Illicit Fentanyl Exposure Among Victims of Violence Treated at a Trauma Center.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid overdoses and violent injury are leading causes of death in the United States, yet testing for novel opioids like fentanyl remains uncommon. The purpose of this investigation is to characterize a population of victims of violence who test positive for illicit fentanyl. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients treated at a level-one trauma center between January 31, 2019 and February 21, 2020. Data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Subjects were included if they had an encounter diagnosis for a violent or intentional injury, using the International Classification of Diseases, v10 (X92-Y09). We excluded patients who received licit fentanyl as a part of their care before testing. Those who tested positive for fentanyl exposure on our standard hospital urine drug screen were considered to have been exposed to illicit fentanyl. Those testing negative for fentanyl were considered controls. RESULTS: Of the 1132 patients treated for intentional injuries during the study period, 366 were included in the study (32.3%). Of these, 133 (36.3%) subjects were exposed to illicit fentanyl prehospital. There were no demographic differences between cases and controls. Cases had a lower GCS voice score on arrival (median = 4, interquartile range [IQR] = 4-5 versus median = 5, IQR = 4-5, P = 0.02), higher rates of ventilator usage (32.3% versus 21.5%, P = 0.02), and more intensive care unit admissions (27.1% versus 12.0%, P = 0.005). More than half of cases tested negative for opiates (78/133, 58.6%). Cases had more trauma center encounters (26.3% had ≥2 visits versus 15.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to illicit fentanyl was common among victims of violence in this single-center study. These patients are at increased risk of being admitted to intensive care units and repeated trauma center visits, suggesting fentanyl testing may help identify those who could benefit from violence prevention and substance abuse treatment.

States should use Medicaid to support violence intervention efforts.

ABSTRACT: In recent years, calls to address gun violence through public health approaches have increased. However, securing funding for health-based community violence intervention models has remained a challenge. New actions suggest that this may be shifting. Upon taking office, the Biden administration announced a series of funding opportunities for these programs, which ranged from competitive grant programs to a proposed 8-year, $5 billion plan. Less publicized, but just as important, is the administration's announcement that Medicaid can be used to reimburse this work, specifically noting the eligibility of hospital-based violence intervention and prevention programs. For these programs, this creates a predictable and reliable funding source that has not existed to date. This integration of violence prevention programming in the traditional health care and financing systems represents a critical inflection point in the United States' shifting response to community violence. However, the decision to use this optional benefit lies with each state. States should strongly consider harnessing Medicaid as a wise investment to address the United States' gun violence epidemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and value-based evaluation, level IV.

Balancing Efficiency and Access: Discouraging Emergency Department Boarding in a Global Budget System.

Reducing cost without sacrificing quality of patient care is an important yet challenging goal for healthcare professionals and policymakers alike. This challenge is at the forefront in the United States, where per capita healthcare costs are much higher than in similar countries around the world. The state of Maryland is unique in the hospital financing landscape due to its "capitation" payment system (also known as "global budget"), in which revenue for hospital-based services is set at the beginning of the year. Although Maryland's system has yielded many benefits, including reduced Medicare spending, it also has had unintentional adverse consequences. These consequences, such as increased emergency department boarding and ambulance diversion, constrain Maryland hospitals' ability to fulfill their role as emergency care providers and act as a safety net for vulnerable patient populations. In this article, we suggest policy remedies to mitigate the unintended consequences of Maryland's model that should also prove instructive for a variety of emerging alternative payment mechanisms.

Two pulmonary emboli in a psych pod.

BACKGROUND: A female patient known to have schizoaffective disorder self-presented to an emergency department in a state of acute agitation and paranoia shortly after a 35-day inpatient stay at a psychiatric facility. CASE REPORT: The patient exhibited no signs or complaints of dyspnea or hypoxia, but later collapsed and became hypoxic after sleeping comfortably with sedation for 12 h in the psychiatric unit. She was intubated and a computed tomography angiogram revealed bilateral lobar pulmonary emboli and right heart strain. CONCLUSION: Psychiatric hospitalizations, medications, diagnoses and relevant sequelae increase venous thromboembolism risk more than many realize.

Prevention Professional for Violence Intervention: A Newly Recognized Health Care Provider for Population Health Programs.

The National Uniform Claim Committee recognized a new type of health care provider for violence intervention: prevention professional. This creates a pathway for population health interventions to obtain reimbursement through traditional medical financing systems. In addition to violence, prevention professionals may specialize in other conditions of public health importance.

Trauma-Informed Care for Violently Injured Patients in the Emergency Department.

Violent traumatic injury remains a common condition treated by emergency physicians. The medical management of these patients is well described and remains an area of focus for providers. However, violently injured patients disproportionately carry a history of physical and psychological trauma that frequently affects clinical care in the emergency department. The alteration of our clinical approach, taking into consideration how a patient's previous experiences influence how he or she may perceive and react to medical care, is a concept referred to as trauma-informed care. This approach is based on 4 pillars: knowledge of the effect of trauma, recognition of the signs and symptoms of trauma, avoidance of retraumatization, and the development of appropriate policies and procedures. Using this framework, we provide practical considerations for emergency physicians in the delivery of trauma-informed care for violently injured patients.

A Content Analysis of Hospitals' Community Health Needs Assessments in the Most Violent U.S. Cities.

The emergence of evidence-supported interventions allows hospitals the opportunity to reduce future reinjury among patients who are violently injured. However, hospital knowledge of these interventions and their perceived role in violence prevention is unknown. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act created new legal requirements for non-profit hospitals to conduct community health needs assessments (CHNA) every three years to maintain not-for-profit status. In turn, this allows an empiric evaluation of hospital recognition and response to community violence. To do so, this study performed a content analysis of hospital CHNAs from the 20 U.S. cities with the highest violent crime rates. A total of 77 CHNAs were examined for specific violence-related keywords as well as whether violence prevention was listed as a priority community need. Overall, 74% of CHNAs mentioned violence-related terms and only 32% designated violence prevention as a priority need. When discussed, 88% of CHNAs referenced community violence, 42% intimate partner or sexual violence, and 22% child abuse. This study suggests that hospitals may lack awareness of violence as an actionable, preventable public health issue. Further, evidence-based program models are available to hospitals that can reduce the recurrence of assaultive injuries.