Outcomes after laser enucleation of the prostate with and without significant storage symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To test for differences in recovery of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) between patients with storage-positive vs -negative symptoms after laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive storage-positive (severe storage symptoms, International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] storage subscore >8) vs storage-negative patients treated with LEP (November 2017-September 2022) within our tertiary-care database were identified. Mixed linear models tested for changes in IPSS and quality of life (QoL) at 1, 3 and 12 months after LEP. Multiple linear regression models tested for LUTS and QoL recovery risk factors at 1, 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: Of 291 study patients, 180 (62%) had storage-positive symptoms. There were no differences between storage-positive and -negative patients in mean adjusted total IPSS, IPSS-storage, IPSS-voiding and QoL at 12 months after LEP. In multiple linear regression models, storage-positive status was identified as a risk factor for higher IPSS at 1 month (ß coefficient 2.98, P = 0.004) and 3 months (ß coefficient 2.24, P = 0.04), as well as for more unfavourable QoL at 1 month (ß coefficient 0.74, P = 0.006) and 3 months (ß coefficient 0.73, P = 0.004) after LEP. Conversely, at 12 months there were no differences between storage-positive vs -negative patients. CONCLUSION: Storage-positive patients appear to experience similar long-term benefits from LEP compared to storage-negative patients. However, significant storage symptoms are associated with higher total IPSS and less favourable QoL at 1 and 3 months after LEP. These findings advocate for the consideration of LEP also in storage-positive cases with the need for thorough patient education especially in the initial post-LEP period.

Transcriptomics of Marburg virus-infected primary proximal tubular cells reveals negative correlation of immune response and energy metabolism.

Marburg virus, a member of the Filoviridae, is the causative agent of Marburg virus disease (MVD), a hemorrhagic fever with a case fatality rate of up to 90 %. Acute kidney injury is common in MVD and is associated with increased mortality, but its pathogenesis in MVD remains poorly understood. Interestingly, autopsies show the presence of viral proteins in different parts of the nephron, particularly in proximal tubular cells (PTC). These findings suggest a potential role for the virus in the development of MVD-related kidney injury. To shed light on this effect, we infected primary human PTC with Lake Victoria Marburg virus and conducted transcriptomic analysis at multiple time points. Unexpectedly, infection did not induce marked cytopathic effects in primary tubular cells at 20 and 40 h post infection. However, gene expression analysis revealed robust renal viral replication and dysregulation of genes essential for different cellular functions. The gene sets mainly downregulated in PTC were associated with the targets of the transcription factors MYC and E2F, DNA repair, the G2M checkpoint, as well as oxidative phosphorylation. Importantly, the downregulated factors comprise PGC-1α, a well-known factor in acute and chronic kidney injury. By contrast, the most highly upregulated gene sets were those related to the inflammatory response and cholesterol homeostasis. In conclusion, Marburg virus infects and replicates in human primary PTC and induces downregulation of processes known to be relevant for acute kidney injury as well as a strong inflammatory response.

Thulium fiber laser vs. holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: results of a prospective randomized non-inferiority trial.

PURPOSE: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) represents the current standard procedure for size-independent surgical therapy of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). With advent of the novel laser technology thulium fiber laser (TFL), we hypothesized that the functional outcome of TFL enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) is non-inferior compared to HoLEP. METHODS: From October 2021 to October 2022, 150 patients with BPO were recruited for the prospective randomized trial in accordance with CONSORT. Stratified randomization into the arms ThuFLEP (n = 74) or HoLEP (n = 76) was carried out. The primary endpoint was non-inferior international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) at three months after treatment. Secondary endpoints were rates of complications, peak flow, residual urine and operation times. RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics showed no significant differences. Overall IPSS and QoL improved from 21 to 8 and 4 to 1.5, respectively, after three months of follow-up. No statistically significant differences between ThuFLEP and HoLEP were observed regarding median postoperative IPSS (8.5 vs. 7, p > 0.9), QoL (1 vs. 2, p = 0.6), residual urine (48 vs. 30ml, p = 0.065) and peak flow (19 vs. 17ml/s, p > 0.9). Similarly, safety profile was comparable with no statistically significant differences regarding rate of major complications (5.3 vs. 5.4%, p = 0.5), laser hemostasis time (3 vs. 2min, p = 0.2), use of additive electric coagulation (74 vs. 87%, p = 0.06) or electric coagulation time (8 vs. 8min, p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective, randomized trial ThuFLEP showed non-inferior results compared to HoLEP in terms of functional outcomes measured by IPSS and QoL as primary endpoint. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00032699 (18.09.2023, retrospectively registered).