TRKA expression and NTRK1 gene copy number across solid tumours.

AIMS: Neurotrophic Tropomyosin Kinase Receptor 1 (NTRK1) gene encodes for the protein Tropomyosin-related kinase A (TRKA). Deregulated activity of TRKA has been shown to have oncogenic potential. We present here the results of an immunohistochemical (IHC) observational cohort study of TRKA expression together with gene copy number (GCN) assessment in various solid tumours. METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded consecutive samples of different tumour types were tested for TRKA expression. Samples showing TRKA IHC staining in at least 10% of cells were analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridisation to assess NTRK1 gene rearrangements and/or individual GCN gain. All patients underwent this molecular assessment within the phase I ALKA-001 clinical trial. RESULTS: 1043 samples were tested and annotation for histology was available in 1023. Most of the samples were colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) (n=550, 52.7%) and lung adenocarcinoma (n=312, 29.9%). 24 samples (2.3%) were biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Overall, 17 (1.6%) samples were characterised by TRKA IHC expression (four weak, eight moderate, five strong): 9/17 lung adenocarcinoma, 3/17 CRC, 3/17 BTC, 1/17 thyroid cancer and 1/17 cancer of unknown primary. Of these, 1/17 with strong TRKA IHC staining displayed NTRK1 gene rearrangement and 15/17 NTRK1 GCN gain by FISH. No correlation was found between intensity of TRKA IHC staining and number of copies of NTRK1. CONCLUSIONS: TRKA expression can be found in 1.6% of solid tumours and can be paralleled by NTRK1 gene rearrangements or mostly GCN gain. The prognostic and translational therapeutic impact of the latter remains to be established.

[Learning assessment in the nursing process]. / Valutazione dell'apprendimento del processo di assistenza infermieristica.

One of the many different skills that nursing students have to achieve is how to dispense care by applying nursing concepts. The authors propose and instrument for evaluating and monitoring various aspects of learning in nursing students and their ability to put them into practice by considering 31 indicators, taking into account the degree of difficulty (D) and discrimination (d) involved in each one. All but 2 of the indicators were found to be reliable for assessing learning in nursing students . An overall statistical analysis and an analysis of the scores obtained enabled the tutors to establish an evaluation score for the nursing plans elaborated by the students.