Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases (pmCRC) in a large international data set of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pmCRC from 39 centres who underwent cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC between 1991 and 2018 were selected and compared for the HIPEC protocols received-oxaliplatin-HIPEC versus mitomycin-HIPEC. Following analysis of crude data, propensity-score matching (PSM) and Cox-proportional hazard modelling were performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the HIPEC dose-response effects (high versus low dose, dose intensification and double drug protocols) on OS, RFS and 90-day morbidity. Furthermore, the impact of the treatment time period was assessed. RESULTS: Of 2760 patients, 2093 patients were included. Median OS was 43 months (95% c.i. 41 to 46 months) with a median RFS of 12 months (95% c.i. 12 to 13 months). The oxaliplatin-HIPEC group had an OS of 47 months (95% c.i. 42 to 53 months) versus 39 months (95% c.i. 36 to 43 months) in the mitomycin-HIPEC group (P = 0.002), aHR 0.77, 95% c.i. 0.67 to 0.90, P < 0.001. The OS benefit persisted after PSM of the oxaliplatin-HIPEC group and mitomycin-HIPEC group (48 months (95% c.i. 42 to 59 months) versus 40 months (95% c.i. 37 to 44 months)), P < 0.001, aHR 0.78 (95% c.i. 0.65 to 0.94), P = 0.009. Similarly, matched RFS was significantly higher for oxaliplatin-HIPEC versus others (13 months (95% c.i. 12 to 15 months) versus 11 months (95% c.i. 10 to 12 months, P = 0.02)). High-dose mitomycin-HIPEC protocols had similar OS compared to oxaliplatin-HIPEC. HIPEC dose intensification within each protocol resulted in improved survival. Oxaliplatin + irinotecan-HIPEC resulted in the most improved OS (61 months (95% c.i. 51 to 101 months)). Ninety-day mortality in both crude and PSM analysis was worse for mitomycin-HIPEC. There was no change in treatment effect depending on the analysed time period. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin-based HIPEC provided better outcomes compared to mitomycin-based HIPEC. High-dose mitomycin-HIPEC was similar to oxaliplatin-HIPEC. The 90-day mortality difference favours the oxaliplatin-HIPEC group. A trend for dose-response between low- and high-dose HIPEC was reported.

A case of life-threatening, early postoperative refeeding syndrome in an obese young female undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Early complications after a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) include bleeding, leaks, strictures and bowel obstructions. Patients post-LSG experience rapid but intended weight loss and may be on a restricted diet before and following surgery. Thus, many of these patients are in a malnourished state, placing them at a risk of developing potentially life-threatening refeeding syndrome (RFS). We describe the case of an 18-year-old female who developed RFS 2 weeks after LSG. We examine potential causes, review literature and discuss RFS pathophysiology as well as the guidelines that could help prevent RFS in bariatric surgery. Currently, not much is known about the risk of RFS in bariatric surgery and to our knowledge, this is the first report of RFS occurring in the early postoperative phase after LSG. A globally accepted definition of RFS should be established for guidelines to encompass wider patient groups.

External validation of prognostic scores and comparison of predictive accuracy for patients with colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases considered for cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prognostic scores are developed to facilitate the selection of patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) for treatment with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC). Three prominent prognostic scores are the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS), the Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Prognostic Surgical Score (COMPASS), and the modified COloREctal-Pc (mCOREP). We externally validate these scores and compare their predictive accuracy. METHODS: Data from consecutive CRPM patients who underwent CRS/IPC from 1996 to 2018 was used to externally validate COMPASS, PSDSS, and mCOREP. Analysis evaluated the efficacy of each score in predicting (1) open-close laparotomy-those found at laparotomy to not be eligible for curative intent CRS/IPC, (2) surgical futility-those who underwent open-close laparotomy, palliative debulking surgery, or had an overall survival of less than 12 months, and (3) overall and recurrence-free survival (OS, RFS). RESULTS: Prognostic scores were calculated for the 174-patient external validation cohort. COMPASS was most accurate in predicting open-close laparotomy, futile surgery, and survival (OS and RFS). Area under the curve (AUC) for open-close prediction was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.68-0.87), representing useful discrimination. However, AUC for futility prediction was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.71), and C-statistic for OS was 0.65 indicating only possibly helpful discrimination. C-statistic for RFS was 0.59 indicating poor discrimination. CONCLUSION: While COMPASS showed the best statistical behavior, accuracy for several clinically relevant outcomes remains low, and thus applicability to clinical practice limited.

Medium Term Outcomes of Revision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy after Gastric Banding: A Propensity Score Matched Study.

PURPOSE: Revision bariatric surgery may be undertaken after weight loss failure and/or complications following primary bariatric surgery. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of revision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (RLSG) after gastric banding (GB) to those of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (PLSG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, propensity-score matched study was conducted to compare between PLSG (control) patients and RLSG after GB (treatment) patients. Patients were matched using 2:1 nearest neighbor propensity score matching without replacement. Patients were compared on weight loss outcomes and postoperative complications for up to five years. RESULTS: 144 PLSG patients were compared against 72 RLSG patients. At 36 months, PLSG patients had significantly higher mean %TWL than RLSG patients (27.4 ± 8.6 [9.3-48.9]% vs. 17.9 ± 10.2 [1.7-36.3]%, p < 0.01). At 60 months, both groups had similar mean %TWL (16.6 ± 8.1 [4.6-31.3]% vs. 16.2 ± 6.0 [8.8-22.4)]%, p > 0.05). Early functional complication rates were slightly higher with PLSG (13.9% vs. 9.7%), but late functional complication rates were comparatively higher with RLSG (50.0% vs. 37.5%). The differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Both early (0.7% vs 4.2%) and late (3.5% vs 8.3%) surgical complication rates were lower in PLSG patients compared to RLSG patients but did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: RLSG after GB has poorer weight loss outcomes than PLSG in the short-term. Although RLSG may carry higher risks of functional complications, the safety of RLSG and PLSG are overall comparable.

Use of Prognostic Factors and Scores in Selection of Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis (CRPM) for Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/IPC): Results of an International Survey Among Oncologic Clinicians.

BACKGROUND: No universally accepted guidelines exist for treatment of patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) undergoing cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/IPC). Several uncertainties remain concerning almost every aspect of this treatment modality, resulting in marked variability in patient management and likely outcomes. This survey aimed to define variations and trends in clinician decision making more clearly. METHODS: A 41-question web-based survey was distributed electronically via the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI), the International Society for the Study of Pleura and Peritoneum (ISSPP) as well as via social media (particularly Twitter). The survey sought to address and record clinician responses regarding patient workup/assessment, selection for preoperative systemic therapy, preoperative and intraoperative selection for CRS/IPC, and consideration of prognosis and complications. RESULTS: Complete responses were received from 60 clinicians from 45 centres in 22 countries. Upon assessment of survey responses, several interesting trends were noted in each section of the survey. Significant variability in surgeon practice and opinion were identified concerning almost every aspect of the treatment modality. CONCLUSION: This international survey provides the most comprehensive insight into clinician decision-making trends regarding patient assessment, selection and management. This should allow areas of variability to be more clearly defined and could potentially prompt development of initiatives for achieving consensus and standardisation of care in the future.

The role of adjuvant pharmacotherapy with liraglutide for patients with inadequate weight loss following bariatric surgery.

PURPOSE: Despite the benefits of bariatric surgery for many patients, there are a proportion of patients who do not achieve adequate weight loss. We evaluate the role of liraglutide as adjuvant pharmacotherapy in those who respond poorly to weight loss surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A non-controlled, prospective, open-label cohort study in which participants are prescribed liraglutide following inadequate response to weight loss surgery. The efficacy and tolerability of liraglutide was measured through measurement of BMI and monitoring of side effect profile. RESULTS: A total of 68 partial responders to bariatric surgery were included in the study, 2 participants were lost to follow-up. Overall 89.7% lost weight on liraglutide, with 22.1% showing a good response (>10% total body weight loss). There were 41 patients who discontinued liraglutide mainly due to cost. CONCLUSION: Liraglutide is efficacious in achieving weight loss and reasonably well tolerated in patients who have inadequate weight loss post-bariatric surgery.

Perioperative chemotherapy in colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases: A global propensity score matched study.

Background: There is a paucity of studies evaluating perioperative systemic chemotherapy in conjunction with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRCPM). The aim was to evaluate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant systemic therapy in CRCPM. Methods: Patients with CRCPM from 39 treatment centres globally from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 2018, who underwent CRS+HIPEC were identified and stratified according to neoadjuvant/adjuvant use. Crude data analysis, propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox-proportional hazard modelling was performed. Findings: Of 2093 patients, 1613 were included in neoadjuvant crude evaluation with 708 in the PSM cohort (354 patients/arm). In the adjuvant evaluation, 1176 patients were included in the crude cohort with 778 in the PSM cohort (389 patients/arm). The median overall survival (OS) in the PSM cohort receiving no neoadjuvant vs neoadjuvant therapy was 37.0 months (95% CI: 32.6-42.7) vs 34.7 months (95% CI: 31.2-38.8, HR 1.08 95% CI: 0.88-1.32, p = 0.46). The median OS in the PSM cohort receiving no adjuvant therapy vs adjuvant therapy was 37.0 months (95% CI: 32.9-41.8) vs 45.7 months (95% CI: 38.8-56.2, HR 0.79 95% CI: 0.64-0.97, p = 0.022). Recurrence-free survival did not differ in the neoadjuvant evaluation but differed in the adjuvant evaluation - HR 1.04 (95% CI: 0.87-1.25, p = 0.66) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.98, p = 0.03), respectively. Multivariable Cox-proportional hazard modelling in the crude cohorts showed hazard ratio 1.08 (95% CI: 0.92-1.26, p = 0.37) for administering neoadjuvant therapy and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.72-1.03, p = 0.095) for administering adjuvant therapy. Interpretation: Neoadjuvant therapy did not confer a benefit to patients undergoing CRS+HIPEC for CRCPM, whereas adjuvant therapy was associated with a benefit in this retrospective setting. Funding: None.

Comparison of Microwave and Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Pulmonary Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for colorectal cancer pulmonary metastases (CRCPulM) has been shown to be safe. Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged in the treatment for CRCPulM. However, short to long-term efficacy of both modalities have yet to be understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 203 patients who received RFA and MWA from 2000-2018 at a major tertiary hospital in Australia. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients underwent RFA and 42 MWA. Median ablation size and time was 4 (range=3-5 cm) vs. 3.5 cm (range=3-4 cm; p=0.0395) and 49 (range=26-65 min) vs. 8 min (5-13 min) in the RFA and MWA groups, respectively (p<0.001). The complication rate was 112 (55%) and 40 (74%) in the RFA and MWA group, respectively (p=0.011). Life-threatening pulmonary haemorrhage occurred in 1 (0.5%) and 4 (7.4%) patients in the RFA and MWA group, respectively (p=0.007). Local recurrences detected after discharge were similar in both groups [28% (p<0.001)]. However, the MWA group demonstrated higher survival rate and less recurrence rate than RFA in the first 24 months of follow up. CONCLUSION: RFA and MWA are competitive treatment methods for CRCPulM. Although MWA has significantly higher complication rate than RFA, it can be performed in a much shorter time and lead to a shorter length of hospital stay.

Intraperitoneal Instillation of Local Anesthetic (IPILA) in Bariatric Surgery and the Effect on Post-operative Pain Scores: a Randomized Control Trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective analgesia after bariatric procedures is vital as it can reduce post-operative opioid use. This leads to less nausea which may be associated with shorter post-operative length of stay (LOS). Understanding analgesic requirements in patients with obesity is important due to the varied physiology and increased number of comorbidities. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraperitoneal instillation of local anesthetic (IPILA) to reduce opioid requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. METHODS: A double-blinded randomized control trial was conducted to compare intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine to normal saline in 104 patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The primary endpoint was pain in recovery with secondary endpoints at 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, and 48 h post-operatively. Further endpoints were post-operative analgesic use and LOS. Safety endpoints included unexpected reoperation or readmission, complications, and mortality. RESULTS: There were 54 patients in the placebo arm and 50 in the IPILA. Pain scores were significantly lower in the IPILA group both at rest (p = 0.04) and on movement (p = 0.02) in recovery with no difference seen at subsequent time points. Equally, IPILA was independently associated with reducing severe post-operative pain at rest and movement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.69, p = 0.007 and aOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.62, p = 0.004, respectively). There was no significant difference in LOS, opioid use, antiemetic use, morbidity, or mortality between the intervention and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: The administration of ropivacaine intraperitoneally during laparoscopic bariatric surgery reduces post-operative pain in the recovery room but does not reduce opioid use nor LOS.

Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: An Update on Incidence, Risk Factors, Management, and Clinical Sequelae in 1,141 Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: An update on the incidence, risk factors, clinical sequalae, and management of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the St George CRS/HIPEC database. RESULTS: Sixty-five (5.7%) out of 1,141 patients developed a POPF. Patients with POPFs were older, had a higher peritoneal cancer index, longer operation time, and required more units of blood intraoperatively. Splenectomy and distal pancreatectomy were significant risk factors for developing POPFs. While there was no effect on overall long-term survival in POPF patients, they did suffer higher rates of Clavien-Dindo grade 3/4 complications, in-hospital deaths, and longer hospital length of stay. Of the 65 POPF patients, 23 were taken back to theatre, 48 required radiological drains and 7 underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. CONCLUSION: There are multiple risk factors for developing POPFs that are non-modifiable. While POPFs are associated with increased postoperative morbidity, long-term survival does not appear to be affected.

Barrett's Oesophagus and Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery-IFSO 2020 Position Statement.

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) has been playing an integral role in educating both the metabolic surgical and the medical community at large about the importance of surgical and/or endoscopic interventions in treating adiposity-based chronic diseases. The occurrence of chronic conditions following bariatric/metabolic surgery (BMS), such as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and columnar (intestinal) epithelial metaplasia of the distal oesophagus (also known as Barrett's oesophagus (BE)), has long been discussed in the metabolic surgical and medical community. Equally, the risk of neoplastic progression of Barrett's oesophagus to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and the resulting requirement for surgery are the source of some concern for many involved in the care of these patients, as the surgical alteration of the gastrointestinal tract may lead to impaired reconstructive options. As such, there is a requirement for guidance of the community.The IFSO commissioned a task force to elucidate three aspects of the presenting problem: First, to determine what the estimated incidence of Barrett's oesophagus is in patients presenting for BMS; second, to determine the frequency at which Barrett's oesophagus may develop following BMS (with a particular focus on the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)); and third, to determine if regression of Barrett's oesophagus may occur following BMS given the close relationship of obesity and the development of BE/EAC. Based on these findings, a position statement regarding the management of this pathology in the context of BMS was developed. The following position statement is issued by the IFSO Barrett's Oesophagus task force andapproved by the IFSO Scientific Committee and Executive Board. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence. It will be reviewed regularly.

Effectiveness and safety of ablative fractional CO2 laser for the treatment of burn scars: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Burn scars are a major clinical challenge. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and safety of one treatment with the ablative fractional CO2 laser (AFL-CO2) compared to standard burn scar treatment. METHOD: From December 2014 to October 2018 patients were prospectively recruited and treatment effects analyzed by assessing various outcome parameters from the date of first consultation and after treatment. A case control study was conducted looking at the impact of one AFL-CO2 treatment compared to a cohort subjected to conventional conservative treatment. Adverse effects were noted at follow up. RESULTS: 187 patients were included, with 167 in the AFL-CO2, and 20 in the control cohort. Baseline demographics and scar characteristics showed no significant differences. Ultrasound measured scar thickness as well as the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) revealed a significant reduction in the treatment cohort, but no significant improvement in the control group. The POSAS-O was significantly improved in both cohorts. Subjective parameters (POSAS-P, DN4-Pain, and modified D4Pruritus scores) decreased significantly in the AFL-CO2 cohort but remained unchanged in the control group. The BSHS-B quality of life score increased significantly in the AFL-CO2 group, but worsened at the follow up of the untreated patients. Sub-domain analyses found the biggest differences in Affect, Body Image, Heat Sensitivity, Treatment and Work. Complications occurred in 5 patients (2.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that AFL-CO2 is an effective and safe treatment modality for burn scars improving thickness, symptoms and quality of life of burn survivors when compared to conventional scar treatment.

Ablative fractional resurfacing with laser-facilitated steroid delivery for burn scar management: Does the depth of laser penetration matter?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the depth of ablative fractional CO2 laser (CO2 -AFL) penetration of pathological burn scars influences clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients presenting to the Concord Repatriation General Hospital (CRGH) Scar Clinic received ultrasound measurement at the thickest point of their burn scars. Subsequently, the effect of various CO2 -AFL settings (energy which correlates to penetration depths) on different outcome parameters was analysed. Patients were divided into five groups depending on minimal scar penetration depth. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (158 scars) had complete data allowing for analysis. Median scar thickness was 3,400 µm and median laser scar penetration depth was 900 µm. Scar penetration categories were as follows: 0-25% (n = 40), 25-50% (n = 67), 50-75% (n = 31), 75-100% (n = 8), >100% (n = 3) of scar thickness. The median reduction in maximum scar thickness was 800 µm following one treatment (P < 0.001). However, this effect depended on scar penetration depth, whereby scars that were penetrated ≥75% showed no significant improvement in scar thickness and those penetrated >100% indicated a tendency to become worse. Other assessed outcome parameters included: the Vancouver Scar Scale, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, a neuropathic pain score (DN4 Pain Questionnaire), and a pruritus score (modified D4 Pruritus Score). All these factors showed significant improvement in the categories up to 75% scar penetration depth. CONCLUSIONS: CO2 -AFL scar penetration depth significantly influences subjective and objective pathologic burn scar modulation. The penetration depth of 51-75% achieves the greatest reduction in scar thickness. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The volume-time index (VTI) is prognostic in patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) is an important prognostic factor in colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM), however it fails to consider the time period over which disease burden develops. The volume-time index (VTI) is the ratio between PCI and time from primary tumour resection. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 182 patients managed from 1996 to 2017 was performed. RESULTS: As stratified by high vs low VTI groups, median overall survival (OS) was 23 months (95% 17-46) vs 44 months (95% 35-72) with a difference in 5-year OS of 20.3% (95%CI 10.2-40.4) vs 40.1% (95%CI 29.7-54.1), p = 0.002. No difference in 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) exists. On multivariable analysis, an elevated VTI was independently associated with poorer OS (adjusted HR 3.20, 95%CI 1.64-6.23, p < 0.001) and RFS (adjusted HR 1.90, 95%CI 1.10-3.29, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: VTI is an independent prognostic factor for OS and RFs in patients with CRPM undergoing CRS/IPC, behaving as a surrogate of tumour aggressiveness.

Ablative fractional resurfacing for burn scar management affects the number and type of elective surgical reconstructive procedures, hospital admission patterns as well as length of stay.

BACKGROUND: Reconstructive surgery remains the main approach to address burn scar contractures. Ablative fractional resurfacing is an increasingly popular tool for severe burn scar management, but its effect on overall burns reconstructive case-mix, operating time and patterns of hospital admission have not been reported. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of hospital administrative data from September 2013 to June 2017 was performed evaluating these effects of ablative fractional CO2 laser (CO2-AFL). RESULTS: The total number of acute burn patients treated at CRGH increased substantially over this timeframe, resulting in 412 elective procedures including 82 before and 330 after introducing CO2-AFL. The proportion of traditional non-laser reconstructive procedures dropped considerably to 23.9% in about 2.5 years following CO2-AFL introduction. This change in approach had a profound effect on LOS with average LOS being 1.96days for non-laser and 0.36days for CO2-AFL-procedures (p<0.001). Anaesthetic times also decreased significantly, with median durations at 90min pre-laser and 64min post-laser introduction (p<0.001), and median anaesthetic times at 87min (non-AFL) and 57min (AFL procedures) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: AFL profoundly affects elective reconstructive burn case mix with a replacement of conventional reconstructive operations in favour of AFL-procedures. This results in reductions of average LOS and anaesthetic times. Consequently, increased use of AFL in burn scar management could potentially reduce overall costs associated with burn scar reconstruction.

Volume-Time Index Is Not an Indicator of Outcome for Patients Undergoing CRS/HIPEC for Treatment of High-Grade Appendiceal Carcinomatosis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Completeness of cytoreduction score (CC-score) and tumour grade have been shown to be independent prognostic factors in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of high-grade appendiceal carcinomatosis (PMCA). In patients with colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases (CRPM) that undergo CRS/HIPEC, volume time index (VTI) has been shown to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS). This analysis was conducted to evaluate VTI as a prognostic factor in PMCA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed A retrospective cohort study of 131 patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC for PMCA from 1996 to 2017. VTI was calculated and analyses were performed to determine the association with patients' outcomes. RESULTS: Median overall survival by high vs. low VTI groups were 69 months (95%CI=45-NA) vs. 63 months [95% Confidence Interval (CI)=48-not available (NA)], with an associated difference in 5-year survival rates of 52.1 (95%CI=39.5-68.8) vs. 50.6 (95%CI=35.2-72.6) respectively, with a non-significant p-value of 0.968. For the 82 patients with complete recurrence data, the median RFS stratified by high vs. low VTI were 16 months (95%CI=10-25) vs. 20 months (95%CI=13-34) respectively, with no statistically significant difference in 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). CONCLUSION: VTI for PMCA was not shown to be correlated with overall survival (OS) for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC, and suggests that the rate of tumour growth does not affect the patients' outcome. Neither high PCI nor rapid tumour growth following primary tumour resection should, therefore, be a contraindication for CRS/HIPEC in patients with PMCA.