Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 12(5): 348-53, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24565697

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Limited data are available regarding patients with renal cell carcinoma and ESRD treated with TTs. The objective of this study was to explore the tolerability and safety of TT in patients with mRCC and ESRD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with mRCC and ESRD treated at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 2002 to 2012. Patient characteristics including demographic, histology, treatment, and adverse events are reported. Duration of treatment (TOT) was determined from date of drug initiation to discontinuation. Overall survival (OS) was determined from initiation of TT to death. Statistics are descriptive. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were identified. Ten patients had clear-cell histology and 4 had papillary histology. The median number of TTs per patient was 3 (range, 1-4) with median TOT of 28 months for all TTs. Eighty-eight percent of all toxicities were Grade 1 to 2; no Grade 4 toxicities were noted. Treatment discontinuations included 3 patients treated with sorafenib due to hand-foot syndrome, intolerable fatigue, and squamous cell skin cancer development; 2 patients treated with pazopanib due to intolerable fatigue and increased transaminase levels; and 1 patient treated with everolimus due to pneumonitis. Eight patients died from progressive disease. Median OS from initiation of TT was 28.5 months and 35 months from time of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Toxicities were mild to moderate and consistent with those reported in previous studies. TTs appear to be safe, well tolerated and produce antitumor response in patients with mRCC and ESRD receiving dialysis.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Falência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Everolimo , Feminino , Humanos , Indazóis , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Niacinamida/efeitos adversos , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Niacinamida/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sirolimo/efeitos adversos , Sirolimo/análogos & derivados , Sirolimo/uso terapêutico , Sorafenibe , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Urol Oncol ; 32(1): 53.e1-8, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24239463

RESUMO

Human papillomavirus infection (HPV) has been implicated in penile cancer, and although the annual incidence is estimated to be 1,570 in the United States, there are areas of the world in which the incidence is as much as 20-fold higher. Ample data in the literature support testing and vaccination against HPV-related cervical cancer, but for men and penile cancer, these data are lacking. However, some preliminary data would suggest that HPV not only plays an important role in a significant subset of patients with penile cancer but also may be a target for penile cancer prevention as well via initiation of a vaccination program in high-risk male populations.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/imunologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Neoplasias Penianas/imunologia , Alphapapillomavirus/fisiologia , Interações Hospedeiro-Patógeno/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Penianas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Penianas/virologia , Pênis/imunologia , Pênis/patologia , Pênis/virologia , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco
3.
Urol Oncol ; 32(3): 345-54, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24321256

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, is approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, prognostic models are needed to determine the patients who would most benefit from this therapy. We have developed a model based on clinical parameters and patient stratification into risk groups to predict patients with RCC who will derive the most benefit from treatment with everolimus. METHODS: We assessed retrospective data on 57 patients with RCC who received everolimus after previous treatment with immunotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors to identify prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In the original phase II study, patients received 10mg of everolimus daily without interruption and were assessed every other week for the first 8 weeks on therapy and every 4 weeks thereafter. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate OS and PFS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were constructed using the Cox proportional hazards model and a stepwise procedure to validate the data. RESULTS: We grouped patients according to risk: 0 prognostic factors indicated favorable risk, 1 to 2 factors intermediate risk, and≥3 factors poor risk. We found notable differences in median OS (29.6 mo for favorable risk, 14.3 mo for intermediate risk, and 7.2 mo for poor risk). Three risk factors (prior radiation treatment, no lung metastasis present at the start of treatment, and lymphocytes<25cells/µl) in the multivariate analysis were found to be associated with PFS, and 4 risk factors were found to be associated with OS (bone metastasis at start of treatment, LDH>1.5×upper limit of normal, alkaline phosphatase>120U/l, and lymphocytes<25cells/µl). CONCLUSIONS: Our prognostic model includes 3 readily available clinical parameters for PFS and 4 readily available clinical parameters for OS to help stratify patients into poor, intermediate, and favorable prognosis groups for the treatment of everolimus in clear cell RCC. These intriguing results warrant further study in a larger patient population to validate the findings.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Imunoterapia , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Sirolimo/análogos & derivados , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Everolimo , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Sirolimo/uso terapêutico
4.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 10(1): 26-31, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22169794

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, and sorafenib, a RAF kinase inhibitor, has shown efficacy in renal cell cancer (RCC) as single agents. We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of combining these agents for potential additive or synergistic effects when treating progressive metastatic RCC (mRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 15 patients enrolled in the study had predominantly clear cell RCC (cRCC) and progressive measurable disease with previous treatment that included immunotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and/or everolimus. Patients received daily everolimus and twice-daily sorafenib at escalating dose levels of 2.5 mg/400 mg (cohort 1), 5 mg/400 mg (cohort 2), and 10 mg/400 mg (cohort 3), and they were evaluated weekly for toxicity and every 8 weeks for response, using computed tomography/positron emission tomography (CT/PET) and CT at baseline and at first staging. RESULTS: In cohort 1, 2 of 6 patients experienced dose-limited toxicity (DLT) of thrombocytopenia/leukopenia and pneumonitis. In cohort 2, 1 of 6 patients experienced a DLT of pulmonary embolism, and the 3 patients in cohort 3 experienced no DLTs. The MTD was 10 mg/400 mg. Common adverse events included grade 1/2 hand-foot syndrome. Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), 1 patient achieved a pathologic complete response (CR), 1 patient achieved a radiographic CR, and 1 patient achieved a surgical CR. Seven patients achieved stable disease; 10 patients had decreased fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. Median progressive-free survival was 5.6 months; overall survival was 7.9 months. CONCLUSION: The MTD of daily everolimus 10 mg and twice-daily sorafenib 400 mg is safe and effective for progressive mRCC.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Benzenossulfonatos/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Everolimo , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compostos de Fenilureia , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Sirolimo/administração & dosagem , Sirolimo/análogos & derivados , Sorafenibe , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA