Shift in sleep apnoea type in heart failure patients in the CANPAP trial.

In patients with heart failure (HF), the predominant type of sleep apnoea can change over time in association with alterations in circulation time. The aim of this study was to determine whether, in some patients with HF, a spontaneous shift from mainly central (>50% central events) to mainly obstructive (>50% obstructive events) sleep apnoea (CSA and OSA, respectively) over time coincides with improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Therefore, sleep studies and LVEFs of HF patients with CSA from the control arm of the Canadian Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Patients with Central Sleep Apnea and Heart Failure (CANPAP) trial were examined to determine whether some converted to mainly OSA and, if so, whether this was associated with an increase in LVEF. Of 98 patients with follow-up sleep studies and LVEFs, 18 converted spontaneously to predominantly OSA. Compared with those in the nonconversion group, those in the conversion group had a significantly greater increase in the LVEF (2.8% versus -0.07%) and a significantly greater fall in the lung-to-ear circulation time (-7.6 s versus 0.6 s). In patients with HF, spontaneous conversion from predominantly CSA to OSA is associated with an improvement in left ventricular systolic function. Future studies will be necessary to further examine this relationship.

Initial use of portable monitoring versus polysomnography to confirm obstructive sleep apnea in symptomatic patients: an economic decision model.

BACKGROUND: When using portable (level III and level IV) studies to "rule in" obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in symptomatic patients, the pre-test probability (P) needs to be sufficiently high to minimize patients with negative tests who require full polysomnography. METHODS: We used a theoretical decision analysis model to assess the pre-test probability above which it would be appropriate to use portable studies to rule in disease in symptomatic patients with suspected OSA. For the base case, we considered a symptomatically sleepy patient referred with a probability of OSA of P. We determined the lower threshold of P appropriate for a clinical algorithm based upon an initial ambulatory study compared to initial diagnosis with PSG by comparing costs using the PSG algorithm with a diagnostic algorithm involving initial assessment with a portable study. RESULTS: In our base case, the pre-test probability above which portable testing would be less costly than initial diagnostic PSG would be 0.47. When an initial split night study was compared to portable testing, the pre-test probability above which portable testing was more economically attractive was greater (0.68). Values of P, however, varied considerably depending on values of many variables, including costs of diagnostic testing and CPAP compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Using a decision model, we have developed a theoretical framework to ascertain the pre-test disease probability above which portable studies would be economically attractive as an initial test in the assessment of patients with suspected OSA.

Cost-effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea (OSAH) is a common disorder characterized by recurrent collapse of the upper airway during sleep. Patients experience a reduced quality of life and an increased risk of motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which is the first-line therapy for OSAH, improves sleepiness, vigilance and quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of CPAP therapy versus no treatment for OSAH patients who are drivers. METHODS: A Markov decision analytical model with a five-year time horizon was used. The study population consisted of male and female patients, between 30 and 59 years of age, who were newly diagnosed with moderate to severe OSAH. The model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of CPAP therapy in reducing rates of MVCs and improving quality of life. Utility values were obtained from previously published studies. Rates of MVCs under the CPAP and no CPAP scenarios were calculated from Insurance Corporation of British Columbia data and a systematic review of published studies. MVCs, equipment and physician costs were obtained from the British Columbia Medical Association, published cost-of-illness studies and the price lists of established vendors of CPAP equipment in British Columbia. Findings were examined from the perspectives of a third-party payer and society. RESULTS: From the third-party payer perspective, CPAP therapy was more effective but more costly than no CPAP (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] of $3,626 per quality-adjusted life year). From the societal perspective, the ICER was similar ($2,979 per quality-adjusted life year). The ICER was most dependent on preference elicitation method used to obtain utility values, varying almost sixfold under alternative assumptions from the base-case analysis. CONCLUSION: After considering costs and impact on quality of life, as well as the risk of MVCs in individuals with OSAH, CPAP therapy for OSAH patients is a highly efficient use of health care resources. Provincial governments who do not provide funding for CPAP therapy should reconsider.

Risk and severity of motor vehicle crashes in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea (OSAH) appears to be associated with an increased risk of motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). However, its impact on crash patterns, particularly the severity of crashes, has not been well described. A study was undertaken to determine whether OSAH severity influenced crash severity in patients referred for investigation of suspected sleep-disordered breathing. METHODS: Objective crash data (including the nature of crashes) for 783 patients with suspected OSAH for the 3 years prior to polysomnography were obtained from provincial insurance records and compared with data for 783 age- and sex-matched controls. The patient group was 71% male with a mean age of 50 years, a mean apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) of 22 events/h and a mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 10. RESULTS: There were 375 crashes in the 3-year period, 252 in patients and 123 in controls. Compared with controls, patients with mild, moderate and severe OSAH had an increased rate of MVCs with relative risks of 2.6 (95% CI 1.7 to 3.9), 1.9 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.8) and 2.0 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.0), respectively. Patients with suspected OSAH and normal polysomnography (AHI 0-5) did not have an increased rate of MVC (relative risk 1.5 (95% CI 0.9 to 2.5), p = 0.21). When the impact of OSAH on MVC associated with personal injury was examined, patients with mild, moderate and severe OSAH had a substantially higher rate of MVCs than controls with relative risks of 4.8 (95% CI 1.8 to 12.4), 3.0 (95% CI 1.3 to 7.0) and 4.3 (95% CI 1.8 to 8.9), respectively, whereas patients without OSAH had similar crash rates to controls with a relative risk of 0.6 (95% CI 0.2 to 2.5). Very severe MVCs (head-on collisions or those involving pedestrians or cyclists) were rare, but 80% of these occurred in patients with OSAH (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Patients with OSAH have increased rates of MVCs, and disproportionately increased rates of MVCs are associated with personal injury.

The impact of obstructive sleep apnea and daytime sleepiness on work limitation.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) participate in the work force. However, the impact of OSA and sleepiness on work performance is unclear. METHODS: To address this issue, we administered the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ), and an occupational survey to patients undergoing full-night polysomnography for the investigation of sleep-disordered breathing. Of 498 patients enrolled in the study, 428 (86.0%) completed the questionnaires. Their mean age+/-standard deviation (SD) was 49+/-12 years, mean body mass index (BMI) was 31+/-7 kg/m(2) mean apnea hypopnea index (AHI) was 21+/-22 events/h, and mean ESS score was 10+/-5. Subjects worked a mean of 39+/-18 h per week. The first 100 patients to complete the survey were followed up at two years. RESULTS: In the group as a whole, there was no significant relationship between severity of OSA and the four dimensions of work limitation. However, in blue-collar workers, significant differences were detected between patients with mild OSA (AHI 5-15/h) and those with severe OSA (AHI>30/h) with respect to time management (limited 23.1% of the time vs. 43.8%, p=0.05) and mental/personnel interactions (17.9% vs. 33.0%, p=0.05). In contrast, there were strong associations between subjective sleepiness (as assessed by the ESS) and three of the four scales of work limitation. That is, patients with an ESS of 5 had much less work limitation compared to those with an ESS 18 in terms of time management (19.7% vs. 38.6 %, p<0.001), mental-interpersonal relationships (15.5% vs. 36.0%, p<0.001) and work output (16.8% vs. 36.0%; p<0.001). Of the group followed up, 49 returned surveys and 33 who were using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) showed significant improvements between the initial and second follow-up in time management (26% vs. 9%, p=0.0005), mental-interpersonal relationships (16% vs. 11.0%, p=0.014) and work output (18% vs. 10%; p<0.009). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated a clear relationship between excessive sleepiness and decreased work productivity in a population referred for suspected sleep-disordered breathing. Screening for sleepiness and sleep-disordered breathing in the workplace has the potential to identify a reversible cause of low work productivity.

Impact of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Patients with untreated obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea (OSAH) are predisposed to developing hypertension, and therapy with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may reduce blood pressure (BP). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of CPAP therapy on BP in patients with OSAH. We performed a comprehensive literature search up to July 2006 [Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane controlled trials register (CCTR), and Database of Abstract and Reviews of Effect (DARE)] to identify clinical studies and systemic reviews that examined the impact of CPAP on BP. Studies were included if they (1) were randomized controlled trials with an appropriate control group, (2) included systolic and diastolic BP measurements before and after CPAP/control in patients with OSAH, and (3) contained adequate data to perform a meta-analysis. To calculate pooled results, studies were weighted by inverse variances, with either a fixed or a random effects model used depending on the presence of heterogeneity (assessed with Q test). Ten studies met our inclusion criteria (587 patients): three studies were crossover (149 patients) and seven were parallel in design. Seven studies (421 patients) used 24-h ambulatory BP and three used one-time measurements. Two studies were of patients with heart failure (41 patients). Overall, the effects of CPAP were modest and not statistically significant; CPAP (compared to control) reduced systolic BP (SBP) by 1.38 mmHg (95% CI: 3.6 to -0.88, p = 0.23) and diastolic BP (DBP) by 1.52 mmHg (CI: 3.1 to -0.07; p = 0.06). Six of the trials studied more severe OSAH (mean AHI > 30/h, 313 patients); in these six trials, CPAP reduced SBP by 3.03 mmHg (CI 6.7 to -0.61; p = 0.10) and DBP by 2.03 mmHg (CI: 4.1 to -0.002; p = 0.05). There was a trend for SBP reduction to be associated with CPAP compliance. In unselected patients with sleep apnea, CPAP has very modest effects on BP. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that certain subgroups of patients may have more robust responses-this may include patients with more severe OSAH or difficult-to-control hypertension. Future randomized controlled trials in this area should potentially concentrate on these subgroups of patients.

Efficacy and patient satisfaction with autoadjusting CPAP with variable expiratory pressure vs standard CPAP: a two-night randomized crossover trial.

Expiratory pressure relief (C-Flex) technology monitors the patient's airflow during expiration and reduces the pressure in response to the patient. Increased comfort levels associated with C-Flex therapy have potential to improve patient adherence to therapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the combination of autoadjusting CPAP (APAP) and C-Flex in terms of (1) treatment efficacy, and (2) patient preference when compared to standard CPAP. Fifteen patients who had previously undergone formal CPAP titration polysomnography were treated with either one night of the APAP with C-Flex or one night of conventional CPAP, in a crossover trial. Patient satisfaction levels were recorded using visual analog scales (VAS) on the morning after the study. Mean patient age was 50 +/- 12 years, body mass index (BMI) was 36 +/- 6 kg/m(2), baseline AHI was 53 +/- 31 events/h, and CPAP Pressure was 11 +/- 2 cm/H(2)O. APAP with C-Flex was as effective as CPAP, with no differences detected in sleep latency (17 +/- 5 vs 12.3 +/- 3 min, p = 0.4), or respiratory indices (AHI of 4.2 +/- 2 vs 2.4 +/- 0.7 events/h, p = 0.1). VAS scores (scale 0-10) indicated a trend towards increased patient satisfaction while using APAP with C-Flex (7.9 vs 7.2, p = 0.07). 10 patients expressed a preference for APAP with C-Flex (VAS, 0 to 10) over standard CPAP (total positive score of 68, mean score of 4.8 +/- 4.3). One patient expressed no preference. Four patients expressed a preference for CPAP (total positive score of 13, mean score of 0.9 +/- 1.9) (APAP with C-Flex vs standard CPAP, p < 0.01 paired t test). APAP with C-Flex eliminates sleep disordered breathing as effectively as standard CPAP. Patients indicated a preference for APAP with C-Flex suggesting a possible advantage in terms of patient adherence for this mode of treatment.

Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea (OSAH) is a syndrome characterised by recurrent episodes of partial or complete upper airway obstruction during sleep that are usually terminated by an arousal. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the primary treatment for OSAH , but many patients are unable or unwilling to comply with this treatment. Oral appliances (OA) are an alternative treatment for OSAH. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to review the effects of OA in the treatment of OSAH in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register. Searches were current as of June 2005. Reference lists of articles were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing OA with control or other treatments in adults with OSAH . DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted for missing information. MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen studies (745 participants) met the inclusion criteria. All the studies had some shortcomings, such as small sample size, under-reporting of methods and data, and lack of blinding. OA versus control appliances (six studies): OA reduced daytime sleepiness in two crossover trials (WMD -1.81;95%CI -2.72 to -0.90), and improved apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) (-10.78; 95% CI-15.53 to -6.03 parallel group data - five studies). OA versus CPAP (nine studies): OA were less effective than CPAP in reducing apnoea-hypopnoea index (parallel group studies: WMD 13 (95% CI 7.63 to 18.36), two trials; crossover studies: WMD 7.97; (95% CI 6.38 to 9.56, seven trials). However, no significant difference was observed on symptom scores. CPAP was more effective at improving minimum arterial oxygen saturation during sleep compared with OA. In two small crossover studies, participants preferred OA therapy to CPAP. OA versus corrective upper airway surgery (one study): Symptoms of daytime sleepiness were initially lower with surgery, but this difference disappeared at 12 months. AHI did not differ significantly initially, but did so after 12 months in favour of OA. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is increasing evidence suggesting that OA improves subjective sleepiness and sleep disordered breathing compared with a control. CPAP appears to be more effective in improving sleep disordered breathing than OA. The difference in symptomatic response between these two treatments is not significant, although it is not possible to exclude an effect in favour of either therapy. Until there is more definitive evidence on the effectiveness of OA in relation to CPAP, with regard to symptoms and long-term complications, it would appear to be appropriate to recommend OA therapy to patients with mild symptomatic OSAH, and those patients who are unwilling or unable to tolerate CPAP therapy. Future research should recruit patients with more severe symptoms of sleepiness, to establish whether the response to therapy differs between subgroups in terms of quality of life, symptoms and persistence with usage. Long-term data on cardiovascular health are required.

Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea is a syndrome characterised by recurrent episodes of partial or complete upper airway obstruction during sleep that are usually terminated by an arousal. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure is the primary treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea, but many patients are unable or unwilling to comply with this treatment. Oral appliances are an alternative treatment for sleep apnoea. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to review the effects of oral appliance in the treatment of sleep apnoea in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Sleep Apnoea RCT Register. Searches were current as of June 2004. Reference lists of articles were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing oral appliance with control or other treatments in adults with sleep apnoea. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and two reviewers extracted data independently. Study authors were contacted for missing information. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen trials involving 553 participants were included. All the studies had some shortcomings, such as small sample size, under-reporting of methods and data, and lack of blinding. Oral appliances versus control appliances (five studies): Oral appliances reduced daytime sleepiness in two crossover trials (WMD -1.81 [95%CI: -2.72, -0.90]), and improved apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) (-13.17 [-18.53 to -7.80] parallel group data - four studies). Oral appliances versus CPAP (seven studies): Oral appliances were less effective than continuous positive pressure in reducing apnoea-hypopnoea index (WMD 13 [95% CI: 7.63, 18.36], parallel studies - two trials; WMD 6.96 [4.82, 9.10] cross-over studies - six trials). However, no significant difference was observed on symptom scores. Nasal continuous positive pressure was more effective at improving minimum arterial oxygen saturation during sleep compared with oral appliance. In two small crossover studies, participants preferred oral appliance therapy to continuous positive airways pressure. Oral appliances versus surgery (one study): Symptoms of daytime sleepiness were initially lower with surgery, but this difference disappeared at 12 months. AHI did not differ significantly initially, but did so after 12 months in favour of OA. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence suggesting that oral appliance improves subjective sleepiness and sleep disordered breathing compared with a control. Nasal continuous positive airways pressure appears to be more effective in improving sleep disordered breathing than oral appliance. Until there is more definitive evidence on the effectiveness of oral appliances, it would appear to be appropriate to restrict oral appliance therapy to patients with sleep apnoea who are unwilling or unable to comply with continuous positive airways pressure therapy.

Effects of mandibular advancement on airway curvature and obstructive sleep apnoea severity.

In a curved tube, the amount of airflow appears to be influenced by the amount of curvature. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity and awake velopharyngeal curvature in response to an anteriorly titrated mandibular position in 20 male OSA patients. Baseline supine cephalometry was obtained before the initial insertion of a titratable oral appliance and follow-up supine cephalometry was undertaken after titration of the mandibular position with the appliance in place. The mean apnoea/hypopnea index (AHI) before treatment (31.6 +/- 13.0 events x h(-1)) was significantly reduced (9.8 +/- 7.4 events x h(-1)) after titration of the mandibular position in all 20 patients. There was a significant increase in the anteroposterior calibre and the radius of the curvature of the anterior wall of the velopharynx in 14 good responders who exhibited an AHI reduction to < or = 15. Similar observations were not found in six poor responders. To conclude, an anteriorly titrated mandibular position reduced obstructive sleep apnoea severity, enlarged the velopharynx and diminished the curvature of the anterior velopharyngeal wall in good responders. It is proposed that this change in the upper airway curvature associated with mandibular advancement may effect obstructive sleep apnoea severity through its effect on airflow dynamics.

Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea is a syndrome characterised by recurrent episodes of partial or complete upper airway obstruction during sleep that are usually terminated by an arousal. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure is the primary treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea, but many patients are unable or unwilling to comply with this treatment. Oral appliances are an alternative treatment for sleep apnoea. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to review the effects of oral appliance in the treatment of sleep apnoea in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE 1966-2003, and the Cochrane Airways Group Sleep Apnoea RCT Register. Searches were current as of July 2003. Reference lists of articles were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing oral appliance with control or other treatments in adults with sleep apnoea. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and two reviewers extracted data independently. Study authors were contacted for missing information. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve trials involving 509 participants were included. All the studies had some methodological shortcomings. Oral appliances improved apnoea-hypopnoea index compared with inactive control (-13.17 AHI [-18.53 to -7.80] parallel group data - four studies). Oral appliances reduced daytime sleepiness in two trials (WMD -1.77 [95%CI: -2.91 to -0.62]). Oral appliances were less effective than continuous positive pressure in reducing apnoea-hypopnoea index (WMD 13 [95% CI: 7.63, 18.36], parallel studies - two trials; WMD 6.75 [4.93, 8.57] cross-over studies - six trials). However, no significant difference was observed on symptom scores (3 trials). Nasal continuous positive pressure was more effective at improving minimum arterial oxygen saturation during sleep compared with oral appliance. In two small crossover studies, participants preferred oral appliance therapy to continuous positive airways pressure. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is some limited evidence suggesting that oral appliance improves subjective sleepiness and sleep disordered breathing compared with a control. Nasal continuous positive airways pressure appears to be more effective in improving sleep disordered breathing than oral appliance. Until there is more definitive evidence on the effectiveness of oral appliances, it would appear to be appropriate to restrict oral appliance therapy to patients with sleep apnoea who are unwilling or unable to comply with continuous positive airways pressure therapy.

Overnight home oximetry: can it identify patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea who have minimal daytime sleepiness?

BACKGROUND: Overnight home oximetry is being widely used as a case selection technique for patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea (OSAH). In the absence of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), patients with snoring and/or witnessed apnea are considered to have low probability of OSAH. METHODS: Patients suspected to have OSAH, who denied EDS, and had a normal overnight home oximetry were studied by polysomnography for presence of significant OSAH (apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) > 15/h). RESULTS: Twelve (40%) of the 30 patients studied had significant OSAH. All had a 2% oxygen desaturation index of less than 10/h. The sensitivity of oximetry increased at lower desaturation indices butthis was associated with decreased specificity. Review of oximetry waveform pattern, by experienced physicians, did not improve the diagnostic accuracy. Combining oximetry with a clinical prediction rule would have reduced the need for polysomnography by 30%. CONCLUSION: Many patients, who present with snoring and/or witnessed apnea and are referred to a sleep disorder clinic for suspected OSAH, may have significant OSAH even if they deny EDS. Overnight home oximetry did not help discriminate between those patients with or without OSAH.

Cephalometric and physiologic predictors of the efficacy of an adjustable oral appliance for treating obstructive sleep apnea.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether any physiologic or cephalometric parameters could be used to predict the efficacy of an adjustable mandibular advancement appliance for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Forty-two male and 5 female patients with OSA were recruited on the basis of baseline polysomnography with a documented Apnea and Hypopnea Index (AHI) greater than 15 per hour. Repeat polysomnography was performed with the appliance in place. Baseline cephalometry was performed for each patient, and follow-up cephalometry was completed for 19 of the subjects. The subjects were divided into 3 groups on the basis of the degree of change in the AHI with oral appliance therapy: good response (> 75% decrease in AHI), moderate response (25% to 75% decrease in AHI), and poor response (< 25% decrease in AHI). Patients with a good response were younger and had smaller upper airways. In a linear regression analysis, the change in AHI (%) was associated with physiologic (age and body mass index), cephalometric (overjet, height of the maxillary molars, vertical height of the hyoid bone), and airway variables. However, changes in either overbite or overjet were not related to changes in any of the polysomnographic variables for the 19 subjects. A stepwise regression analysis revealed a better treatment response with the adjustable mandibular advancement appliance in patients who were younger and had a lower body mass index, a longer maxilla, a smaller oropharynx, a smaller overjet, less erupted maxillary molars, and a larger ratio of vertical airway length to the cross-sectional area of the soft palate.

Sleep bruxism in patients with sleep-disordered breathing.

The aim was to test the hypothesis of a direct association between sleep-disordered breathing and sleep bruxism. The frequency of masseter contraction (MC) episodes and rhythmic jaw movements (RJM) was measured in patients with mild and moderate obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The diagnosis of sleep bruxism was made from a combination of questionnaire, clinical observation and all-night polysomnographic recording which included masseter electromyography. A total of 21 patients (19 males/two females, mean age 40.0 years+/-9.2 SD) were randomly selected from a provisional diagnosis of snoring and OSA by a sleep physician. In the patients with mild OSA [n=11, mean apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI)=8.0+/-4.1 SD, body mass index (BMI)=29.1+/-5.0], the diagnosis of sleep bruxism was made in six out of 11 patients (54%); similarly, four out of 10 patients (40%) with moderate OSA (n=10, mean AHI=34.7+/-19.1, BMI=30.6+/-5.0) were identified as bruxists. Although the combination of clinical, subjective estimation and nocturnal electromyographic recording of masseter muscle might provide a more solid base for the diagnosis of sleep bruxism, the result is biased by the variation in the bruxing activity. MC episodes were associated with the termination of apnoea or hypopnoea episodes in only 3.5% of the mild group and 14.4% of the moderate group (p<0.05). It appears that sleep bruxism is rarely directly associated with apnoeic events, but is rather related to the disturbed sleep of OSA patients.

Treatment, airway and compliance effects of a titratable oral appliance.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To measure the effects of a titratable anterior mandibular repositioner on airway size and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and to evaluate its compliance. DESIGN: Before and after insertion sleep studies were obtained in a total of 38 OSA patients of varying severity from three different sites. Covert compliance was measured by means of a newly-developed, miniaturized, temperature-sensitive, imbedded monitor. Validity testing was completed in six adult volunteers who wore monitors imbedded into small acrylic appliances. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The mean RDI before treatment was 32.6 (SEM 2.1) and after the insertion of the appliance, the RDI was reduced to 12.1 (SEM 1.7, p<0.001). RDI was reduced to less than 15/hour in 80% of a group of moderate OSA patients (RDI 15 to 30) and in 61% of a group of severe OSA patients (RDI > 30) with respect to baseline RDI. Fiber optic video endoscopy was performed on 9 OSA patients with and without the appliance. No significant differences in hypopharynx or oropharynx cross sectional areas were found, but at the level of the velopharynx, the airway size was significantly increased (p<0.05). The index of agreement was 0.99 between the monitor clock time and the subject's log sheets. Compliance data from eight OSA subjects instructed to wear the appliance during sleep indicated that it was worn for a mean of 6.8 hours with a range of 5.6 to 7.5 hours per night. CONCLUSION: The titratable adjustable mandibular advancement appliance, made from thermoelastic acrylic, significantly reduces RDI in moderate to severe OSA patients, has a direct effect on airway size and is well worn throughout the night.

Cephalometric comparisons between Chinese and Caucasian patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

The purpose of this study was to compare two groups of adult men from different ethnic backgrounds and with obstructive sleep apnea; they were selected by matching age, gender, skeletal pattern, body mass index, and respiratory disturbance index. Pretreatment cephalometric radiographs and overnight polysomnograms of 30 Chinese and 43 Caucasian patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions were analyzed to investigate if there were craniofacial and upper airway structural differences between the two ethnic groups. The Chinese group, when compared with the group of Caucasian patients, revealed more severe underlying craniofacial skeletal discrepancies with significantly smaller maxilla and mandibles, more severe mandibular retrognathism, proclined lower incisors, increased total and upper facial heights, and steeper and shorter anterior cranial bases. However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in posterior facial height, ratio of upper to lower anterior facial height, and the position of hyoid bone, maxilla, and upper incisors. With regard to soft tissue and upper airway measurements, there were no significant ethnic differences in tongue and soft palate size, vertical length of oropharynx, and anteroposterior dimensions of the upper airway at most of the levels except for a larger super-posterior airway space, a larger nasopharynx and oropharynx cross-sectional area, and a smaller tongue height in the Chinese group. We conclude that there are a number of craniofacial and upper airway structures that differ between the two ethnic groups that may be relevant to the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in various ethnic groups.