MYTX-011: A pH-Dependent Anti-c-MET Antibody-Drug Conjugate Designed for Enhanced Payload Delivery to c-MET-Expressing Tumor Cells.

Advances in linker payload technology and target selection have been at the forefront of recent improvements in antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) design, leading to several approvals over the last decade. In contrast, the potential of novel ADC technologies to enhance payload delivery to tumors is relatively underexplored. We demonstrate that incorporation of pH-dependent binding in the antibody component of a c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET)-targeting ADC (MYTX-011) can overcome the requirement for high c-MET expression on tumors, an innovation that has the potential to benefit a broader population of patients with lower c-MET levels. MYTX-011 drove fourfold higher net internalization than a non-pH-engineered parent ADC in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells and showed increased cytotoxicity against a panel of cell lines from various solid tumors. A single dose of MYTX-011 showed at least threefold higher efficacy than a benchmark ADC in mouse xenograft models of NSCLC ranging from low to high c-MET expression. Moreover, MYTX-011 showed improved pharmacokinetics over parent and benchmark ADCs. In a repeat dose toxicology study, MYTX-011 exhibited a toxicity profile similar to other monomethyl auristatin E-based ADCs. These results highlight the potential of MYTX-011 for treating a broader range of patients with NSCLC with c-MET expression than other c-MET-targeting ADCs. A first-in-human study is ongoing to determine the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of MYTX-011 in patients with NSCLC (NCT05652868).

MYTX-011: a pH-dependent anti-cMET antibody-drug conjugate designed for enhanced payload delivery to cMET expressing tumor cells.

Advances in linker payload technology and target selection have been at the forefront of recent improvements in antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) design, leading to several approvals over the last decade. In contrast, the potential of novel ADC technologies to enhance payload delivery to tumors is relatively underexplored. We demonstrate that incorporation of pH-dependent binding in the antibody component of a cMET targeting ADC (MYTX-011) can overcome the requirement for high cMET expression on tumors, an innovation that has the potential to benefit a broader population of patients with lower cMET levels. MYTX-011 drove four-fold higher net internalization than a non-pH engineered parent ADC in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells and showed increased cytotoxicity against a panel of cell lines from various solid tumors. A single dose of MYTX-011 showed at least three-fold higher efficacy than a benchmark ADC in mouse xenograft models of NSCLC ranging from low to high cMET expression. Moreover, MYTX-011 showed improved pharmacokinetics over parent and benchmark ADCs. In a repeat dose toxicology study, MYTX-011 exhibited a toxicity profile similar to other MMAE-based ADCs. These results highlight the potential of MYTX-011 for treating a broader range of NSCLC patients with cMET expression than other cMET targeting ADCs. A first in human study is ongoing to determine the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of MYTX-011 in patients with NSCLC (NCT05652868).

Biparatopic antibodies: therapeutic applications and prospects.

Biparatopic antibodies (bpAbs) bind distinct, non-overlapping epitopes on an antigen. This unique binding mode enables new mechanisms of action beyond monospecific and bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) that can make bpAbs effective therapeutics for various indications, including oncology and infectious diseases. Biparatopic binding can lead to superior affinity and specificity, promote antagonism, lock target conformation, and result in higher-order target clustering. Such antibody-target complexes can elicit strong agonism, increase immune effector function, or result in rapid target downregulation and lysosomal trafficking. These are not only attractive properties for therapeutic antibodies but are increasingly being explored for other modalities such as antibody-drug conjugates, T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptors. Recent advances in bpAb engineering have enabled the construction of ever more sophisticated formats that are starting to show promise in the clinic.

Assessing the degree to which randomized controlled trials align with the core outcome set for osteoarthritis of knee and hip: A cross-sectional analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree of core outcome set alignment and identify issues with alignment to the 2019 COS among clinical trial registrations focused on knee and/or hip osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Our search was performed on registered knee and hip OA randomized controlled trials (RCTs) available on ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The screening process considered trials registered between 8/2014 and 6/2023. We extracted data on general trial characteristics and the five trial endpoints detailed in the COS (pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, and adverse events), in a masked and duplicate manner. The frequencies of COS alignment were assessed over time prior to and after COS publication. RESULTS: Of the 10,718 RCTs screened, 481 met inclusion criteria. Most were phase 3 (368/481, 76.51%) and heavily university-funded (184/481, 38.25%). Despite the 2019 COS, no marked enhancement in overall alignment was noted. The outcome 'Pain' exhibited the highest degree of COS alignment (455/481, 94.59%), whereas 'adverse events' lagged behind (89/481, 18.50%). Additionally, trial factors such as 'Continent', 'Funding Type', and 'Recruitment Status' displayed no significant influence on COS alignment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the acknowledged advantages of using COS in RCTs and the availability of an updated COS, the alignment to these outcomes remains notably low. Significant efforts are needed to encourage broader adoption in future studies on knee and hip OA, with the aim of improving research quality and patient care.

Assessing the uptake of the type 1 diabetes core outcome set in randomized controlled trials: A Cross-Sectional study.

AIMS: This study analyzed uptake of the core outcome set (COS) for type 1 diabetes (T1D) and trends in its use before and after its development in December 2017. METHODS: On June 26, 2023, ClinicalTrials.gov was systematically searched for T1D randomized controlled trials. The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database provided a COS of eight key outcomes for analysis. Included trials were analyzed for COS uptake before and after its release in December 2017 in a masked, duplicate fashion by independent reviewers. We also calculated the proportion of trials that measured the complete COS and assessed the most frequently reported COS outcomes. RESULTS: Of 3,792 originally screened articles, 144 RCTs were included in the final sample. Following COS publication, its use steadily decreased. Within the COS, HbA1c and severe hypoglycemia were most frequently implemented as endpoints; other recommended outcomes were rarely used in the published trials. CONCLUSION: Despite the 2017 T1D COS publication, use has decreased over time. This inconsistency negatively influences evidence-based practices and care. Educating researchers on COS and promoting uptake is crucial. Wider COS adoption in T1D trials could enhance clinical research overall. Further study of barriers and facilitators influencing uptake is essential to support consistent use and reporting.

Assessing uptake of the core outcome set in clinical trials for immune thrombocytopenia: A cross-sectional analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials (CTs) guide clinical practice, but inconsistent outcome reporting presents challenges. To increase comparability, a core outcome set (COS) was created for primary Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in 2009 to standardize outcome measurements. We aimed to evaluate uptake of the primary ITP COS in CT registries. MATERIALS & METHODS: Our cross-sectional analysis employed a search string on ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP for phase III/IV CTs in June 2023. Inclusion criteria consisted of subjects with primary ITP, study was registered five years before COS publication to June 26, 2023, and assessed effectiveness of interventions. Two investigators extracted data in a masked, duplicate manner. Interrupted time series analysis, ANOVAs, and correlation analyses were conducted to assess the main outcome of COS uptake pre/post COS publication. RESULTS: The search identified 131 eligible trials for data extraction. Altogether, 38.2 % (50/131) followed IWG platelet response guidelines. An alternative platelet count measurement was 50,000 × 109 L, with 46.56 % (61/131) of trials reporting it. The most measured outcome was adverse events (106/131, 80.9 %). Remaining secondary outcomes were measured in <50 % of studies. After COS publication, there was a statistically non-significant 0.03 % (p = 0.50, CI 95 % = [-0.06, 0.13]) 0.03 % (p = 0.50, CI 95 % = [-0.06, 0.13]) increase in the monthly trend of COS-defined outcomes. CONCLUSION: We found a non-significant increase in uptake of the ITP COS since its publication and highlighted the lack of standardization among endpoints within ITP clinical trials. Our analysis highlights the need for heightened awareness and a COS update that acknowledges the variability in clinical trials.

Taking a chance on outcome standardisation: A cross-sectional analysis assessing the uptake of the prevention of preterm birth core outcome set in randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Analyse uptake of the core outcome set (COS) within preterm birth (PTB) clinical trials. DESIGN: On 26 June 2023, we conducted a systematic search of phase III/IV trial registry entries regarding PTB interventions via ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform. These trials were analysed for the outcomes measured. SETTING: N/A. SAMPLE: After searching the two databases, 5257 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were screened, resulting in 92 RCTs for analysis. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were the following: subjects were patients receiving an intervention for PTB, study enrolment began within 5 years prior to publication of PTB COS to 26 June 2023, and evaluated the efficacy of interventions. Authors screened and extracted data in masked, duplicate fashion, then performed an interrupted time series analysis, analysis of variance and correlation analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We extracted outcomes measured by each clinical trial in our sample. Trials were analysed for the percentage of adopted outcomes from PTB COS. RESULTS: After COS publication, there was no significant change in percentage of COS outcomes measured. The most measured outcome was 'offspring mortality' (54.34%, 50/92) and the least measured outcome was 'late neonatal neurodevelopment morbidity' (3.26%, 3/92). Additionally, 22.83% (21/92) of trials measured zero outcomes related to the PTB COS. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated no significant change in outcome measurement before or after PTB COS publication. We recommend focusing on both the measurement of outcomes and the assessments that are used.

Assessing uptake of the core outcome set in randomized controlled trials for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's Disease (PD) affects more than 10 million individuals, with increasing incidence worldwide. As PD's incidence rises, research funding is increasing substantially. PD's core outcome set (COS) provides standardization for PD clinical trial outcomes, improves research quality, and study comparability. Our study aimed to analyze COS uptake rate before and after the PD COS publication. METHODS: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to retrieve phase III/IV adult PD trials published between 2013 and 2023. Screening for inclusion and data extraction occurred in a masked, duplicate fashion. Trial characteristics and COS uptake rate were extracted from this sample. RESULTS: In our 111 included trials, the COS uptake rate was highest for the 'Walking and Balance' outcome and lowest for the 'Hospital Admissions' outcome. Overall, there was a non-significant monthly increase of 0.26 % (P = 0.266, CI = [-0.20, 0.72]) in "COS-defined outcome" measurement when comparing pre- and post-COS publication. CONCLUSION: Our study found no significant increase in COS uptake in PD clinical trials. We found multiple outcomes to be vastly unmeasured and heterogeneity among the measurement instruments used. These findings complicate standardizing and comparing RCT outcomes. Overcoming these barriers is vital to improving the usefulness of PD research.

Prevalence of Adverse Event Reporting in Adolescents and Young Adults Enrolled in Cancer Clinical Trials.

PURPOSE: Survival for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer has improved over the past few decades, and targeted approaches are needed to further improve outcomes. Limited reports suggest that AYAs tolerate cancer treatment differently than older and younger patients. Lack of adverse event (AE) data prevents the optimization of treatment regimens for AYAs by maximizing drug delivery and minimizing treatment-related toxicity. The extent to which the frequency and severity of AEs are reported for AYAs in cancer trials is unknown. METHODS: Using a retrospective, observational design we reviewed all phase II/III clinical trials published in 2021 that included cancer-directed therapy and enrolled at least one patient age 15-39 years diagnosed with one of the five common AYA cancers: breast cancer, colorectal cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or melanoma. The primary outcome was to determine the proportion of phase II/III trials that report AEs for the AYA population. RESULTS: Of 2,540 publications identified, 182 were included in the final analysis. No studies reported AE data for AYAs separate from older adults. Given the lack of reporting of AEs by age, it was not possible to assess differences in AE frequency or severity or whether AEs were associated with differences in dose reductions, treatment delays, or discontinuation for AYAs. CONCLUSION: Reporting of AEs for AYAs with cancer is absent in the public domain. Failure to account for differences in treatment tolerance between AYAs and older adults may lead to undertreatment or overtreatment and delay progress toward further improving outcomes for AYAs.