibility of physicians. The aim of this study was to investigate whether physicians are aware of RUD principles and how they apply them in daily medical practice. METHODS: A total 136 physicians working at the Kartal Training and Research Hospital in Istanbul were enrolled in the study between February and March 2012. A face-to-face interview was conducted with physicians to assess their knowledge and attitude regarding RUD. RESULTS: A large majority of the physicians declared that consultation time was insufficient (84 %). The data obtained from the survey indicate that 54 % of the enrolled physicians monitored the therapeutic outcome and that 27 % found the information given to the patient to be sufficient. Participating physicians stated that the less known characteristics of the drugs they prescribed were drug interactions, traceability in market, and price. The most preferred reference source was Vademecum (a drug guideline prepared by the private sector). Two major factors contributing to prescribing patterns were "self study" and "observation of teachers" at clinical training. There was a significant difference between internists-surgeons and residents-specialists in the number of prescribed drugs per prescription (p < 0.001) and in the information provided to the patient on the prescribed drugs (name, effect, dose, instructions, possible side effect) (p < 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings overall show that the principles of RUD were not fully applied in daily medical practice by the participating physicians. One important reason for this is a heavy patient load, which requires a change in managerial practices within the healthcare system. The other, more essential explanation is education; consequently, serious consideration should be given to including effective clinical pharmacotherapy training and RUD courses in the medical education curriculum.