Healthy myeloid-derived suppressor cells express the surface ectoenzyme Vanin-2 (VNN2).

Study of human monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor cells Mo-MDSC (CD14+ HLA-DRneg/low) has been hampered by the lack of positive cell-surface markers. In order to identify positive markers for Mo-MDSC, we performed microarray analysis comparing Mo-MDSC cells from healthy subjects versus CD14+ HLA-DRhigh monocytes. We have identified the surface ectoenzyme Vanin-2(VNN2) protein as a novel biomarker highly-enriched in healthy subjects Mo-MDSC. Indeed, healthy subjects Mo-MDSC cells expressed 68 % VNN2, whereas only 9% VNN2 expression was observed on CD14+ HLA-DRhigh cells (n = 4 p < 0.01). The top 10 percent positive VNN2 monocytes expressed CD33 and CD11b while being negative for HLA-DR, CD3, CD15, CD19 and CD56, consistent with a Mo-MDSC phenotype. CD14+VNN2high monocytes were able to inhibit CD8 T cell proliferation comparably to traditional Mo-MDSC at 51 % and 48 % respectively. However, VNN2 expression on CD14+ monocytes from glioma patients was inversely correlated to their grade. CD14+VNN2high monocytes thus appear to mark a monocytic population similar to Mo-MDSC only in healthy subjects, which may be useful for tumor diagnoses.

The immunology of renal cell carcinoma.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer and comprises several subtypes with unique characteristics. The most common subtype (~70% of cases) is clear-cell RCC. RCC is considered to be an immunogenic tumour but is known to mediate immune dysfunction in large part by eliciting the infiltration of immune-inhibitory cells, such as regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, into the tumour microenvironment. Several possible mechanisms have been proposed to explain how these multiple tumour-infiltrating cell types block the development of an effective anti-tumour immune response, including inhibition of the activity of effector T cells and of antigen presenting cells via upregulation of suppressive factors such as checkpoint molecules. Targeting immune suppression using checkpoint inhibition has resulted in clinical responses in some patients with RCC and combinatorial approaches involving checkpoint blockade are now standard of care in patients with advanced RCC. However, a substantial proportion of patients do not benefit from checkpoint blockade. The identification of reliable biomarkers of response to checkpoint blockade is crucial to facilitate improvements in the clinical efficacy of these therapies. In addition, there is a need for the development of other immune-based strategies that address the shortcomings of checkpoint blockade, such as adoptive cell therapies.

Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Nonmetastatic Urothelial Carcinoma of Bladder Is Associated With Pathologic Complete Response and Overall Survival.

BACKGROUND: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) have immunosuppressive activity and enhance tumor progression. We hypothesized that lower blood MDSC would correlate with pathologic complete response and better outcomes in nonmetastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Before cystectomy, blood MDSC were measured in whole blood (WB) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells using flow cytometry. MDSC were defined as CD33+/HLA-DR-. MDSC subtypes were polymorphonuclear MDSC (CD15+/CD14-), monocytic (M)-MDSC (CD15-/CD14+), and uncommitted (UnC) MDSC (CD15-/CD14-). The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare MDSC between pathologic complete response groups. The optimal cutoff points for MDSC were identified using recursive partitioning analysis with cross-validation. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to associate MDSC and other clinical factors with recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Overall, 109 patients were included: 86% men with median (range) age of 67 (30-88) years, 76% with pure UC, 29% intravesical therapy, and 41% neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients (19%) had pT0N0 and 23 (24%) < pT2N0. Median (range) follow-up time was 17.4 (0.4-42.4) months. Total MDSC and polymorphonuclear MDSC percentage in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was significantly lower in patients with pT0N0 disease (P = .03). One- and 2-year OS rates were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90-99) and 83% (95% CI, 75-93), respectively. In the multivariate Cox model after adjusting for age and gender, patients with higher WB M-MDSC and UnC-MDSC had shorter OS (optimal cutoff points by recursive partitioning analysis, hazard ratio = 7.5 [95% CI, 2.5-22.8], P = .0004; hazard ratio = 3.4 [95% CI, 1.0-11.0], P = .046, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with nonmetastatic UC of bladder, higher WB M-MDSC and UnC-MDSC before cystectomy had negative prognostic value. Prospective validation is warranted.

Blood Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Correlate with Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Overall Survival in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) were linked to pathologic stage in bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC). Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inflammatory biomarker with a prognostic role in metastatic (m)UC. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that MDSC levels correlate with NLR and overall survival (OS) in mUC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MDSCs were measured in blood samples from patients with mUC in fresh unfractionated whole blood (WB) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) by flow cytometry and defined as LinloCD33+/HLADR- (Total MDSC). MDSC subsets were defined as polymorphonuclear (PMN-MDSC: CD15+/CD14-), monocytic (M-MDSC: CD15-/CD14+), and uncommitted (UNC-MDSC: CD15-/CD14-). MDSC populations were presented as a percentage of live nucleated blood cells. Spearman's rank correlation assessed correlations between MDSC and NLR. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test estimated OS from the time of MDSC collection to last follow-up or date of death. RESULTS: Of the 76 patients, 78% were men and 43% were never smokers with a median age of 69 years (range 31-83); 72% had pure UC and 76% had lower tract UC. Prior therapies included intravesical therapy (22%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (30%), cystectomy or nephroureterectomy (55%). Median follow-up for all patients was 12 months (0.6-36.5). PMN-MDSC was the predominant subset in WB and PBMC. There was significant correlation between individual MDSC subsets in WB and PBMC (p ≤ 0.001). Both WB UNC-MDSC/PMN-MDSC ratios (rho = - 0.27, p = 0.03) and PBMC UNC-MDSC/PMN-MDSC (rho = - 0.28, p = 0.02) were negatively correlated with NLR. Median OS was 17.7 months (95% CI: 11.0-NE). Overall 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 0.60 (95% CI 0.49-0.73) and 0.15 (95% CI 0.03-0.67), respectively. Higher WB UNC-MDSC levels (HR 3.78, p = 0.0022) and higher NLR (HR 2.6, p = 0.0179) were associated with shorter OS. CONCLUSIONS: Specific MDSC subsets correlate with NLR. Higher WB UNC-MDSC levels and higher NLR were negative prognostic factors. Given the feasibility of serial blood draws, dynamic assessment of MDSC over time and further validation with longer follow-up are warranted.

Mediators of Inflammation-Driven Expansion, Trafficking, and Function of Tumor-Infiltrating MDSCs.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are induced by and accumulate within many histologically distinct solid tumors, where they promote disease by secreting angiogenic and immunosuppressive molecules. Although IL1ß can drive the generation, accumulation, and functional capacity of MDSCs, the specific IL1ß-induced inflammatory mediators contributing to these activities remain incompletely defined. Here, we identified IL1ß-induced molecules that expand, mobilize, and modulate the accumulation and angiogenic and immunosuppressive potencies of polymorphonuclear (PMN)-MDSCs. Unlike parental CT26 tumors, which recruited primarily monocytic (M)-MDSCs by constitutively expressing GM-CSF- and CCR2-directed chemokines, IL1ß-transfected CT26 produced higher G-CSF, multiple CXC chemokines, and vascular adhesion molecules required for mediating infiltration of PMN-MDSCs with increased angiogenic and immunosuppressive properties. Conversely, CT26 tumors transfected with IL1ß-inducible molecules could mobilize PMN-MDSCs, but because they lacked the ability to upregulate IL1ß-inducible CXCR2-directed chemokines or vascular adhesion molecules, additional PMN-MDSCs could not infiltrate tumors. IL1ß-expressing CT26 increased angiogenic and immunosuppressive factors of tumor-infiltrating MDSCs, as did CT26 tumors individually transfected with G-CSF, Bv8, CXCL1, or CXCL5, demonstrating that mediators downstream of IL1ß could also modulate MDSC functional activity. Translational relevance was indicated by the finding that the same growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules responsible for the mobilization and recruitment of PMN-MDSCs into inflammatory CT26 murine tumors were also coordinately upregulated with increasing IL1ß expression in human renal cell carcinoma tumors. These studies demonstrated that IL1ß stimulated the components of a multifaceted inflammatory program that produces, mobilizes, chemoattracts, activates, and mediates the infiltration of PMN-MDSCs into inflammatory tumors to promote tumor progression.

Immunological Correlates of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The identification of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) could help guide treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: We assessed changes in programmed cell death-1 (PD1)/PD1 ligand (PDL1) expression in key immunomodulatory cell subsets (myeloid-derived suppressor cells [MDSC]; cytotoxic T lymphocytes [CTL]) following ICI therapy and investigated whether these changes correlated with outcomes in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serial peripheral blood samples were collected from ICI-treated mUC patients. Flow cytometry was used to quantify PD1/PDL1 expression on MDSC (CD33+HLADR-) and CTL (CD8+CD4-) from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. MDSC were grouped into monocytic (M)-MDSC (CD14+CD15-), polymorphonuclear (PMN)-MDSC (CD14-CD15+), and immature (I)-MDSC (CD14-CD15-). Mixed-model regression and Wilcoxon signed-rank or rank-sum tests were performed to assess post-ICI changes in immune biomarker expression and identify correlations between PD1/PDL1 expression and objective response to ICI. RESULTS: Of 41 ICI-treated patients, 26 received anti-PDL1 (23 atezolizumab/3 avelumab) and 15 received anti-PD1 (pembrolizumab) therapy. Based on available data, 27.5% had prior intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy, 42% had prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 70% had prior cystectomy or nephroureterectomy. Successive doses of anti-PDL1 correlated with decreased percentage of PDL1+ (%PDL1+) M-MDSC, while doses of anti-PD1 correlated with decreased %PD1+ M- and I-MDSC. Although pre-treatment %PD1+ CTL did not predict response, a greater %PD1+ CTL within 9 weeks after ICI initiation correlated with objective response. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ICI correlated with distinct changes in PD1/PDL1-expressing peripheral immune cell subsets, which may predict objective response to ICI. Further studies are required to validate immune molecular expression as a prognostic and/or predictive biomarker for long-term outcomes in mUC.

Myeloid-derived suppressors cells (MDSC) correlate with clinicopathologic factors and pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) undergoing cystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are heterogeneous immunosuppressive cells with potential predictive and prognostic roles in cancer. The association between MDSC, clinicopathologic factors, and pathologic response in patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC) was explored. METHODS: Peripheral blood or tissue were collected from patients with UC undergoing definitive surgery. MDSCs levels were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and fresh tumor tissue. MDSCs were identified by flow cytometry and defined as total MDSC (T-MDSC) CD33+/HLADR-. From this population, 3 subsets were identified: polymorphonuclear-MDSC (PMN-MDSC) defined as CD33+/HLADR-/CD15+/CD14-, monocytic-MDSC (M-MDSC) defined as CD33+/HLADR-/CD15-/CD14+, and immature-MDSC (I-MDSC) defined as CD33+/HLADR-/CD15-/CD14-. MDSC populations were presented as % of live nucleated blood cells. Spearman correlations (r) and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to assess correlations between MDSC populations, clinicopathologic factors, and pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS: 85 patients scheduled to undergo cystectomy from February 2015 through Dec 2016 were included. All patients had blood drawn for analysis and 23 patients had residual tumor tissue collected for analysis at the time of surgery. Of these 85, 74 (87%) were men with a median age at diagnosis of 68 (range: 44-87). Pure UC was the most common histology (75%); 28 (35%) patients had prior treatment with intravesical therapy and 36 (42%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, primarily gemcitabine plus cisplatin (n = 24). On surgical pathology, 18 (21%) of the patients had pCR, 11 (13%) had positive lymph nodes, and 20 patients (24%) had lymphovascular invasion. Statistically significant associations were found between circulating MDSC levels and pCR rates (P<0.01), absolute neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.008), and histology (P = 0.01). Tumor % M-MDSCs were negatively associated with lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.04). There were no significant correlations between peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor MDSC subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Blood and tissue MDSC levels correlate with several clinicopathologic factors and may predict for pCR. Future studies are needed to highlight the role of MDSC in predicting long-term outcomes and to determine the clinical implications of these findings.

MEK inhibition abrogates sunitinib resistance in a renal cell carcinoma patient-derived xenograft model.

BACKGROUND: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) typically respond initially, but usually develop resistance to therapy. We utilised transcriptome analysis to identify gene expression changes during development of sunitinib resistance in a RCC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model. METHODS: RCC tumours were harvested during pre-treatment, response and escape phases. Direct anti-proliferative effects of sunitinib plus MEK inhibitor were assessed. Activation status (phosphorylation) of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 was determined, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) sub-fractions were quantitated and G-CSF was measured by ELISA. RESULTS: During the response phase, tumours exhibited 91% reduction in volume, characterised by decreased expression of cell survival genes. After 4-week treatment, tumours developed resistance to sunitinib, associated with increased expression of pro-angiogenic and cell survival genes. During tumour escape, cellular movement, inflammatory response and immune cell trafficking genes were induced, along with intra-tumoural accumulation of MDSC. In this PDX model, either continuous treatment with sunitinib plus MEK inhibitor PD-0325901, or switching from sunitinib to PD-0325901 was effective. The combination of PD-0325901 with TKI suppressed intra-tumoural phospho-MEK1/2, phospho-ERK1/2 and MDSC. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous treatment with sunitinib alone did not maintain anti-tumour response; addition of MEK inhibitor abrogated resistance, leading to improved anti-tumour efficacy.

Active surveillance in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a prospective, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma show indolent growth of metastases. Because of the toxicity and non-curative nature of systemic therapy, some of these patients could benefit from initial active surveillance. We aimed to characterise the time to initiation of systemic therapy in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma under active surveillance. METHODS: In this prospective phase 2 trial, we enrolled patients with treatment-naive, asymptomatic, metastatic renal-cell carcinoma from five hospitals in the USA, Spain, and the UK. Patients were radiographically assessed at baseline, every 3 months for year 1, every 4 months for year 2, then every 6 months thereafter. Patients continued on observation until initiation of systemic therapy for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma; a decision that was made at the discretion of the treating physician and patient. The primary endpoint of the study was time to initiation of systemic therapy in the per-protocol population. The follow-up of patients is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Aug 21, 2008, and June 7, 2013, we enrolled 52 patients. Median follow-up of patients in the study was 38·1 months (IQR 29·4-48·9). In the 48 patients included in analysis, median time on surveillance from registration on study until initiation of systemic therapy was 14·9 months (95% CI 10·6-25·0). Multivariate analysis showed that higher numbers of International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) adverse risk factors (p=0·0403) and higher numbers of metastatic disease sites (p=0·0414) were associated with a shorter surveillance period. 22 (46%) patients died during the study period, all from metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. INTERPRETATION: A subset of patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma can safely undergo surveillance before starting systemic therapy. Additional investigation is required to further define the benefits and risks of this approach. FUNDING: None.

Definitive activation of endogenous antitumor immunity by repetitive cycles of cyclophosphamide with interspersed Toll-like receptor agonists.

Many cancers both evoke and subvert endogenous anti-tumor immunity. However, immunosuppression can be therapeutically reversed in subsets of cancer patients by treatments such as checkpoint inhibitors or Toll-like receptor agonists (TLRa). Moreover, chemotherapy can leukodeplete immunosuppressive host elements, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T-cells (Tregs). We hypothesized that chemotherapy-induced leukodepletion could be immunopotentiated by co-administering TLRa to emulate a life-threatening infection. Combining CpG (ODN 1826) or CpG+poly(I:C) with cyclophosphamide (CY) resulted in uniquely well-tolerated therapeutic synergy, permanently eradicating advanced mouse tumors including 4T1 (breast), Panc02 (pancreas) and CT26 (colorectal). Definitive treatment required endogenous CD8+ and CD4+ IFNγ-producing T-cells. Tumor-specific IFNγ-producing T-cells persisted during CY-induced leukopenia, whereas Tregs were progressively eliminated, especially intratumorally. Spleen-associated MDSCs were cyclically depleted by CY+TLRa treatment, with residual monocytic MDSCs requiring only continued exposure to CpG or CpG+IFNγ to effectively attack malignant cells while sparing non-transformed cells. Such tumor destruction occurred despite upregulated tumor expression of Programmed Death Ligand-1, but could be blocked by clodronate-loaded liposomes to deplete phagocytic cells or by nitric oxide synthase inhibitors. CY+TLRa also induced tumoricidal myeloid cells in naive mice, indicating that CY+TLRa's immunomodulatory impacts occurred in the complete absence of tumor-bearing, and that tumor-induced MDSCs were not an essential source of tumoricidal myeloid precursors. Repetitive CY+TLRa can therefore modulate endogenous immunity to eradicate advanced tumors without vaccinations or adoptive T-cell therapy. Human blood monocytes could be rendered similarly tumoricidal during in vitro activation with TLRa+IFNγ, underscoring the potential therapeutic relevance of these mouse tumor studies to cancer patients.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: The green light for myeloma immune escape.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous, immature myeloid cell population with the ability to suppress innate and adaptive immune responses that promote tumor growth. MDSCs are increased in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and have bidirectional interaction with tumors within the MM microenvironment. MM-MDSCs promote MM tumor growth and induce immune suppression; conversely, MM cells induce MDSC development and survival. Although the role of MDSCs in infections, inflammatory diseases and solid tumors has been extensively characterized, their tumor-promoting and immune-suppressive role in MM and the MM microenvironment is only beginning to emerge. The presence and activation of MDSCs in MM patients has been well documented; however, the direct actions and functional consequences of MDSCs on cancer cells is poorly defined. Immunosuppressive MDSCs play an important role in tumor progression primarily because of their capability to promote immune-escape, angiogenesis, drug resistance and metastasis. However, their role in the bone marrow (BM), the primary MM site, is poorly understood. MM remains an incurable malignancy, and it is likely that the BM microenvironment protects MM against chemotherapy agents and the host immune system. A growing body of evidence suggests that host immune cells with a suppressive phenotype contribute to a myeloma immunosuppressive network. Among the known suppressor cells, MDSCs and T regulatory cells (Tregs) have been found to be significantly increased in myeloma patients and their levels correlate with disease stage and clinical outcome. Furthermore, it has been shown that MDSC can mediate suppression of myeloma-specific T-cell responses through the induction of T-cell anergy and Treg development in the MM microenvironment. Here, we review clinical correlations and the preclinical proof-of-principle data on the role of MDSCs in myeloma immunotolerance and highlight the mechanistically relevant MDSC-targeted compounds and their potential utility in a new approach for anti-myeloma therapy.

GBM Derived Gangliosides Induce T Cell Apoptosis through Activation of the Caspase Cascade Involving Both the Extrinsic and the Intrinsic Pathway.

Previously we demonstrated that human glioblastoma cell lines induce apoptosis in peripheral blood T cells through partial involvement of secreted gangliosides. Here we show that GBM-derived gangliosides induce apoptosis through involvement of the TNF receptor and activation of the caspase cascade. Culturing T lymphocytes with GBM cell line derived gangliosides (10-20 µg/ml) demonstrated increased ROS production as early as 18 hrs as indicated by increased uptake of the dye H2DCFDA while western blotting demonstrated mitochondrial damage as evident by cleavage of Bid to t-Bid and by the release of cytochrome-c into the cytosol. Within 48-72 hrs apoptosis was evident by nuclear blebbing, trypan blue positivity and annexinV/7AAD staining. GBM-ganglioside induced activation of the effector caspase-3 along with both initiator caspases (-9 and -8) in T cells while both the caspase-8 and -9 inhibitors were equally effective in blocking apoptosis (60% protection) confirming the role of caspases in the apoptotic process. Ganglioside-induced T cell apoptosis did not involve production of TNF-α since anti-human TNFα antibody was unable to protect T cells from nuclear blebbing and subsequent cell death. However, confocal microscopy demonstrated co-localization of GM2 ganglioside with the TNF receptor and co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed recruitment of death domains FADD and TRADD with the TNF receptor post ganglioside treatment, suggesting direct interaction of gangliosides with the TNF receptor. Further confirmation of the interaction between GM2 and TNFR1 was obtained from confocal microscopy data with wild type and TNFR1 KO (TALEN mediated) Jurkat cells, which clearly demonstrated co-localization of GM2 and TNFR1 in the wild type cells but not in the TNFR1 KO clones. Thus, GBM-ganglioside can mediate T cell apoptosis by interacting with the TNF receptor followed by activation of both the extrinsic and the intrinsic pathway of caspases.

Myeloid derived suppressor cell infiltration of murine and human gliomas is associated with reduction of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes.

Myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are bone marrow derived cells with immunosuppressive properties. We have shown previously that MDSCs numbers are elevated in the circulation of GBM patients and that they produce reversible T cell dysfunction. Here, we evaluated whether MDSCs infiltrate human GBM tissues, and whether a commonly used mouse model of GBM reproduces the biology of MDSCs that is observed in patients. We evaluated tumor specimens from patients with newly diagnosed GBM. We harvested and evaluated normal brain, tumors and hematopoietic tissues from control, vehicle and sunitinib-treated mice. In human GBM tumors, MDSCs represented 5.4 ± 1.8 % of total cells. The majority of MDSCs (CD33+HLADR-) were lineage negative (CD14-CD15-), followed by granulocytic (CD15+CD14-) and monocytic (CD15-CD14+) subtypes. In murine GBM tumors, MDSCs were 8.06 ± 0.78 % of total cells, of which more were monocytic (M-MDSC, CD11b+ Gr1-low) than granulocytic (G-MDSC, CD11b+ Gr1-high). Treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib decreased the infiltration of both granulocytic and monocytic MDSCs in murine GBM tumors. In the hematopoietic tissues, circulating G-MDSC blood levels were reduced after sunitinib treatment. In tumors, both CD3(+) and CD4(+) T cell counts increased following sunitinib treatment (p ≤ 0.001). Total T cell proliferation (p < 0.001) and interferon gamma production (p = 0.004) were increased in the spleens of sunitinib treated mice. Sunitinib-treated mice survived longer than vehicle-treated mice (p = 0.002). MDSCs are present in both human and mouse GBM tumors. Sunitinib may have an immunostimulatory effect, as its use is associated with a reduction in G-MDSCs and improvement in anti-tumor immune function.

The differential regulation of human ACT1 isoforms by Hsp90 in IL-17 signaling.

IL-17 is a proinflammatory cytokine implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases including psoriasis. ACT1 is an essential adaptor molecule in the IL-17 signaling pathway. A missense single nucleotide polymorphism (rs33980500; SNP-D10N) that resulted in the substitution of an asparagine for an aspartic acid at position 10 of ACT1 (ACT1-D10N) is associated with psoriasis susceptibility. Due to alternative splicing in humans, SNP-D10N encodes two mutated ACT1 proteins, ACT1-D10N and ACT1-D19N. Although both ACT1 isoforms are Hsp90 client proteins, the nine additional amino acids in ACT1-D19N provide an additional Hsp90 binding site that is absent in ACT1-D10N. Therefore, whereas ACT1-D10N is a dead protein that is unable to transduce IL-17 signals for gene expression, ACT1-D19N is fully responsive to IL-17. Intriguingly, the two ACT1 isoforms are differentially expressed in ACT1(D10N/D10N) fibroblasts and T cells. Fibroblasts express both isoforms equally, enabling ACT1-D19N to compensate for the loss of ACT1-D10N function. ACT1(D10N/D10N) T cells, however, express predominantly ACT1-D10N. Lacking this compensatory mechanism, ACT1(D10N/D10N) T cells behave like ACT1-deficient T cells, exhibiting a dysregulated and hyperactive Th17 phenotype with overproduction of IL-22 and IL-17. The hyperactive Th17 response combined with fully responsive fibroblasts likely synergized to contribute to psoriasis susceptibility in SNP-D10N patients.

Combination of sunitinib with anti-tumor vaccination inhibits T cell priming and requires careful scheduling to achieve productive immunotherapy.

Sunitinib, a protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor is the frontline therapy for renal and gastrointestinal cancers. We hypothesized that by virtue of its well documented tumor apoptosis and immune adjuvant properties, combination of Sunitinib with anti-tumor immunotherapeutics will provide synergistic inhibition of tumor growth. Our study was designed to evaluate the impact of Sunitinib on immunotherapy mediated anti-tumor immune responses and evaluate its efficacy as a combinatorial therapy with tumor targeted immunotherapeutic vaccination. Mice immunized with recombinant α-lactalbumin, a lactation protein expressed on majority of breast tumors were treated with 1 mg of Sunitinib for seven consecutive days beginning (1) concurrently, on the day of α-lactalbumin immunization or (2) sequentially, on day 9 after immunization. Ten-day lymph nodes or 21 day spleens were tested by ELISPOT assays and flow cytometry to evaluate responsiveness to α-lactalbumin immunization in presence of Sunitinib and distribution of cells involved in T cell antigen priming and proliferation in different lymphoid compartments. In addition, therapeutic efficacy of the α-lactalbumin/ Sunitinib combination was evaluated by monitoring tumor growth in the 4T1 transplanted tumor model. Our studies reveal that concurrent administration of Sunitinib with active vaccination against a targeted tumor antigen inhibits priming to the immunogen due to a drastic decrease in CD11b+CD11c+ antigen presenting cells, leading to failure of vaccination. However, sequential delivery of Sunitinib timed to avoid the priming phase of vaccination results in the desired vaccination mediated boost in immune responses.

Modification of the tumor microenvironment as a novel target of renal cell carcinoma therapeutics.

To move forward with immunotherapy, it is important to understand how the tumor microenvironment generates systemic immunosuppression in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) as well as in patients with other types of solid tumors. Even though antigen discovery in RCC has lagged behind melanoma, recent clinical trials have finally authenticated that RCC is susceptible to vaccine-based therapy. Furthermore, judicious coadministration of cytokines and chemotherapy can potentiate therapeutic responses to vaccine in RCC and prolong survival, as has already proved possible for melanoma. Although high-dose interleukin 2 immunotherapy has been superseded as first-line therapy for RCC by promiscuous receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (rTKIs) such as sunitinib, sunitinib itself is a potent immunoadjunct in animal tumor models. A reasonable therapeutic goal is to unite antiangiogenic strategies with immunotherapy as first-line therapy for RCC. This strategy is equally appropriate for testing in all solid tumors in which the microenvironment generates immunosuppression. A common element of RCC and pancreatic, colon, breast, and other solid tumors is large numbers of circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and because MDSCs elicit regulatory T cells rather than vice versa, gaining control over MDSCs is an important initial step in any immunotherapy. Although rTKIs like sunitinib have a remarkable capacity to deplete MDSCs and restore normal T-cell function in peripheral body compartments such as the bloodstream and the spleen, such rTKIs are effective only against MDSCs, which are engaged in phospho-STAT3-dependent programming (pSTAT3+). Unfortunately, rTKI-resistant pSTAT3- MDSCs are especially apt to arise within the tumor microenvironment itself, necessitating strategies that do not rely exclusively on STAT3 disruption. The most utilitarian strategy to gain control of both pSTAT3+ and pSTAT3- MDSCs may be to exploit the natural differentiation pathway, which permits MDSCs to mature into tumoricidal macrophages (TM1) via such stimuli as Toll-like receptor agonists, interferon γ, and CD40 ligation. Overall, this review highlights the mechanisms of immune suppression used by the different regulatory cell types operative in RCC as well as other tumors. It also describes the different therapeutic strategies to overcome the suppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment.

Clinical perspectives on targeting of myeloid derived suppressor cells in the treatment of cancer.

Tumors escape immune recognition by several mechanisms, and induction of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) is thought to play a major role in tumor mediated immune evasion. MDSC arise from myeloid progenitor cells that do not differentiate into mature dendritic cells, granulocytes, or macrophages, and are characterized by the ability to suppress T cell and natural killer cell function. They are increased in patients with cancer including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and their levels have been shown to correlate with prognosis and overall survival. Multiple methods of inhibiting MDSCs are currently under investigation. These can broadly be categorized into methods that (a) promote differentiation of MDSC into mature, non-suppressive cells (all trans retinoic acid, vitamin D), (b) decrease MDSC levels (sunitinib, gemcitabine, 5-FU, CDDO-Me), or (c) functionally inhibit MDSC (PDE-5 inhibitors, cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors). Recently, several pre-clinical tumor models of combination therapy involving sunitinib plus vaccines and/or adoptive therapy have shown promise in MDSC inhibition and improved outcomes in the tumor bearing host. Current clinical trials are underway in RCC patients to assess not only the impact on clinical outcome, but how this combination can enhance anti-tumor immunity and reduce immune suppression. Decreasing immune suppression by MDSC in the cancer host may improve outcomes and prolong survival in this patient population.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells adhere to physiologic STAT3- vs STAT5-dependent hematopoietic programming, establishing diverse tumor-mediated mechanisms of immunologic escape.

The receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, sunitinib, is astonishingly effective in its capacity to reduce MDSCs in peripheral tissues such as blood (human) and spleen (mouse), restoring responsiveness of bystander T lymphocytes to TcR stimulation. Sunitinib blocks proliferation of undifferentiated MDSCs and decreases survival of more differentiated neutrophilic MDSC (n-MDSC) progeny. Ironically, sunitinib's profound effects are observed even in a total absence of detectable anti-tumor therapeutic response. This is best explained by the presence of disparate MDSC-conditioning stimuli within individual body compartments, allowing sensitivity and resistance to sunitinib to coexist within the same mouse or patient. The presence or absence of GM-CSF is likely the major determinant in each compartment, given that GM-CSF's capacity to preempt STAT3-dependent with dominant STAT5-dependent hematopoietic programming confers sunitinib resistance and redirects differentiation from the n-MDSC lineage to the more versatile monocytoid (m-MDSC) lineage. The clinical sunitinib experience underscores that strategies for MDSC and Treg depletions must be mindful of disparities among body compartments to avoid sanctuary effects. Ironically, m-MDSCs manifesting resistance to sunitinib also have the greatest potential to differentiate into tumoricidal accessory cells, by virtue of their capacity to respond to T cell-secreted IFN-γ or to TLR agonists with nitric oxide and peroxynitrate production.

Defining the critical hurdles in cancer immunotherapy.

Scientific discoveries that provide strong evidence of antitumor effects in preclinical models often encounter significant delays before being tested in patients with cancer. While some of these delays have a scientific basis, others do not. We need to do better. Innovative strategies need to move into early stage clinical trials as quickly as it is safe, and if successful, these therapies should efficiently obtain regulatory approval and widespread clinical application. In late 2009 and 2010 the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), convened an "Immunotherapy Summit" with representatives from immunotherapy organizations representing Europe, Japan, China and North America to discuss collaborations to improve development and delivery of cancer immunotherapy. One of the concepts raised by SITC and defined as critical by all parties was the need to identify hurdles that impede effective translation of cancer immunotherapy. With consensus on these hurdles, international working groups could be developed to make recommendations vetted by the participating organizations. These recommendations could then be considered by regulatory bodies, governmental and private funding agencies, pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions to facilitate changes necessary to accelerate clinical translation of novel immune-based cancer therapies. The critical hurdles identified by representatives of the collaborating organizations, now organized as the World Immunotherapy Council, are presented and discussed in this report. Some of the identified hurdles impede all investigators; others hinder investigators only in certain regions or institutions or are more relevant to specific types of immunotherapy or first-in-humans studies. Each of these hurdles can significantly delay clinical translation of promising advances in immunotherapy yet if overcome, have the potential to improve outcomes of patients with cancer.