Long-Term Complications of Open and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in an Afro-Caribbean Population.

Background With the Afro-Caribbean population increasing in the United States, their complication profiles following open (ORP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic (RALP) radical prostatectomy warrants investigation. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate differences in long-term complications between ORP and RALP in Afro-Caribbeans. Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing ORP or RALP between April 2010 and August 2019 at an academic medical center and county hospital was conducted. Patients who identified as Afro-Caribbean with complete data were analyzed. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Age, transrectal ultrasound prostate volume, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, Gleason scores, and long-term complications (persisting to at least 18 months postoperatively) were compared between procedures using the Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher's exact test for statistical significance. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the odds of complications. Results This study included 53 Afro-Caribbean patients (mean age±SD; 65.9±6.8 years, 30 ORP, and 23 RALP). Patients treated by RALP were younger and had lower Gleason scores. Patients who were treated by RALP had a lower association to having ≥1 complications compared to those treated by ORP (OR=0.28, 95%CI 0.09-0.89, p=0.024). In addition, >60% of complications had a Clavien-Dindo grade≤II for both procedures. RALP resulted in fewer grade II complications compared to ORP (OR=0.25, 95%CI 0.08-0.81, p=0.046). Conclusions Treatment of Afro-Caribbeans with RALP allows for fewer complications, especially Clavien-Dindo Grade II complications. While previous investigations show that Black populations experience more complications when treated with ORP or RALP compared to other groups, their complication profile is likely not homogenous when considering their sub-ethnic background and must be investigated to understand optimal interventions for prostate cancer.

The monetary costs of pediatric upper urinary tract stone disease: Analysis in a contemporary United States cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of upper urinary tract stone disease (USD) in the United States is rising among both adults and children. Studies on the contemporary economic burden of USD management in the pediatric population are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively analyze the economic impact of USD in a contemporary United States pediatric cohort, and to evaluate drivers of cost. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients (aged 0-17), diagnosed with USD between 2011 and 2018 were identified from PearlDiver-Mariner, an all-payer claims database containing diagnostic, treatment and prescription data provided in all treatment settings. Relevant International Classification of Disease (ICD-9 and ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used for identification, and only patients with claims recorded for at least one year before and after entry of a diagnosis code for USD were selected (N = 10,045). Patients were stratified into those undergoing operative vs. non-operative management and for each patient, total 1-year healthcare costs following USD diagnosis, including same day and non-same day encounters, were analyzed. Factors associated with increased spending, as well as economic trends were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 8498 (85%) patients were managed non-operatively, while 1547 (15%) underwent a total of 1880 procedural interventions. Total overall cost was $117.1 million, while median annual expenditure was $15.8 million. Proportion of spending for outpatient, inpatient and prescription services was 52%, 32% and 16%, respectively (Table). Outpatient management accounted for 67% of overall spending. The proportion of patients managed non-operatively increased significantly over time, in parallel with spending for non-operative care. Comorbidity burden, treatment year and geographic region were among predictors of costs. DISCUSSION: Our study is the first to report actual insurance reimbursements for pediatric USD management using actual reimbursement data, examined across all treatment settings. We found that majority of the costs were for outpatient services and for non-operative management, with a rising tendency toward non-operative management over time. Regional variation in expenditures was evident. Specific reasons underlying these observed patterns could not directly be discerned from our dataset, but merit further investigation. CONCLUSION: Non-operative and outpatient management for pediatric USD are increasingly common, resulting in parallel shifts in spending. Notably, 52% of overall spending was for outpatient care. These insights into the contemporary economic burden of pediatric USD could provide value in shaping future healthcare policy.

Contemporary Assessment of the Economic Burden of Upper Urinary Tract Stone Disease in the United States: Analysis of One-Year Health Care Costs, 2011-2018.

Background: The U.S. health care landscape has witnessed numerous changes since implementation of the Affordable Care Act coupled with rising prevalence of upper urinary tract stone disease (SD). Data on the economic burden of SD during this period are lacking, providing the objective of our study. Materials and Methods: Adults diagnosed as having SD from 2011 to 2018 were identified from PearlDiver Mariner, a national all-payer database reporting reimbursements and prescription costs for all health care encounters. Patients undergoing operative and nonoperative care were identified. Time trends in annual expenditures were evaluated. Multivariable analysis evaluated determinants of spending. Results: A total of $10 billion were spent on SD management between 2011 and 2018 (median overall annual expenditure = $1.4 billion) among 786,756 patients. Inpatient, prescription, and outpatient costs accounted for 34.7%, 20.7%, and 44.6% of expenditures, respectively. Seventy-eight percent of patients were managed nonoperatively (total cost = $6.9 billion). The average overall cost per encounter was $13,587 ($17,102 for surgical vs $11,174 for nonsurgical care). Expenditures on inpatient care decreased significantly over time, while expenditures on prescriptions and outpatient care increased significantly. On multivariable analysis, a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was associated with higher spending, while associations for age, insurance, and region varied by treatment modality. Conclusions: The economic burden of SD management is substantial, dominated by expenditure on nonoperative management and outpatient care. Expenditures for prescription and outpatient care are rising, with the only consistent predictor of higher spending being CCI. Spending variation according to demographic, clinical, and geographic factors was evident.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Urology Residents: a Narrative Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges for urology resident education. In this review, we discuss the pandemic's impact on urology trainees and their education. RECENT FINDINGS: Urology trainees were often redeployed to frontline services in unfamiliar clinical settings. Residents often experienced increased levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. Many programs instituted virtual "check-ins" and formed liaisons with mental health services to foster cohesiveness. Urology trainees experienced the integration of telehealth into the clinical realm. Virtual surgery lectures and simulations were utilized to augment surgical education. Academic governing bodies upheld resident protections and provided dynamic guidance for training requirement throughout the pandemic. Medical students were unable to participate in traditional in-person away rotations and interviews, complicating the residency application process. The COVID-19 pandemic shook the healthcare system and ushered in seismic changes for urology trainees worldwide. Though the longstanding effects of the pandemic remain to be seen, urology residents have demonstrated tremendous resilience and bravery throughout this challenging period, and those qualities will undeniably withstand the test of time.

Well-being and education of urology residents during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of an American National Survey.

BACKGROUND: The rapid spread of COVID-19 has placed tremendous strain on the American healthcare system. Few prior studies have evaluated the well-being of or changes to training for American resident physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aim to study predictors of trainee well-being and changes to clinical practice using an anonymous survey of American urology residents. METHODS: An anonymous, voluntary, 47-question survey was sent to all ACGME-accredited urology programmes in the United States. We executed a cross-sectional analysis evaluating risk factors of perception of anxiety and depression both at work and home and educational outcomes. Multiple linear regressions models were used to estimate beta coefficients and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Among ~1800 urology residents in the USA, 356 (20%) responded. Among these respondents, 24 had missing data leaving a sample size of 332. Important risk factors of mental health outcomes included perception of access to PPE, local COVID-19 severity and perception of susceptible household members. Risk factors for declination of redeployment included current redeployment, having children and concerns regarding ability to reach case minimums. Risk factors for concern of achieving operative autonomy included cancellation of elective cases and higher level of training. CONCLUSIONS: Several potential actions, which could be taken by urology residency programme directors and hospital administration, may optimise urology resident well-being, morale, and education. These include advocating for adequate access to PPE, providing support at both the residency programme and institutional levels, instituting telehealth education programmes, and fostering a sense of shared responsibility of COVID-19 patients.