Information on Cardiovascular Disease in the Digital Era: Results From a Cross-Sectional Patient Survey.

Public health strategies to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) rely on the effective dissemination of evidence-based information to at-risk populations. An improved understanding of the information sources patients use can facilitate content development and promote awareness of effective interventions for CVD prevention, monitoring, and management. We therefore sought to determine the contemporary patterns of CVD information source usage via a prospective, cross-sectional survey study of CVD information sources in a primary care centre in Ontario, Canada. Primary source(s) used for CVD information were defined as: traditional media (television or print media), Internet-based sources, or community resources (community agencies and health care providers). Of 4682 consecutively screened patients aged > 18 years 3189 (68%) participated in the survey. The mean age of the survey respondents was 37 ± 14 years and 54.4% were female. Traditional media (71%) were used more frequently than Internet-based sources (45%) or community health services (23%). Only 20% of respondents identified health care providers as the source of information for CVD. Compared with respondents aged ≥ 55 years, the adjusted odds of Internet-based source use were significantly higher among younger age groups, whereas the adjusted odds of print media and health services usage was lowest among ages 25-34 years. Although traditional print and electronic media remain the primary resource for CVD-related information, younger individuals increasingly rely on Internet-based sources. These findings have important implications for public health policy and resource allocation, highlighting the importance of maintaining traditional media presence in addition to the development of high-quality Internet-based sources of CVD information.

Repatriation to referral hospital after reperfusion of STEMI patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights of a Canadian regional STEMI care system.

BACKGROUND: In regional systems of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care, patients presenting to hospitals without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are transferred to PCI-capable hospitals for primary PCI. Repatriation, a practice whereby such patients are transferred back to non-PCI referral hospitals after reperfusion is prevalent in many jurisdictions, yet little is known of this practice and its safety. METHODS: We studied 979 consecutive STEMI patients transported from the emergency department and catchment area of two non-PCI hospitals in Ontario, Canada to a regional PCI-hospital for primary PCI between January 2008 and June 2014. Logistic regression modeling was performed to determine factors associated with delayed repatriation beyond 24 hours and to evaluate the association between repatriation and index-admission mortality. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifteen (83.2%) patients were repatriated with 524 (65.2%) patients repatriated within 24 hours. Factors independently associated with delayed repatriation included systolic blood pressure (OR 1.03 per 5 mmHg decrease, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, P= .04), requirement for mechanical ventilation (OR 24.9, 95% CI 5.4-115.3, P< .0001), ventricular arrhythmia (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.3-6.6, P= .01), infarct-related artery (P= .03), final TIMI flow grade (P= .01) and access-site complications (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.04-5.4, P= .04). After repatriation, 9 (1.3%) patients returned to the PCI-hospital for urgent care, and 16 (2.0%) died during index-admission. After adjustment, repatriation was not associated with increase in index-admission mortality (adjusted OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.16-1.32, P= .15). CONCLUSIONS: In a regional STEMI care system in Ontario, Canada, patients are routinely repatriated to non-PCI hospitals after primary PCI. This practice was associated with very low and acceptable rate of return to the PCI-hospital during index-admission without an adverse impact on short-term outcomes.