Anatomic TSA for B2 glenoids treated with asymmetric reaming has equivalent survivorship and patient outcomes compared to type A glenoids at mean 9 years follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Walch B2 glenoids can present a challenge to shoulder arthroplasty surgeons. Short-term studies have demonstrated that corrective reaming to 10° of retroversion in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) can result in good outcomes, however there is little data reporting the long-term outcomes in this cohort. B2 glenoids treated with high-side reaming present a theoretical risk of early glenoid component failure as one may ream into the subchondral bone. This study aimed to demonstrate that 1) B2 glenoids treated with corrective reaming have durable results and 2) offer similar results to Walch A1/2 in long-term follow-up. METHODS: Patients who underwent aTSA by a single surgeon (E.L.F.) were identified from a shoulder arthroplasty registry. Inclusion criteria included Walch A1, A2 or B2 glenoid, a diagnosis of primary shoulder osteoarthritis, and a minimum radiographic and clinical follow-up of 5 years. 43 patients with B2 glenoids were compared to a cohort of 42 patients with A1 or A2 glenoids. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and radiographs were utilized to assess deformity, glenoid version, and posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Postoperatively, patients were assessed with radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). RESULTS: 85 shoulders (82 patients, 42 B2 and 43 A1/A2 glenoids) with an average follow-up of 9.4 years were included. In the B2 cohort, the average retroversion was 21.1° and posterior subluxation was 69.4% compared with 10.6°(p<0.001) and 57.5% (p<0.001) in the A1 or A2 cohort. The cohort demographics were similar except for male sex (B2 69.8% vs A1 or A2 37.2%, p=0.008). There was no difference between the cohorts in their improvement in ASES (p=0.807), SST (p=0.586), or VAS (p=0.930) scores. There was no difference in lateral humeral offset (p=0.889) or acromial humeral interval (p=0.468) between initial postoperative and final follow-up visits. Survivorship for B2 glenoids was 97.6%, 94.1% and 73.3% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively compared to 97.6%, 91.9% and 83.5% in type A glenoids. The revision rate was similar between the two groups (p=0.432). Lazarus score (p=0.682) and rates of humeral radiolucency (p=0.366) and humeral osteolysis (p=0.194) were similar between the two cohorts at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Asymmetric reaming of patients with B2 glenoids is a reliable method of glenoid preparation with excellent mid- to long-term clinical results, patient reported outcomes, and low revision rates similar to their A1 and A2 counterparts.

Glenosphere Size Does Not Matter in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Objective There are few studies to date reporting on outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with cohorts stratified by glenosphere size. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role that glenosphere size has on postoperative outcomes. Methods Patients who underwent reverse TSA between 1987 with minimum of 2.0 years of follow-up were included. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on glenosphere size of 36mm or 40mm. Patients' range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic variables (glenoid preoperative morphology, scapular notching, humeral loosening) were evaluated. Results All measurements of range of motion measurements with the exception of internal rotation saw significant preoperative to postoperative improvements within each cohort. There were no significant differences in postoperative range of motion, ASES, or VAS pain scores across the two cohorts. Overall, forward elevation improved to 134° ± 16° in the 36mm cohort and 133° ± 14° in the 40mm cohort ( p = 0.47). External rotation improved to 37° ± 13° for 36mm patients and 35° ± 19° for 40mm patients ( p = 0.58). In the 36mm group, internal rotation increased by 1.3 vertebral levels and 2.3 vertebral levels in the 40mm cohort. At final follow-up, the 36mm cohort had a VAS score of 2 ± 2, ASES score of 66 ± 19, and SST score of 6 ± 3. Similarly, the 40mm cohort had a VAS score of 2 ± 3, ASES score of 77 ± 28, and SST score of 9 ± 3. Conclusions Reverse TSA provides sustained improvements in range of motion and shoulder function irrespective of glenosphere size. Level of Evidence III.

Effect of patient-reported allergies on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes at over two years follow-up.

Background/aims: Understanding the factors that lead to poor outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is important to appropriate patient counseling. While patient-reported allergies (PRAs) have been shown to be associated with poorer outcomes after both TKA and THA, their effect on rTSA outcomes remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of zero, one, and two or more preoperative PRAs on clinical outcomes after rTSA at over two years follow-up in a cohort of fifty-two patients from our institution. Methods: Patients who underwent rTSA and had a minimum follow-up time of two years were identified from an institutional database. Patients were split into cohorts of zero, one, and two or more PRAs. Range of motion (ROM) was assessed by degrees of forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score. Results: Fifty-two patients, 10 of whom reported one allergy and 11 of whom reported two or more allergies, were included in our analysis. Mean ROM and PROs improved after rTSA in each cohort. Differences in ROM and PROs between cohorts did not reach statistical significance; however, patients with PRAs tended to have worse preoperative forward elevation, VAS score, and ASES score. Two patients in the zero-allergy cohort required revision (6 %). Conclusion: This study found no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes among cohorts of patients with zero, one, or two or more preoperative PRAs after rTSA at over two years follow-up. However, patients with PRAs tended to have lower preoperative functional scores. We postulate that this may be the result of psychosomatic factors at play in these patients. PRAs should not dissuade patients or clinicians from pursuing rTSA.

Cemented vs. press-fit humeral stems: a matched cohort analysis at a mean follow-up of 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Although cementation of humeral stems has long been considered the gold standard for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), cementless, or press-fit, fixation offers a relatively cheaper and less demanding alternative, particularly in the setting of a revision procedure. However, this approach has been accompanied by concerns of implant loosening and high rates of radiolucency. In the present study, we performed a propensity-matched comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes between cemented and cementless fixation techniques for aTSA. We hypothesized that cemented fixation of the humeral component would have significantly better implant survival while providing comparable functional outcomes at final follow-up. METHODS: This study was a retrospective comparison of 50 shoulders undergoing aTSA: 25 using cemented humeral fixation vs. 25 using press-fit humeral fixation. Patients in the 2 groups were propensity matched according to age, sex, and preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score. Primary outcome measures included range of motion (ROM) (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation), patient-reported outcomes (ASES, Simple Shoulder Test [SST], visual analog scale [VAS]), and implant survival. RESULTS: At baseline, the 2 fixation groups were similar in regard to age, sex, body mass index, preoperative ASES score, and surgical indication. Mean follow-up was 11.7 ± 4.95 years in the cemented cohort and 9.13 ± 3.77 years in the press-fit cohort (P = .045). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements postoperatively in all included ROM and patient-reported outcomes. However, press-fit patients reported significantly better VAS, ASES, and SST scores. Mean VAS pain score was 1.1 ± 1.8 in press-fit patients and 3.2 ± 3.0 in cemented patients (P = .005). The mean ASES score was 87.7 ± 12.4 in press-fit patients and 69.5 ± 22.7 in cemented patients (P = .002). Lastly, the mean SST score was 9.8 ± 3.1 in press-fit patients and 7.7 ± 3.7 in cemented patients (P = .040). Both fixation techniques provided lasting implant survivorship with only a single revision operation in each of the cohorts. CONCLUSION: Herein, we provide a propensity-matched, long-term comparison of patients receiving anatomic shoulder arthroplasty stratified according to humeral stem fixation technique. The results of this analysis illustrate that both types of humeral fixation techniques yield durable and significant improvements in shoulder function with similar rates of survival at 10 years of follow-up.

Mid-term outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty now exceeds the incidence of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Previous mid-to-long-term studies on rTSA have reported a decrease in shoulder function as follow-up increased. The purpose of this study was to provide data on mid-term outcomes and implant survival in a series focusing on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demographic information such as age at surgery, revision surgery status, BMI, and smoking status were recorded. The clinical endpoints measured in this study were range of motion scores (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation) and patient reported outcomes (VAS, ASES, SST). Radiographic variables captured included preoperative glenoid morphology, humeral lucency, and glenoid loosening. RESULTS: Fifty-six shoulders were included in this study. The overall mean age at surgery was 72.5 ± 7.2 years with an average follow-up time of 6.8 ± 3.5 years. The mean BMI was 28.1 ± 5.5. All measurements of range of motion saw significant and sustained improvements. Overall, forward elevation improved from 82° preoperatively to 133° postoperatively (p < 0.01). External rotation improved from 23° preoperatively to 36° (p < 0.01), while internal rotation improved from L3 to L1 (p = 0.05). ASES scores improved from 31 preoperatively to 70 postoperatively (p < 0.01). SST scores improved from 2 preoperatively to 7 (p < 0.01). VAS pain index scores improved from 6 to 2 following surgery (p < 0.01). Postoperative scapular notching was seen in 18 patients at final follow-up. Glenoid loosening was seen in 3 shoulders. Humeral loosening was seen in 18 shoulders. Tuberosity resorption was seen in 8 shoulders. The 5 year survival estimate was 98%, and the 10 year survival estimate was 83%. CONCLUSION: In this series, we found that rTSA provides mid-term improvements in range of motion in patients while reducing pain levels. When considered together, this demonstrates that most patients undergoing rTSA can have excellent use of their shoulder from age at surgery to end-of-life.

Improved functional, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes at midterm follow-up for shoulder arthroplasty patients 75 years and older.

Background: Current discussion centers around the appropriateness of shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients, and whether anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty yield acceptable results in this population. The purpose of this study was to examine midterm outcomes in patients 75 years and older who underwent either procedure. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) between 2000 and 2018. Inclusion criteria was patient age ≥75 years at time of surgery and ≥1 years postoperative follow-up. Primary outcomes were differences in Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, and range of motion. A secondary outcome was revision surgery. Results: 22 patients who underwent aTSA and 17 patients who underwent rTSA were included. Mean age at surgery was 79 and 80 in the aTSA and rTSA groups, respectively. Mean postoperative follow-up was 6.6 years across both cohorts. Anatomic TSA patients experienced improvements in VAS (7 preop vs. 1 postop; p < 0.001), ASES (16 vs. 75; p < 0.001), and SST (2 vs. 8; p < 0.001) scores. Reverse TSA patients also experienced improvements in VAS (7 vs. 1; p < 0.001), ASES (29 vs. 74; p < 0.001), and SST (1 vs. 7; p < 0.001) scores. Anatomic TSA patients experienced improved external rotation (17° vs. 53°; p < 0.001), forward elevation (108° vs. 155°; p < 0.001), and internal rotation (L5 vs. T10; p < 0.001). Reverse TSA patients experienced improved forward elevation (52° vs. 126°; p < 0.001). 21 aTSA patients (100%) and 16 rTSA patients (94%) experienced survival free from revision. 100% of aTSA and rTSA patients experienced survival free from loosening. Conclusion: Both aTSA and rTSA can be performed in the elderly population with acceptable midterm outcomes, suggesting that implant survival and patient satisfaction have the potential to endure through the end of life. Level of evidence: IV.

Evaluating the effects of age on the long-term functional outcomes following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, the number of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) procedures has steadily increased. Patients over 65 years of age comprise the vast majority of recipients, and outcomes have been well documented; however, patients are opting for definitive surgical treatment at younger ages.We aim to report on the effects of age on the long-term clinical outcomes following aTSA. METHODS: Among the patients who underwent TSA, 119 shoulders were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome data were collected. Linear regression analysis (univariate and multivariate) was conducted to evaluate the associations of clinical outcomes with age. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate implant survival. RESULTS: At final follow-up, patients of all ages undergoing aTSA experienced significant and sustained improvements in all primary outcome measures compared with preoperative values. Based on multivariate analysis, age at the time of surgery was a significant predictor of postoperative outcomes. Excellent implant survival was observed over the course of this study, and Cox regression survival analysis indicated age and sex to not be associated with an increased risk of implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: When controlling for sex and follow-up duration, older age was associated with significantly better patient-reported outcome measures. Despite this difference, we noted no significant effects on range of motion or implant survival. Level of evidence: IV.

Does humeral fixation technique affect long-term outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: For anatomic total arthroscopic repair, cementless humeral fixation has recently gained popularity. However, few studies have compared clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes between cemented and press-fit humeral fixation, and none have performed follow-up for longer than 5 years. In this study, we compared long-term postoperative outcomes in patients receiving a cemented versus press-fit humeral stem anatomic arthroscopic repair. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 169 shoulders that required primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Shoulders were stratified by humeral stem fixation technique: cementation or press-fit. Data were collected pre- and postoperatively. Primary outcome measures included range of motion, patient reported outcomes, and radiographic measures. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight cemented humeral stems and 31 press-fit stems were included. Significant improvements in range of motion were seen in all aTSA patients with no significant differences between final cemented and press-fit stems (forward elevation: P=0.12, external rotation: P=0.60, and internal rotation: P=0.77). Patient reported outcome metrics also exhibited sustained improvement through final follow-up. However, at final follow-up, the press-fit stem cohort had significantly better overall scores when compared to the cemented cohort (visual analog score: P=0.04, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score: P<0.01, Simple Shoulder Test score: P=0.03). Humeral radiolucency was noted in two cemented implants and one press-fit implant. No significant differences in implant survival were observed between the two cohorts (P=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, we found that irrespective of humeral fixation technique, aTSA significantly improves shoulder function. However, within this cohort, press-fit stems provided significantly better outcomes than cemented stems in terms of patient reported outcome scores. Level of evidence: III.

Superior migration of the humeral head does not significantly affect outcomes at an average of 11 years after total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Superior migration of the humeral head has been linked with rotator cuff dysfunction and glenoid loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We aimed to determine if superior migration was associated with poor shoulder function following anatomic TSA at long-term follow-up. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed patients undergoing TSA by a single surgeon at an urban, academic institution. To study the effect of superior migration on TSA outcomes, we stratified the cohort by ≥ and <7 mm of acromiohumeral interval (AHI) and compared range of motion and patient reported outcomes (PROs). Clinical variables included preoperative and postoperative forward elevation (FE), internal rotation, external rotation, visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, and Simple Shoulder Text score. Radiographic variables included immediate postoperative and long-term follow-up AHI, lateral humeral offset, and glenoid loosening scores. RESULTS: After applying exclusion criteria, 121 TSAs were included. The mean age was 63.9 ± 9.5 years, and 66 surgeries (55%) were in male patients. The mean follow-up for our cohort was 11.2 years (range, 5-26 years). Nine shoulders underwent revision surgery. All range of motion and PROs improved significantly from preoperative to the most recent postoperative follow-up. The mean AHI immediately following surgery was 10.9 ± 4.1 mm, while the mean AHI at most recent follow-up was 8.4 ± 3.5 mm. Glenoid loosening was observed in 29 (23.8%) shoulders at the most recent follow-up appointment. Although AHI correlated weakly with FE (r = 0.252; P = .006), we did not observe a clear threshold of migration which led to degraded function. Importantly, glenoid loosening was not related to AHI at long-term follow-up (P = .631). None of FE, internal rotation, external rotation, visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, Simple Shoulder Text, or revisions were significantly different between patients with ≥ and <7 mm of AHI. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that anatomic TSA provides durable improvements to pain, function, and PROs despite changes to the AHI.

A comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Background: The two main glenoid types used in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are the pegged and keeled glenoid designs. We aimed to determine if a pegged glenoid is superior to a keeled glenoid at long-term follow-up as measured by range of motion (ROM), patient reported outcomes (PROs), and radiographic glenoid loosening. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing TSA by a single surgeon at an urban, academic hospital. The cohort was stratified into two groups based on glenoid type - one group consisting of keeled implants and a second group consisting of pegged implants. For each patient, forward elevation (FE), internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, and simple shoulder test (SST) scores were collected preoperatively and at the most recent follow-up visit. Radiographic variables included acromiohumeral interval (AHI) and glenoid loosening. Results: After applying exclusion criteria, 144 TSAs were included in our study. Of these, 42 (29.2%) had keeled glenoids and 102 (70.8%) had pegged glenoids. Patients with a pegged glenoid implant were older (67.4 vs. 60.7 years; p < 0.001) and had a shorter follow-up time (9.3 vs. 14.4 years; p < 0.001) than patients with a keeled glenoid implant. At the most recent follow-up visit, there were no significant differences among postoperative FE, ER, AHI, or PROs. However, pegged glenoid implants provided significantly more internal rotation (T11 vs. L1; p = 0.010) and were less likely to show evidence of radiographic glenoid loosening (16.7% vs. 42.9%; p=<0.001). Revision rates were not significantly different between the pegged and keeled groups (6.9% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.158). Conclusion: Although a pegged design correlated with superior internal rotation and less radiographic glenoid loosening, both pegged and keeled glenoid designs offered favorable long-term clinical outcomes following TSA over the long-term.

The impact of tobacco use on clinical outcomes and long-term survivorship after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Introduction: Postoperative outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty can be affected by preoperative health factors such as tobacco usage. Methods: The charts of patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty were retrospectively analyzed and stratified based on smoking status. The primary data included range of motion and patient reported outcomes. Additionally, demographic, radiographic, and survivorship analyses were conducted. All data were analyzed using statistical inference. Results: There were 78, 49, and 16 non-smoker, former smoker, and current smoker shoulders respectively with no significant differences in sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, body mass index, or mean follow-up time (average: 10.7 yrs). Smokers (51.5 ± 10.4 years) were younger than both non-smokers (64.9 ± 8.1 years; p < 0.01) and former smokers (65.1 ± 9.1years; p < 0.01) at the time of surgery. For non-smokers and former smokers, all range of motion and patient reported outcome scores significantly improved. Smokers reported significant improvements in all patient reported outcomes and external and internal rotation. Visual Analog Scale, American Shoulder and Elbow, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were lower for smokers comparatively, but these differences did not reach significance. Forward elevation was higher postoperatively for non-smokers (149.7o ± 17.2o) and former smokers (147.1o ± 26.0o) compared to current smokers (130.9o ± 41.2o; p = 0.017). No differences between the cohorts were found in the radiographic analysis. Revision rates were lower in the non-smoking cohort (7.7%) compared to both former (20.4%; p = 0.036) and current smokers (37.5%; p < 0.01). Survival curves showed that non-smoker implants lasted longer than those of current smokers. Conclusion: After a decade, patients generally had improved shoulder range of motion, functionality, and pain regardless of smoking status. However, current smokers required shoulder replacements sooner and revision surgery more frequently.

Does body mass index influence long-term outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: As of 2018, upwards of 42% of the US adult population was considered obese based on body mass index (BMI) scales. With the annual number of total joint replacements increasing, this study aimed to evaluate the impact BMI has on anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 128 shoulders requiring primary aTSA. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts based on their BMI at surgery: underweight/normal weight (U/NW; BMI ≤25.0), overweight (25.0 < BMI ≤ 30.0), and obese (BMI >30.0). BMI was separately analyzed as a continuous variable. Clinical endpoints were range of motion scores, including forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation, and patient-reported outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS) scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) scores, and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). Survivorship curves were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Forty-four, 50, and 34 patient shoulders were in the U/NW, overweight, and obese cohorts, respectively. The mean follow-up time was 11.4 years. The U/NW cohort had more females (73%) compared with the overweight (34%; P = .0030) and obese (35%; P = .0015) groups; no differences were seen in revision rates. BMI was negatively correlated with age at surgery (r = -0.19, P = .014); it was not correlated with any of the 6 postoperative clinical endpoints. All 3 cohorts saw significant improvements in forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation and VAS, ASES, and SST scores when compared preoperatively to postoperatively (P < .001). There were no significant differences between the 3 cohorts with respect to postoperative range of motion. Postoperative ASES scores were higher for the overweight cohort (82.6 ± 18.6) compared with both the U/NW (63.0 ± 25.1) and obese cohorts (70.5 ± 26.8) (P < .001). The overweight cohort also had higher SST (P = .0012) postoperative scores compared with the U/NW and obese cohorts; VAS scores were comparable between groups (P = .12). The nonobese (BMI <30) group (n = 94) showed 5-, 10-, and 15-year implant survival of 98.9%, 94.9%, and 83.9%, respectively compared to 97.1%, 93.7%, and 87.0% in the obese (BMI ≥30) group (n = 34). The log rank test revealed no significant difference in survival curves (P = .82). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the longest follow-up study analyzing clinical endpoints stratified by BMI for aTSA. We saw that patients with a higher BMI required shoulder replacement at a significantly younger age. However, we also report that regardless of BMI, all patients saw significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes and range of motion scores postoperatively.

Mid-term outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi transfer.

Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is a common treatment for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy who have failed a prior rotator cuff repair. Latissimus dorsi transfer can be performed simultaneously to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for patients with preoperative external rotation deficiency. Current literature is limited with several studies providing functional and pain improvements at short-term follow-up; however, there is a deficit in data regarding mid-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi transfer with mid-term follow-up. We hypothesized significant improvement in external rotation and shoulder functionality for patients with preoperative external rotation lag. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi transfer. Preoperative and postoperative changes in range of motion were assessed. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score and the Simple Shoulder Test were used to evaluate changes in shoulder function while pain scores were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Radiographs were reviewed for rotator cuff arthropathy, fatty infiltration, scapular notching, baseplate loosening, and osteolysis. We reported frequency and mean ± standard deviation for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Means were compared using the paired Student's t-test and proportions using the Chi-square test. Results: Fifteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the cohort was 71.7 ± 8.4 years (range 51.2-87.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 6.3 ± 4.1 years (range 1.0-14.5 years). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi transfer improved external rotation (-7 ± 21.3° to 38 ± 15.8°; p value = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference regarding forward flexion (116.3 ± 45.4° to 133.7 ± 14.7°; p value = 0.17) and internal rotation (T12 to L2; p value = 0.57). The procedure led to an increase in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score scores (37 ± 19 to 62 ± 22; p = 0.005) and Simple Shoulder Test scores (2 ± 2 to 6 ± 3; p value = 0.001) with a significant reduction in Visual Analog Scale scores (5 ± 3 to 2 ± 3; p value = 0.022). The procedure corrected external rotation lag in 10 patients. Radiographically, rotator cuff arthropathy was found to be grade 3 in two patients, grade 4 A in four patients, grade 4B in eight patients, and grade 5 in one patient. On postoperative imaging, scapular notching was found in six patients (40%). Twelve patients had cortical humeral erosion at the site of the latissimus dorsi transfer. Only one patient experienced a shoulder-related complication which was aseptic baseplate loosening and required a revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with allograft. Conclusions: In this study, patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi transfer experienced improvements in range of motion, functional scores, and pain at mid-term follow-up. The shoulder-related complication rate was low.Level of evidence: IV; Case series.

Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty in patients under age 60 years.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to characterize the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients aged < 60 years. We hypothesized meaningful improvements in shoulder functionality and pain with TSA and an acceptably low rate of prosthesis complications and revisions. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 29 patients (34 shoulders) undergoing TSA before age 60 years with a minimum follow-up period of 10 years. Shoulder range of motion, functionality (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Simple Shoulder Test scores), and pain (visual analog scale score) were evaluated. Radiographs were assessed for lateral humeral offset, the acromiohumeral interval, and glenoid loosening. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 54.4 ± 5.5 years (range, 35.5-59.8 years), with a mean follow-up period of 16.1 ± 4.5 years (range, 10.0-26.1 years). In patients aged < 60 years, TSA significantly improved forward elevation (from 119° ± 26° to 146° ± 21°, P = .0002), external rotation (from 21° ± 25° to 52° ± 15°, P = .0001), and internal rotation (from L5 to L1, P = .002). Additionally, TSA significantly increased American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (from 32 ± 20 to 64 ± 27, P = .0008) and Simple Shoulder Test scores (from 3 ± 2 to 7 ± 4, P = .0004) and reduced visual analog scale pain scores (from 7 ± 3 to 3 ± 3, P = .0001). Radiographically, there was no significant difference in mean lateral humeral offset (13 ± 6 mm vs. 10 ± 12 mm, P = .472) or the mean acromiohumeral interval (20 ± 4.2 mm vs. 16 ± 6 mm, P = .061) between immediate postoperative and final follow-up radiographs. Radiographic evidence of glenoid loosening was noted in 2 patients. Complications occurred in 6 patients (17.6%), all of which were cases of aseptic glenoid loosening. Ultimately, 4 patients underwent conversion to a reverse TSA and 2 underwent arthroscopic glenoid removal. The rate of prosthesis survivorship was 97.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.4%-100%) at 10 years, 85.4% (95% CI, 73.7%-97.2%) at 15 years, and 80.1% (95% CI, 65.1%-98.4%) at 20 years. DISCUSSION: TSA consistently improved shoulder functionality and reduced pain while limiting the need for further revisions. These findings suggest that TSA is a viable treatment option for glenohumeral arthritis in younger patients.

Survivorship of total shoulder arthroplasty vs. hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of avascular necrosis at greater than 10-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is a debilitating pathology that can be managed with an array of treatments depending on disease staging. Humeral head arthroplasty for AVN has demonstrated good short-term improvements in pain and range of motion, but the published long-term outcomes data are limited. The objective of this study was to report long-term survivorship and outcomes for patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for the treatment of AVN of the humeral head. METHODS: The practice of one fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon was queried for the surgical treatment of AVN of the humeral head via appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, codes. Sixteen shoulders that met inclusion criteria were identified. Demographics included the radiographic stage, age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and body mass index. The primary endpoint was survivorship of the implant. Secondary endpoints were range of motion in forward elevation, internal and external rotation, visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, and the Simple Shoulder Test score. RESULTS: Of the 16 shoulders included in the study, 10 underwent HA and 6 underwent TSA. The TSA cohort was significantly older (mean 60.5 vs. 44.2, P = .005), with a higher mean ASA score (mean 3.0 vs. 2.13, P = .02) than the HA group. The 10-year survivorship rates were 88.9% for HA and 80% for TSA with no significant difference between groups. Survivorship data were available for a mean 13.0 ± 5.6 years' follow-up in the HA group and 13.8 ± 4.8 years in the TSA group. When compared to one another, the results between HA and TSA only differed in internal rotation, which was statistically significantly improved in the TSA group compared with HA (2.3 ± 2.6 compared with -3.0 ± 5.0, P = .03). CONCLUSION: The survivorship of both TSA and HA for the treatment of AVN was at least 80% at 10 years. Secondary endpoints, such as range of motion, pain, and shoulder function, improved significantly postoperatively in each cohort and were similar between the 2 groups, except for internal rotation, which had improved significantly more in the TSA group than in HA. Both TSA and HA are viable options for the treatment of AVN, each with durable long-term survival.

Everything pectoralis major: from repair to transfer.

Background: Pectoralis major ruptures are increasing in incidence primarily due to an increase in awareness, activity level among young males between 20 and 40 years of age, and use of anabolic steroids. Although the majority of pectoralis major ruptures are acute injuries, many chronic ruptures are unrecognized and it is imperative to understand the proper evaluation of these injuries, as well as the appropriate treatment for acute and chronic ruptures.Purpose: Pectoralis major ruptures can lead to deformity and physical disability if left untreated. This review paper discusses both acute and chronic ruptures as well as indications for nonoperative treatment and operative treatment to give the reader the best understanding of this diagnosis and proper management.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using a search of electronic databases. Search terms such as pectoralis major rupture, pectoralis major repair, pectoralis major tendon transfer, and pectoralis major nonoperative treatment were used. Case reports, systematic reviews, prospective and retrospective studies were included to provide a comprehensive review. The only exclusion criteria consisted of studies not published in English. This review article includes the anatomy and biomechanics of the pectoralis major muscle, proper evaluation of the patient, operative and nonoperative treatment of acute and chronic pectoralis major ruptures, and outcomes of the recommended treatment.Conclusion: Nonoperative treatment is indicated for patients with medical comorbidities, older age, incomplete tears, or irreparable damage. Patients treated non-operatively have been shown to lose strength, but regain full range of motion. Patients with surgery before 6 weeks reported better outcomes than patients with surgery between 6 and 8 weeks. The chronicity of the rupture (>8 weeks) increases the likelihood of reconstruction, involving the use of autografts or allografts. Patients treated with delayed repair had significantly better strength, satisfaction, and outcomes than patients with nonoperative treatment. The pectoralis tendon can also be transferred in patients with rotators cuff tears, atrophy, or significant functional limitation. Tendon transfers have been shown to have unpredictable outcomes, but overall satisfactory results.

Retrospective review of open and arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears with subscapularis involvement: a single surgeon's experience.

BACKGROUND: There have been conflicting results when comparing outcomes of open vs. arthroscopic anterosuperior rotator cuff repairs with subscapularis involvement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate midterm outcome differences and complications following open vs. arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis by a single surgeon. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 57 rotator cuff repairs involving the subscapularis performed by a single surgeon over a 10-year period. During this time, the surgeon transitioned from open to arthroscopic repair. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, lift-off test, belly press test, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment form scores were measured. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had open procedures and 39 had arthroscopic repair. The mean preoperative ASES score for the open group was 39 and postoperatively was 79. The mean preoperative ASES score for the arthroscopic group was 44 and improved to 80 postoperatively. There was no significant difference in score or change in score between the 2 groups (P > .05). There was only 1 complication. It occurred in the open group and was a superficial wound dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated no outcome differences between open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair involving the subscapularis, even with large subscapularis tears. Both techniques significantly improved shoulder function. Arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repairs including the subscapularis are relatively safe procedures, and either technique is an acceptable option.

Multiscale mechanisms of tendon fatigue damage progression and severity are strain and cycle dependent.

Tendinopathies are common chronic injuries that occur when damage accumulation caused by sub-rupture fatigue loading outpaces repair. Studies have linked fatigue loading with various mechanical, structural, and biological changes associated with pathology. However, the multiscale progression of damage accumulation with respect to area, severity and the distinct contributions of strain level and number of cycles has not been fully elucidated. The objective of this study was to investigate multiscale mechanisms underlying fatigue damage accumulation and their effect on the cellular environment. Using an in situ model in rat tail tendon (RTT), fatigue loading was applied at various strains and cycle numbers to induce fatigue damage. Pre- and post- fatigue diagnostic mechanical testing, second harmonic generation (SHG) imaging, and transmission electron microscope (TEM) imaging were used to investigate extracellular and cellular damage modes at multiple scales. Fatigue loading at strains at or below 1.0% resulted in no significant changes in SHG damage area or severity and no changes in collagen fibril or cell morphology compared with controls. Fatigue loading at strains above 1.5% resulted in greater mechanical changes correlated with increased damage area measured by SHG and collagenous damage observed by TEM. Increased cycles at high strain further altered mechanical properties, increased structural damage severity (but not area), and altered TEM collagen rupture patterns. Cell morphology was similarly progressively affected with increased strain and cycle number. These damage mechanisms that may trigger degenerative changes characteristic of tendinopathy could be targeted as a part of prevention or therapy.

Promoting effective tendon healing and remodeling.

Daily activities subject our tendons to accumulation of sub-rupture fatigue injury which can lead to tendon rupture. Consequently, tendinopathies account for over 30% of musculoskeletal consultations. We adopted a multidisciplinary approach to determine the role of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in the pathogenesis of tendinopathy and impaired healing of ruptured tendons. We have been investigating three main areas: (i) the pathogenesis of tendon degeneration; (ii) approaches to promoting remodeling of sub-rupture fatigue injuries; and the (iii) role of the ECM in promoting scarless tendon healing. In this Kappa Delta Young Investigator award paper, we describe the key discoveries made in each of our three research areas of focus. Briefly, we discovered that sub-rupture fatigue damage can accumulate from just one bout of fatigue loading. Furthermore, any attempt to repair the fatigue damage diminishes as the severity of induced damage increases. We have utilized exercise to develop animal models of exercise-led degeneration and exercise-led repair of sub-rupture fatigue damage injuries, wherein underlying mechanisms can be uncovered, thereby overcoming a major hurdle to development of therapeutics. Since damage accumulation ultimately leads to rupture that is characterized by formation of a mechanically inferior scar, we have used the MRL/MpJ mouse to evaluate the role of the systemic environment and the local tendon environment in driving regeneration to identify new therapeutic pathways to promote scarless healing. Our data suggests that the therapeutic potential of the MRL/MpJ provisional ECM should be further explored as it may harness biological and structural mechanisms to promote scarless healing. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:3115-3124, 2018.