Recommendations for clinical management of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea - A Delphi consensus study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Excessive daytime sleepiness is common with obstructive sleep apnoea and can persist despite efforts to optimise primary airway therapy. The literature lacks recommendations regarding differential diagnosis and management of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea. This study sought to develop expert consensus statements to bridge the gap between existing literature/guidelines and clinical practice. METHODS: A panel of 10 international experts was convened to undertake a modified Delphi process. Statements were developed based on available evidence identified through a scoping literature review, and expert opinion. Consensus was achieved through 3 rounds of iterative, blinded survey voting and revision to statements until a predetermined level of agreement was met (≥80 % voting "strongly agree" or "agree with reservation"). RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for 32 final statements. The panel agreed excessive daytime sleepiness is a patient-reported symptom. The importance of subjective/objective evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness in the initial evaluation and serial management of obstructive sleep apnoea was recognised. The differential diagnosis of residual excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea was discussed. Optimizing airway therapy (eg, troubleshooting issues affecting effectiveness) was addressed. The panel recognised occurrence of residual excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea despite optimal airway therapy and the need to evaluate patients for underlying causes. CONCLUSIONS: Excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea is a public health issue requiring increased awareness, recognition, and attention. Implementation of these statements may improve patient care, long-term management, and clinical outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in an Atrial Fibrillation Population: What's the Best Test?

BACKGROUND: Among individuals with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can be as high as 85%. Continuous positive airway pressure treatment for moderate or severe OSA might improve AF outcomes and quality of life, so early identification of OSA might be of value. However, screening questionnaires for OSA are suboptimal because they are weighted toward tiredness and loud snoring, which might be absent in AF patients. NoSAS (Neck, Obesity, Snoring, Age, Sex) is a new OSA questionnaire that excludes these parameters. Acoustic pharyngometry (AP) is a potential novel screening technique that measures pharyngeal cross-sectional area, which is reduced in patients with OSA. METHODS: We prospectively compared the accuracy of the NoSAS, the STOP-BANG questionnaire (Snoring, Tiredness, Observed apnea, blood Pressure, Body mass index, Age, Neck circumference and Gender), and AP with home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) in consecutive patients with nonvalvular AF. RESULTS: Of 188 participants, 86% had OSA and 49% had moderate or severe OSA. Mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores were low; 5.9 (SD, 3.9), indicating that most participants were not sleepy. Receiver operating characteristic curves for comparisons of screening tests with HSAT showed suboptimal accuracy. For moderate plus severe and severe only groups respectively, the area under the curve was 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.58) and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.34-0.52) for AP, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.58-0.73) and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.52-0.74) for the STOP-BANG questionnaire, and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.60-0.75) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.59-0.80) for the NoSAS. CONCLUSIONS: AP and NoSAS are not sufficiently accurate for screening AF patients for OSA. Because of the high rates of OSA in this cohort, the potential benefits of OSA treatment, and the suboptimal accuracy of current screening questionnaires, cardiologists should consider HSAT for AF patients.

CONTEXTE: Chez les sujets présentant une fibrillation auriculaire (FA) non valvulaire, la prévalence de l'apnée obstructive du sommeil (AOS) peut atteindre 85 %. En cas d'AOS modérée ou sévère, un traitement par ventilation spontanée en pression positive continue peut améliorer les résultats liés à la FA et la qualité de vie du patient; un diagnostic précoce d'AOS pourrait donc être utile. Les questionnaires de dépistage de l'AOS ne sont toutefois pas optimaux parce qu'ils accordent une grande importance à la fatigue et aux ronflements sonores, des symptômes qui ne se manifestent pas nécessairement en cas de FA. Le questionnaire NoSAS (de l'anglais Neck, Obesity, Snoring, Age, Sex) est un nouvel outil d'évaluation de l'AOS qui ne tient pas compte de ces paramètres. La pharyngométrie acoustique (PA) pourrait aussi constituer une nouvelle technique de dépistage; elle mesure l'aire de section transversale du pharynx, qui est réduite chez les patients souffrant d'AOS. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons comparé de façon prospective la précision du score au questionnaire NoSAS, du score au questionnaire STOP-BANG (de l'anglais Snoring, Tiredness, Observed apnea, blood Pressure, Body mass index, Age, Neck circumference and Gender) et des résultats de la PA à celle du test d'apnée du sommeil à domicile (TASD) chez des patients consécutifs présentant une FA non valvulaire. RÉSULTATS: Sur les 188 participants, 86 % présentaient une AOS et 49 % souffraient d'AOS modérée ou sévère. Le score moyen sur l'échelle de somnolence d'Epworth était faible et se situait à 5,9 (écart-type : 3,9), ce qui indique que la plupart des participants ne ressentaient pas de somnolence. La comparaison entre les questionnaires de dépistage et le TASD effectuée au moyen des courbes caractéristiques de la performance des tests a révélé une précision sous-optimale. Dans les groupes souffrant d'AOS modérée ou sévère et d'AOS sévère seulement, les aires sous la courbe étaient respectivement de 0,50 (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : de 0,42 à 0,58) et de 0,42 (IC à 95 % : de 0,34 à 0,52) pour la PA, de 0,65 (IC à 95 % : de 0,58 à 0,73) et de 0,63 (IC à 95 % : de 0,52 à 0,74) pour le questionnaire STOP-BANG, et de 0,68 (IC à 95 % : de 0,60 à 0,75) et de 0,69 (IC à 95 % : de 0,59 à 0,80) pour le questionnaire NoSAS. CONCLUSIONS: La PA et le questionnaire NoSAS ne sont pas suffisamment précis pour dépister l'AOS chez les patients présentant une FA. Compte tenu de la forte prévalence de l'AOS dans cette cohorte, des bienfaits potentiels d'un traitement de l'AOS et de la précision sous-optimale des questionnaires de dépistage actuels, il conviendrait d'envisager un TASD chez les patients présentant une FA.

Compliance and side effects of tongue stabilizing device in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Objective: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness, compliance, and side effects of tongue stabilizing devices (TSDs).Methods: Thirty-nine patients were followed up after 12 and 30 months. The subjective effectiveness was assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Functional Outcomes Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ-10), the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ), and a sleep-related quality of life questionnaire (QoL). Compliance and side effects were assessed.Results: At 12-months, 35.9% of patients confirmed continuing the therapy, compared to only 15.4% of patients at 30 months. At 30 months, a significant average improvement of ESS (2.0 ± 2.8) was observed compared to baseline levels in six patients. Six patients demonstrated an average increase in blood pressure. The most frequently reported side effects were mouth dryness and excessive salivation. The 3D analysis revealed small tooth movements.Conclusion: The TSD therapy demonstrated a good long-term subjective effectiveness against OSA but had a relatively low treatment acceptance rate.

The efficacy of a titrated tongue-stabilizing device on obstructive sleep apnea: a quasi-experimental study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and self-reported outcomes of tongue-stabilizing device (TSD) therapy as compared to those of mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy in an adult population diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: This study is a parallel, nonrandomized clinical trial of the TSD and MAD therapies. The efficacy of both interventions was evaluated objectively by level 3 home sleep apnea testing and by self-report using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, the Chalder Fatigue Scale, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Adherence and adverse effects were self-reported. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients who received TSD therapy, 27 managed to adapt and complete the trial and were matched with 26 patients who received MAD therapy. At the 2-month follow-up, the acceptance rate of the TSD therapy was 53.8%. Both patients receiving TSD therapy and patients receiving MAD therapy showed significant improvements in their respiratory event index (P < .05), with no difference between the treatments (P > .05). In those receiving TSD therapy (n = 27), the only self-reported efficacy measure that significantly improved with TSD therapy was the Chalder Fatigue Scale (P < .05). In contrast, all 4 self-reported measures (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and Chalder Fatigue Scale) showed a significant improvement with MAD therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed similar improvements in apneas and oxygen saturation between TSD and MAD therapies. Whereas MAD therapy was a better treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in terms of daytime sleepiness and quality-of-life improvements, TSD therapy had a low treatment acceptance rate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: The Efficacy of Tongue Stabilizing Device in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02329925; Identifier: NCT02329925; and Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Adherence and Preference of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Mandibular Advancement Splints in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Randomized Trial (CHOICE); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02242617; Identifier: NCT02242617. CITATION: Alshhrani WM, Hamoda MM, Okuno K, et al. The efficacy of a titrated tongue-stabilizing device on obstructive sleep apnea: a quasi-experimental study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(8):1607-1618.

Tongue Stabilizing Device-Emergent Central Sleep Apnea: A Case Report.

ABSTRACT: Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea is a phenomenon that has been reported after many obstructive sleep apnea treatment modalities. We present a case of demonstrating treatment-emergent central sleep apnea while using the tongue stabilizing device therapy. This case adds to the evidence that showed the effect of the supine position on the severity of central sleep apnea and shows the advantage of polysomnography follow-up after oral appliance therapy for central apnea assessment.

Pediatric sleep disorder medicine training in Canada: past, present and future.

Pediatric sleep medicine is rapidly evolving in Canada. As pediatric sleep disorders are increasingly recognized, there is a growing need for clinicians educated in the evaluation and treatment of pediatric sleep disorders. Current pediatric sleep resources in Canada are inadequate to meet the needs of the population. Until this year, there was no formal pathway or specific requirements for pediatric sleep disorder medicine training in Canada and exposure to this field of medicine in post-graduate training was limited. In 2018, the Royal College of Physicians of Canada approved an Area of Focused Competence program for certification and maintenance of competence in Sleep Disordered Medicine. It was designed to ensure adequate breadth and depth of training experiences in this diverse field. The goals of the program are to ensure competence in the assessment and management of adults and children with a range of sleep-wake disorders and sleep-disordered breathing, to interpret sleep investigations, to administratively manage a sleep laboratory and to advance the discipline of Sleep Disorder Medicine through research. The program follows a competency-based model in which, within the year of training, trainees accumulate a dossier of experiences which are evaluated by a Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons committee. This new program will ensure that a critical mass of trained sleep medicine physicians is developed to meet the needs of the Canadian pediatric population and to contribute to advancement of the field of pediatric sleep medicine.

Distinct Patterns of Hyperpnea During Cheyne-Stokes Respiration: Implication for Cardiac Function in Patients With Heart Failure.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: In heart failure (HF), we observed two patterns of hyperpnea during Cheyne-Stokes respiration with central sleep apnea (CSR-CSA): a positive pattern where end-expiratory lung volume remains at or above functional residual capacity, and a negative pattern where it falls below functional residual capacity. We hypothesized the negative pattern is associated with worse HF. METHODS: Patients with HF underwent polysomnography. During CSR-CSA, hyperpnea, apnea-hyperpnea cycle, and lung to finger circulation times (LFCT) were measured. Plasma N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were assessed. RESULTS: Of 33 patients with CSR-CSA (31 men, mean age 68 years), 9 had a negative hyperpnea pattern. There was no difference in age, body mass index, and apnea-hypopnea index between groups. Patients with a negative pattern had longer hyperpnea time (39.5 ± 6.4 versus 25.8 ± 5.9 seconds, P < .01), longer cycle time (67.8 ± 15.9 versus 51.7 ± 9.9 seconds, P < .01), higher NT-proBNP concentrations (2740 [6769] versus 570 [864] pg/ml, P = .01), and worse New York Heart Association class (P = .02) than those with a positive pattern. LFCT and LVEF did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HF and a negative CSR-CSA pattern have evidence of worse cardiac function than those with a positive pattern. Greater positive expiratory pressure during hyperpnea is likely generated during the negative pattern and might support stroke volume in patients with worse cardiac function. COMMENTARY: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 1227. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com; ISRCTN67500535) and Clinical Trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01128816).

Design of the effect of adaptive servo-ventilation on survival and cardiovascular hospital admissions in patients with heart failure and sleep apnoea: the ADVENT-HF trial.

INTRODUCTION: Both types of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), obstructive and central sleep apnoea (OSA and CSA, respectively), are common in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In such patients, SDB is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality but it remains uncertain whether treating SDB by adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) in such patients reduces morbidity and mortality. AIM: ADVENT-HF is designed to assess the effects of treating SDB with ASV on morbidity and mortality in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: ADVENT-HF is a multicentre, multinational, randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial with blinded assessment of endpoints of standard medical therapy for HFrEF alone vs. with the addition of ASV in patients with HFrEF and SDB. Patients with a history of HFrEF undergo echocardiography and polysomnography. Those with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% and SDB (apnoea-hypopnoea index ≥15) are eligible. SDB is stratified into OSA with ≥50% of events obstructive or CSA with >50% of events central. Those with OSA must not have excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth score of ≤10). Patients are then randomized to receive or not receive ASV. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular hospital admissions, new-onset atrial fibrillation requiring anti-coagulation but not hospitalization, and delivery of an appropriate discharge from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator not resulting in hospitalization during a maximum follow-up time of 5 years. CONCLUSION: The ADVENT-HF trial will help to determine whether treating SDB by ASV in patients with HFrEF improves morbidity and mortality.

Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine Guidelines on Preoperative Screening and Assessment of Adult Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

The purpose of the Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine guideline on preoperative screening and assessment of adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is to present recommendations based on the available clinical evidence on the topic where possible. As very few well-performed randomized studies in this field of perioperative care are available, most of the recommendations were developed by experts in the field through consensus processes involving utilization of evidence grading to indicate the level of evidence upon which recommendations were based. This guideline may not be appropriate for all clinical situations and all patients. The decision whether to follow these recommendations must be made by a responsible physician on an individual basis. Protocols should be developed by individual institutions taking into account the patients' conditions, extent of interventions and available resources. This practice guideline is not intended to define standards of care or represent absolute requirements for patient care. The adherence to these guidelines cannot in any way guarantee successful outcomes and is rather meant to help individuals and institutions formulate plans to better deal with the challenges posed by perioperative patients with OSA. These recommendations reflect the current state of knowledge and its interpretation by a group of experts in the field at the time of publication. While these guidelines will be periodically updated, new information that becomes available between updates should be taken into account. Deviations in practice from guidelines may be justifiable and such deviations should not be interpreted as a basis for claims of negligence.

Sleep Stage Coordination of Respiration and Swallowing: A Preliminary Study.

Swallowing is an important physiological response that protects the airway. Although aspiration during sleep may cause aspiration pneumonia, the mechanisms responsible have not yet been elucidated. We evaluated the coordination between respiration and swallowing by infusing water into the pharynx of healthy young adults during each sleep stage. Seven normal subjects participated in the study. During polysomnography recordings, to elicit a swallow we injected distilled water into the pharynx during the awake state and each sleep stage through a nasal catheter. We assessed swallow latency, swallow apnea time, the respiratory phase during a swallow, the number of swallows, and coughing. A total number of 79 swallows were recorded. The median swallow latency was significantly higher in stage 2 (10.05 s) and stage 3 (44.17 s) when compared to awake state (4.99 s). The swallow latency in stage 3 showed a very wide interquartile range. In two subjects, the result was predominantly prolonged compared to the other subjects. There was no significant difference in the swallow apnea time between sleep stages. The presence of inspiration after swallowing, repetitive swallowing, and coughing after swallowing was more frequent during sleep than when awake. This study suggests that the coordination between respiration and swallowing as a defense mechanism against aspiration was impaired during sleep. Our results supported physiologically the fact that healthy adult individuals aspirate pharyngeal secretions during sleep.

Obstructive sleep apnoea and frequency of occupational injury.

We sought to determine whether patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are at increased risk of occupational injury (OI). Patients referred to the University of British Columbia Hospital Sleep Laboratory for suspected OSA (May 2003 to July 2011 were recruited and rates and types of validated OI (that caused at least 1 day of disability) in the 5 years prior to polysomnography were calculated. In a sample of 1236, patients with OSA were twice as likely (OR=1.93, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.50, p=0.03) to suffer at least one OI compared with patients without OSA. This association was attenuated (OR=1.76, CI 0.86 to 3.59, p=0.12) after controlling for confounders. In a secondary analysis, patients with OSA were almost three times more likely (OR=2.88, CI 1.02 to 8.08, p=0.05) to suffer from an injury more likely related to reduced vigilance (eg, a fall or commercial motor vehicle crash) when compared with patients without OSA, and this again was attenuated after controlling for confounders (OR=2.42, CI 0.085 to 6.93, p=0.10).

Swallowing and breathing patterns during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to determine the frequencies of swallowing and swallowing associated with arousals during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and to determine whether these were associated with the severity of OSA and differed according to the preceding breathing route. METHODS: Standard audio-video polysomnography including an evaluation of swallowing-related elevation of the thyroid cartilage and breathing route (i.e., nasal or oronasal) was undertaken in an academic sleep laboratory. Fifty-six patients were analyzed (13 non-OSA patients, 17 mild, 10 moderate, and 16 severe OSA). RESULTS: The frequency of swallowing per hour of sleep was significantly higher in the severe OSA patients when compared to mild OSA patients (mild OSA, 3.1/h and severe OSA, 8.4/h). This was mainly due to the significantly higher frequency of swallowing associated with a respiratory event-related arousal in the severe OSA patients when compared to non- and mild OSA patients (non-OSA, 0.6/h; mild OSA, 1.0/h; severe OSA, 6.0/h), especially when swallowing was preceded by oronasal breathing (non-OSA, 0.2/h; mild OSA, 0.4/h; severe OSA, 4.2/h). CONCLUSIONS: Swallowing frequency during sleep can increase with increasing OSA severity in most OSA patients. These events are predominately associated with respiratory event-related arousals and are more frequent when preceded by oronasal breathing. The observed swallowing under high ventilatory needs may compromise the maintenance of the pharynx as a conduit for airflow in OSA patients.

Obstructive sleep apnea and driving: A Canadian Thoracic Society and Canadian Sleep Society position paper.

Untreated patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at increased risk for motor vehicle collisions; however, it is unclear how this should be translated into fitness-to-drive recommendations. Accordingly, the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) Sleep Disordered Breathing Clinical Assembly and the Canadian Sleep Society (CSS) assembled a CTS-CSS working group to propose recommendations with regard to driving in patients with OSA. Recommendations for assessing fitness to drive in noncommercial drivers: 1. Severity of OSA alone is not a reliable predictor of collision risk and, therefore, should not be used in isolation to assess fitness to drive; 2. The severity of sleep apnea should be considered in the context of other factors to assess fitness to drive; 3. The decision to restrict driving is ultimately made by the motor vehicle licensing authority; however, they should take into account the information and recommendations provided by the sleep medicine physician and should follow provincial guidelines; 4. For patients prescribed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, objective CPAP compliance should be documented. Efficacy should also be documented in terms of reversing the symptoms and improvement in sleep apnea based on physiological monitoring; 5. For patients treated with surgery or an oral appliance, verification of adequate sleep apnea treatment should be obtained; and 6. A driver diagnosed with OSA may be recertified as fit to drive based on assessment of symptoms and demonstrating compliance with treatment. The assessment should be aligned with the provincial driver's license renewal period. Commercial vehicles: Assessment of fitness to drive should be more stringent for patients operating commercial vehicles. In general, the CTS-CSS working group was in agreement with the Medical Expert Panel recommendations to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration in the United States; these recommendations were adapted for Canadian practitioners.

Carotid intima media thickness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: comparison with a community-based cohort.

BACKGROUND: The impact of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the absence of overt CVD or risk factors is unclear. Our purpose was to assess whether patients with OSA without overt CVD or risk factors have subclinical atherosclerosis as evaluated by carotid intima medial thickness (CIMT) compared to matched controls. METHODS: We measured CIMT in patients >40 years old, who underwent polysomnography for suspected OSA and did not have a history of CVD or risk factors (smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia). OSA severity was classified according to apnea-hypopnea index. Serum levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and lipids were assessed and relationships with OSA severity explored. CIMT measurements from patients with OSA were compared those of to age-, gender-, and BMI-matched controls from a community-based cohort without known CVD or OSA. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were studied. Of these, patients with severe OSA had an increased CIMT compared to patients without OSA, but the relationship was not significant after controlling for age (p = 0.10). However, 37 patients had OSA and were matched to 105 controls. CIMT was significantly increased in OSA patients versus controls (0.77 vs. 0.68 mm, p = 0.03). The difference between patients and controls was greater for patients with severe OSA (0.83 vs. 0.71 mm) than for patients with mild-to-moderate OSA (0.71 vs. 0.67 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OSA but without a history of or risk factors for CVD have increased CIMT compared to a BMI-, age-, and gender-matched cohort. This provides evidence that OSA is an independent risk factor for the development of CVD.

Sleep laboratory test referrals in Canada: sleep apnea rapid response survey.

BACKGROUND: An estimated 5.4 million Canadian adults have been diagnosed with sleep apnea or are at high risk of experiencing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). There are no recent Canadian data regarding access to and predictors of referral for diagnostic testing in these populations. METHODS: The Sleep Apnea Rapid Response survey sampled 8647 Canadian adults and captured information about risk, testing, diagnosis and treatment of sleep apnea. Predictors of sleep laboratory test referrals were assessed using log-linked binomial regression modelling. Information regarding sleep testing facilities was updated at the provincial and regional levels. RESULTS: Approximately 76.8% (95% CI 70.1% to 83.6%) of adult Canadians with sleep apnea and 5.1% (95% CI 3.4% to 6.7%) of those at high risk for OSA reported being referred to a sleep laboratory. Significant predictors of sleep laboratory referral in the general population were male sex, middle age, overweight or obese, a chronic condition, having a regular medical doctor and reporting symptoms of sleep apnea. Region of residence was also a predictor of reported sleep laboratory referral, with individuals from Ontario being more likely to report being referred to a sleep laboratory versus individuals from other regions. CONCLUSION: Individuals reporting risk factors and symptoms associated with OSA were more likely to report a sleep laboratory testing referral compared with those without risk factors or symptoms. However, Canada's diagnostic sleep laboratory testing capacity varies across regions and is believed to be inadequate given the number of individuals at high risk for OSA who did not report testing referral.

Mandibular advancement splint as short-term alternative treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea already effectively treated with continuous positive airway pressure.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: CPAP is used as the first-line treatment for patients with severe OSA, but this machine is not always feasible to use on the long term. We performed a clinical trial to determine whether patients with OSA could use a mandibular advancement splint (MAS) as a short-term treatment alternative to CPAP. METHODS: Twenty-two patients adherent with CPAP therapy were recruited to the study. Each patient used the MAS for approximately 4 months. The transition between CPAP to MAS was gradual, and patients were asked to start using MAS together with CPAP during the MAS titration until subjective improvement or maximum mandibular advancement was achieved. Sleepiness (ESS), quality of life (SAQLI), and polysomnography were recorded prior to and after MAS titration. Patients recorded CPAP or MAS usage for the following 3 months. RESULTS: Seven women and 12 men with a mean age of 53.8 (± 12.1) years and mean body mass index of 28.1 (± 4.8) kg/m² completed the clinical trial. Prior to MAS, CPAP adherence was 5.8 h/night. AHI decreased significantly with MAS use compared to baseline (30.7 ± 23.1 vs 13.2 ± 11; p < 0.01). Fourteen patients (74%) had > 50% decrease in their AHI, while 2 patients had an increase in their AHI. There were no significant differences in SAQLI between MAS and CPAP treatment, while ESS decreased significantly on MAS. MAS self-reported usage was correlated with treatment efficacy (r = 0.52; p < 0.05). Seventy-five percent of the patients reported being sufficiently satisfied with MAS to continue to use it as an alternative short-term therapy. CONCLUSIONS: MAS partially or completely reduced sleep disordered breathing in the majority of selected, successfully CPAP-treated severe OSA patients. Many patients can probably effectively use MAS as a short-term treatment alternative to CPAP.