Three simple metrics to define in vitro fertilization success rates.

Describing clinical outcomes from assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatment cycles has been an evolving challenge throughout the world. Three simple metrics provide a transparent and highly accurate summary of ART outcomes. The first metric is the probability of having no embryos available to transfer. This metric incorporates all causes of failure from initiation of the treatment cycle up to the point immediately before actual embryo transfer. Patients will know what the risk is of failing, whether it is due to poor follicular stimulation, failed fertilization, poor embryo development, or abnormal preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) results. The second and most important metric is sustained implantation rate: the probability that any transferred embryo will implant and progress to delivery. In the event of a single-embryo transfer, the metric is identical to delivery rate per transfer. By calculating per embryo, it provides a summary of the quality of outcomes within the program without the obscuring effect of multiple-embryo transfer. The final metric is the number of supernumerary embryos cryopreserved during the cycle. This speaks to the efficiency of the process by providing an estimate of potential benefits which may come from an additional transfer should the first one be unsuccessful or even to allow the couple to pursue an additional child without another full ART cycle. These metrics are easy to calculate and provide a detailed picture of the outcomes attained by the program.

Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

PURPOSE: Advances in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) have led to practice changes in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), enabling fertility centers to transfer single embryos while maintaining excellent ongoing pregnancy rates, reducing miscarriage rates, and dramatically reducing ART-associated multiple pregnancies. The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows PGT laboratories to assess for embryo mosaicism-although the true incidence and reproductive potential of predicted mosaic embryos are controversial. Due to concern for genetic contamination from other spermatozoa, most reference laboratories require use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for single gene preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGT-M). However, in PGT for aneuploidy (PGT-A), conventional insemination (IVF) is typically permissible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of euploid, aneuploid, and mosaic in trophectoderm biopsy samples from embryos in IVF versus ICSI PGT-A cycles. Secondary aims were to assess sex ratio, and subtypes of aneuploidy and mosaicism in IVF versus ICSI PGT-A cycles. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of women undergoing PGT-A at a single academic fertility center from July 1, 2015, to September 1, 2017. In all cycles, PGT-A was performed via trophectoderm biopsy on day 5 or 6 and analyzed using NGS at a single reference lab. We collected and compared patient demographics, fertility testing, cycle characteristics, and PGT-A outcomes between IVF and ICSI cycles. RESULTS: Three hundred two PGT-A cycles were included for analysis: 75 IVF and 227 ICSI cycles, resulting in 251 IVF and 724 ICSI biopsied blastocysts. Mean oocyte age of included cycles was 38.6 years (IVF) and 38.5 years (ICSI), p = 0.85. Baseline characteristics of IVF and ICSI PGT-A cycles were similar with the exception of semen parameters: IVF cycles had higher sperm concentration and total motility compared to ICSI cycles. PGT-A outcomes did not differ between IVF and ICSI cycles: euploid 27.9% (IVF) versus 30% (ICSI); aneuploid 45.4% (IVF) versus 43.1% (ICSI); no result 4.4% (IVF) versus 6.2% (ICSI). Though not significant, we identified a trend toward higher rate of mosaicism in IVF (25.9%) versus ICSI (20.9%). Among mosaic embryos, a lower percentage of simple mosaic embryos resulted from IVF (53.8%) versus ICSI (70.2%). Among aneuploid embryos, a non-significant higher percentage of complex aneuploidy resulted from IVF (16.3%) versus ICSI (9%). IVF resulted in a non-significant higher proportion of cycles with no transferrable embryos (42.7%) versus ICSI (36.6%). Numerical and sex chromosome involvement in mosaicism and aneuploidy were similar between IVF and ICSI cycles. CONCLUSION: IVF and ICSI NGS PGT-A have similar rates of euploid, aneuploid, and no result embryos, though IVF may result in higher rates of mosaicism and demonstrates differences in proportions of mosaic and aneuploid subtypes compared to ICSI. ICSI may be preferable to conventional insemination to minimize the rate of mosaic results in NGS PGT-A cycles.

Bisphenol A (BPA) Exposure In Utero Leads to Immunoregulatory Cytokine Dysregulation in the Mouse Mammary Gland: A Potential Mechanism Programming Breast Cancer Risk.

Bisphenol-A (BPA) is a ubiquitous estrogen-like endocrine disrupting compound (EDC). BPA exposure in utero has been linked to breast cancer and abnormal mammary gland development in mice. The recent rise in incidence of human breast cancer and decreased age of first detection suggests a possible environmental etiology. We hypothesized that developmental programming of carcinogenesis may involve an aberrant immune response. Both innate and adaptive immunity play a role in tumor suppression through cytolytic CD8, NK, and Th1 T-cells. We hypothesized that BPA exposure in utero would lead to dysregulation of both innate and adaptive immunity in the mammary gland. CD1 mice were exposed to BPA in utero during gestation (days 9-21) via osmotic minipump. At 6 weeks, the female offspring were ovariectomized and estradiol was given at 8 weeks. RNA and protein were extracted from the posterior mammary glands, and the mRNA and protein levels were measured by PCR array, qRT-PCR, and western blot. In mouse mammary tissue, BPA exposure in utero significantly decreased the expression of members of the chemokine CXC family (Cxcl2, Cxcl4, Cxcl14, and Ccl20), interleukin 1 (Il1) gene family (Il1ß and Il1rn), interleukin 2 gene family (Il7 receptor), and interferon gene family (interferon regulatory factor 9 (Irf9), as well as immune response gene 1 (Irg1). Additionally, BPA exposure in utero decreased Esr1 receptor gene expression and increased Esr2 receptor gene expression. In utero exposure of BPA resulted in significant changes to inflammatory modulators within mammary tissue. We suggest that dysregulation of inflammatory cytokines, both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory, leads to a microenvironment that may promote disordered cell growth through inhibition of the immune response that targets cancer cells.

Chemotherapy after portal vein embolization to protect against tumor growth during liver hypertrophy before hepatectomy.

IMPORTANCE: Portal vein embolization improves the safety of liver resection by increasing the size of residual liver, but the embolization may increase tumor growth during the waiting period before definitive hepatectomy. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the administration of chemotherapy mitigates tumor growth after portal vein embolization (PVE) performed before major hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Review of prospectively collected data at Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center was conducted. The database included patients subjected to PVE before major hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Lesions in both the embolized and nonembolized lobes of the liver before and 1 month after PVE were measured and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors were applied to assess disease status. Assessment of survival was based on receipt of post-PVE chemotherapy and then stratified by subsequent resectability. RESULTS: Two hundred eight tumors were measured in 64 patients; 53 tumors were in patients undergoing post-PVE chemotherapy. Approximately one-third of the lesions progressed after PVE when no chemotherapy was administered. This did not differ significantly according to whether tumors were ipsilateral or contralateral to the PVE. When chemotherapy was administered, there was a significantly lower rate of progression (18.9%, P = .03). In long-term follow-up, treatment with post-PVE chemotherapy was also independently associated with improved survival (P < .006). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Chemotherapy does not retard growth of the liver after PVE and may prevent cancer progression. Thus, the combination of PVE and chemotherapy may enhance both oncologic and operative safety.

Hormone therapy: A to Z.

CLINICAL SCENARIO: A 65-year-old postmenopausal women comes into the office with concerns of vaginal dryness and hot flashes. She recounts numerous nights waking up drenched in sweat and days spent trying to find the coolest rooms at work. She reluctantly mentions that she and her partner have difficulty with intimacy because she has found intercourse to be painful because of vaginal dryness. She is distraught and frustrated seeking something to alleviate her menopause symptoms. As you begin a conversation about hormone therapy, she immediately becomes concerned and reluctant because she has seen many commercials indicating that this unsafe for women.

Treatment with bazedoxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, causes regression of endometriosis in a mouse model.

Endometriosis is a common estrogen-dependent disorder. Medical treatments currently consist of progestins or GnRH agonists; however, neither is fully effective and both entail significant side effects. Selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulators (SERM) have tissue-selective actions, acting as an ER agonist in some tissues and ER antagonist in others. The SERM bazedoxifene (BZA) effectively antagonizes estrogen-induced uterine endometrial stimulation without countering estrogenic effects in bone or central nervous system. These properties make it an attractive candidate for use in the treatment of endometriosis. Experimental endometriosis was created in reproductive-age CD-1 mice. After 8 wk, 10 animals received i.p. injections of BZA (3 mg/kg·d) for 8 wk, whereas 10 received vehicle control. Mice were killed, and implant size was assessed. The mean size of the implants after treatment was 60 mm(2) in the control group and 21 mm(2) in the BZA treatment group (P = 0.03). Quantitative PCR and immunohistochemical analysis were used to determine the effect on endometrial gene expression. PCNA, ERα, and LIF mRNA and protein expression were significantly decreased in endometrium of the treated group. Caspase 3 mRNA expression was increased. Expression of PR and Hoxa10 were not significantly altered by treatment. There was no evidence of ovarian enlargement or cyst formation. Decreased PCNA and ER expression demonstrated that the regression of endometriosis likely involved decreased estrogen-mediated cell proliferation. BZA may be an effective novel agent for the treatment of endometriosis due to greater endometrial-specific estrogen antagonism compared with other SERM.

HOXA10 expression is decreased in endometrium of women with adenomyosis.

HOXA10 gene expression is decreased in the secretory phase endometrium of women with adenomyosis. Diminished expression of HOXA10 is a potential mechanism explaining decreased implantation observed in women with adenomyosis.