A Randomized, Open-Label Study Conducted to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Pegfilgrastim-cbqv On-Body Injector Versus Prefilled Syringe in Healthy Male Participants.

INTRODUCTION: To help prevent febrile neutropenia, pegfilgrastim-cbqv (UDENYCA®; Coherus BioSciences), a pegfilgrastim (NEULASTA®; Amgen) biosimilar, is administered 24-96 h after myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Delivery of pegfilgrastim-cbqv using an on-body injector (OBI) provides an alternative method of administration, affording options in drug delivery. This study aimed to establish pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) bioequivalence and assess the safety of pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered using an OBI compared with a prefilled syringe (PFS). METHODS: In this open-label, two-period crossover study, healthy adult male participants (N = 189) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pegfilgrastim-cbqv 6 mg subcutaneously using an OBI (n = 92) or a PFS (n = 95) in period 1 and then an injection via the other method in period 2. Primary PK end points were area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum plasma concentration. Secondary PD end points, safety, immunogenicity, and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios for the PK and PD end points fell within the predetermined range (80-125%), indicating PK and PD bioequivalence between pegfilgrastim-cbqv OBI and pegfilgrastim-cbqv PFS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 87.8% and 75.8% of participants in the OBI and PFS groups, respectively. Most TEAEs were musculoskeletal effects. The most common OBI-related TEAE was injection site erythema (31.7%), which was mild, transient, and self-limiting. The incidence of treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies (ADAs) was similar between the OBI and PFS. ADAs had no apparent impact on PK, PD, or safety. Neutralizing antibodies were not detected in any participant. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study showed PK and PD bioequivalence of pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered using OBI compared with PFS. OBI and PFS administration had similar safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity profiles. No unexpected safety signals were identified. Graphical Abstract available for this article.

Febrile neutropenia is when a patient has a fever and a lower-than-normal number of white blood cells. When white blood cell counts are low, patients are more susceptible to opportunistic infections as a result of their weakened immune systems. Severe febrile neutropenia can lead to the stopping or delaying of chemotherapy. The drug pegfilgrastim-cbqv is used 24­96 h after chemotherapy to stimulate the growth of white blood cells. Pegfilgrastim-cbqv is available in a single-dose prefilled syringe and in a prefilled autoinjector. If a patient cannot inject themselves with the drug, they must go to a clinic for the injection. Using an on-body injector applied to the skin that automatically injects the drug at a specific time could eliminate the need to go to the clinic. During this study, healthy adult male participants were given pegfilgrastim-cbqv through an on-body injector or a prefilled syringe to investigate if the movement of the drug into, through, and out of the body (pharmacokinetics) and the physiological action of the drug in the body (pharmacodynamics) were similar between the two injection methods. Side effects were also studied. The researchers found that the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for pegfilgrastim-cbqv given by on-body-injector or prefilled syringe were similar. The number and types of side effects were also similar. The most common side effect for the on-body injector was mild erythema at the injection site. This side effect resolved by itself. The treatment benefit and safety of pegfilgrastim-cbqv were very similar regardless of how the drug was administered.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Bioequivalence of Pegfilgrastim-cbqv Delivered via a Prefilled Autoinjector and Prefilled Syringe in Healthy Male Participants.

INTRODUCTION: Pegfilgrastim-cbqv (UDENYCA®; Coherus BioSciences, Redwood City, CA, USA) is a pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) biosimilar approved for administration by prefilled syringe (PFS). The recently approved pegfilgrastim-cbqv prefilled autoinjector (AI) was developed as another method of self-administration and to aid in-office use, providing flexibility in drug delivery. The objectives of the study were to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to determine bioequivalence of the prefilled AI and the PFS for administration of pegfilgrastim-cbqv and to assess the safety profile of the prefilled AI. METHODS: During this open-label, two-period crossover study, healthy adult males (N = 155) were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive a subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim-cbqv using a prefilled AI (n = 76) or a PFS (n = 79) in period 1. During period 2, participants received an injection using the other method. Primary PK and secondary PD parameters were calculated to assess the bioequivalence of the treatment as administered by the two delivery methods. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. RESULTS: The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the PK and PD parameters were within the required range (80-125%), demonstrating bioequivalence between the pegfilgrastim-cbqv prefilled AI and PFS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 75% and 74.1% of participants in the prefilled AI and PFS groups, respectively. The most common TEAEs in both treatment groups were myalgia, bone pain, and headache. AI-device-related TEAEs were injection site pain (1.4%) and injection site bruising (0.7%). The incidence of antidrug antibodies and neutralizing antibodies was low and was similar in both treatment sequences. CONCLUSIONS: The bioequivalence of pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered using a prefilled AI and a PFS was established. The safety, including immunogenicity profiles, of pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered using the prefilled AI and the PFS were similar, with no new safety findings.

Pegfilgrastim-cbqv is used 24­96 h after chemotherapy to prevent febrile neutropenia. This is when a patient has a fever and a lower-than-normal number of white blood cells. Pegfilgrastim-cbqv is also used to treat someone who has a fever and a low number of white blood cells after high radiation exposure (hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome). Pegfilgrastim-cbqv is given as an injection by hand. The syringe is already filled with the drug. The US Food and Drug Administration also approved a prefilled autoinjector as another way to give the drug. The autoinjector is a spring-loaded system that delivers pegfilgrastim-cbqv in less than 10 s. A shield covers the needle before and after the drug is given. The autoinjector is safe and effective for patients to give pegfilgrastim-cbqv to themselves and for health care staff to use in-office. This study looked at whether the way in which pegfilgrastim-cbqv moves through the body (pharmacokinetics) and its effects on the body (pharmacodynamics) were similar in healthy adult males when using a prefilled autoinjector and a prefilled syringe. Side effects were also assessed. The two administration methods had very similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic results for pegfilgrastim-cbqv. The side effects for both groups were also similar. The most common side effects were muscle aches and pains, bone pain, and headaches. Giving pegfilgrastim-cbqv with the prefilled autoinjector was very similar to giving it with the prefilled syringe and the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety were similar.

Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim-cbqv Demonstrated Similar Immunogenicity to Pegfilgrastim in Healthy Subjects Across Three Randomized Clinical Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Biologic therapeutics can trigger immune responses in patients. As part of the totality of evidence that is required for regulatory approval of biosimilars, immunogenicity similarity must be assessed in the clinical programs. Pegfilgrastim-cbqv (UDENYCA®) is a pegfilgrastim biosimilar approved in the USA and European Union. This article demonstrates the similar immunogenicity of pegfilgrastim-cbqv compared with its reference product, pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®). METHODS: The immunogenicity of pegfilgrastim-cbqv was assessed in three clinical studies in healthy subjects (one specifically designed to evaluate immunogenicity similarity and two studies to assess pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics bioequivalence) using a tiered approach, in which plasma samples were tested for the presence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) as well as ADA binding-specificity, titer and neutralizing activity. To assess the clinical impact of ADAs, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety profiles were compared between ADA-positive and -negative subjects. RESULTS: These studies demonstrated similar immunogenicity of pegfilgrastim-cbqv and pegfilgrastim. The small differences in ADA incidence between treatment groups observed in the immunogenicity study were driven by non-neutralizing, low-titer, polyethylene glycol (PEG)-reactive ADAs, which are commonly present in healthy subjects. No treatment-emergent neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were detected in either treatment group, and there was no apparent impact of ADAs on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics or safety. CONCLUSION: Pegfilgrastim-cbqv has similar immunogenicity to pegfilgrastim. The presented immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety data support the overall demonstration of no clinically meaningful differences between pegfilgrastim-cbqv and pegfilgrastim. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02418104 (CHS-1701-04, April 2015), NCT02650973 (CHS-1701-05, February 2016) and NCT02385851 (CHS-1701-03, March 2015).

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Equivalence of Pegfilgrastim-cbqv and Pegfilgrastim in Healthy Subjects.

INTRODUCTION: Pegfilgrastim-cbqv was developed as a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim, a pegylated form of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor approved for decreasing febrile neutropenia-associated infection in patients receiving myelosuppressive drugs. This multicenter, randomized, single-blind, partial-reference-replicated, three-sequence crossover study assessed pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of pegfilgrastim-cbqv and pegfilgrastim in healthy subjects. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two subjects were randomized to one of three treatment sequences; each included one dose of pegfilgrastim-cbqv and two doses of pegfilgrastim separated by ≥ 28 days. The primary pharmacokinetic end points were area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) and maximum concentration (Cmax). The primary pharmacodynamic end points were maximum absolute neutrophil count (ANCmax) and ANC AUC from time 0 to the last measurable observation (ANC AUC0-last). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalences were demonstrated if the 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of pegfilgrastim-cbqv to pegfilgrastim was within 80-125% for the primary end points. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence criteria were met for Cmax (GMR 105.0; 90% CI 95.5-115.4) and AUC0-∞ (GMR 97.5; 90% CI 88.6-107.2). Pharmacodynamic bioequivalence criteria were met for ANCmax (GMR 99.6; 90% CI 96.2-103.2) and ANC AUC0-last (GMR 96.7; 90% CI 92.2-101.4). Adverse events occurred in 76.0%, 76.6%, and 73.1% of subjects for pegfilgrastim-cbqv, first pegfilgrastim, and second pegfilgrastim dosing periods across treatment sequences, respectively. Investigators found no drug-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: This study established pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of pegfilgrastim-cbqv to pegfilgrastim. The treatments displayed similar safety profiles, including immunogenicity, with no unexpected safety findings. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02650973, February 2016.

Anti-inflammatory approaches that target the chemokine network.

Chemokine-ligand/receptor axes play pivotal roles in a myriad of inflammatory, allergic and autoimmune diseases, as well as in the promotion of tumor growth and metastasis. Upon insult, tissue resident cells (and cancer cells in general) release a defined set of inflammatory chemokines that are responsible for the recruitment of activated pathological leukocytes. Recruited leukocytes synthesize and release a host of inflammatory mediators such as chemokines, cytokines, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, and proteinases. These agents are responsible for the maintenance and amplification of inflammatory responses, and are directly responsible for secondary tissue damage, promotion of autoimmunity, fibrosis and tissue remodelling. Many cancers are associated with the expression of chemokine ligands that co-opt leukocytes such as tumor associated macrophages which in turn provide mediators including growth factors, chemokines and proteinases that promote angiogenesis, tumor growth, and cancer metastasis. Here, we discuss the relevant patents, development and the mechanism of action of a range of therapeutic and potential therapeutic agents that specifically target the chemokine ligand and receptor network. The main approaches that will be highlighted here are antagonism, cell depletion and the relatively unexplored fields of anti-sense, gene and stem cell therapies.

Clinical grade production and characterization of a fusion protein comprised of the chemokine CCL2-ligand genetically fused to a mutated and truncated form of the Shiga A1 subunit.

First generation chemokine ligand-Shiga A1 (SA1) fusion proteins (leukocyte population modulators, LPMs) were previously only obtained in small quantities due to the ribosomal inactivating protein properties of the SA1 moiety which inhibits protein synthesis in host cells. We therefore employed 4-aminopyrazolo[3,4-d]-pyrimidine, an inhibitor of Shiga A1, to allow the growth of these cells prior to induction and during the expression phase post-induction with IPTG. Scale-up allowed the production of gram quantities of clinical grade material of the lead candidate, OPL-CCL2-LPM. A manufacturing cell bank was established and used to produce OPL-CCL2-LPM in a fed-batch fermentation process. Induction of the expression of OPL-CCL2-LPM led to the production of 22.47 mg/L per OD(600) unit. The LPM was purified from inclusion bodies using solubilization, renaturation, refolding and chromatography steps. The identity and purity of the OPL-CCL2-LPM was determined using several analytical techniques. The product retained the ability of the SA1 moiety to inhibit protein synthesis as measured in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate cell-free protein synthesis assay and was cytotoxic to target cells. Binding studies established that the protein exerts its effects via CCR2, the cognate receptor for CCL2. Clinical trials in inflammatory nephropathies are planned.

Preclinical evaluation of an anti-alpha5beta1 integrin antibody as a novel anti-angiogenic agent.

Integrin alpha5beta1, the principal fibronectin receptor, is an important survival factor, playing a key role in angiogenesis. Angiogenesis is critical for tumor growth, and anti-angiogenic therapies have met clinical success. To validate the therapeutic potential of an anti-alpha5beta1 strategy, we generated volociximab (M200) a chimeric human IgG4 version of the alpha5beta1 function-blocking murine antibody IIA1; and F200, the Fab derivative. Volociximab, F200 and IIA1 showed similar activity by ELISA (EC50= 0.2nM), Biacore (Kd= 0.1-0.4nM) and inhibition of fibronectin binding (IC50= 2-3nM). The inhibitory potential of alpha5beta1 antibodies was compared to HuMV833, an anti-VEGF antibody. Both volociximab and HuMV833 inhibited HUVEC proliferation (IC50 of volociximab = 0.2-0.5nM; IC50 of HuMV833 = 45nM). However, IIA1, volociximab and F200 were also potent inhibitors of an in vitro model of angiogenesis (HUVEC tube formation assay), unlike HuMV833. Additionally, volociximab inhibited in vitro tube formation induced by VEGF and/or bFGF, suggesting a mechanism of action independent of growth factor stimulus. In fact, inhibition of alpha5beta1 function by volociximab induced apoptosis of actively proliferating, but not resting, endothelial cells. Volociximab does not cross-react with rodent alpha5beta1, therefore in vivo validation of an anti-alpha5beta1 approach was conducted in a cynomolgus model of choroidal revascularization. Volociximab and F200 were potent inhibitors of neovessel formation in this model. These data demonstrate that volociximab has therapeutic potential in diseases in which new vessel formation is a component of the pathology.

Long-term efficacy and safety of etanercept in children with polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: interim results from an ongoing multicenter, open-label, extended-treatment trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of etanercept in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) participating in an ongoing multicenter, open-label, extended-treatment trial. All patients had been participants in an initial randomized efficacy and safety trial of etanercept. METHODS: Etanercept was administered at a dosage of 0.4 mg/kg (maximum 25 mg) subcutaneously twice each week. Safety and efficacy evaluations were performed every 3-4 months. The JRA 30% definition of improvement (DOI) was defined as improvement of > or =30% in at least 3 of 6 response variables used to assess disease activity, with no more than 1 variable worsening by more than 30%. RESULTS: At the time of analysis, 48 of the 58 patients (83%) were still enrolled in the study; 43 of them (74%) had completed 2 years of treatment. Of these 43 patients, 81% met the JRA 30% DOI, 79% met the JRA 50% DOI, and 67% met the JRA 70% DOI. Ten children started low-dose methotrexate after year 1. Of the 32 children taking prednisone, the dosage was decreased to <5 mg/day in 26 (81%). Two children had serious infections (varicella with aseptic meningitis in one and complicated sepsis in the other). In general, adverse events were of the types seen in a general pediatric patient population. CONCLUSION: Children with severe, longstanding, methotrexate-resistant polyarticular JRA demonstrated sustained clinical improvement with >2 years of continuous etanercept treatment. Etanercept was generally well-tolerated. There were no increases in the rates of adverse events over time. However, children taking etanercept should be monitored closely for infections.

Etanercept versus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received monotherapy with either etanercept or methotrexate (MTX) for 2 years and to assess the safety of this therapy. METHODS: In the Enbrel ERA (early rheumatoid arthritis) trial, 632 patients with early, active RA were randomized to receive either twice-weekly subcutaneous etanercept (10 mg or 25 mg) or weekly oral MTX (mean dosage 19 mg per week) for at least 1 year in a double-blind manner. Following the blinded phase of the trial, 512 patients continued to receive the therapy to which they had been randomized for up to 1 additional year, in an open-label manner. Radiograph readers remained blinded to treatment group assignment and the chronologic order of images. RESULTS: At 24 months, more 25-mg etanercept patients than MTX patients met American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (72% and 59%, respectively; P = 0.005), and more had no increase in total score and erosion scores on the Sharp scale (P = 0.017 and P = 0.012, respectively). The mean changes in total Sharp score and erosion score in the 25-mg etanercept group (1.3 and 0.66 units, respectively) were significantly lower than those in the MTX group (3.2 and 1.86 units, respectively; P = 0.001). Significantly more patients in the 25-mg etanercept group (55%) than in the MTX group (37%) had at least 0.5 units of improvement in the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (P < 0.001). Fewer patients in the etanercept group than in the MTX group experienced adverse events or discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Etanercept as monotherapy was safe and was superior to MTX in reducing disease activity, arresting structural damage, and decreasing disability over 2 years in patients with early, aggressive RA.

Preliminary definition of disease flare in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop preliminary criteria for defining disease flare in patients with polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). METHODS: Data from a randomized clinical trial of etanercept in JRA (51 patients) and the 6 core response variables (CRV) for JRA were used to derive flare definitions. The criterion standard of flare was treatment with placebo. Candidate flare definitions were assessed by receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve properties and other statistics for diagnostic tests. RESULTS: Of the possible flare definitions tested with acceptable statistical properties, the one that seemed to be the most useful was worsening in any 2/6 CRV by > or = 40% without improvement in more than 1 of the remaining CRV by > or = 30%. Two other superior flare definitions were (1) worsening in 3/6 CRV by > or = 30% and (2) any worsening of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire, worsening of erythrocyte sedimentation rate by > or = 30% and worsening of the active joint count by > or = 10%. CONCLUSIONS: CRV are useful for defining flare in JRA. Worsening in any 2/6 CRV by > or = 40% without concomitant improvement of more than one of the remaining CRV by > or = 30% appears to be the most suitable preliminary flare definition. Because the proposed flare criteria were derived from a small number of patients, it is essential to perform more definitive testing of this and several alternative flare definitions in larger patient populations.

Association of baseline levels of urinary glucosyl-galactosyl-pyridinoline and type II collagen C-telopeptide with progression of joint destruction in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether measurements of urinary glucosyl-galactosyl-pyridinoline (Glc-Gal-PYD) and urinary C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type II collagen (CTX-II), 2 new markers of destruction of the synovium and cartilage collagen breakdown, respectively, are associated with the progression of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to compare this association with that with serum matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3), a proteinase expressed by synovial tissue and chondrocytes, and that with serum C-reactive protein (CRP), an index of systemic inflammation. METHODS: The prospective study cohort comprised 116 patients with early RA who were part of a large, double-blind, randomized study comparing the efficacy of etanercept and methotrexate. The relationship between baseline levels of urinary Glc-Gal-PYD, urinary CTX-II, and serum MMP-3 and the progression of joint destruction, as measured by changes in the modified Sharp score (average findings of 2 independent readers) over 1 year, was investigated. RESULTS: Levels of urinary Glc-Gal-PYD (+70%), urinary CTX-II (+104%), and serum MMP-3 (+219%) were elevated compared with the levels in 76 healthy controls. The baseline levels of Glc-Gal-PYD (r = 0.30), CTX-II (r = 0.25), and MMP-3 (r = 0.29) correlated with the changes over 1 year in the total Sharp score (joint space narrowing and bone erosion). Patients with baseline levels of Glc-Gal-PYD, CTX-II, and MMP-3 that were higher than the mean + 2 SD in healthy controls had a significantly greater progression of joint damage, with an increase in the total Sharp score over 1 year that was from 3- to 8-fold higher than that in patients with low baseline levels of these markers. Moreover, patients with these higher levels of Glc-Gal-PYD, CTX-II, and MMP-3 had a higher risk of progression of the disease (increase in total Sharp score > or =0.5 units) than did the other patients (relative risks and 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] 3.3 [95% CI 1.5-7.4], 2.5 [95% CI 1.1-5.7], and 2.5 [95% CI 1.1-5.6], respectively). The baseline serum level of CRP was not significantly associated with the progression of joint damage. Adjustment of the levels of Glc-Gal-PYD, CTX-II, and MMP-3 according to radiologic damage at baseline did not alter their association with progression. After adjustment for serum CRP, the relative risk slightly decreased, but remained significant, for Glc-Gal-PYD (2.6 [95% CI 1.1-6.3]). Patients with both increased levels of the molecular markers and radiologic damage at baseline had a higher risk of progression of joint damage than did those with either high molecular marker levels or radiologic damage. CONCLUSION: High baseline levels of Glc-Gal-PYD, CTX-II, and MMP-3 are associated with increased risk of progression of joint destruction over 1 year in early RA. The association between baseline levels of urinary Glc-Gal-PYD and progression of joint erosion was independent of the severity of radiologic damage and inflammation at baseline. Combining the measurements of these molecular markers with radiologic assessment of joint damage may be useful for identifying patients with RA who are at high risk of rapid progression and for whom early aggressive treatment would be beneficial.