Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JTCVS Tech ; 24: 27-40, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835563

RESUMO

Objective: To maximize successful repair of bicuspid aortic valves by adding figure-of-8 hitch-up stitches at commissures. Methods: From 2000 to 2022, bicuspid aortic valve repair was performed on 1112 patients at Cleveland Clinic, with 367 patients receiving figure-of-8 hitch-up stitches along with classical techniques, including Cabrol suture, cusp plication, raphe resection, and valve-sparing root replacement. Operative outcomes, repair durability, and survival were assessed in the figure-of-8 hitch-up stitches cohort, and outcomes were compared among 195 balancing-score-matched patient pairs who underwent bicuspid aortic valve repair with and without figure-of-8 hitch-up stitches. Results: Patients who underwent bicuspid aortic valve repair with figure-of-8 stitches had an operative mortality of 0.3% (1 of 367) and in-hospital reoperation for aortic valve dysfunction of 1.1% (4 of 367). At 10 years, prevalence of severe aortic regurgitation was 8.6%, mean gradient 24 mm Hg, freedom from aortic valve reoperation 75%, and survival 98%. In matched cohorts, operative mortality was similar (0.51% vs 0%; P > .9) as were morbidities, including in-hospital reoperation due to aortic valve dysfunction (1.0% vs 1.5%; P > .9). Comparable long-term outcomes were observed at 10 years (prevalence of severe aortic regurgitation of 8.7% vs 5.0% [P = .11], mean gradient 18 vs 17 mm Hg [P = .40]; freedom from aortic valve reoperation 80% vs 81% [P = .73]; and survival 99.5% vs 94.6% [P = .18]). Conclusions: Figure-of-8 hitch-up stitch is a safe bicuspid aortic valve repair technique. It increases the likelihood of a successful repair without increasing risk of cusp tear and achieves satisfactory long-term survival and durability when added to classical repair techniques.

2.
JTCVS Open ; 18: 12-30, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38690415

RESUMO

Objective: Anterior mitral anular calcification, particularly in radiation heart disease, and previous valve replacement with destroyed intervalvular fibrosa are challenging for prosthesis sizing and placement. The Commando procedure with intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction permits double-valve replacement in these challenging conditions. We referenced outcomes after Commando procedures to standard double-valve replacements. Methods: From January 2011 to January 2022, 129 Commando procedures and 1191 aortic and mitral double-valve replacements were performed at the Cleveland Clinic, excluding endocarditis. Reasons for the Commando were severe calcification after radiation (n = 67), without radiation (n = 43), and others (n = 19). Commando procedures were referenced to a subset of double-valve replacements using balancing-score methods (109 pairs). Results: Between balanced groups, Commando versus double-valve replacement had higher total calcium scores (median 6140 vs 2680 HU, P = .03). Hospital outcomes were similar, including operative mortality (12/11% vs 8/7.3%, P = .35) and reoperation for bleeding (9/8.3% vs 5/4.6%, P = .28). Survival and freedom from reoperation at 5 years were 54% versus 67% (P = .33) and 87% versus 100% (P = .04), respectively. Higher calcium score was associated with lower survival after double-valve replacement but not after the Commando. The Commando procedure had lower aortic valve mean gradients at 4 years (9.4 vs 11 mm Hg, P = .04). After Commando procedures for calcification, 5-year survival was 60% and 59% with and without radiation, respectively (P = .47). Conclusions: The Commando procedure with reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrosa destroyed by mitral anular calcification, radiation, or previous surgery demonstrates acceptable outcomes similar to standard double-valve replacement. More experience and long-term outcomes are required to refine patient selection for and application of the Commando approach.

3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692479

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a transaortic approach to midventricular and apical septal myectomy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular outflow tract or midventricular obstruction. METHODS: From January 2018 to August 2023, 940 patients underwent transaortic septal myectomy at the Cleveland Clinic, of whom 682 (73%) had midventricular or apical resection. Patients who underwent isolated basal myectomies were excluded. Templated operative reports designated septal regions resected as basal (opposition to mitral valve up to the leaflet tips), midventricular (leaflet tips to just beyond the papillary muscle heads), and apical (apical third of the ventricle). Myocardial resection specimen weights, intraventricular gradients, and clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 682 patients, 582 (85%) had basal plus midventricular resection and 78 (11%) had basal, midventricular, and apical resection. Mean preoperative intraventricular gradient was 102 ± 41 mm Hg. Median resection weight was 10 g (15th, 85th percentiles: 7, 15), and mean postoperative intraventricular gradient was 16 ± 10 mm Hg, with 625 (96%) patients achieving gradients 36 mm Hg or less. There were no iatrogenic mitral or aortic valve injuries. Permanent pacemaker placement was required in 38 patients (5.6%), of whom 8 (1.2%) had normal preoperative conduction. Operative mortality occurred in 1 patient (0.1%) after an intraoperative ventricular septal defect. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients undergoing septal myectomy for relief of obstruction required resection beyond the basal septum. With specialized instrumentation, detailed imaging and knowledge of variable septal anatomy, resecting midventricular and apical septal muscle can be safely and effectively achieved through a transaortic approach.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...