The transition to consultant: Identifying gaps in higher specialist training.

BACKGROUND: New consultants consistently feel better prepared for the clinical rather than non-clinical aspects of their role. However, deficiencies in generic competencies have been linked to burnout and patient complaints. This study explored how higher specialty training prepares doctors for the transition to consultant in genitourinary medicine. RESULTS: New consultants felt less prepared for non-clinical aspects of their role. Prior practical experience was the greatest influencing factor in levels of preparedness, with increased responsibility and leadership driving deeper learning. Observation of others helped individuals develop a professional identity but also learn about the wider processes within their service. The learning environment positively influenced preparedness but highlighted a need for dedicated time to learn non-clinical aspects. CONCLUSION: To ensure future trainees feel prepared for the non-clinical aspects of the consultant role, practical experience of non-clinical areas with high levels of leadership and responsibility within a supportive learning environment is essential.

A not very NICE case of endocarditis.

A 69-year-old man, previously independent and with a pre-existing metallic aortic valve, presented with a history of fevers, confusion and malaise and was diagnosed with prosthetic valve endocarditis. Blood cultures taken on presentation grew Streptococcus sanguinis and vegetations were confirmed on transoesophageal echocardiogram. He had had a dental procedure 10 days before presentation but had not received prophylactic antibiotics; he had been receiving antibiotic prophylaxis for dental treatment up until the change in NICE guidelines in 2008. He was treated with high dose antibiotics and was referred for cardiothoracic surgery, but developed a cerebrovascular event, thought to be embolic, and deteriorated and died. Given that the patient had a metallic aortic valve and poor dentition, and therefore was at increased risk of infective endocarditis, should the new guidelines have been followed so rigidly, particularly as American and European guidelines still recommend the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in this patient group?